Why does my function return null?
class TestClass2
{
private $test_var="value";
public function getVar(){
global $test_var;
return $test_var;
}
}
$myclass = new TestClass2();
var_dump($myclass::getVar());
Is there an other way to access variables, which are outside the function, other than passing it in as a parameter, or declaring it as global?
You do not need "global", you just need "$this->test_var" to access your private variable inside a method of your class (in your case, the "getVar" method).
As for calling the function, since it is not static, use "->".
class TestClass2
{
private $test_var="value";
public function getVar(){
return $this->test_var;
}
}
$myclass = new TestClass2();
var_dump($myclass->getVar());
Now that I'm pretty certain what you're asking, I'll go ahead and give you a full answer.
When you call a method, an invisible argument, called $this is passed to it. It is a pointer to your class. I'm not certain this is how it works in PHP, but it's how C++ does it so the behaviors should be similar.
So if you're inside a class's method and you want to access one of its properties, you could tell PHP to use the global scope to break outside of your method and into the class, but that's bulky, obnoxious, and can lead to some complications as your class gets more complex.
The solution is to use the reference to our class that PHP magically gives us. If you want to access $foo->bar inside $foo->getBar(), you can get $this->bar. A good way to think of it is that this is a variable that holds the name of your class.
An additional advantage of this is that, because we're in our class, private properties are visible. This means that $this->bar is valid, whereas $foo->bar isn't, assuming bar is private, of course.
So if we apply this to your code, it becomes a lot simpler and prettier to look at (by PHP standards):
class TestClass2
{
private $test_var="value";
public function getVar(){
return $this->test_var;
}
}
$myclass = new TestClass2();
$myclass->test_var; // Error
$myclass->getVar(); // Not an error
Related
Let's say I have a class:
class test {
public static function sayHi() {
echo 'hi';
}
}
Call it by test::sayHi();
Can I define sayHi() outside of the class or perhaps get rid of the class altogether?
public static function sayHi() {
echo 'hi';
}
I only need this function to encapsulate code for a script.
Maybe the answer is not a static method but a plain function def?
A static method without a class does not make any sense at all. The static keywords signals that this method is identical for all instances of the class. This enables you to call it.. well.. statically on the class itself instead of on one of its instances.
If the content of the method is self-contained, meaning it does not need any other static variables or methods of the class, you can simply omit the class and put the code in a global method. Using global methods is considered a bad practice.
So my advice is to just keep the class, even if it has only that one method within. This way you can still autoload the file instead of having to require it yourself.
Functions in OOP are public by default, you can modify them to private like:
private function test(){
//do something
}
Or like you said, to static, in public or private like:
private static function test(){
//do something
}
But if you're not using OOP, functions by default are global and public, you can't change their access to private. That's not the way they are supposed to works because if you change their type to private, you will NEVER be able to access to that function. Also, static doesn't works because is another property of OOP...
Then, you can simply create that function and access it from everywhere you want (obviously where is available :P because you need to include the file where is stored)
Inside the definition of a class' method I include an external file. I would like this external file unable to access $this, but only the "public" instance, i.e. only the public methods and properties.
So far I have tried to use anonymous functions, call_user_func with a method returning $this.
I have seen I can unset $this in my anonymous function without altering the rest of the execution, but I haven't found a way to get the instance as I want it. I think I could try to unset all non-public properties and methods in the anonymous function but I wonder if there is not a simpler way.
Class Foo{
private $test = 23;
public function getFoo(){
return $this;
}
public function inclFile($file){
$foo = call_user_func([$this, 'getFoo']);
$r = function()use($foo){
unset($this);
var_dump($foo->test); // i am getting it!
require($file);
};
$r();
// Here $this is still set
}
}
I would turn the design around a bit, and create this function (and place it anywhere):
function access_object_in_file($file_to_require, $object) {
require $file_to_require;
}
This will limit the scope of the file to only have access to $object. Since PHP is PHP, your file will be allowed to create reflection classes, parse back trace etc but the variable scope is limited to $object.
If you do not want any type of objects passed to the function, I would add an interface and type hint for it, such as this:
// let's pretend we're in a view layer
function render($view_file, Properties $object) {
require $file_to_require;
}
I understand OOP. What I understand so far is that private and protected cannot be referenced from outside the class using $this->blah notation. If that is correct, how can the following code work?
<?php
class test {
protected $a = "b";
public static function oo(){
$instance = new static();
echo $instance->a;
}
}
test::oo();
Gives me an output of b! Now, how in Lord's name can that happen?
In PHP 5.3, a new feature called late static bindings was added – and this can help us get the polymorphic behavior that may be preferable in this situation. In simplest terms, late static bindings means that a call to a static function that is inherited will “bind” to the calling class at runtime. So, if we use late static binding it would mean that when we make a call to “test::oo();”, then the oo() function in the test class will be called.after that you return $instance->a; static keyword allows the function to bind to the calling class at runtime.so if you use static then whatever access modifier(private,public,protected) you use it's just meaning less...
please read this link,another
That happens because you're "presenting it" by echo'ing it. You can't reference it like this for example:
class test {
private $a = 'b';
function __construct() {
echo 'instantiated';
}
}
$test = new test();
echo $test->a; // This line won't work, since it's a private var.
It would give you an error message that looks like this:
Fatal error: Cannot access private property test::$a
Example (https://eval.in/226435)
As I said before, you're accessing it from within the class itself, so you CAN view it. (That's the $instance you have there.) If you modify your code to use it like this:
class test {
protected $a = "b";
public static function oo(){
$instance = new static();
return $instance;
}
}
echo test::oo()->a;
Example of the above (https://eval.in/226439)
You'll get that "private acess blah blah" error.
You're understanding the statement wrong. "private and protected cannot be referenced from outside the class" means that as the examples above show, you CAN NOT access the variables outside the class, but with your example, you're accessing it from INSIDE the class, which means they'll do as you require (echo'ing out as you did)
What I understand so far is that private and protected cannot be referenced from outside the class
As follows, since oo is defined in the same type as a, oo has access to a.
This is actually a very good question, and shouldn't be down-voted.
From what I understand, the reason why you can access a protected/private property from within a static method of the same class, is because "the implementation specific details are already known when inside this class". I rephrased this a little from what is documented on the official page on Visibility:
Objects of the same type will have access to each others private and protected members even though they are not the same instances. This is because the implementation specific details are already known when inside those objects.
This makes sense. Visibility access is meant to only expose things that are safe for the public to use. But if you already have access to the code of the Class you're using, then there is no point of preventing you to use what you already see. Hope that makes sense..
I am having trouble understanding how to work with objects.
The specific code:
class first{
class second{
public function widgets(){
$a_variable = $a_value;
}
#1
}
$second = new second;
#2
}
#3
$first = new first;
If I initialize $a_variable as $a_variable it is only available inside the function, correct?
If I initialize $a_varialbe as $this->a_variable it is only available inside class second, correct?
Can I initialize $a_variable as $first->second->a_variable? If so, How would I call it at #1, #2, and #3?
Can I initialize $a_varialbe as $this->second->a_variable? If so, How would I call it at #1, #2, and #3?
As you can see I am simply confused as to how OOP works.
First of all, I want to express how much I appreciate all of the help. I have already learned more than enough to consider this question a smashing success.
That said, even if it is poorly formulated, psuedo-code and invalid syntax, this code DOES run.
class class_1{
public function function_1(){
require('class_2.php');
public function function_2_callback(){
//%%%%%% How do I set a variable here and get the DATA...
}
$this->class_2 = new class_2("function_2_callback");
}
}
$class_1 = new class_1;
//&&&&&&&&&& Get the DATA here?
/* CONTENTS OF class_2.php */
class class_2($callback){
call_user_function($callback);
}
Even if we have to look at this as an exercise. Can someone tell me how I would first set (# %%%%%%%)and then call a variable (# &&&&&&&&) as shown?
First off: What you have there doesn't work, you cannot declare a class inside a class the way you are doing (notwithstanding conditionally declaring a class inside a function, which you should not do).
Scope in PHP (including OOP) is very simple:
variables have function scope
object properties are accessible if you have a reference to the object
the visibility of object properties can be restricted
The only real scope you have is function scope for variables:
$a = 'foo';
function bar() {
$a = 'bar';
}
The two $as are entirely unrelated, in different scopes. As simple as that.
class Foo {
public $a = 'foo';
public function bar() {
$this->a; // foo
$a = 'bar';
}
}
$foo = new Foo;
$foo->a; // foo
An object property has no scope, it has visibility. You can access it if you have the object in scope. Above, $foo is the object. It's in scope, its property a is public, therefore it can be accessed using $foo->a. Inside the class, the property is accessible via $this->a.
The $a = 'bar' is a local variable in the function and has nothing to do with $this->a. It is not accessible anywhere except inside the function. Refer to rule #1, function scope.
class Bar {
protected $b = 'bar';
public function baz() {
$this->b; // bar
}
}
$bar = new Bar;
$bar->b; // doesn't work
If the visibility is not public, the property (here b) is not accessible from outside the class itself. Inside the class you can access it using $this->b, but not from outside using $bar->b. It's not about scope, but visibility.
And that's pretty much the scope rules in PHP.
First of all your example is invalid code
PHP does not support nested classes, meaning a class within a class.
if you define a class, a variable initialized within a method is local to that method, while you can "initialize" an attribute with $this->newattribute, you should have declared it and its visibility before (before you write a method public / private / protected $varname = "initial value";).
Your questions 3 and 4 would make sense in another context, this is when an object is passed as member of another object, see example below.
If you build it like
<?php
class First {
public $second;
}
class Second {
public $a_variable;
}
$foo = new First();
$foo->second = new Second();
you can access it:
$foo->second->a_variable = "foo";
or within a method in second with
$this->a_variable;
or within a method in first with
$this->second->a_variable;
You should NOT be nesting classes like that. That shouldn't even run. I would suggest running the code first. There are some tools online for testing small snippets of PHP code, such as this.
For the code to run as you might expected it to, it should look like this:
class second{
public function widgets(){
$a_variable = $a_value;
}
}
class first{
public $second;
public function __construct() {
$this->second = new second;
}
}
$first = new first;
A variable that begins with $[a-z]+ is local to the function. A property beginning with $this->[a-z]+ (where [a-z] is 1 or more letters) is part of the object.
There's some documentation on php.net that goes over the specifics of objects in php here.
If I initialize $a_variable as $a_variable it is only available inside
the function, correct?
Yes, correct. It begins with $[a-z]. Not quite true if you use the global keyword, but that's discouraged.
If I initialize $a_varialbe as
$this->a_variable it is only available inside class second, correct?
Yes, but you should declare it first. You can do this with public $variable, protected $variable or private $variable. public means a property can be accesses from the outside, whereas private means only the class itself can access it. protected is private to the outside, but public to classes that extend from your class.
(public/private/public became available in PHP 5. In PHP 4 you would use var $variable, which defaults to public in PHP 5)
Can I initialize $a_variable as $first->second->a_variable?
You can arbitrarily initialize class variables without declaring them, but that's not something you should be doing.
If so, How would I call it at #1, #2, and #3?
You can't call code there (in your example). Code must be inside a function or in the global context (outside of the class definition).
A Brief Explanation of Classes
class foo{
// This can be accessed anywhere
public $i_am_public;
// This can be accessed within this class and any sub classes
protected $i_am_protected;
// Thi can only be accessed within this class
private $i_am_private;
// This function can be accessed anywhere
public function foo_function(){
// This variable is only available in this function
// it cannot be accessed anywhere else
$variable = 'Hello World';
// However, you can access any of the other variables listed above
// like so
$this->i_am_public = 'public';
$this->i_am_protected = 'protected';
$this->i_am_private = 'private';
// Write these variables
echo $this->i_am_public;
echo $this->i_am_protected;
echo $this->i_am_private;
}
}
$foo = new foo;
$foo->foo_function();
// You can change any publicly defined variables outside
// of the class instance like so
$foo->i_am_public = 'testing';
Specific Answers to Questions
Before I go any further, I would hugely urge you not to define a class within a class! Instead, use class extensions which I will explain later. In fact, I am surprised your code even works!
If I initialize $a_variable as $a_variable it is only available inside
the function, correct?
Yes, this will only be available inside the function. If you want to access it outside of the function then you need to define it outside the function using one of the scope definitions public, protected, private.
If I initialize $a_varialbe as $this->a_variable it is only available
inside class second, correct?
This depends on what scope you give it, but you shouldn't be defining a class within a class anyway.
Can I initialize $a_variable as $first->second->a_variable? If so, How
would I call it at #1, #2, and #3?
I cannot answer this as I have never nested a class within a class, once again I would urge you to change this structure.
Can I initialize $a_varialbe as $this->second->a_variable? If so, How
would I call it at #1, #2, and #3?
Please see above answer :-)
Nesting Classes
As mentioned, I have never seen this before, and I am surprised it even works. You should definitely change this structure.
One suggestions would be to use extensions like so:
class foo{
// This can be accessed anywhere
public $i_am_public;
// This can be accessed within this class and any sub classes
protected $i_am_protected;
// Thi can only be accessed within this class
private $i_am_private;
public function foo_function(){
echo 'Hello World';
}
}
class bar extends foo {
// This is a public function
public function baz(){
// These will work
$this->i_am_public = 'public';
$this->i_am_protected = 'protected';
// This will not work as it is only available to
// the parent class
$this->i_am_private = 'private';
}
}
// This will create a new instance of bar which is an
// extension of foo. All public variables and functions
// in both classes will work
$bar = new bar;
// This will work because it is public and it is inherited
// from the parent class
$bar->foo_function();
// This will work because it is public
$bar->baz();
I noticed two ways in PHP to do the same thing. Can you tell me which way is a better programming practice?
In the first example, I use a private variable on the class. On the second example, I use a static variable in a class method.
class Test {
private $_myvar;
public function getVar(){
if (!isset($this->_myvar)) {
$this->_myvar = "test\n";
}
return $this->_myvar;
}
}
$oTest = new Test();
echo $oTest->getVar(); // sets var first time and returns it
echo $oTest->getvar(); // pulls from cache
Or:
class Test {
public function getVar(){
static $myvar;
if (!isset($myvar)) {
$myvar = "test\n";
}
return $myvar;
}
}
$oTest = new Test();
echo $oTest->getVar(); // sets var first time and returns it
echo $oTest->getvar(); // pulls from cache
That is like saying which room is better the Kitchen or the Bathroom, they are both rooms, but they have different functions.
A static variable is the same in multiple objects.
An instance variable, declared via private above is particular to a given object.
Note that private is an access modifier, static is not, a variable can be both.
In the location you have your static variable, within the function, it is not a class/object variable at all, but a traditional function-level static variable, which will be single-instanced across all calls to the function, making it similar to a class-level static variable, but only accessible within the method it is defined within.
With the class property (be it public, private or protected), the variable is accessible to other parts of the class.
With the static variable, it is only visible to that method of the class.
I would suggest using the class property (but probably not private, which I generally don't find much use for; protected is normally a better idea) as it's easier for testing later; you can't do anything to unset, alter or check the static variable.
I see some possible confusion in the other answers here between static variables and static class properties. PHP uses the same modifier, but the behaviour is quite different; an example follows.
<?php
class Foo {
// Static class property
public static $bar = 'bar';
public function blarg() {
static $bar;
if (empty($bar)) {
$bar = 'blarg';
}
return $bar;
}
}
In the above example the static class property can be accessed using Foo::$bar (or self::$bar within the class and static::$bar in PHP 5.3); the static variable cannot and is only visible inside the function blarg().
Neither is "better". It would be like asking whether a screwdriver is better than a tenon saw.
The private variable in your first example will only be available to that instance of the class (although only to its methods). Create a new instance, and the variable can and will have a different value.
The static variable in your second example will be available to all instances of that class, admittedly only in that method. But set it one instance, and a second instance will see the same value.