Where is the best place to make query call in Laravel 4? - php

First of all, Everything is kind of confusing. There is a few tutorials and complete documentation but i feel like something is just not working way it should. For now I'm a little bit confused and discouraged. I learned how to write forms, how to make views with blade. How to menage migrations and even seeds. I know how to create new controller and simple routes.
But guys... I need some advice if you would answer...
I created a form with a view for example that form:
{{Form::open(array('url' => 'person/confirm'))}}
{{Form::label('firstname', 'Firstname:')}}
{{Form::text('firstname')}}
{{Form::label('lastname', 'Lastname:')}}
{{Form::text('lastname')}}
{{Form::label('company_name', 'Company name:')}}
{{Form::text('company_name')}}
{{Form::label('mail', 'Mail:')}}
{{Form::text('mail')}}
{{Form::label('phone', 'Phone:')}}
{{Form::text('phone')}}
{{Form::label('additional_phone', 'Additional phone:')}}
{{Form::text('additional_phone')}}
{{Form::label('city', 'City:')}}
{{Form::text('city')}}
{{Form::label('postalcode', 'Postalcode:')}}
{{Form::text('postalcode')}}
{{Form::label('address', 'Address:')}}
{{Form::text('address')}}
{{Form::label('notes', 'Notes:')}}
{{Form::text('notes')}}
{{Form::submit('Submit')}}
{{Form::close()}}
Nothing fancy, just a basic form. If I call submit, it will take me to person/confirm route. And it will be like this:
Route::post('person/confirm', function(){
$input = Input::all();
DB::table('humanity')->insert(
array('firstname' => $firstname);
);
}
I know that it is wrong.
How to get values from $input?
How to insert it to table correctly and safely?
Where is the best place to make query call?
It will be better to make query before routing starts or when next route will execute?
It would be good to create query in controller function and execute it in route then redirect to "message: Success"?
What exactly are classes and models and how can I use them?
I plan to write some system and day by day it makes me more sicker than satisfied. Something call me that I had hitched my wagon to a star.
Thank you in advice.

It looks like you're in way over your head, especially since you asked what classes are.
I'd suggest putting Laravel (or any framework, for that matter) aside for a while until you have a solid understanding about object oriented programming and architectural patterns such as MVC / MVP. While Laravel resources will improve your knowledge quite a bit, it won't be nearly enough to create well structured applications.
Here are a couple of books that might be useful:
PHP Objects, Patterns and Practice
Clean Code: A Handbook of Agile Software Craftsmanship

Ok so first off I suggest you look into Eloquent. Laravels ORM (http://laravel.com/docs/eloquent).
Eloquent will allow you to do this:
$human = new Human(Input::all());
$human->save();
But we can come back to that, your first question here is how to use the Input class.
The real documentation can be found under Requests in the laravel documentation, but here's a brief guide.
Input::get('firstname'); //gets the first name
Input::get('lastname'); //get doesn't refer to the method, "get" will retrieve from post or get.
Input::all(); //will get you all input as an array - don't forget to validate
Input::except(array('csrf_token')); //will get you everything except for the 'csrf_token' as an array
One of the best ways to get help with Laravel is through the Laravel IRC channel, the community is great.
#Laravel is a place where many developers hang out and discuss the framework. Many people frequently pop their heads in looking for some
help.
But, the real-time chat nature of IRC can be a refreshing contrast to posting on a forum and waiting for a reply.
The official community hub for laravel
Laravel.io has forums along with a plethora or useful tools such as the pastebin, you should become friends.
The other resource I suggest is Taylor's book
It's not free but it's well worth it.
Written by the creator of Laravel, this is the definitive guide to
advanced application development with Laravel 4. Learn about
dependency injection, interfaces, service providers, SOLID design, and
more while exploring practical, real-world code examples. Whether
you're building a robust, large application with the Laravel
framework, or just want to sharpen your software design chops, this
book will be of great value to you and your team.

Related

Building Simple REST API using PHP without framework

I want to build a REST API using PHP, but without any framework. By the following requirments:
The code should be as simple as possible with OOP development principles in mind, easy to read and expand
Data should be kept in MySQL and to be returned as JSON in the given format
DO NOT use ANY Framework or ANY already written code, but to have structure
User input data validation
There should be no security issues
At first, I thought I should build complete MVC project, but I realized that actually I will probably don't need any views and I will use Services instead of controllers. And also models for both entities (Articles and Users).
I'm still not sure what is the perfect way to do it, so I will just tell you what I`m thinking so far...Sorry if Its a duplicate post but I haven't found much information about this and from the little I found, I got more confused.
I thinking of a simple router.php class that will have a method:
map($httpMethod, $route, $callback)
So, for example, I will call ("POST", "/users/register", registerUser(params)) or ("GET", "/users", registerUser(params)), just like I would do in a MVC web app.
I think I will need a model and a service for each of both entities. The service will execute the SQL for each CRUD operation. I think I know how to create the service, as it won't be much different than a controller.
But I wonder how can I create the model part for both entities. What exactly I will need for the models as a code?
First of all, it would be nice if you agree that this is the right way and if not, I would love to hear a lot of criticism because I'm currently confused and really don't know where to start.
I agree with you.
And suggest you to know about Loopback, it's good, like what you described.
I know your question is how to build your own rest api without framework, but it sounds like you'd actually make good use of at least some components (not necessarily a whole framework), do you really need/want to write a router from beginning?
if so sure, if no maybe some microframework? anyway, symfony has some info on how you would create your own framework (just as an example), they use couple of their own classes (i.e. httpcomponent), but just for the explanation of idea/way how things you want are done.
https://symfony.com/doc/current/create_framework/index.html
I found this library in PHP for get started with REST API's
php-platform/restful
This requires prior knowledge on using Composer

Laravel 3 : Looking for explanation how to use the model

I'm new at MVC and my first framework is Laravel (3 for now). I've started coding exclusively in the routes, and I moved to the controller. I'm however doing all of my database operations in the controller. I do not understand how to use the model.
Examples either demonstrate everything in the controller or in the route, but they never split the model, controller and view.
Could anyone kindly explain me how to use the model? In short I don't understand how to link one to each other, like sending form input to them model, or processed data back to the controller.
A github repo of a Laravel (v3 if possible) with a full MVC setup would be nice to analyze too, if anyone has one up for me to look at?
Thanks.
The best statement on the subject of Frameworks I've heard is due to Uncle Bob:
A good Architecture allows major decisions to be deferred!
Specifically:
A good Architecture delays choosing a Framework!
Another great piece to think about:
MVC is not an Architecture! It is a Delivery Design Pattern.
Watch his video - it is one of the sadly few ones out there that don't spend 1000 words on what can be said in 10 and I can't highly enough recommend it - and it will help you to understand many points raised in your question:
Robert C Martin(Uncle Bob) -Clean Architecture and Design - Video
Of course, his book on Clean Code is also highly recommended!
Although this link is for Laravel 4 docs, it may help you understand how the models work - (Laravel 3 also uses Eloquent):
http://laravel.com/docs/eloquent
Also, specific to laravel 3:
http://codehappy.daylerees.com/eloquent-orm

PHP Frameworks for JQUERY/AJAX Client Mainly for Authentication Process and Database Manipulation. Which one?

I'd like to have "PRO" Php developers advice regarding the framework they use , specially for an application that use "mainly" php as authentication process, connector and db data process in relationship with an Ajax/Jquery Client ... I use Zend Framework , but is that framework the lightest solution for that kind of process ?
In my list i have :
Symfony http://symfony.com/get_started
Kohana http://kohanaframework.org/
Ok,
Here are further details on what i need :
I'm developing a website that needs these requirements :
Simple login with classic interface and social ones (facebook, twitter).
When user login , he can just change some parameters on his account (pseudo, password and so on).
Then, the only thing he can do is creating what i will call "objects" that have different properties.
These "objects" can then be share with others through a graphical interface.
Nearly everything on the client side will be just displaying these objects with Jquery/Ajax in relashionship with PHP...
So, i just need PHP for oAuth process and datas manipulations...
I'm trying to find the best solutions regarding this little scenario...
For now, i use Zend Framework on Zend server, it works, but seems to be a little bit "heavy" .. so my question is : is there a better 'lightest' way to consider this ?
Dunno if i'm clear :-/ ...
So, thanks in advance !
Aside agreeing with Gordon, I can see you're just looking for someone to suggest something besides zend.
I would go with Kohana over Symfony because Kohana is much easier to understand out of the box and doesn't require any special setup to work with. It is fast enough to supply you with whatever I assume you need at this level - and by that I mean that if you were building an enterprise level site like ebay you wouldn't be asking this question at all.
You don't need to use the ORM for database interaction but if you decide to it is very easy to understand and will make the development process much faster, even if you don't know the ins and outs of it.
Officially my answer is to agree with Gordon though. If he posts his comment as an answer I will upvote it because you shouldn't just ask the community what they use while providing a tiny list of things you need that almost every site on the planet also uses. It's just too vague.
And yes, I use Kohana all the time. Codeigniter as well if you want another option.
Limonade is another option for very tiny micro-framework. I dislike it for a huge number of reasons but it is not hard to use.

integrating CakePHP or CodeIgniter in existing projects

i have a project i took over. it is an app that has been build over many years with PHP and mysql.
It currently has a sort of good folder structure but the code itself is very poor written.
There is php, sql statements and html code in almost every file.
There is javascript code generated using php echo for not reason and so on.
I will like to use for further development either CakePHP or CodeIgniter, even if that means that for the new features some code will be written that already exists (eg.: maybe utility functions) in the old code.
is it possible to integrate one of these frameworks into an existing app?
which one is easier?
do you have any links on how to do it?
thanks.
I have very little experience with CakePHP so my answer is going to be about CodeIgniter. I played with CakePHP for about a day and that was almost two years ago. In my opinion it will probably be easier to integrate with CodeIgniter although someone more experienced with CakePHP might prove me wrong.
Here is the approach I would take. I have never done this, but it seems like a logical way to approach the problem. I suppose this approach would also work with CakePHP.
First, start with a fresh CodeIgniter install using the latest version.
Next, create controllers and actions (controller methods) that mirror the current structure of the application. For example, if you had a page with the URL http://example.com/users/view you would create a Users controller with a view() method.
Next, create view files for each of the current files of the application and load them via the appropriate controller methods. The goal here is to get the application working using CodeIgniter's routing system although at this point you won't be utilizing any models, libraries, or helpers.
Once you have the application sitting on top of CodeIgniter, start refactoring it to fit into the MVC pattern. Pull out application logic (queries, form handling, etc...) from the view files and place them into the controllers. Keep all presentation logic and HTML in the views.
Next, refactor the controllers. This is where it gets tricky because controller code can be placed into models, libraries, or other controller methods. A good starting point would be to take all of the queries and put them into appropriate models. Compare your controllers and see if there is any code duplication. That is a good sign that you should remove it from the controller and place it elsewhere. Unfortunately I can't really tell you where because it differs in each situation.
Continue refactoring your application until you have it in a workable state that you are pleased with...
Hopefully this helps. I certainly missed some critical steps such as setting up and configuring CodeIgniter but if you're serious about doing this I would highly recommend reading through the CodeIgniter User Guide to get a good idea about how it works. You should also get familiar with MVC (model-view-controller) if you aren't already.
There's not really a one size fits all solution here but hopefully I've given you some ideas or at least a starting point to jump off of. If you have any questions or are a little confused drop a comment below and I'll get back to you.
In my opinion, it's easier just to write your controllers in CodeIgniter (I've never used CakePHP) and models, than you just copy paste with some adjustments the views.

Fully Object Oriented framework in PHP

I want to create a 100% object oriented framework in PHP with no procedural programming at all, and where everything is an object. Much like Java except it will be done in PHP.
Any pointers at what features this thing should have, should it use any of the existing design patterns such as MVC? How creating objects for every table in the database would be possible, and how displaying of HTML templates etc would be done?
Please don't link to an existing framework because I want to do this on my own mainly as a learning excercise. You will be downvoted for linking to an existing framework as your answer and saying 'this does what you want'.
Some features I'd like to have are:
Very easy CRUD page generation
AJAX based pagination
Ajax based form validation if possible, or very easy form validation
Sortable tables
Ability to edit HTML templates using PHP
I've gone through many of problems on your list, so let me spec out how I handle it. I am also OOP addict and find object techniques extremely flexible and powerful yet elegant (if done correctly).
MVC - yes, hands down, MVC is a standard for web applications. It is well documented and understandable model. Furthermore, it does on application level what OOP does on class level, that is, it keeps things separated. Nice addition to MVC is Intercepting Filter pattern. It helps to attach filters for pre- and post-processing request and response. Common use is logging requests, benchmarking, access checking, caching, etc.
OOP representation of database tables/rows is also possible. I use DAO or ActiveRecord on daily basis. Another approach to ORM issues is Row Data Gateway and Table Data Gateway. Here's example implementation of TDG utilising ArrayAccess interface.
HTML templates also can be represented as objects. I use View objects in conjunction with Smarty template engine. I find this technique EXTREMELY flexible, quick, and easy to use. Object representing view should implement __set method so every property gets propagated into Smarty template. Additionally __toString method should be implemented to support views nesting. See example:
$s = new View();
$s->template = 'view/status-bar.tpl';
$s->username = "John Doe";
$page = new View();
$page->template = 'view/page.tpl';
$page->statusBar = $s;
echo $page;
Contents of view/status-bar.tpl:
<div id="status-bar"> Hello {$username} </div>
Contents of view/page.tpl:
<html>
<head>....</head>
<body>
<ul id="main-menu">.....</ul>
{$statusBar}
... rest of the page ...
</body>
</html>
This way you only need to echo $page and inner view (status bar) will be automatically transformed into HTML. Look at complete implementation here. By the way, using one of Intercepting Filters you can wrap the returned view with HTML footer and header, so you don't have to worry about returning complete page from your controller.
The question of whether to use Ajax or not should not be important at time of design. The framework should be flexible enough to support Ajax natively.
Form validation is definitely the thing that could be done in OO manner. Build complex validator object using Composite pattern. Composite validator should iterate through form fields and assigned simple validators and give you Yes/No answer. It also should return error messages so you can update the form (via Ajax or page reload).
Another handy element is automatic translation class for changing data in db to be suitable for user interface. For example, if you have INT(1) field in db representing boolean state and use checkbox in HTML that results in empty string or "on" in _POST or _GET array you cannot just assign one into another. Having translation service that alters the data to be suitable for View or for db is a clean way of sanitizing data. Also, complexity of translation class does not litter your controller code even during very complex transformations (like the one converting Wiki syntax into HTML).
Also i18n problems can be solved using object oriented techniques. I like using __ function (double underscore) to get localised messages. The function instead of performing a lookup and returning message gives me a Proxy object and pre-registers message for later lookup. Once Proxy object is pushed into View AND View is being converted into HTML, i18n backend does look up for all pre-registered messages. This way only one query is run that returns all requested messages.
Access controll issues can be addressed using Business Delegate pattern. I described it in my other Stackoverflow answer.
Finally, if you would like to play with existing code that is fully object oriented, take look at Tigermouse framework. There are some UML diagrams on the page that may help you understand how things work. Please feel free to take over further development of this project, as I have no more time to work on it.
Have a nice hacking!
Now at the risk of being downvoted, whilst at the same time being someone who is developing their own framework, I feel compelled to tell you to at least get some experience using existing frameworks. It doesn't have to be a vast amount of experience maybe do some beginner tutorials for each of the popular ones.
Considering the amount of time it takes to build a good framework, taking the time to look into what you like and loathe about existing solutions will pale in comparison. You don't even need to just look at php frameworks. Rails, Django etc are all popular for a reason.
Building a framework is rewarding, but you need a clear plan and understanding of the task at hand, which is where research comes in.
Some answers to your questions:
Yes, it should probably use MVC as the model view controller paradigm translates well into the world of web applications.
For creating models from records in tables in your database, look into ORM's and the Active Record pattern. Existing implementations to research that I know of include Doctrine, more can be found by searching on here.
For anything AJAX related I suggest using jQuery as a starting point as it makes AJAX very easy to get up and running.
Creating your own framework is a good way to gain an appreciation for some of the things that might be going on under the hood of other frameworks. If you're a perfectionist like me, it gives you a good excuse to agonize over every little detail (e.g. is should that object be called X or Y, should I use a static method or an instance method for this).
I wrote my own (almost completely OO framework a while ago), so here's my advice:
If you've worked with other frameworks before, consider what you liked/didn't like and make sure yours gives you exactly what you want.
I personally love the MVC pattern, I wouldn't dream of doing a project without it. If you like MVC, do it, if you don't don't bother.
If you want to do JavaScript/AJAX stuff, do use a JavaScript library. Coding all your own JavaScript from scratch teaches you a bit about the DOM and JavaScript in general, but ultimately its a waste of time, focus on making your app/framework better instead.
If you don't want to adopt another framework wholesale, take a look at whether there are other open source components you like and might want to use, such as Propel, Smarty, ADOdb, or PEAR components. Writing your own framework doesn't necessarily mean writing everything from scratch.
Use design patterns where they make sense (e.g. singletons for database access perhaps), but don't obsess over them. Ultimately do whatever you think produces the neatest code.
Lastly, I learned a lot by delving into a bit of Ruby on Rails philosophy, You may never use RoR (I didn't), but some of the concepts (especially Convention over Configuration) really resonated with me and really influenced my thinking.
Ultimately, unless your needs are special most people will be more productive if they adopt an existing framework. But reinventing the wheel does teach you more about wheels.
At the risk of sounding glib, this seems to me like any other software project, in this sense:
You need to define your requirements clearly, including motivation and priorities:
WHY do this? What are the key benefits you hope to realize? If the answer is "speed" you might do one thing, if it's "ease of coding" you might do another, if it's "learning experience" you might do a thid
what are the main problems you're trying to solve? And which are most important? Security? Easy UI generation? Scalability?
The answer to "what features it should have" really depends on answers to questions like those above.
Here are my suggestions:
Stop what you're doing.
It's already been done to death.
Click this Zend Framework or that CakePHP or maybe even this Recess Framework.
Now, my reasons:
... if you've worked with developers at all, you've worked with developers that love reinventing the wheel for no good reason. This is a very, very common failure pattern.
... they would go off and write hundreds and thousands of the crappiest languages you could possibly imagine ...
... "Oh, I'm gonna create my own framework, create my own everything," and it's all gonna be crappier than stuff you could just go out and get ...
from StackOverflow Podcast # 3.
So, save yourself some time, and work on something that solves a problem for people like a web app that lets people automatically update Twitter when their cat's litter box needs cleaning. The problem of "Object Oriented PHP Framework" is done. Whatever framework you slap together will never be as reliable or useful or feature rich as any of the freely available, fully supported frameworks available TODAY.
This doesn't mean you can't have a learning experience, but why do it in the dark, creating a framework that will grow into a useless blob of code, leaving you without anything to show for your time? Develop a web app, something for people to use and enjoy, I think you'll find the experience incredibly rewarding and EDUCATIONAL.
Like Jim OHalloran said, writing your own framework gives you a very good insight into how other frameworks do things.
That said, I've written a data-access layer before that almost completely abstracted away any SQL. Application code could request the relevant object and the abstraction layer did lots of magic to fetch the data only when it was needed, didn't needlessly re-fetch, saved only when it was changed, and supported putting some objects on different databases. It also supported replicated databases, and respected replication lag, and had an intelligent collection object. It was also highly extensible: the core was parameter driven and I could add a whole new object with about 15 lines of code - and got all the magic for free.
I've also written a CRUD layout engine which was used for a considerable percentage of a site. The core was parameter driven so it could run list and edit pages for anything, once you wrote a parameter list. It automatically did pagination, save-new-delete support etc etc, leveraging the object layer above. It wasn't object-oriented in and of itself, but it could have been made so.
In other words, a object-oriented framework in PHP is not only possible, it can be very efficient. This was all in PHP 4, BTW, and I bumped up against what was possible with PHP 4 objects a couple of times. :-)
I never got as far as a central dispatch that called objects, but I wasn't far away. I've worked with several frameworks that do that, though, and the file layout can get hairy quickly. For that reason, I would go for a dispatch system that is only as complex as it needs to be and no more. A simple action/view (which is almost MVC anyway) should get you more than far enough.
I initially started creating my own framework with similar ideals to your own. However, after a couple of months I realised I was re-creating work that had been done many times over. In the end I found an open source framework which was easily extendable and used it as a basis for my own development.
The features I implemented myself:
MVC Architecture
Authentication object
Database access class
URL rewriting config
Pagination class
Email class
Encryption
The features I looked at and thought, forget it! I'll build on top of someone elses:
Caching class
Form validation class
FTP class
Plugin-ability classes
Of course, writing a framework that outperforms the open source options is possible, but why would you bother?
It's true that some developers reinvent the wheel for no good reason. But because there are already good frameworks around doesn't mean that it's a waste of time doing one yourself. I started on one a while ago with no intention of using it for anything more than an exercise. I highly recommend doing it.
I've got the perfect link for you my friend: http://nettuts.com/tutorials/php/creating-a-php5-framework-part-1/. This is an awesome tutorial I have looked at, and its not too overwhelming. Plus look around the PHP section of that site I saw an article on CRUD. As for the AJAX look elsewhere, but you have to start somewhere, and this tutorial is awesome.
Note: this tutorial has 3 parts and I think it brings up MVC in the second instalment, but starts the first part using other methods.
The one, huge selling point I would look for in a new framework is that it would make writing testable code easy.
We typically work with Zend Framework, and it's mostly awesome, but trying to unit test/test drive ZF-based code is not far short of masochism.
If you could provide a framework that replaces the MVC parts of ZF with something that allows us to write testable code, whilst still allowing us to use the library parts of ZF, I will - quite literally - buy you a beer.
I'll buy you two beers if you ditch the AJAX. There's a huge gulf between an OO PHP framework and a JavaScript framework.
Please don't link to an existing framework
I will not, I started writing my own for learning purposes, and took a peek into some of the mainstream frameworks, and even with my limited knowledge see so many mistakes and bad ideas in them.
They're built by hardcore developers, not end users.
I'm in no way saying I could write better than the "big boys" but I (along with most of you I imagine) could point out why some things they do are bad, even if just because they're not end user/non-developer friendly...
I wonder how your framework is doing, some 6 years on?
Are you still working on it? Did you stop?
Should You Write Your Own Framework
This is probably a little late for you, but for anyone else, writing your own framework is a fantastic thing to do for learning purposes.
If, however, you are wanting to write one other than learning purposes, because you cannot work out the one you are using, or because it's too bloated, then do not!
Believe me, and don't be insulted, you would not be here contemplating it if you are a knowledgeable enough developer to do so successfully!
Last year I wanted to learn OOP/classes, and more advanced PHP.
And writing my own framework was the best thing I did (am actually still doing), as I have learned so much more than I anticipated.
Along the way I've learned (to name a few):
OOP/Classes many best practices which come with it - such as
Dependency Injection, SRP
Design patterns, which help you write code and structure your system
in such a way that it makes many things logical and easy. For an
example see Wiki - SOLID
Namespaces
PHP Error Handling and all of the functionality which that provides
A more robust (and better) understanding of MVC, and how to apply it
appropriately (as there is no clear cut way to use it, just guides
and best practices).
Autoloading (of classes for OOP)
Better code writing style and more structured layout, and better
commenting skills
Naming conventions (it's fun making your own, even if based on
common practices).
And many other basic PHP things which you invariably come across accidentally from reading something.
All of this not only vastly improved my grasp of PHP and things which come with it, to a more advanced level, but also some of the commercially/widely used methods and principles.
And this all boosted my confidence in using PHP in general, which in turns makes it easier to learn.
Why Write a Framework To Learn All of This
When you start out, you learn the basics - A (variables), then B (how to write a basic function), etc.
But it doesn't take long when you're trying to learn more advanced things, that to learn and use D and E, you also have to learn and understand F, G, H, and J, and to know those you have to know K, L, and M, and to know parts of L and M you first need to understand N and O...
It becomes a minefield as trying to learn one thing brings the need to first learn a few other things, and those other things often bring a need to understand various other things.
And you end up a mile away from where you started, your mind tingling and shooting sparks from it, and about 20 tabs open all with various advanced PHP things, none of which you are 100% comfortable with.
But over time, with practice and most certainly dedication, it will all fit into place, and you'll look back at code, even a collection of files/classes, and think "Did I write that.."?
Writing a framework helped greatly with this "minefield" because:
I had specific tasks to do, which brought about the need to learn and
implement other things, but specific things. This allowed me to focus
on less things at once, and even when something branches off to
various other things, you can reel it back in to where you started
because you are working on something specific. You can do this with
any learning, but if you do not have some goal, or specific task you
are focusing on, you can easily get distracted and lost in the ether
of things to learn.
I had something practical to work with. Often reading tutorials about
an animal class, and how cat and dog classes extend animal etc,
can be confusing. When you have a real life task in your own
framework, such as how do I manage XYZ, then you can learn how
classes work easier because you have trial and error and a solid
requirement which you understand, because you created the
requirement! Not just theory-like reading which means nothing
usually.
I could put it down when my mind was blown, although as it was my
framework (my Frankenstein's monster in the beginning :P) I wanted to
press on, because it was interesting, and a personal goal to learn
and sort the next stage, to resolve an issue I was stuck with, etc.
You can do it how you want. It might not be best practice, but as long as you are trying to learn best practice, over time you will improve, and likely easier than just reading tutorials, because you are in control of what and how you do something.
Wait, I Shouldn't Re-invent the Wheel Though
Well, firstly, you cannot reinvent the wheel, it is impossible, as you will just make a wheel.
When people say "Don't reinvent the wheel", they of course mean "there are already frameworks out there", and to be fair, they are written by skilled developers.
That's not to say the frameworks don't have problems or issues, but in general they are pretty solid, secure and well written.
But the statement is nonsensical in relation to writing your own framework!
Writing your own framework for learning purposes is really useful.
Even if you plan to use it commercially, or for your own website, you haven't just "re-invented the wheel", you've made something else.
Your framework won't be like the others, it won't have many features and functionality, which might be a major advantage to you!
As long as you understand about best security practices etc, because you can think you are writing a great system, which is super fast and without all the bloat other frameworks have, but in fact you have holes in places which someone could crawl into...
But a project for learning which you don't use on the internet is ideal - or use it, eventually, when you are advanced enough to know it's secure!
With all that said, you should write your own framework IF:
You are not needing it any time soon! It takes a lot of time as
there are so many aspects to consider, learn, and trial and error
leads to refactoring (a lot at first!)
You are willing to read, code, test, change, read, code, and read
some more. There is a lot of good advice on the internet for advanced
PHP, most of it mind blowing at first, like reading all the design
patterns. But they eventually make sense, and end up helping you
resolve problems you face, and how to do things within your
framework.
Willing to put the time in, and keep trying to improve, and head
towards best practice, especially with security. Speed issues shouldn't be an issue with a small framework, and besides, if you have a fairly decent system, you can usually refactor and make speed improvements. usually if you have significant speed issues it means you've chosen intensive operations, which can usually be addressed by doing it a different way.
.
Without previous experience, or an advanced knowledge of PHP, you will likely spend some time writing a framework, further reading and knowledge will show you that your approach is skewed, and so you might delete everything and start again.
Don't be disheartened by this.
I did exactly that, as I learned so much advanced patterns and ways of doing things along the way in the first month, I ended up where refactoring was no good, and a blank canvas with a whole new approach was the only option.
However, this was quite pleasing, as I saw a much better structure take form, and I could see not only a better framework foundation start to take place, but realised it was because I had a better understanding of advanced PHP.
Just do it! Just make sure you have a plan of what you want it to do before you even write some code.
Seriously, write down on paper how you are going to load error checking, are you going to have auto loading, or include files when needed? Are you going to have a centralised loading mechanism, which instantiates classes when you need them, or some other method?
Whatever you do, and whatever stage you are at, if you are heading into new territory, plan it first. You'll be glad of it when you hit a brick wall, can go back to your plans, and realise a slight deviation to your plans will resolve it.
Otherwise you just end up with a mess and no plan or way to re-deign it to resolve the current problem or requirement you face.
You are looking to build exactly same thing I've worked on for a few years and the result is Agile Toolkit.
Very easy CRUD page generation
$page->add('CRUD')->setModel('User');
AJAX based pagination
All pagination and many other things are implemented through a native support for AJAX and Object Reloading. Below code shows a themed button with random label. Button is reloaded if clicked showing new number.
$b=$page->add('Button')->setLabel(rand(1,50));
$b->js('click')->reload();
Ajax based form validation if possible, or very easy form validation
All form validations is AJAX based. Response from server is a JavaScript chain which instructs browser to either highlight and display error message or to redirect to a next page or perform any other javascript action.
Sortable tables
Table sorting and pagination has a very intuitive and simple implementation when you can really on object reloading.
Ability to edit HTML templates using PHP
This seems out of place and a wrong thing to do. Templates are better of in the VCS.

Categories