I am developing a web application using Django and python. We have also a public website where a customer can find information regarding our products. I was thinking to implement this website using WordPress or other well known php CMS, since the content may be modified by people who don't know how to code.
A user must login to access our web application. The login should be located in the public website (built using php and a CMS) along with the registration form. The user model is already implemented in the web application and therefore is not available in the CMS/php. I was thinking to include a login page written in python by means of an iframe. is it a good idea?
Is there a neat solution for this problem? Is a good idea to mix up php/cms and python/Django?
There is an opensource CMS for Django called Mezzanine. Its very elegant.
In some ways, Mezzanine resembles tools such as Wordpress that provide an intuitive interface for managing pages, blog posts, form data, store products, and other types of content. But Mezzanine is also different. Unlike many other platforms that make extensive use of modules or reusable applications, Mezzanine provides most of its functionality by default. This approach yields a more integrated and efficient platform
Follow this link to download and have a look at its features
Regarding you question Is a good idea to mix up php/cms and python/Django?, No, because Django is Python based and wordrepss is PHP based. Although you can sync data by writing different scripts that require some knowledge of both ends.
There is another option https://www.django-cms.org/
This is specially usefull if you have already a django project, because you can add to the project the CMS components, Mezzanine is a very good option too, but you have to start the project from scratch.
Related
I'm hoping to build a website which needs to be done quickly. The website itself should be fairly basic, so I was going to just do that in Wordpress. However, it also needs functionality to allow people to register and then interact (none of this appears on the website, just a link to the user login bit). I think it's going to be easier to build that bit in CakePHP as it has some very specific functionality that I don't think I'd find a WP plugin for.
Is there a way that I can build my website.com in Wordpress and then have something like my website.com/userarea where user area is built in CakePHP?
Yes it's possible, but requires a rather esoteric configuration of your webserver, and that's assuming you are proposing to implement the cakephp part with a front controller architecture. Even if you are a nginx/apache guru I'd recommend running the two components under different vhosts.
An existing 8+ year old application is being migrated from a self-contained website to a webservice-oriented architecture to allow among other things, external parties access to the calculations and data within the application.
The application allows visitors to access insurance-related information, calculate price quotes and contact agents.
The original logic of the application has been extracted from the main application to a SOAP service - so far, so good.
Based on in-house knowledge of Zend FW, the choice was made to drop the legacy code with many downsides and move to a more robust and community-backed framework - Zend.
An initial Zend FW app has been built that consumes the WSDL and allows searching and displaying of customers. After that was finished we wanted to integrate external applications/modules for components such as a basic (!) cms, mass-mailings, polls etc.
As we consider those components essential for the end-product but not our own core-product, we thus want to use external applications for this.
However - looking at e.g. tomatocms and digitalus etc., they seem to require us to build our product into theirs - and we want it the other way around. CMS pages are the exception, and not the rule.
Integrating authentication among these applications seems very difficult, as each seems to want to be 'the' application.
TL;DR:
What would be the best solutions to integrate a CMS or other apps into an existing/in progress zend FW app?
I think the best solution for you is to create a structure for Modules/Plugins where you set a pattern of use and you will make your application understand these modules created following the specifications above.
With this you allow anyone to be creating or developing models desaclopados their application.
I think this is a good example with your Wordpress plugins. Anyone can create and embed its functionality within the application page, but of course you can make in its API limitations, controlling what you want.
I'm working on a web application in Codeigniter. I'd like to integrate the functionality of my application with a CMS so that site admins can easily update the site (about pages, blog, etc). Is this easily done with PyroCMS or another Codeigniter-based CMS? Will I need to drastically restructure my existing app?
From my own experience integrating an app inside Expression Engine I can say that a CMS changes the way you usually work with CI. So be prepared to make some adjustments. Every CMS will come with it's perks and differences. It shouldn't be a big problem though.
If you want to use PyroCms take a look at this doc first:
http://www.pyrocms.com/docs/2.0/developers/creating-custom-modules
If you're looking for alternatives, there are a lot. It seems almost everyone working with CI has made it's own.
Here are a few:
http://www.ionizecms.com/
http://www.halogy.com/
http://codefight.org/
http://www.getfuelcms.com/
Also make sure you check out CI Bonfire, it's not a CMS but does help you when you start up a new project with a basic admin wrapper, which is sometimes more useful than a CMS:
http://cibonfire.com/
This was answered a year ago and answered well, but my support guy has forwarded me a few emails from users asking about this page.
When people talk about Content Management Systems they often suddenly get the idea of rigid backends where you applications have to follow specific rules. While PyroCMS certainly has a few conventions you are free to build your modules just like they are a CodeIgniter application, on the frontend or the backend.
If you want to use Models, Controllers, Views, REST API's, SOAP, whatever the hell, then you can do that.
But, we also offer some awesome tools to make building modules CRAZY-fast. Hate writing CRUD? Well don't bother. Using the Streams API you can leverage the build in "Custom Data" system we use to rock out chunks of interface for you.
Using PyroCMS for your application is certainly not "hacking it into a CMS", this is the exact use-case it was built for.
If you have an existing application, while you can't "put PyroCMS into your app" you can certainly convert your application to a module easy enough.
The simplest way of doing it is to write your models around the CMS' database. Host the CMS at a subdomain with authentication for your admins. (admin.mysite.com) or something and then use the same database to power your front-end for your site.
Is it the best approach? Probably not.
Will it work? Yes.
You will probably find it hard to expand vertically & add new features if you're relying on a 3rd party CMS for data entry & backend.
I have to develop frontend/backend application using cakephp.
can you give me advice how should i develop them, using same cakephp library?
or I have to develop them using separate cakephp libraries?
I am confused - cakePHP would be used to implement both.
PHP would be used to implement the server-side backend. The same "project" would also contain HTML, JS, CSS, etc that will be used to render the front-end within the browser. Any PHP "views" will also execute code on the back-end, although any HTML output will be rendered on the frontend.
Does that help at all? Or am I missing something?
If by frontend/backend, you mean an application with a user interface (frontend) and an administration interface (backend), then you want to refer to the Prefix Routing section of the manual. This will allow you to have separate flow and interfaces (controller/view) for each type of user while sharing the same data (models).
If by frontend/backend, you mean an application (frontend) that communicates with another server application (backend) using web services, then you want to look at the Additional Class Paths section of the manual. This will allow you to share common classes with two (or more) separate applications.
Note: the above links are for CakePHP 3.x, though these features have existed in one form or another since v1.2.
Not quite sure if I understood you correct, but if I did:
You can set up multiple projects using the same cake-core files. The core files don't even need to be placed in the webroot folder..
http://book.cakephp.org/view/35/Advanced-Installation
For your own sanity, you should regard the backend management as part of the same project as the frontend.
The systems I have built generally use view-type methods for the public view and crud-type methods for the admin view. How you lock down the admin is your choice. Personally I don't like the default admin prefix way. I use login and ACL - Mark Story's tutorial on http://book.cakephp.org/ is superb. With that you can password protect methods.
CakePHP is very flexible and extensible and you can make the administration as simple or as flexible as you like.
I have a web application that needs to be built using PHP/MySQL. The application will require documents to be generated from data in the MySQL database. Such documents will be printed and/or emailed and user will be prompted to run a daily print/email job based on business logic.
This application functionality needs to be made available to individual users such that they can upload data, have the system prompt them as to whether letters/emails are to be generated. The site also needs to be able to support a bulletin board, online live training events and will have admin area as well.
Question: Should a hybrid solution be developed such that the data management (upload functionality, and letter production) be a separate part of the site that authenticated Joomla users can access? That is, the document management functionality would exist separately from Joomla, but be called from within it via a link in the Joomla sitemap. Alternatively, should custom modules be developed from within Joomla to accomodate the document management functionality?
Thanks so much for your input!!
Joomla could do the job for you but based on the amount of things you need that differ from a normal Joomla site I would use a framework to build from instead of a CMS. I say this because it sounds like you need a lot more than just a CMS and it can be more work if you try making Joomla do things it wasn't designed to do. In my opinion Joomla is for "web sites" and not as much for "web apps". Of course those terms have overlap but it sounds like you would be better off with a Framework to go off of instead of working around Joomla to get what you want. However if the site is already done in Joomla it may be less work just to make a Joomla add-on.
Since you have to use PHP I would definitely recommend CakePHP for your framework. As for an integrated forum try looking at the links in this post. If that doesn't work for you, try out Vanilla forums (vanillaforums.org) which are very clean and may be easier to integrate into CakePHP than some of the other PHP forums.
If you decide to use CakePHP, check out Cake Forge to see if you can find anything there to make your life even easier.
If you were to use Joomla, the upload functionality and letter production would be written as a custom component. You can write the component to make sure that the current user is authenticated before generating the documents. I would not develop this as a separate application alongside Joomla; it would be easier to write it as a component.
Many forums and forum bridges are available for Joomla, so that would be something you wouldn't have to write.
I'm not sure what kind of live event support you're looking for.