I have a php-file on my server that contains lots of static php functions - and they are loaded every time someone visits a page on my website. Unfortunatelly, loading them every time takes approximatelly 10%-30% of the whole execution time for my webpage.
Like I said, these functions are global and needed on every page - basically just like the normal PHP functions (e.g. rand(), die(), microtime()). And as far as I know, loading these functions doesn't take up any performance speed. I guess they're saved somewhere in RAM, Apache or whatsoever - I'm not an expert at this point.
However, is there a way to tell my server to keep my own global functions in mind for every PHP page? Without having to load them every time?
Use PHP APC (Alternative PHP Cache).
The way PHP works is the server compiles PHP to byte code and then executes it.
The benefit of APC is that it caches the byte code and re-uses it for subsequent requests.
What you are thinking may not be possible using pure PHP. You may checkout HACK(from FB).
if you just want to make your page load faster. You can just replace the rand() function from your code. It will make you site load faster. Find a suitable alternative to rand() function and replace rand.
Related
I'm trying to figure out why my pages are taking so long to load. I have a page with like 30 calls to get_template_directory_uri() and the implementation of that function makes calls to the database, but the value returned by the function is the same for the entirety of my page generation. Therefore I should probably do something like
$tduri = get_template_directory_uri();
and use $tduri as needed, at least as a good practice, but is this totally necessary or would the value of get_template_directory_uri() have been cached anyways?
PHP does not cache return values of functions by itself. In your case the function is making a call to an external database, so how could PHP even know if the result was the same or different each time the function was called?
Also consider that any call to an external system is highly likely to be slower than storing a variable within a PHP script.
So yes, absolutely, cache the return value somewhere suitable and always test whether it makes a noticeable improvement, sometimes the results can be suprising. There are many good ways to profile PHP, microtime is very quick for ad-hoc testing without requiring additional set-up. Search for 'PHP profiling' to get the more powerful tools.
I'm building a feature of a site that will generate a PDF (using TCPDF) into a booklet of 500+ pages. The layout is very simple but just due to the number of records I think it qualifies as a "long running php process". This will only need to be done a handful of times per year and if I could just have it run in the background and email the admin when done, that would be perfect. Considered Cron but it is a user-generated type of feature.
What can I do to keep my PDF rendering for as long as it takes? I am "good" with PHP but not so much with *nix. Even a tutorial link would be helpful.
Honestly you should avoid doing this entirely from a scalability perspective. I'd use a database table to "schedule" the job with the parameters, have a script that is continuously checking this table. Then use JavaScript to poll your application for the file to be "ready", when the file is ready then let the JavaScript pull down the file to the client.
It will be incredibly hard to maintain/troubleshoot this process while you're wondering why is my web server so slow all of a sudden. Apache doesn't make it easy to determine what process is eating up what CPU.
Also by using a database you can do things like limit the number of concurrent threads, or even provide faster rendering time by letting multiple processes render each PDF page and then re-assemble them together with yet another process... etc.
Good luck!
What you need is to change the allowed maximum execution time for PHP scripts. You can do that by several means from the script itself (you should prefer this if it would work) or by changing php.ini.
BEWARE - Changing execution time might seriously lower the performance of your server. A script is allowed to run only a certain time (30sec by default) before it is terminated by the parser. This helps prevent poorly written scripts from tying up the server. You should exactly know what you are doing before you do this.
You can find some more info about:
setting max-execution-time in php.ini here http://www.php.net/manual/en/info.configuration.php#ini.max-execution-time
limiting the maximum execution time by set_time_limit() here http://php.net/manual/en/function.set-time-limit.php
PS: This should work if you use PHP to generate the PDF. It will not work if you use some stuff outside of the script (called by exec(), system() and similar).
This question is already answered, but as a result of other questions / answers here, here is what I did and it worked great: (I did the same thing using pdftk, but on a smaller scale!)
I put the following code in an iframe:
set_time_limit(0); // ignore php timeout
//ignore_user_abort(true); // optional- keep on going even if user pulls the plug*
while(ob_get_level())ob_end_clean();// remove output buffers
ob_implicit_flush(true);
This avoided the page load timeout. You might want to put a countdown or progress bar on the parent page. I originally had the iframe issuing progress updates back to the parent, but browser updates broke that.
I have a website that's about 10-12 pages strong, using jQuery/Javascript throughout. Since not all scripts are necessary in each and every page, I'm currently using a switchstatement to output only the needed JS on any given page, so as to reduce the number of requests.
My question is, how efficient is that, performance-wise ? If it is not, is there any other way to selectively load only the needed JS on a page ?
This may not be necessary at all.
Bear in mind that if your caching is properly set up, embedding a JavaScript will take time only on first load - every subsequent request will come from the cache.
Unless you have big exceptions (like, a specific page using a huge JS library), I would consider embedding everything at all times, maybe using minification so everything is in one small file.
I don't see any performance issues with the method you are using, though. After all, it's about deciding whether to output a line of code or not. Use whichever method is most readable and maintainable in the long term.
Since you're using JS already, you can use JS solution completely - for example you could use yepnope instead of php. I don't know what's the structure of your website and how you determine which page needs what or at what point is something included (on load, on after some remote thing has finished delivering data), however if you use $.ajax extensively, you could also use yepnope to pull additional JS that's needed once $.ajax is done with what it was supposed to do.
You can safely assume the javascript is properly cached on the clientside.
As I also assume you serve a minified file, seen the size of your website I'd say the performance is neglectable.
It is much better to place ALL your JavaScript in a single separate ".js" file and reference this file in your pages.
The reason is that the browser will cache this file efficiently and it will only be downloaded once per session (or less!).
The only downside is you need to "refresh" a couple of times if you change your script.
So, after tinkering a bit, I decided to give LABjs a try. It does work well, and my code is much less bloated as a result. No noticeable increase in performance given the size of my site, but the code is much, much more maintainable now.
Funny thing is, I had a facebook like button in my header. After analyzing the requests in firebug I decided to remove it, and gained an astounding 2 seconds on the pages loading time. Holy crap is this damn thing inneficient...
Thanks for the answers all !
I know of these two tricks for speeding page load time up some:
#ini_set('zlib.output_compression', 1);
which turns on compression
ob_implicit_flush(true);
which implicitly flushes the output buffer, meaning as soon as anything is output it is immediately sent to the user's browser. This one's a tad tricky, since it just creates the illusion that the page is loading quickly while in actuality it takes the same amount of time and the data is just being shown faster.
What other php tricks are there to make your pages load (or appear to load) faster?
It is always better to define a real bottleneck and then try to avoid it.
The way to follow any trick that is supposed to make something faster without understanding whether you have the problem or not - is always a wrong way.
The best way is to ensure that your script isn't creating/destroying unnecessary variables and make everything as efficient as possible. After that, you can look into a caching service so that the server does not have to reparse specific parts of a page.
If all that doesn't make it as fast as you need it to be, you can even "compile" the php code. Facebook does this to support faster load times. They created something called "HipHop for PHP" and you can read about it at: https://developers.facebook.com/blog/post/358/
There are other PHP compilers you can use to help.
If all this fails, then I suggest you either recode the website in a different language, or figure out why it is taking so long (more specifically, WHAT is causing it to take so long) and change that part of the website.
There are some that can speed your website(code custmoization)
1) If you’re looping through an array, for example, count() it beforehand, store the value in a variable, and use that for your test. This way, you avoid needlessly firing the test function with every loop iteration.
2) use build in function instead of custom function
3) put JavaScript function and files at bottom of file
4) use caching
Among the best tricks to speed up PHP page loads is to use as little PHP as possible, i.e. use a PHP cache/accelerator such as Zend or APC, or cache as much as you can yourself. PHP that does not need to be parsed again is faster, and PHP that does not run at all is still faster.
The same goes (maybe even more so) for database. Use as few queries as possible. If you can combine two queries into one, you save one round trip.
I've worked on a CMS which would use Smarty to build the content pages as PHP files, then save them to disc so all subsequent views of the same page could bypass the generation phase, keeping DB load and page loading times down. These pages would be completely standalone and not have to run in the context of another script.
The problem was the instance where a user first visited a page that wasn't cached, they'd still have to be displayed the generated content. I was hoping I could save my generated file, then include() it, but filesystem latency meant that this wasn't an option.
The only solution I could find was using eval() to run the generated string after it was generated and saved to disc. While this works, it's not nice to have to debug in, so I'd be very interested in finding an alternative.
Is there some method I could use other than eval in the above case?
Given your scenario, I do not think there is an alternative.
As for the debugging part, you could always write it to disc and include it for the development to test / fix it up that way and then when you have the bugs worked out, switch it over to eval.
Not knowing your system, I will not second guess that you know it better than I do, but it seems like a lot of effort, especially since that the above scenario will only happen once per page...ever. I would just say is it really worth it for that one instance to display the initial page through eval and why could you not be the initial user to generate the pages?