I'm aware that you can have PHP functions with optional arguments like so:
function do_something($argument = null)
{
// argument not provided
if ($argument === null)
........
}
Consider the case that null/false and other values are all valid arguments to my function. How can I determine whether an argument was provided or not?
do_something(null); // argument provided
do_something(false); // argument provided
do_something(0); // argument provided
do_something("test"); // argument provided
do_something(new stdClass()); // argument provided
do_something(); // nothing provided
How can I detect the last case? I have thought about using func_num_args which would work in most cases but it doesn't work if I have several optional arguments.
Is there anything that solves this problem?
func_num_args() should work exactly as you want it to, because you might be assuming something that's actually not the case: You can't have optional arguments left out if they are in the middle of your arguments list.
So let's look at this function:
function test1 ($param1 = null, $param2 = null) {
return func_num_args();
}
If I call that with different parameter combinations I get the following results:
test1() => 0
test1(true) => 1
test1(true, true) => 2
There is just no way to call the function in a way where $param2 would be set while $param1 isn't. So you can map every possible output of func_num_args() to exactly one parameter configuration.
In the example above you can rely on the fact that
if the return value is 1, $param2 definitely hasn't been set, while $param1 has been.
For 0 it's 100% sure that neither one has been given.
And, of course, if it's 2 both are there.
What you actually would need are named parameters, as many other languages have them. PHP doesn't at the moment. NikiC actually wrote an RFC that suggests the addition of named parameters to PHP, but I think that's still way off in the future. You can check that out here: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/named_params
As these are not yet available, here are a few workarounds you can try:
Workaround 1
If you really need to be able to have all the parameters optional, try a parameter array:
function test1 (array $opts) {
if (!isset($opts['opt1'])) { $opts['opt1'] = 'default1'; }
if (!isset($opts['opt2'])) { $opts['opt2'] = 'default2'; }
}
Then you can call it like this:
test1(array('opt2' => true))
It would set the first parameter to "default1" while keeping the second. And there are definitely better and more elegant ways to do this (e.g. using an object instead), but the general idea is the same.
Workaround 2
You could also go with alias functions:
function test ($param1, $patam2) { ... ]
function testNoParam1 ($param2) {
test("default1", $param2);
}
That at least makes it very easy to read, but of course you need to pick the right function depending on the parameters you have.
Workaround 3
By adding a lot of additional code you could get really fancy and use a FactoryObject:
class FunctionExecutor {
private $param1 = "default1";
private $param2 = "default2";
public function param1($val) {
$this->param1 = $val;
return $this;
}
public function param2($val) {
$this->param2 = $val;
return $this;
}
public function execute() {
return yourFunction($this->param1, $this->param2);
}
}
This could be used like this:
$doSomething = new FunctionExecutor();
$returnValue = $doSomething->param2(42)->execute();
In this approach it would probably be a better idea to actually put your function into the object instead of defining it globally. Anyway...this is definitely a possibility, but not the most practical one. Just wanted to add it, because it has some benefits.
perhaps this will help: http://www.php.net//manual/en/function.func-get-args.php
$args = func_get_args();
if(!isset($arg[0])) {
echo 'no argument';
}
or
isset(func_get_arg(0));
Passing "null", "0", or "false" means that you allocate memory to store a variable, regardless it's scope, type, or size. Then it is used as a parameter to a function.
In PHP you cannot override functions by arguments, but you can access them by calling the "func_get_args()", and this is the only way to handle different numbers / types of arguments passed to a function:
function do_something() {
$args = func_get_args();
//do_something(stdClass, 1)
if($args[0] instanceof stdClass && is_numeric($args[1])) {
//handle
//return
//do_something(1, "string")
} else if(is_numeric($args[0]) && is_string($args[1])) {
//handle
//return
}
throw new Exception('invalid arguments');
}
do_something(new StdClass(), 100); //ok
do_something(100, "hell world") // ok
do_someting(); //throws Exception('invalid arguments');
In PHP 7, you can do:
function action(...$args) {
if (count($args) === 0) {
return action_default();
}
$var1 = array_shift($args);
$var2 = array_shift($args);
$var3 = array_shift($args);
// etc.
}
Related
Is there a way in PHP to use a function which has optional parameters in its declaration where I do not have to pass an optional arguments which already have values declared and just pass the next argument(s) which have different values that are further down the parameter list.
Assuming I have a function that has 4 arguments, 2 mandatory, 2 optional. I don't want to use null values for the optional arguments. In usage, there are cases where I want to use the function and the value of the 3rd argument is the same as the default value but the value of the 4th argument is different.
I am looking for a not so verbose solution that allows me to just pass the argument that differs from the default value without considering the order in the function declaration.
createUrl($host, $path, $protocol='http', $port = 80) {
//doSomething
return $protocol.'://'.$host.':'.$port.'/'.$path;
}
I find myself repeating declaring variables so that I could use a function i.e to use $port, I redeclare $protocol with the default value outside the function scope i.e
$protocol = "http";
$port = 8080;
Is there any way to pass the 2nd optional parameter($port) without passing $protocol and it would "automatically" fill in the default value of $protocol i.e
getHttpUrl($server, $path, $port);
This is possible in some languages like Dart in the form of Named Optional parameters.See usage in this SO thread. Is their a similar solution in PHP
You could potentially use a variadic function for this.
Example:
<?php
function myFunc(...$args){
$sum = 0;
foreach ($args as $arg) {
$sum += $arg;
}
return $sum;
}
Documentation:
http://php.net/manual/en/functions.arguments.php#functions.variable-arg-list
PHP doesn't allow at this state to call functions parameters in the order we want.Maybe in the future it will.However you can easily achieve your purpose by using an associative array as the only argument, and then define, the default parameter in the function.For the call you will need to pass an array with only the values which interest you.This array will be merged with the default array.You can even implement required parameters and call them in any order you want.
example:
function mysweetcode($argument){
$required=['first'];//specify required parameters here
$default=['first'=>0,'second'=>1,'third'=>2];//define all parameters with their default values here
$missing=[];
if(!is_array($argument)) return false;
$argument=array_intersect_key($argument,$default);
foreach($required as $k=>$v){//check for missing required parameters
if(!isset($argument[$v]))
$missing[]=$v;
}
if(!empty($missing)){// if required are missing trigger or throw error according to the PHP version
$cm=count($missing);
if (version_compare(PHP_VERSION, '7.0.0') < 0) {
trigger_error(call_user_func_array('sprintf',
array_merge(array('Required '.(($cm>1)?'parameters:':'parameter:').
str_repeat('%s,',$cm).(($cm>1)?' are':' is').' missing'),$missing)),
E_USER_ERROR);
}else{
throw new Error(call_user_func_array('sprintf',array_merge(
array('Required '.(($cm>1)?'parameters:':'parameter:').
str_repeat('%s',$cm).(($cm>1)?' are':' is').' missing'),$missing)));
}
}
$default=array_merge($default,$argument);//assign given values to parameters
extract($default);/*extract the parameters to allow further checking
and other operations in the function or method*/
unset($required,$missing,$argument,$default,$k,$v);//gain some space
//then you can use $first,$second,$third in your code
return $first+$second+$third;
}
var_dump(mysweetcode(['first'=>9,'third'=>8]));//the output is 18
var_dump(mysweetcode(['third'=>8]));//this throws Error on PHP7 and trigger fatal error on PHP5
You can check a live working code here
Well, this should work:
function myFunc($arg1, $arg2, $arg3=null, $arg4= null){
if ( is_null( $arg3 ) && is_null( $arg4 ) {
$arg3 = 3;
$arg4 = 4;
} else if ( is_null( $arg4 ) ) {
$arg4 = $arg3;
$arg3 = 3;
}
echo $arg1 + $arg2 + $arg3 + $arg4;
}
However I suggest you to rethink your problem (as a whole) because this is not a very good idea.
You could refactor this to use a parameter object; this way, you could include the default parameters in this object and set them in any order (with a trade-off of more verbose code). As an example using your above code,
<?php
class AdditionParameters
{
private $arg1 = 0;
private $arg2 = 0;
private $arg3 = 3;
private $arg4 = 4;
public function getArg1() { return $this->arg1; }
public function getArg2() { return $this->arg2; }
public function getArg3() { return $this->arg3; }
public function getArg4() { return $this->arg4; }
public function setArg1($value) { $this->arg1 = $value; return $this; }
public function setArg2($value) { $this->arg2 = $value; return $this; }
public function setArg3($value) { $this->arg3 = $value; return $this; }
public function setArg4($value) { $this->arg4 = $value; return $this; }
}
From there, you could simply call the function while passing in this new object.
function myFunc(AdditionParameters $request) {
return $request->getArg1()
+ $request->getArg2()
+ $request->getArg3()
+ $request->getArg4();
}
echo myFunc((new AdditionParameters)->setArg1(1)->setArg2(2)->setArg4(6));
// or echo myFunc((new AdditionParameters)->setArg1(1)->setArg4(6)->setArg2(2));
Otherwise, PHP doesn't allow you to have named optional parameters. (e.g. myFunc(1, 2, DEFAULT, 4);)
You have the response in your question, you can declare your function like
function myFunc($arg1, $arg2, $arg3 = null, $arg4 = null){
//here you check if the $arg3 and $arg4 are null
}
then you call your function using
myFunc($arg1, $arg2);
There is no such way in PHP(like in python for example).
You have to use some tricks in order to do that but will not always work.
For example:
// creates instances of a class with $properties.
// if $times is bigger than 1 an array of instances will be returned instead.(this is just an example function)
function getInstance($class, $properties = [], $times = 1){
//my code
}
$user = getInstance("User", ["name" => "John"]); // get one instance
$users = getInstance("User", ["name" => "John"],2); // get two instances.
If you want to use the function without passing the $parameters argument, like this:
$users = getInstance("User",2);
you can change the function to:
// creates instances of a class with $properties.
// if times is bigger than 1 an array of instances will be returned instead.
function getInstance($class, $properties = [], $times = 1){
if(is_numberic($properties)){
$times = $properties;
$properties = [];
}
//my code
}
Of course, this strategy will work only if you parameters have different types.
PS. This method is use in the Laravel Framework a lot. From there I got the inspiration.
This is modified from one of the answers and allows arguments to be added in any order using associative arrays for the optional arguments
function createUrl($host, $path, $argument = []){
$optionalArgs = [
'protocol'=>'http',
'port'=>80];
if( !is_array ($argument) ) return false;
$argument = array_intersect_key($argument,$optionalArgs);
$optionalArgs = array_merge($optionalArgs,$argument);
extract($optionalArgs);
return $protocol.'://'.$host.':'.$port.'/'.$path;
}
//No arguments with function call
echo createUrl ("www.example.com",'no-arguments');
// returns http://www.example.com:80/no-arguments
$argList=['port'=>9000];
//using port argument only
echo createUrl ("www.example.com",'one-args', $argList);
//returns http://www.example.com:9000/one-args
//Use of both parameters as arguments. Order does not matter
$argList2 = ['port'=>8080,'protocol'=>'ftp'];
echo createUrl ("www.example.com",'two-args-no-order', $argList2);
//returns ftp://www.example.com:8080/two-args-no-order
As of version 8.0, PHP now has named arguments. If you name the arguments when calling the function, you can pass them in any order and you can skip earlier default values without having to explicitly pass a value for them.
For example:
function createUrl($host, $path, $protocol = 'http', $port = 80)
{
return "$protocol://$host:$port/$path";
}
createUrl(host: 'example.com', path: 'foo/bar', port: 8080);
// returns: "http://example.com:8080/foo/bar"
How may I use this function and inform only the first and the last arguments?
Function
function foo($first = false, $second = false, $third = false, $last = false)
{
if($first && $last)
{
echo 'ok';
}
}
I've tried the code below, but it didn't work...
foo($first = true, $last = true);
PHP doesn't do named arguments as python does. See this question for more info.
However, life can be made easier by using other techniques like...
Modify the signature of the function to accept arguments as an associative array
Function
function foo($parameters)
{
// Provide default values if parameters are not specified
$first = isset($parameters['first']) ? $parameters['first'] : false;
$second = isset($parameters['second']) ? $parameters['second'] : false;
$third = isset($parameters['third']) ? $parameters['third'] : false;
$last = isset($parameters['last']) ? $parameters['last'] : false;
if($first && $last)
{
echo 'ok';
}
}
Call
foo(['first' => true, 'last' => true]);
This way is suitable when you have a number of parameters big and variative enough and you have a complex logic inside the function so that writing all this code pays off.
It is not very convenient, however, because the default values are specified not in an obvious way, there's extra code and it's hard to track parameter usages.
Modify the signature of the function to accept a parameter object which holds all the necessary info
This is the way to go for complex signatures and especially if you have a cascade of methods which use the same arguments. I love it because it solved a big problem with passing up to 10 query parameters through processing pipeline. Now it's just one object with possibility to find every parameter usage and friendly autosuggestion of available parameters when typing ->.
Parameter object class
class ParameterObject
{
public $first = false;
public $second = false;
public $third = false;
public $last = false;
}
Function
function foo(ParameterObject $paramObj)
{
if($paramObj->first && $paramObj->last)
{
echo 'ok';
}
}
Call
$paramObj = new ParameterObject();
$paramObj->first = true;
$paramObj->last = true;
foo($paramObj);
Note! You can modify the object to use method for setting parameters which will provide you with possibility of chaining if you return $this in every set method. So the function call would like like this:
$paramObj = new ParameterObject();
foo($paramObj->setFirst(true)->setSecond(true));
maybe
foo(true, false, false, true);
or change the position of arguments like
function foo($first, $last, $second=false, $third=false)
foo(true, true);
?
if you want to use last argument of function in php you must enter all argument before it and you can't use name of arguments when call functions. in some language like swift can call function with name of argument but not in php
Consider this scenario where I want to SOMETIMES pass data through to my view:
public function show($orderId)
{
if ($sometimesTrue == true)
{
$optionalParameter = 'optional parameter';
}
return view('show', compact([$a, $b, $c, $optionalParameter]));
}
$optionalParameter is not always set, so I want to know what my options are for setting individual, optional view parameters without re-arranging the structure of the function.
In Zend, the following is possible:
$this->view->optionalParameter = $optionalParameter;
Which can go anywhere in the controller method, not just at the end where the view is instantiated. Of course, back in Laravel, I could do something this:
public function show($orderId)
{
$paramaterArray = [$a, $b, $c];
if ($sometimesTrue == true)
{
$optionalParameter = 'optional parameter';
$paramaterArray[] = $optionalParameter;
}
return view('show', compact($paramaterArray));
}
But re-arranging entire functions because a optional parameter is introduced seems a bit limiting. Is there any way I can set an individual parameter for a view?
You can just built your own protected function + protected property in the Controller class. You could do something like this:
Beneath is using the splat operator so it will only work in php 5.6 >=
protected $optionalParameter;
protected function optionalcompact(...$parameters) {
if(!empty($this->optionalParameter)){
return compact($parameters, $this->optionalParameter);
} else {
return compact($parameters);
}
}
Then back in your own built controller class you can do this:
public function show($orderId)
{
if ($sometimesTrue == true)
{
$this->optionalParameter = 'optional parameter';
}
return view('show', $this->optionalcompact($a, $b, $c));
}
I would simply use the following
public function show($orderId)
{
$paramaterArray = [$a, $b, $c];
$paramaterArray['optional'] = $sometimesTrue == true ? 'optional parameter' : '';
return view('show', $paramaterArray);
}
Since this is an optional parameter so I don't need to check every time in my view whether it's set or not, simply {{ $optional }} will work better, it'll be printed if any value is set or nothing will be printed if the $optional variable is empty. This way, I'll remain consistant.
Also, you may check the Larave's View Composers, it may help you.
Researching further, it seems that using compact with the names of the variables (as opposed to the variables themselves) will silently ignore the missing variable which gives the intended behaviour:
$var1 = 'bob';
$var2 = 'nigel';
var_dump(compact('var1', 'var2', 'var3'));
Returns:
array(2) { ["var1"]=> string(3) "bob" ["var2"]=> string(5) "nigel" }
Which works perfectly for my scenario. Using it this way, the controller method doesn't require refactoring and no additional coding is required. Whether relying on compact to not issue a warning is good coding practice is another question.
Just to confirm, calling compact with the variables themselves WILL throw a notice warning:
$var1 = 'bob';
$var2 = 'nigel';
var_dump(compact($var1, $var2, $var3));
Returns:
NOTICE Undefined variable: var3 on line number 4
I'm trying to write a simple function which takes two arguments, adds them together and returns the result of the calculation.
Before performing the calculation the function checks whether either of the two arguments are undefined and if so, sets the argument to 0.
Here's my function:
Function - PHP
function returnZeroAdd ($arg, $arg2)
{
if(!isset($arg))
{
$arg = 0;
}
if(!isset($arg2))
{
$arg2 = 0;
}
echo $arg + $arg2;
}
I've tried to execute it like so :
returnZeroAdd($bawtryReturnCount, $bawtryFReturnCount);
But this throws up an undefined variable $bawtryFReturnCount error.
I do not know why the function isn't setting $bawtryFReturnCount) to 0 before performing the calculation thereby negating the 'undefined variable' error.
Can anybody provide a solution?
You cannot do this the way you want. As soon as you use an undefined variable, you will get this error. So the error doesn't occur inside your function, but already occurs in the call to your function.
1. Optional parameters
You might make a parameter optional, like so:
function returnZeroAdd ($arg = 0, $arg2 = 0)
{
return $arg + $arg2;
}
This way, the parameter is optional, and you can call the function like this:
echo returnZeroAdd(); // 0
echo returnZeroAdd(1); // 1
echo returnZeroAdd(1, 1); // 2
2. By reference
But I'm not sure if that is what you want. This call will still fail:
echo returnZeroAdd($undefinedVariable);
That can be solved by passing the variables by reference. You can then check if the values are set and if so, use them in the addition.
<?php
function returnZeroAdd (&$arg, &$arg2)
{
$result = 0;
if(isset($arg))
{
$result += $arg;
}
if(isset($arg2))
{
$result += $arg2;
}
return $result;
}
echo returnZeroAdd($x, $y);
Note that you will actually change the original value of a by reference parameter, if you change it in the function. That's why I changed the code in such a way that the parameters themselves are not modified. Look at this simplified example to see what I mean:
<?php
function example(&$arg)
{
if(!isset($arg))
{
$arg = 0;
}
return $arg;
}
echo example($x); // 0
echo $x // also 0
Of course that might be your intention. If so, you can safely set $arg and $arg2 to 0 inside the function.
The error is not thrown by the function itself, as the function is not aware of the global scope. The error is thrown before even the function is executed, while the PHP interperter is trying to pass $bawtryFReturnCount to the function, one does not find it, and throws error, however, it's not a fatal one and the execution is not stopped. THerefore, the function is executed with a non-set variable with default value of null, where I guess, isset will not work, as the arguments are mandatory, but not optional. A better check here will be empty($arg), however the error will still be present.
Because the functions are not and SHOULD NOT be aware of the global state of your application, you should do these checks from outside the functions and then call it.
if (!isset($bawtryReturnCount)) {
$bawtryReturnCount = 0
}
returnZeroAdd($bawtryReturnCount);
Or assign default values to the arguments in the function, making them optional instead of mandatory.
Your function could be rewritten as:
function returnZeroAdd ($arg = 0, $arg2 = 0)
{
echo $arg + $arg2;
}
You missunderstand how variables work. Since $bawtryFReturnCount isn't defined when you call the function; you get a warning. Your isset-checks performs the checks too late. Example:
$bawtryReturnCount = 4;
$bawtryFReturnCount = 0;
returnZeroAdd($bawtryReturnCount, $bawtryFReturnCount);
Will not result in an error.
If you really want to make the check inside the function you could pass the arguments by reference:
function returnZeroAdd (&$arg, &$arg2)
{
if(!isset($arg))
{
$arg = 0;
}
if(!isset($arg2))
{
$arg2 = 0;
}
echo $arg + $arg2;
}
However this will potentially modify your arguments outside the function, if it is not what you intend to do then you need this:
function returnZeroAdd (&$arg, &$arg2)
{
if(!isset($arg))
{
$localArg = 0;
}
else
{
$localArg = $arg;
}
if(!isset($arg2))
{
$localArg2 = 0;
}
else
{
$localArg2 = $arg2;
}
echo $localArg + $localArg2;
}
You can now pass undefined variables, it won't throw any error.
Alternatively you might want to give a default value to your arguments (in your case 0 seems appropriate):
function returnZeroAdd ($arg = 0, $arg2 = 0)
{
echo $arg + $arg2;
}
You have to define the variable before pass it to an function. for example
$bawtryReturnCount=10;
$bawtryFReturnCount=5;
define the two variable with some value and pass it to that function.
function returnZeroAdd ($arg=0, $arg2=0)
{
echo $arg + $arg2;
}
if you define a function like this means the function takes default value as 0 if the argument is not passed.
for example you can call the functio like this
returnZeroadd();// print 0
returnZeroadd(4);// print 4
returnZeroadd(4,5);// print 9
or you can define two variables and pass it as an argument and call like this.
$bawtryReturnCount=10;
$bawtryFReturnCount=5;
returnZeroadd($bawtryReturnCount, $bawtryFReturnCount);
I have lots of code like this in my constructors:-
function __construct($params) {
$this->property = isset($params['property']) ? $params['property'] : default_val;
}
Some default values are taken from other properties, which was why I was doing this in the constructor. But I guess it could be done in a setter instead.
What are the pros and cons of this method and is there a better one?
Edit: I have some dependencies where if a property is not supplied in the $params array then the value is taken from another property, however that other property may be optional and have a default value, so the order in which properties are initialized matters.
This means that if I used getters and setters then it is not obvious which order to call them in because the dependencies are abstracted away in the getter instead of being in the constructer...
I would suggest you, to write proper getter/setter functions, which assert you the correct data-type and validations (and contain your mentioned default-value logic). Those should be used inside your constructor.
When setting multiple fields, which depend on each other, it seems to be nice to have a separate setter for this complex data. In which kind of way are they depending anyway?
e.g.:
// META-Config
protected $static_default_values = array(
"price" => 0.0,
"title" => "foobar"
// and so on
);
protected $fallback_getter = array(
"price" => "getfallback_price"
);
// Class Logic
public function __construct($params){
$this->set_properties($params);
}
public set_properties($properties){
// determines the sequence of the setter-calls
$high_prio_fields = array("price", "title", "unimportant_field");
foreach($high_prio_fields as $field){
$this->generic_set($field, $properties[$field]);
// important: unset fields in properties-param to avoid multiple calls
unset($properties[$field]);
}
foreach($properties as $field => $value){
$this->generic_set($field, $value);
}
}
// this could also be defined within the magic-setter,
// but be aware, that magic-functions can't be resolved by your IDE completely
// for code-completion!
private function generic_set($field, $value){
// check if setter exists for given field-key
$setter_func = "set_".$v;
if(method_exists($this, $setter_func){
call_user_func_array(array($this, $setter_func), array($v));
}
// else => just discard :)
}
// same comment as generic-set
private function generic_get($field){
// check if value is present in properties array
if(isset($this->properties[$field]){
return $this->properties[$field];
}
// check if fallback_getter is present
if(isset($this->fallback_getter[$field]){
return call_user_func_array(array($this, $this->fallback_getter[$field]));
}
// check for default-value in meta-config
if(isset($this->static_default_values[$field]){
return $this->static_default_values[$field];
}
// else => fail (throw exception or return NULL)
return null;
}
public function get_price(){
// custom getter, which ovverrides generic get (if you want to)
// custom code...
return $this->generic_get("price");
}
private function getfallback_price(){
return $this->properties["other_value"] * $this->properties["and_another_value"];
}
public function set_price($price){
$price = (float) $price; // convert to correct data-type
if($price >= 0.0){
$this->properties["price"] = $price;
}
// else discard setting-func, because given parameter seems to be invalid
// optional: throw exception or return FALSE on fail (so you can handle this on your own later)
}
Update to your edit:
the modified source-code should solve all your demands (order of setter-funcs, different resolvings of get-value).
Create "globally available" function array_get.
public static function array_get($array, $property, $default_value = null) {
return isset($array[$property]) ? $array[$property] : $default_value;
}
When having a lot of default options and you need to be able to overwrite them - as you have maybe seen in jQuery using .extend() before - I like to use this simple and quick method:
class Foo {
private $options;
public function __construct($override = array()) {
$defaults = array(
'param1' => 'foo',
'param2' => ...,
'paramN' => 'someOtherDefaultValue');
$this->options= array_replace_recursive($defaults, $override);
}
}
Especially for getting classes started this is a very easy and flexible way, but as already has been mentioned if that code is going to be heavily used then it probably not a bad idea to introduce some more control over those options with getters and setters, especially if you need to take actions when some of those options are get or set, like in your case dependencies if I understood your problem correctly.
Also note that you don't have to implement getters and setters yourself, in PHP you can use the __get and __set magic methods.
It follows some useless code that hopefully gives some ideas:
[...inside Foo...]
public function __set($key, $value){
switch(true){
//option exists in this class
case isset($this->options[$key]):
//below check if $value is callable
//and use those functions as "setter" handlers
//they could resolve dependencies for example
$this->options[$key] = is_callable($value) ? $value($key) : $value;
break;
//Adds a virtual setter to Foo. This so called 'magic' __set method is also called if the property doesn't exist in the class, so you can add arbitrary things.
case $key === 'someVirtualSetterProp': Xyzzy::Noop($value); break;
default:
try{ parent::__set($key, $value); } catch(Exception $e){ /* Oops, fix it! */ }
}
}
Note that in the above examples I squeezed in different approaches and it usually doesn't make sense to mix them like that. I did this only to illustrate some ideas and hopefully you will be able to decide better what suits your needs.