I'm having some trouble while saving a polymorphic one-to-one relation with Laravel 4, this is my model:
namespace App\Models\Proveedores;
class Proveedor extends \Eloquent {
public function proveedorable () {
return $this->morphTo('proveedorable', 'proveedorable_type', 'proveedorable_id');
}
And this is the specific model:
namespace App\Models\Proveedores;
class ProveedorTerminacion extends \Eloquent {
public function proveedor () {
return $this->morphOne ('App\Models\Proveedores\Proveedor', 'proveedorable', 'proveedorable_type', 'proveedorable_id');
}
This way I'm trying to save a Proveedor associated with a specific ProveedorTerminacion model, but for some reason a row for ProveedorTerminacion is created in my table, but not for Proveedor and Laravel won't show any error and return an empty response, what's wrong?
$terminador = ProveedorTerminacion::create (Input::all());
$proveedor = new Proveedor;
$proveedor->fill (Input::all());
$proveedor->proveedorable()->associate ($terminador);
$proveedor->save ();
Associate method doesn't work correctly with morphTo, as it is never setting morphable_type, so don't use it. I'm pretty sure your code should throw fatal error because of that by the way. It requires bugfix.
Instead invert creating the relation and do it in the context of morphable object:
$terminador = ProveedorTerminacion::create (Input::all());
$proveedor = new Proveedor;
$proveedor->fill (Input::all());
$terminador->proveedor()->save($proveedor);
I'm fixing that and going to send a PR to the laravel repo after some testing. I'll update my answer when it's done.
Here it is: https://github.com/laravel/framework/pull/4249
Related
What I need to do is extend all of the functionality of the Spatie permissions package Role model, but use a different table for the derived model.
Right now I have a model SubscriptionPackage that I want to emulate the behavior of a Role such that it can be assigned permissions and in turn this model can be assigned to users. But I wanna keep the Role model intact too.
I have tried extending Yes, but when I create a new SubscriptionPackage, the new record is created in the roles tables instead of subscription_packages table despite specifying the table in my derived Model. As shown below
<?php
namespace App\Models;
use Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Model;
use App\Models\Permission; // This extends from Spatie\Permission\Models\Permission
use Spatie\Permission\Models\Role as SpatieRole;
class SubscriptionPackage extends SpatieRole
{
//
protected $guarded = ['id'];
protected $table = 'subscription_packages';
/**
* The permissions that belong to the package.
*/
public function packagePermissions()
{
return $this->belongsToMany(Permission::class);
}
}
With the code above I expect when I create a new SubscriptionPackage, the record should be inserted into the subscription_packages table but in this case it goes to the roles table.
Any pointers on how to go about this will be highly appreciated.
If you have a look at the Role source code you will this inside the __construct method:
public function __construct(array $attributes = [])
{
$attributes['guard_name'] = $attributes['guard_name'] ?? config('auth.defaults.guard');
parent::__construct($attributes);
$this->setTable(config('permission.table_names.roles')); // <-- HERE IS THE PROBLEM!
}
So, if you want that your SubscriptionPackage to write its records in the right table you have to override this behaviour like this:
public function __construct(array $attributes = [])
{
parent::__construct($attributes)
$this->setTable('your_table_name'); // <-- HERE THE SOLUTION!
}
I don't think you can. Spatie already have 5 tables and fetched data from those only. But still if you want to make the change you have make the changes with table and column name in the model
I have three relational table attached below.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1q1kdURIwFXxHb2MgdRyBkE1e3DMug7r-/view?usp=sharing
I have also three separate models where defined relation among all of my table's.I can read the City Model's information from Country model using hasManyThrough() relation But cannot read the Country information from City model. I have tried to retrieve City model's using ``hasManyThrough``` but didn't get result (attached as commented country method ). Please read my model and it's relational method here..
Is there someone to help me for getting City model's information using Eloquent method hasManyThrough / hasManyThrough or using inverse of hasManyThrough / hasManyThrough ?
01.
<?php
namespace App\Hrm;
use Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Model;
use Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\SoftDeletes;
class Country extends Model
{
//use SoftDeletes;
protected $fillable = ['name','description','status'];
public function districts(){
return $this->hasMany(District::class);
}
public function cities(){
return $this->hasManyThrough(City::class,District::class);
}
}
02.
<?php
namespace App\Hrm;
use Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Model;
use Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\SoftDeletes;
class District extends Model
{
//use SoftDeletes;
protected $fillable = ['country_id','name','description','status'];
public function country(){
return $this->belongsTo(Country::class);
}
public function cities(){
return $this->hasMany(City::class);
}
}
3.
namespace App\Hrm;
use App\User;
use Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Model;
use Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\SoftDeletes;
class City extends Model
{
//use SoftDeletes;
protected $fillable = ['district_id','name','description','status'];
public function district(){
return $this->belongsTo(District::class);
}
// public function country(){
// return $this->hasOneThrough(Country::class, District::class);
// }
Doesn't look like there is a native way to define the inverse of a "hasManyThrough" relationship yet in Laravel. There have been a few issues opened on github to request it, but they were closed.
You could use the staudenmeir/belongs-to-through package if you don't mind installing a third-party package for this functionality. Then you should be able to define a belongsToThrough relationship like this:
class City extends Model
{
use \Znck\Eloquent\Traits\BelongsToThrough;
public function country() {
return $this->belongsToThrough(Country::class, District::class);
}
}
Why can't use parent method?
$city = City::find(1);
$country = $city->district->country();
i just had a similar situation i was able to accomplish a belongsToThrough with hasOneThrough
public function country()
{
return $this->hasOneThrough(
Country::class, // model we are trying to get
District::class, // model we have an _id to
'id', // WHERE `district`.`id` = `city`.`district_id`
'id', // `countries`.`id`
'district_id', // local column relation to our through class
'country_id' // `district`.`country_id`
);
}
what this should generate is
SELECT * FROM `countries`
INNER JOIN `districts`
ON `districts`.`country_id` = `countries`.`id`
WHERE `districts`.`id` = ?
-- ? == city.district_id
Database structure:
City:
id: increments
district_id: integer
...
Country:
id: increments
...
District:
id: increments
country_id: integer
...
we can then do $city->country
note: i have not fully tested this but with the testing that i have done it 'works'
Edit: i originally thought that i needed to leave the localKey
parameter null otherwise the relation wont work. it turns out i didnt
fully understand what that column was doing and that was wrong. That
key is the local column that relates to our through column (unless i
still have more to learn/figure out), when left the value as null, it
would use the local id column which a. is the wrong value, b. can also
be out of range (which is how i discovered it was using the wrong
value)
in my testing i only had two rows, both with the same relations. what
i didnt realize though was that on the "through table" both row 1 and
2 and the same related (relation where are trying to reach) so i didnt
notice the issue right away. hopefully now its all working
I am trying to return data from my database and I want it to include data from the related table. It is a one-to-many relationship. However I all I get is an error
Property [User] does not exist on this collection instance.
In my User model I have
//App\User.php
class User extends Authenticatable{
use Notifiable;
public function systems(){
return $this->hasMany(\App\Models\General\systems::class,'added_by','id');
}
The other model, called systems I have
//App\Models\General\systems.php
class systems extends Model
{
public function User(){
return $this->belongsTo(\App\User::class,'added_by','id');
}
In my controller I have
$this->systemsObject = new \App\Model\General\systems();
$systems = $this->systemsObject->get()->User;
according to the Laravel Documentation this should work but it isn't. I tried reversing the foreign key/local key parameters. I made the ->User uppercase, lowercase.
I have no idea what I am doing wrong
You need to iterate over the collection, for example:
$systems = $this->systemsObject->get();
foreach ($systems as $system) {
echo $system->User->name;
}
I am using Laravel 5's belongsToMany method to define related tables using an intermediary pivot table. My application is using the eloquent models Tour and TourCategory. In the Tour Model I have:
namespace App;
use Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Model;
class Tour extends Model
{
public function cats(){
return $this->belongsToMany('App\TourCategory', 'tour_cat_assignments', 'tour_id', 'cat_id');
}
}
In my controller I am retrieving all the data from the tour table along with the associated category data using Laravel's with method:
$tours = Tour::with('cats')->get();
That all works fine. The problem is that I don't want the category data in its current raw form, I need to first rearrange it. However I cannot overwrite the cats property without unsetting it first:
public function serveTourData(){
$tours = Tour::with('sections', 'cats')->get();
foreach($tours as $tour){
unset($tour->cats); // If I unset first, then it respects the new value. Why do I need to do this?
$tour->cats = "SOME NEW VALUE";
}
Log::info($tours);
}
Can someone explain the logic behind this please?
To override relations on some model, you can use:
public function serveTourData(){
$tours = Tour::with('sections', 'cats')->get();
foreach($tours as $tour){
$tour->setRelation('cats', "SOME NEW VALUE");
}
Log::info($tours);
}
For laravel 5.4 - setRelation
Of course if you are using laravel >= 5.6, you can unset relations by unsetRelation
There is such a structure:
There is a model book (Book) and model systems age restrictions (Rars).
One book can be only one rars, but on one rars can refer a lot of books. That is, the relationship - one to many?
The model Book:
class Book extends Model
{
public function rars()
{
return $this->belongsTo('App\Rars');
}
}
The model Rars:
class Rars extends Model
{
public function books()
{
return $this->hasMany('App\Book');
}
}
In migration Book:
$table->integer('rars_id');
$table->foreign('rars_id')->references('id')->on('rars');
Run code:
$book->rars()->save(\App\Rars::where('eternal_name', 'no_limits')->first());
(Rars with this eternal_name, guaranteed to exist)
And this return:
[BadMethodCallException]
Call to undefined method Illuminate\Database\Query\Builder::save()
What am I doing wrong?
According to the official documentation, for updating 'Belongs To' relationships you should use associate method.
So i think this will work:
$book->rars()->associate(\App\Rars::where('eternal_name', 'no_limits')->first());
$book->save();
For more information you can read here, https://laravel.com/docs/5.1/eloquent-relationships#inserting-related-models
Do not try to edit Rars with an Instance of Book. Make an instance of Rars instead. if you have the book id, do as following.
$book = new Book();
$book = $book->find($bookId);
$rars = new Rars();
$rars = $rars->find($book->rars_id);
/* Update data */
$rars->save();