I am using MySQL as a back end storage.
I was asked by our risk management team to encrypt all the data prior storing it into the database.
Since then I have been doing research on how to secure the data going in and out the database.
I found couple ways one of them was MySQL Encryption Software
A second solution was to encrypt and decrypt data in MySQL using AES_ENCRYPT() AND AES_DECRYPT(). But I will need to create a 128,196 or 256 bit key in order to be able to encrypt and decrypt the data. Then every time I want to execute INSERT/UPDATE I will call AES_ENCRYPT() and supply it with a key to encrypt the data. Then when I execute SELECT then I will have to call AES_DECRYPT() and supply the same key to convert the data to a plain text.
This means that I will have to define a variable in my PHP script that have the private key so I can encrypt/decrypt by supplying the defined variable to both AES_ENCRYPT() and AES_DECRYPT()
My question is
Where/How to a store this private key to prevent a hacker from reading it. if someone hacks my server reads the key then he can simply read the data and the encryption would be mean less.
And what is the best way to go about securing my data?
Thank you
The issue you are facing is not a key issue but an issue of security of the rest of your computer. Using mysql means that mysql (if running safely) is running in it's own account. You would in fact put the keys in your mysql-owned directory. That secures much of mysql. MySql itself needs to have access to that key, so there is not much more you can do for that account. Just make sure it is readable only by the owning account.
If you hide your key and the hacker gets to your PHP code the hacker could do the following:
A. Echo/Print the KEY (it's a variable). He doesn't have to find the code where you define it, he could look for the function where you use it.
B. Forget about the KEY and use your own decrypting function to see the data and export it.
Most of the hacks are exploits to your PHP code, you should secure your computer, system and database.
Use MYSQL Stored Procedures
If only an authenticated user can get the key you could do this... Hide the KEY in a MYSQL STORED PROCEDURE and only give the key to the user when he completes the log in. All the data in the database should be encrypted and the key is not accesible as plain stored data. It should be inside the SQL Stored Procedure that a user having a password will get as query result. Users table should not be encrypted, only the password as one way.
This last solution should work only for authenticated users, like apps as example. You could protect the user profiles easily with this solution.
Users (basic data) --> Profiles (all personal details that depend upon log in)
I don't know much about stored procedures, but for sure you could apply it to the entire database and make your data accesible only through them.
Look at this article:
http://www.sitepoint.com/stored-procedures-mysql-php/
And you will find PROS and CONS here:
http://code.tutsplus.com/articles/an-introduction-to-stored-procedures-in-mysql-5--net-17843
Related
I'm currently upgrading the security on one of the platforms I seal with. But, I am unable to crack how to securely store my encryption/decryption key.
Current setup:
MySQL server
Webserver
I need to store and read all sensitive data in the database using AES_ENCRYPT/AES_DECRYPT. But, the key for which the data is encrypted/decrypted I would like to store securely. So, in the case where someone gains access to the database or the webserver, they won't be able easily guess the key combination or read it out of a config file.
The key can change depending on the data I need to read/write.
Is this at all possible? First option I thought of was just to use a key combination based on some columns on the data I needed to read. But, that makes it possible to guess by looking at the code if someone was to get hold of both source code & database.
Any thoughts?
An easy and secure way to store your keys is by using a key management service like AWS KMS.
They (should) store keys on FIPS-140-2 validated hardware security modules which are designed for key storing and loading.
Online key management services do that in bulk and provide an api to use your key.
They are the industry standard and should be used to store keys securely since storing them in files or in the database can be secure but doesn't garantuee it.
I find myself in a situation where I have a set of users on a site who all have stored usernames and passwords that allow them to automatically access third party services via SOAP. The idea is that each user should only need to log in to the main site to gain access to multiple services, using their respective stored user info for each service. I feel like such data should be encrypted in my database when stored and then automatically decrypted when it's passed to the php/SOAP function when the user needs to access a given service. What would be the best way to accomplish this?
I've had a look at AES_ENCRYPT, but it seems as though the encryption and decryption makes use of a key that would have to be stored in my code, in plain text...which doesn't seem like the brightest thing to do. Anyway, this is my first time out on something like this (if you couldn't tell); if you could give me some pointers on how I should approach this, I'd really appreciate it.
Many thanks in advance
You stumbled over the biggest problem with encrypting data in the database:
➽ Where to store the key?
Encryption cannot solve the problem of securing data, it can only "concentrate" it to a key. Wherever you store the key, your application must be able to decrypt the data, so can do an attacker. There are two possible solutions to this problem i know of:
Place the key in a place as secure as you can. That means, it should surely be placed outside of the www-root directory in an inaccessible directory on the server. Depending on the importance of the data, you can also consider to outsource encryption to another dedicated server.
Don't store a key at all and derive it from the user password. This is the only really safe way, because not even the server can decrypt the data then. The cons are of course, that the user needs to enter the password every time he uses your service. If the user changes the password, you need to re-encrypt all data. If the user forgets the password, the data is lost.
P.S. I would recommend to encrypt the data before storing it to the database, because MySQL AES_ENCRYPT uses the ECB mode without an IV. This allows to search for a certain value, but is less secure (i'm pretty sure that you don't want to search by password).
I have a website that users submit sensitive data to it then a php script encrypts these sensitive data using rijndael 256 and store it in mysql database
the problem is that I want to store the key in a secure place that can be accessed only by the php script and not to be seen by any other one
Depends on how high a security you need for the data. You could consider having a different security key for each user, by possibly encrypting the data that identifies that particular customer and attaching it onto the 256-bit encrypted key. But better still would be split the key up and insert that encrypted data throughout the key. Makes it more complex to decipher. This would mean if a programmer has access to the key the programmer can't simply decrypt everyones data without having access to the customer encrypted data as well which would be different for every user.
And yes it is true that the programmer can still echo the key out to the screen but they would ALSO need the customer encrypted data for each customer they want to decrypt the data of.
You could also consider Public and Private Key Encryption instead if applicable. The customer/user could generate their own keys. Customer places the public key into a form on the website which gets stored in the database, then the customer/user would have the private key to decrypt the data. You use the public key to encrypt the data. This would mean each user/customer would have their own set of keys. The Private key could possibly be even placed on a keycard and hooked to the computer to verify access.
More information # http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public-key_cryptography
One alternative would be to have the PHP script call an external script (doesn't necessarily have to be another PHP script; it could be anything) that would have access to the key. As long as no one has write access to the external script, or read access to it if you hard-code the key into it, then it should be relatively secure. If you store the key in a separate file, that file needs to be readable/writable only by the owner of the external script.
You could encrypt/decrypt with certificates and have the server request a password for the certificate upon bootup.
The good thing is that your key is only in memory and can be different for every installation/server.
However, this method is quite a pain and generally only works when you have your own system administrators/are not dependent on a third-party hosting provider.
The intermediate solution to generate an encryption key per section/user/client in your database and encrypt the sensitive data with this per client key. These per-client keys are encrypted with a master key and stored in your database, while the master-key is stored somewhere in on disk with minimal priviliges.
This will not safe you when your server gets fully compromised, but does limit the risk in case of -for example- a data-leak/partial compromise.
If the problem is you don't trust a) the programmer or b) the system administrator, you are out of luck.
I'm looking to store some fairly sensitive data using PHP and MySQL and will be using some form of reversible encryption to do so since I need to get the data back out in plain text for it to be of any use.
I'll be deriving the encryption key from the users' username/password combination but I'm stumped for what to do in the (inevitable) event of a password being forgotten. I realise that the purpose of encryption is that it can only be undone using the correct key but this must have been addressed before..
I'm trying to get my head around whether or not public key cryptography would apply to the problem but all I can think of is that the private key will still need to be correct to decrypt the data..
Any ideas?
It's not clear what you are striving for, so advice on how to implement it is hard.
Standards like PGP and S/MIME encrypt each message with a new symmetric key. Those keys are then encrypted for each recipient of the message. This way, instead of duplicating the message (which could be very large) for each recipient, everyone gets the same ciphertext, and only the key (which is small) is duplicated—but encrypted differently for each recipient.
Maybe you could do something similar here, encrypting the key with the user's password, and encrypting another copy with your public key. If the user forgets their password, you can recover the message for them (after an appropriate backup identity verification) using your private key.
The conventional solution is to have a "recovery agent": one user that holds a second password that can be used to decrypt all data. Strict usage policies would apply to using the recovery password, such as putting it physically into a safe.
Then, either encrypt all data twice: once with the user key and once with the recovery key; alternatively, generate a session key for every set of data, and encrypt the data only once, but the session key twice.
For that to work, at least the key of the recovery agent must be asymmetric, since the private part will live in the safe, and the public key in the software.
As yet another alternative using the same scheme: encrypt the user's passwords with the recovery key on password change. This is simpler to implement, but will allow to recover the passwords and not just the data, which may be undesirable.
I'm looking to store some fairly
sensitive data using PHP and MySQL and
will be using some form of reversible
encryption to do so since I need to
get the data back out in plain text
for it to be of any use.
Protecting sensitive data is good. Now:
Whose data is it? (yours, your user's, or a third party?)
What does it need to be protected from? (disclosure, corruption (accidental or intentional...)
Who does it need to be protected from
Uninvolved parties goes without saying.
Do you need / want to avoid accessing the plaintext data yourself (useful for deniability),
Do you need to protect either your user's data from being visible to a third party,
Or a third party's data from the user,
Or your data from the user or a third party?
What are likely attacks?
Do you need to protect in the case where the server is completely compromised?
Do you need to protect against an application level attack where the user simply gains access to some but not all available data (e.g. access to the SQL database, but not the filesystem)?
Will the amount of data be small enough that the attacker can guess and simply check whether he/she got it right? (short passwords, numbers, simple words, fixed form text are likely candidates)
Will the attacker have known plaintext with which to attack?
Is it better for the data to go away (or to re-retrieve the data) if the user forgets their password, or is it worth an increased risk of exposing the data to avoid that cost?
There are probably other questions, but this is the type of thing you want to think about when using encryption. The answers will help you figure out what you need vs. what you want, and will probably help point in the right direction. You might not want to share all of the answers with us.
I'll be deriving the encryption key
from the users' username/password
combination but I'm stumped for what
to do in the (inevitable) event of a
password being forgotten. I realise
that the purpose of encryption is that
it can only be undone using the
correct key but this must have been
addressed before..
You might have decided on a solution without considering the impact. That doesn't mean the solution is wrong, but this question suggests you should think about what you are willing to risk for security. Sometimes data will be risked.
I'm trying to get my head around
whether or not public key cryptography
would apply to the problem but all I
can think of is that the private key
will still need to be correct to
decrypt the data..
This too sounds like a solution in search of a problem. Public key cryptography is useful when you have two (or more) separate actors with an interest in communicating data between them. Those actors can be real (people) or functional (components of a system), but without two actors, there is no reason to have a separate public and private key.
Basically, if you encrypt something, and lose the encryption key, you're screwed.
When it comes to securing data, you need to consider why you're securing it, and what you're attempting to secure it against. And what tradeoffs are worth making in order to do so - the only truly secure system is one that is completely isolated from the internet, which is a level of security that is self-defeating for most applications.
So here are some questions to ask yourself:
If someone compromises my database, is it acceptable for them to be able to access this data?
What if someone compromises my entire application stack?
If the answers to the above two questions are "no", then the key material must be held by the user. And they will lose access to their data if they lose the key.
You can provide an option for manual key recovery if you also have a "master key" that you don't store anywhere near your application, only you hold it and you use it to manually reset passwords. If that's also not an option (say, only the user should be able to access the data, not the system administrator), then you're going to have to make a compromise somewhere.
This is a question I have thought about myself and as I see it the following options are available (with option #1 being the most secure):
Provide no reset password functionality - if they have forgotten their password then they are locked out.
Generate a new secure master key and encrypt & hash the user's key with this master key and store the cipher text and hash result in the database. The secure key is then made known to the user either by adding it to a file that the user downloads, emailing to the user or displaying the secure master key on screen. To reset the password the user would have to enter this master key which is then hashed and compared and if they match, the user's key in the database is decrypted.
Ask the user to provide 2 security questions and answers when registering; hash the answers and store the questions and answer hash in the database. The second answer is used as the master key to encrypt the user's key. To receive a password reset request email the user has to answer the first question correctly. Once they click the link in the email the web page then asks the second question, if this is correct and the query string parameter values are valid then use the answer to the second question to decrypt the user's key.
Use an application global master key (maybe stored in the web/UI application and use this to encrypt and store the user's key. Once a user is verified through a password reset email process the user's key is decrypted using the application global master key and then reencrypted with their new password.
In summary, the benefits of each option is as follows:
This is the ultimate for security and would possibly be the only option if the data was critical to be kept encrypted. However, in the real world people forget their passwords as sure as the sun rises and not providing a reset password function could be a bad commercial decision.
This is secure as the master key is not stored on the front end or database so if the platform is compromised then the data would require some significant effort to decrypt. However, the downside is the user could still lose their master key anyway.
The weakness here is if the database is compromised the answer to the question could be researched and then used to decrypt the users encrypted key.
This approach leaves the application key in the stack leaving your data vulnerable if your platform is hacked. The only protection you have is that if the database server is hacked then the data would still be safe.
As with most things in the world of software development you need to consider what is best for what you are trying to accomplish and aim for the correct balance.
Why are you using a different key for every user?
If you choose one key, it is much easier to handle.
Store your encryption key outside of the database.
Your application will still have to have access to it, but someone with a db dump will not be able to read the encrypted info.
Generate a random session key.
Use the session key to encrypt the data.
Encrypt the random key with any number of user passwords that you need.
This way you can use any user password to decrypt the data.
I have a database that contains user details including sensitive data. They're not as sensitive as financial, but they are sensitive nonetheless. The passwords to the accounts are hashed and salted but the rest can only be encrypted not hashed to allow editing.
How far would you go encrypting the fields? Would you go as far as encrypting everything including generic fields like username, first name, last name, or only fields like address and phone. The first name is used frequently after the user logs in.
Can someone suggest an algorithm (with sample code if available) to encrypt the fields? I use PHP and MySQL primarily.
I wouldn't encrypt the fields at all since it's going to be a royal pain in the rear end :-)
I would instead move sensitive data to a separate table and use the security features of the DBMS itself to protect the data while still allowing access to the non-sensitive data.
In other words, have two tables (user and user_sensitive) tied together with a userID column. Let anyone peruse the user table to their hearts content but access (of any sort) to user_sensitive is restricted to admin-type bods).
And, if my DBMS didn't provide such facilities (I do not know whether MySQL does), I would move to a DBMS that did.
If you want a user to have access to their own sensitive data but not that of other users, we once implemented such a scheme in DB2 by providing a stored procedure. It retrieved all the desired rows but also checked to see which user was executing it. For rows that didn't match that user, the sensitive information was blanked out. The underlying table was fully protected from everyone except the stored procedure itself.
In order for that to work, you would have to be able to run the stored procedure under a different user from the one invoking it. Whether that's possible under MySQL, I have no idea.
I'd google for "transculent databases" - there are both printed books on the subject and some on-line resources.
There are variations of this method but basic idea is to:
encrypt only sensitive fields
encrypt with key from data only the user knows of (like login/password pair)
Password ofc must not be clearly saved in any table. Keys should be held only for session. This way the attacker doesn't have the means to decrypt information whether the database and/or the application is compromised (forgetting for a moment possibility of modifying app code and silently gathering keys).
You want to encrypt the database but still be able to access it using the application. This means that the application needs to have a way to decrypt the data. If the attacker has access to the database, it is quite likely that he will gain access to the application and figures out how to decrypt the database.
You could use transparent disk encryption. However, this only guards against physical access to the disk. It does not add much security if your server is stored somewhere safe.