I am totally confused on how to host a Dynamic website created using PHP and MySQL in Amazon Cloud.
I went through Amazon S3 and I hosted a static website there!
Then I tried Amazon EC2 and I learned some aspects about the concept of VPC. I thought that the dynamic websites are hosting in Amazon Cloud using EC2. I followed some steps and they taught me how to launch a website using Drupal (But, I didn't want that !! )
No other tutorials on EC2 to deploy my web application was not found.
Then I found AWS Elastic Beanstalk, I uploaded a simple PHP document and I can see that deployed successfully.
But Still, I am not satisfied. Because, I don't know which is the correct way to deploy my PHP application.
So can anyone direct me on Deploying a PHP MySQL Application in AWS ?
Depends on your needs. Elastic Beanstalk might be a good option for many apps, but I chose EC2 for my app's backend (using PHP, MySQL and S3 for storage).
Quick steps to get you up and running:
Log into the AWS Mangement Console and start a new EC instance (Windows server 2012 R2 Base > t2.micro should be good enough for a start!)
At step "6. Configure Security Group", add Rules for at least HTTP, HTTPS and RDP (so you can connnect via Remote Desktop)
Connect to your new instance via Remote Desktop and install a decent browser (Enable File Downloads in IE's Security Settings and download Chrome or Firefox)
Open the Windows Firewall and add rules for the same ports you opened in the Security Group of your Instance in the AWS Management Console. (Right-click on “Inbound Rules”, then select “New Rule…”)
Download and install XAMPP (I put it in C:\xampp)
Open the XAMPP Control panel and install Apache and MySQL as services (so they will start automatically when your instance launches); make sure everything is started up.
Now put your files in C:\xampp\htdocs\ and you're ready to go!
Bonus Steps:
Set up Filezilla FTP Server (and open the required ports in both the instance's security group and the Windows Firewall) so you can upload/download files without having to go through Remote Desktop.
Get an Elastic IP and assign it to your instance, so it's IP address will never change.
Get an SSL certificate so you can use HTTPS
The answer depends on the load that you are expecting and the resources you have to handle all the administration tasks.
If you expect heavy or variable loads, there are many reasons why not to deploy a production PHP + MySQL application on a EC2.
Here are some of the benefits of deploying to Elastic Beanstalk instead of a manual configured EC2:
You get version control of each deployment.
You can scale up or down automatically if you need more/less instances to handle new load.
You get a load-balancer in front of your EC2s instances with a bunch of out-of-the-box "recommended" configurations.
Regarding MySQL, if you go for an Amazon RDS instance you can handle replication, monitorization and automatic backups with pretty low effort. A lot of the configurations you would need to tweak are now available through parameter-groups.
On the other hand, if you want to have full control of everything that is going on on your server (that means you have time to monitor, backup and do maintenance tasks, which is not my case :), or if you do not plan to have much traffic, or if you want the less expensive option, you should go with a low cost EC2 instance.
In my experience, (after 2 years of working on AWS with 10 production applications, I'm kind of a regular AWS user) pretty much every customization or change I needed on both RDS and EBS I was able to tweak it and get it working, so I'm pretty satisfied with choosing the EBS+RDS option.
Below are two links i found which are helpful to Create and Update an Application with AWS Elastic Beanstalk
https://aws.amazon.com/getting-started/tutorials/launch-an-app/
https://aws.amazon.com/getting-started/tutorials/update-an-app/
Related
I have this setup currently.
My front end runs on Google App Engine ( GAE ) on PHP. I use PDO to connect to an open AWS RDS MYSLQ 8.
I can not move the data out of the AWS RDS instance.
I have been requested to make the RDS secure and not allow open in coming ports like 0.0.0.0/0 in the AWS security group.
I want to know if there is a serverless way to achieve this type of connection without setting up a EC proxy or an Google Compute Engine server.
I am not able to find a solution and all known solution points to setting up a proxy.
Any one have any thoughts on this problem?
It's hard to tell something without any codes and errors stacks etc. But I have some thoughts.
If you are thinking of "serverless" solution. "serverless" does not mean that there is no server, but it means that there is no need to care about sever which is being maintained by some service provider (like GAE or other). So practically there is no 100% serverless solution, but it's just covered behind provider logic.
The main question is that you cannot connect to RDS. This should be possible form local machine. So you should be able to develop something that is working on your local machine and than for sure you are able to deploy the same logic to App Engine.
If above is not possible, you should consider GCP cloud SQL or serverless.
I have a web app running with PHP and MySQL.
I need to develop a desktop application which will sync data from the cloud DB whenever the client's computer connects to internet. If the client's computer is not connected to the internet, the desktop application will continue to work offline, using the local DB. The local DB is obviously a replica of the cloud DB.
I don't want to use Microsoft c# to create the desktop application. The desktop application needs to be cross platform and should run on Windows, Mac and Linux.
I have used XAMPP to create a local MySQL DB and have achieved the local app to sync with the cloud app. However, there are multiple problems to that approach.
-- Whenever my client's need to install the local app, they need to call me and I have to install XAMPP in their computer, setup the server, setup the local database and prepare it to sync with the cloud database with their account. They obviously aren't tech savvy so they don't know how to do it themselves.
-- If the client formats his computer, they will call me again and again and I have to set it up for them all the time, which isn't scalable in the longer haul.
-- XAMPP doesn't work when there are other processes running and using common ports. Example - Skype, Quickheal and other antivirus software running will prevent the SQL server to start. Sometimes what happens is that even after I have installed the local app, the client will install an antivirus software or some other tool and my local app will stop working on their computer.
Hence, I need to do away with XAMPP and switch to something else.
SQLite is out of question since it is serverless. I don't want to use .NET either. What I am looking for is this
I want to develop the database driven local application and package it somehow. I want to provider an installer file which will automatically install the database server, setup the database and everything else. The client will only login to the system in the local app and he doesn't have to setup any server. All the work that he does will be synced with the cloud server whenever internet connection resumes.
Please note that there is a master slave work involved. The client will have multiple terminal computers using the master system from other terminals and all these terminal computers will use the local database installed in the master computer.
I have tried to illustrate this with a diagram below
What's the best way to go about it?
I'm running a PHP app on GCloud (Google App Engine). This app will require users to submit files for processing via FTP. A python cron job with process them.
Given that dev to prod is via the GAE deployment, I'm assuming there is no FTP access to the app folder structure.
How would I go about providing simple one-way FTP to my users? Can I deploy a Python project that will be a server? Or do I need to run a VM?
I've done some searching which suggests the VM option, but surely there are other options?
App Engine projects are not based on server virtual machines. App Engine is a platform as a service, not infrastructure as a service. Your code is packaged up and served on Google App Engine in a manner that can scale easily. App Engine is not a drop-in replacement for your old school web hosting, its quite a bit different.
That said, FTP is just a mechanism to move files. If your files just need to be processed by a job, you can look at providing an upload for your users where the files end up residing on Google Cloud Storage and then your cron job reads from that location and does any processing that is needed. What results from that processing might result in further considerations. Don't look at FTP being a requirement, but rather a means to moving files and you'll probably have plenty of options.
Total newb question I'm sure but I'm new to S3 and trying to open a simple PHP file on my server. Yet it prompts to Save the file each time instead of opening it. Is S3 not able to run PHP files?
I believe Amazon S3 is a storage not a server.
Amazon S3:
Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3), provides developers and IT teams with secure, durable, highly-scalable object storage. Amazon S3 is easy to use, with a simple web service interface to store and retrieve any amount of data from anywhere on the web. With Amazon S3, you pay only for the storage you actually use. There is no minimum fee and no setup cost.
Link: https://aws.amazon.com/s3/
Amazon EC2:
Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) is a web service that provides resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale cloud computing easier for developers.
Link: https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/
You want to get an instance from EC2 and install php on its linux server.
AWS has a great tutorial to do so here.
Basically AWS EC2 linux servers are the same as any other linux server except lots of features from AWS so you can follow other tutorials on how to install PHP on an Apache2 servers.
Good luck!
EDIT: However, you can host a static website. Static website is a website that shows the same content for all users. Basic informational websites are the example. As opposed to static website, dynamic website is a website that shows different contents for different users. The purpose of php script is to create a dynamic website, so you must look for other options than AWS S3. So EC2 would be great fit for you.
I'm a little bit confused by how scaling in Azure works. I'm using a Cloud Service and have 2 web roles running a PHP application. I can RDP on both machines and both applications run great on each machine. Also I don't have any problems calling the staging URL.
But I can't figure out if I configure scaling so that 2 machines run always, if I have to configure a load balancer somehow. Or is this already done for me?
In Azure VM's I had to create a load-balanced set endpoint for an endpoint, but what about cloud services? (Load balance virtual machines)
And how is this done in the XML configuration file for my service? What if I don't do it?
The question has been answered in the MSDN Forums:
Windows Azure supports load balance for cloud services and standard websites, we just need to set instance count to more than 1 to enable load balance. For virtual machines, it needs to set up manually.
Answer at MSDN