Related
In PHP, the HEREDOC string declarations are really useful for outputting a block of html. You can have it parse in variables just by prefixing them with $, but for more complicated syntax (like $var[2][3]), you have to put your expression inside {} braces.
In PHP 5, it is possible to actually make function calls within {} braces inside a HEREDOC string, but you have to go through a bit of work. The function name itself has to be stored in a variable, and you have to call it like it is a dynamically-named function. For example:
$fn = 'testfunction';
function testfunction() { return 'ok'; }
$string = <<< heredoc
plain text and now a function: {$fn()}
heredoc;
As you can see, this is a bit more messy than just:
$string = <<< heredoc
plain text and now a function: {testfunction()}
heredoc;
There are other ways besides the first code example, such as breaking out of the HEREDOC to call the function, or reversing the issue and doing something like:
?>
<!-- directly output html and only breaking into php for the function -->
plain text and now a function: <?PHP print testfunction(); ?>
The latter has the disadvantage that the output is directly put into the output stream (unless I'm using output buffering), which might not be what I want.
So, the essence of my question is: is there a more elegant way to approach this?
Edit based on responses: It certainly does seem like some kind of template engine would make my life much easier, but it would require me basically invert my usual PHP style. Not that that's a bad thing, but it explains my inertia.. I'm up for figuring out ways to make life easier though, so I'm looking into templates now.
If you really want to do this but a bit simpler than using a class you can use:
function fn($data) {
return $data;
}
$fn = 'fn';
$my_string = <<<EOT
Number of seconds since the Unix Epoch: {$fn(time())}
EOT;
I would not use HEREDOC at all for this, personally. It just doesn't make for a good "template building" system. All your HTML is locked down in a string which has several disadvantages
No option for WYSIWYG
No code completion for HTML from IDEs
Output (HTML) locked to logic files
You end up having to use hacks like what you're trying to do now to achieve more complex templating, such as looping
Get a basic template engine, or just use PHP with includes - it's why the language has the <?php and ?> delimiters.
template_file.php
<html>
<head>
<title><?php echo $page_title; ?></title>
</head>
<body>
<?php echo getPageContent(); ?>
</body>
index.php
<?php
$page_title = "This is a simple demo";
function getPageContent() {
return '<p>Hello World!</p>';
}
include('template_file.php');
I would do the following:
$string = <<< heredoc
plain text and now a function: %s
heredoc;
$string = sprintf($string, testfunction());
Not sure if you'd consider this to be more elegant ...
For completeness, you can also use the !${''} black magic parser hack:
echo <<<EOT
One month ago was { ${!${''} = date('Y-m-d H:i:s', strtotime('-1 month'))} }.
EOT;
See it live on 3v4l.org.
Note: PHP 8.2 deprecated bare ${} variable variables within strings, in preference to the explicit { ${} } syntax. The example above uses this explicit format to remove the deprecation notice, though it makes this method even more noisy!
Try this (either as a global variable, or instantiated when you need it):
<?php
class Fn {
public function __call($name, $args) {
if (function_exists($name)) {
return call_user_func_array($name, $args);
}
}
}
$fn = new Fn();
?>
Now any function call goes through the $fn instance. So the existing function testfunction() can be called in a heredoc with {$fn->testfunction()}
Basically we are wrapping all functions into a class instance, and using PHP's __call magic method to map the class method to the actual function needing to be called.
I'm a bit late, but I randomly came across it. For any future readers, here's what I would probably do:
I would just use an output buffer. So basically, you start the buffering using ob_start(), then include your "template file" with any functions, variables, etc. inside of it, get the contents of the buffer and write them to a string, and then close the buffer. Then you've used any variables you need, you can run any function, and you still have the HTML syntax highlighting available in your IDE.
Here's what I mean:
Template File:
<?php echo "plain text and now a function: " . testfunction(); ?>
Script:
<?php
ob_start();
include "template_file.php";
$output_string = ob_get_contents();
ob_end_clean();
echo $output_string;
?>
So the script includes the template_file.php into its buffer, running any functions/methods and assigning any variables along the way. Then you simply record the buffer's contents into a variable and do what you want with it.
That way if you don't want to echo it onto the page right at that second, you don't have to. You can loop and keep adding to the string before outputting it.
I think that's the best way to go if you don't want to use a templating engine.
found nice solution with wrapping function here: http://blog.nazdrave.net/?p=626
function heredoc($param) {
// just return whatever has been passed to us
return $param;
}
$heredoc = 'heredoc';
$string = <<<HEREDOC
\$heredoc is now a generic function that can be used in all sorts of ways:
Output the result of a function: {$heredoc(date('r'))}
Output the value of a constant: {$heredoc(__FILE__)}
Static methods work just as well: {$heredoc(MyClass::getSomething())}
2 + 2 equals {$heredoc(2+2)}
HEREDOC;
// The same works not only with HEREDOC strings,
// but with double-quoted strings as well:
$string = "{$heredoc(2+2)}";
This snippet will define variables with the name of your defined functions within userscope and bind them to a string which contains the same name. Let me demonstrate.
function add ($int) { return $int + 1; }
$f=get_defined_functions();foreach($f[user]as$v){$$v=$v;}
$string = <<< heredoc
plain text and now a function: {$add(1)}
heredoc;
Will now work.
I think using heredoc is great for generating HTML code. For example, I find the following almost completely unreadable.
<html>
<head>
<title><?php echo $page_title; ?></title>
</head>
<body>
<?php echo getPageContent(); ?>
</body>
However, in order to achieve the simplicity you are forced to evaluate the functions before you start. I don't believe that is such a terrible constraint, since in so doing, you end up separating your computation from display, which is usually a good idea.
I think the following is quite readable:
$page_content = getPageContent();
print <<<END
<html>
<head>
<title>$page_title</title>
</head>
<body>
$page_content
</body>
END;
Unfortunately, even though it was a good suggestion you made in your question to bind the function to a variable, in the end, it adds a level of complexity to the code, which is not worth, and makes the code less readable, which is the major advantage of heredoc.
you are forgetting about lambda function:
$or=function($c,$t,$f){return$c?$t:$f;};
echo <<<TRUEFALSE
The best color ever is {$or(rand(0,1),'green','black')}
TRUEFALSE;
You also could use the function create_function
This is a little more elegant today on php 7.x
<?php
$test = function(){
return 'it works!';
};
echo <<<HEREDOC
this is a test: {$test()}
HEREDOC;
I'd take a look at Smarty as a template engine - I haven't tried any other ones myself, but it has done me well.
If you wanted to stick with your current approach sans templates, what's so bad about output buffering? It'll give you much more flexibility than having to declare variables which are the string names of the functions you want to call.
A bit late but still.
This is possible in heredoc!
Have a look in the php manual, section "Complex (curly) syntax"
Here a nice example using #CJDennis proposal:
function double($i)
{ return $i*2; }
function triple($i)
{ return $i*3;}
$tab = 'double';
echo "{$tab(5)} is $tab 5<br>";
$tab = 'triple';
echo "{$tab(5)} is $tab 5<br>";
For instance, a good use for HEREDOC syntax is generate huge forms with master-detail relationship in a Database. One can use HEREDOC feature inside a FOR control, adding a suffix after each field name. It's a typical server side task.
Guys should note that it also works with double-quoted strings.
http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.types.string.php
Interesting tip anyway.
<div><?=<<<heredoc
Use heredoc and functions in ONE statement.
Show lower case ABC="
heredoc
. strtolower('ABC') . <<<heredoc
". And that is it!
heredoc
?></div>
<?php
echo <<<ETO
<h1>Hellow ETO</h1>
ETO;
you should try it . after end the ETO; command you should give an enter.
In PHP, the HEREDOC string declarations are really useful for outputting a block of html. You can have it parse in variables just by prefixing them with $, but for more complicated syntax (like $var[2][3]), you have to put your expression inside {} braces.
In PHP 5, it is possible to actually make function calls within {} braces inside a HEREDOC string, but you have to go through a bit of work. The function name itself has to be stored in a variable, and you have to call it like it is a dynamically-named function. For example:
$fn = 'testfunction';
function testfunction() { return 'ok'; }
$string = <<< heredoc
plain text and now a function: {$fn()}
heredoc;
As you can see, this is a bit more messy than just:
$string = <<< heredoc
plain text and now a function: {testfunction()}
heredoc;
There are other ways besides the first code example, such as breaking out of the HEREDOC to call the function, or reversing the issue and doing something like:
?>
<!-- directly output html and only breaking into php for the function -->
plain text and now a function: <?PHP print testfunction(); ?>
The latter has the disadvantage that the output is directly put into the output stream (unless I'm using output buffering), which might not be what I want.
So, the essence of my question is: is there a more elegant way to approach this?
Edit based on responses: It certainly does seem like some kind of template engine would make my life much easier, but it would require me basically invert my usual PHP style. Not that that's a bad thing, but it explains my inertia.. I'm up for figuring out ways to make life easier though, so I'm looking into templates now.
If you really want to do this but a bit simpler than using a class you can use:
function fn($data) {
return $data;
}
$fn = 'fn';
$my_string = <<<EOT
Number of seconds since the Unix Epoch: {$fn(time())}
EOT;
I would not use HEREDOC at all for this, personally. It just doesn't make for a good "template building" system. All your HTML is locked down in a string which has several disadvantages
No option for WYSIWYG
No code completion for HTML from IDEs
Output (HTML) locked to logic files
You end up having to use hacks like what you're trying to do now to achieve more complex templating, such as looping
Get a basic template engine, or just use PHP with includes - it's why the language has the <?php and ?> delimiters.
template_file.php
<html>
<head>
<title><?php echo $page_title; ?></title>
</head>
<body>
<?php echo getPageContent(); ?>
</body>
index.php
<?php
$page_title = "This is a simple demo";
function getPageContent() {
return '<p>Hello World!</p>';
}
include('template_file.php');
I would do the following:
$string = <<< heredoc
plain text and now a function: %s
heredoc;
$string = sprintf($string, testfunction());
Not sure if you'd consider this to be more elegant ...
For completeness, you can also use the !${''} black magic parser hack:
echo <<<EOT
One month ago was { ${!${''} = date('Y-m-d H:i:s', strtotime('-1 month'))} }.
EOT;
See it live on 3v4l.org.
Note: PHP 8.2 deprecated bare ${} variable variables within strings, in preference to the explicit { ${} } syntax. The example above uses this explicit format to remove the deprecation notice, though it makes this method even more noisy!
Try this (either as a global variable, or instantiated when you need it):
<?php
class Fn {
public function __call($name, $args) {
if (function_exists($name)) {
return call_user_func_array($name, $args);
}
}
}
$fn = new Fn();
?>
Now any function call goes through the $fn instance. So the existing function testfunction() can be called in a heredoc with {$fn->testfunction()}
Basically we are wrapping all functions into a class instance, and using PHP's __call magic method to map the class method to the actual function needing to be called.
I'm a bit late, but I randomly came across it. For any future readers, here's what I would probably do:
I would just use an output buffer. So basically, you start the buffering using ob_start(), then include your "template file" with any functions, variables, etc. inside of it, get the contents of the buffer and write them to a string, and then close the buffer. Then you've used any variables you need, you can run any function, and you still have the HTML syntax highlighting available in your IDE.
Here's what I mean:
Template File:
<?php echo "plain text and now a function: " . testfunction(); ?>
Script:
<?php
ob_start();
include "template_file.php";
$output_string = ob_get_contents();
ob_end_clean();
echo $output_string;
?>
So the script includes the template_file.php into its buffer, running any functions/methods and assigning any variables along the way. Then you simply record the buffer's contents into a variable and do what you want with it.
That way if you don't want to echo it onto the page right at that second, you don't have to. You can loop and keep adding to the string before outputting it.
I think that's the best way to go if you don't want to use a templating engine.
found nice solution with wrapping function here: http://blog.nazdrave.net/?p=626
function heredoc($param) {
// just return whatever has been passed to us
return $param;
}
$heredoc = 'heredoc';
$string = <<<HEREDOC
\$heredoc is now a generic function that can be used in all sorts of ways:
Output the result of a function: {$heredoc(date('r'))}
Output the value of a constant: {$heredoc(__FILE__)}
Static methods work just as well: {$heredoc(MyClass::getSomething())}
2 + 2 equals {$heredoc(2+2)}
HEREDOC;
// The same works not only with HEREDOC strings,
// but with double-quoted strings as well:
$string = "{$heredoc(2+2)}";
This snippet will define variables with the name of your defined functions within userscope and bind them to a string which contains the same name. Let me demonstrate.
function add ($int) { return $int + 1; }
$f=get_defined_functions();foreach($f[user]as$v){$$v=$v;}
$string = <<< heredoc
plain text and now a function: {$add(1)}
heredoc;
Will now work.
I think using heredoc is great for generating HTML code. For example, I find the following almost completely unreadable.
<html>
<head>
<title><?php echo $page_title; ?></title>
</head>
<body>
<?php echo getPageContent(); ?>
</body>
However, in order to achieve the simplicity you are forced to evaluate the functions before you start. I don't believe that is such a terrible constraint, since in so doing, you end up separating your computation from display, which is usually a good idea.
I think the following is quite readable:
$page_content = getPageContent();
print <<<END
<html>
<head>
<title>$page_title</title>
</head>
<body>
$page_content
</body>
END;
Unfortunately, even though it was a good suggestion you made in your question to bind the function to a variable, in the end, it adds a level of complexity to the code, which is not worth, and makes the code less readable, which is the major advantage of heredoc.
you are forgetting about lambda function:
$or=function($c,$t,$f){return$c?$t:$f;};
echo <<<TRUEFALSE
The best color ever is {$or(rand(0,1),'green','black')}
TRUEFALSE;
You also could use the function create_function
This is a little more elegant today on php 7.x
<?php
$test = function(){
return 'it works!';
};
echo <<<HEREDOC
this is a test: {$test()}
HEREDOC;
I'd take a look at Smarty as a template engine - I haven't tried any other ones myself, but it has done me well.
If you wanted to stick with your current approach sans templates, what's so bad about output buffering? It'll give you much more flexibility than having to declare variables which are the string names of the functions you want to call.
A bit late but still.
This is possible in heredoc!
Have a look in the php manual, section "Complex (curly) syntax"
Here a nice example using #CJDennis proposal:
function double($i)
{ return $i*2; }
function triple($i)
{ return $i*3;}
$tab = 'double';
echo "{$tab(5)} is $tab 5<br>";
$tab = 'triple';
echo "{$tab(5)} is $tab 5<br>";
For instance, a good use for HEREDOC syntax is generate huge forms with master-detail relationship in a Database. One can use HEREDOC feature inside a FOR control, adding a suffix after each field name. It's a typical server side task.
Guys should note that it also works with double-quoted strings.
http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.types.string.php
Interesting tip anyway.
<div><?=<<<heredoc
Use heredoc and functions in ONE statement.
Show lower case ABC="
heredoc
. strtolower('ABC') . <<<heredoc
". And that is it!
heredoc
?></div>
<?php
echo <<<ETO
<h1>Hellow ETO</h1>
ETO;
you should try it . after end the ETO; command you should give an enter.
In PHP, the HEREDOC string declarations are really useful for outputting a block of html. You can have it parse in variables just by prefixing them with $, but for more complicated syntax (like $var[2][3]), you have to put your expression inside {} braces.
In PHP 5, it is possible to actually make function calls within {} braces inside a HEREDOC string, but you have to go through a bit of work. The function name itself has to be stored in a variable, and you have to call it like it is a dynamically-named function. For example:
$fn = 'testfunction';
function testfunction() { return 'ok'; }
$string = <<< heredoc
plain text and now a function: {$fn()}
heredoc;
As you can see, this is a bit more messy than just:
$string = <<< heredoc
plain text and now a function: {testfunction()}
heredoc;
There are other ways besides the first code example, such as breaking out of the HEREDOC to call the function, or reversing the issue and doing something like:
?>
<!-- directly output html and only breaking into php for the function -->
plain text and now a function: <?PHP print testfunction(); ?>
The latter has the disadvantage that the output is directly put into the output stream (unless I'm using output buffering), which might not be what I want.
So, the essence of my question is: is there a more elegant way to approach this?
Edit based on responses: It certainly does seem like some kind of template engine would make my life much easier, but it would require me basically invert my usual PHP style. Not that that's a bad thing, but it explains my inertia.. I'm up for figuring out ways to make life easier though, so I'm looking into templates now.
If you really want to do this but a bit simpler than using a class you can use:
function fn($data) {
return $data;
}
$fn = 'fn';
$my_string = <<<EOT
Number of seconds since the Unix Epoch: {$fn(time())}
EOT;
I would not use HEREDOC at all for this, personally. It just doesn't make for a good "template building" system. All your HTML is locked down in a string which has several disadvantages
No option for WYSIWYG
No code completion for HTML from IDEs
Output (HTML) locked to logic files
You end up having to use hacks like what you're trying to do now to achieve more complex templating, such as looping
Get a basic template engine, or just use PHP with includes - it's why the language has the <?php and ?> delimiters.
template_file.php
<html>
<head>
<title><?php echo $page_title; ?></title>
</head>
<body>
<?php echo getPageContent(); ?>
</body>
index.php
<?php
$page_title = "This is a simple demo";
function getPageContent() {
return '<p>Hello World!</p>';
}
include('template_file.php');
I would do the following:
$string = <<< heredoc
plain text and now a function: %s
heredoc;
$string = sprintf($string, testfunction());
Not sure if you'd consider this to be more elegant ...
For completeness, you can also use the !${''} black magic parser hack:
echo <<<EOT
One month ago was { ${!${''} = date('Y-m-d H:i:s', strtotime('-1 month'))} }.
EOT;
See it live on 3v4l.org.
Note: PHP 8.2 deprecated bare ${} variable variables within strings, in preference to the explicit { ${} } syntax. The example above uses this explicit format to remove the deprecation notice, though it makes this method even more noisy!
Try this (either as a global variable, or instantiated when you need it):
<?php
class Fn {
public function __call($name, $args) {
if (function_exists($name)) {
return call_user_func_array($name, $args);
}
}
}
$fn = new Fn();
?>
Now any function call goes through the $fn instance. So the existing function testfunction() can be called in a heredoc with {$fn->testfunction()}
Basically we are wrapping all functions into a class instance, and using PHP's __call magic method to map the class method to the actual function needing to be called.
I'm a bit late, but I randomly came across it. For any future readers, here's what I would probably do:
I would just use an output buffer. So basically, you start the buffering using ob_start(), then include your "template file" with any functions, variables, etc. inside of it, get the contents of the buffer and write them to a string, and then close the buffer. Then you've used any variables you need, you can run any function, and you still have the HTML syntax highlighting available in your IDE.
Here's what I mean:
Template File:
<?php echo "plain text and now a function: " . testfunction(); ?>
Script:
<?php
ob_start();
include "template_file.php";
$output_string = ob_get_contents();
ob_end_clean();
echo $output_string;
?>
So the script includes the template_file.php into its buffer, running any functions/methods and assigning any variables along the way. Then you simply record the buffer's contents into a variable and do what you want with it.
That way if you don't want to echo it onto the page right at that second, you don't have to. You can loop and keep adding to the string before outputting it.
I think that's the best way to go if you don't want to use a templating engine.
found nice solution with wrapping function here: http://blog.nazdrave.net/?p=626
function heredoc($param) {
// just return whatever has been passed to us
return $param;
}
$heredoc = 'heredoc';
$string = <<<HEREDOC
\$heredoc is now a generic function that can be used in all sorts of ways:
Output the result of a function: {$heredoc(date('r'))}
Output the value of a constant: {$heredoc(__FILE__)}
Static methods work just as well: {$heredoc(MyClass::getSomething())}
2 + 2 equals {$heredoc(2+2)}
HEREDOC;
// The same works not only with HEREDOC strings,
// but with double-quoted strings as well:
$string = "{$heredoc(2+2)}";
This snippet will define variables with the name of your defined functions within userscope and bind them to a string which contains the same name. Let me demonstrate.
function add ($int) { return $int + 1; }
$f=get_defined_functions();foreach($f[user]as$v){$$v=$v;}
$string = <<< heredoc
plain text and now a function: {$add(1)}
heredoc;
Will now work.
I think using heredoc is great for generating HTML code. For example, I find the following almost completely unreadable.
<html>
<head>
<title><?php echo $page_title; ?></title>
</head>
<body>
<?php echo getPageContent(); ?>
</body>
However, in order to achieve the simplicity you are forced to evaluate the functions before you start. I don't believe that is such a terrible constraint, since in so doing, you end up separating your computation from display, which is usually a good idea.
I think the following is quite readable:
$page_content = getPageContent();
print <<<END
<html>
<head>
<title>$page_title</title>
</head>
<body>
$page_content
</body>
END;
Unfortunately, even though it was a good suggestion you made in your question to bind the function to a variable, in the end, it adds a level of complexity to the code, which is not worth, and makes the code less readable, which is the major advantage of heredoc.
you are forgetting about lambda function:
$or=function($c,$t,$f){return$c?$t:$f;};
echo <<<TRUEFALSE
The best color ever is {$or(rand(0,1),'green','black')}
TRUEFALSE;
You also could use the function create_function
This is a little more elegant today on php 7.x
<?php
$test = function(){
return 'it works!';
};
echo <<<HEREDOC
this is a test: {$test()}
HEREDOC;
I'd take a look at Smarty as a template engine - I haven't tried any other ones myself, but it has done me well.
If you wanted to stick with your current approach sans templates, what's so bad about output buffering? It'll give you much more flexibility than having to declare variables which are the string names of the functions you want to call.
A bit late but still.
This is possible in heredoc!
Have a look in the php manual, section "Complex (curly) syntax"
Here a nice example using #CJDennis proposal:
function double($i)
{ return $i*2; }
function triple($i)
{ return $i*3;}
$tab = 'double';
echo "{$tab(5)} is $tab 5<br>";
$tab = 'triple';
echo "{$tab(5)} is $tab 5<br>";
For instance, a good use for HEREDOC syntax is generate huge forms with master-detail relationship in a Database. One can use HEREDOC feature inside a FOR control, adding a suffix after each field name. It's a typical server side task.
Guys should note that it also works with double-quoted strings.
http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.types.string.php
Interesting tip anyway.
<div><?=<<<heredoc
Use heredoc and functions in ONE statement.
Show lower case ABC="
heredoc
. strtolower('ABC') . <<<heredoc
". And that is it!
heredoc
?></div>
<?php
echo <<<ETO
<h1>Hellow ETO</h1>
ETO;
you should try it . after end the ETO; command you should give an enter.
I'm just about ready to cry. I have read the php.net manual page, tried a dozen Google searches with various phrases, and scanned hundreds of stackoverflow threads. I have seen this method in use, but it just doesn't work for me. It seems so basic. I have a couple related questions or problems I don't know how to find answers to.
The important part of the PHP file looks like this:
switch() {
…other cases…
default:
$tpl['title'] = "Newsletter Signup";
$tpl['description'] = "Newsletter description";
$tpl['page-content'] = file_get_contents('signup.html');
}
$tpl_src = addslashes(file_get_contents('index.tpl'));
eval("\$html = \"$tpl_src\";");
echo $html;
My index.tpl file includes lines like these:
<title>{$tpl['title']}</title>
<meta name="description" content="{$tpl['description']}" />
nav, etc…
<div id="main-content"> {$tpl['page-content']} </div>
I like how neat and clean the code is, without a whole bunch of extra <?=…?>'s.
First, when curly brackets {} appear in a string, what is that called? I might be able to look it up and learn how to use them if I knew.
Next, this just doesn't work at all. If I remove the single quotes from the variable keys, it's good, but php.net says you should never do that in case my name becomes a language constant at some point. Fair enough. But how do I fix this? I like using an array for the vars in case I want to build an evalTemplate subroutine and can just pass $tpl to it.
Lastly, $tpl['page-content'] doesn't print out. The variable is set okay; I can use echo $tpl['page-content'] to test, but it appears as a single blank line in the final HTML.
I'm sure there's just some aspect of the language I don't know yet. Any help is much appreciated!!
As Volker pointed out, addslashes seems to be an issue. Try addcslashes instead. Also, I'd strongly recommend making this a function, to simplify sanitisation / parsing:
function render ($file, $vars)
{
// .. extra sanitisation, validation, et al.
$_html = '';
$_raw_file = addcslashes (file_get_contents ($file), '"\\');
extract ($vars, EXTR_SKIP);
eval ('$_html = "'.$_raw_file.'"');
return $_html;
}
And called thus:
switch() {
// …other cases…
default:
$tpl['title'] = "Newsletter Signup";
$tpl['description'] = "Newsletter description";
$tpl['page-content'] = render ('signup.html');
}
echo render ('index.tpl', $tpl);
PS: The use of extract above means that your vars will simply be $title, not $tpl['title'], etc.
Usually you don't use the '' string delimiters in string variable expansion. I.e. "$tpl[content]" instead of "$tpl['content']".
As for as the braces, they delimit variable's when identifier characters may come straight before or after the name. For example:
$item = "Cup";
$text = "I smashed four $items"; // won't work
$text = "I smashed four {$item}s"; // will work.
// 2nd output: "I smashed four Cups"
addslashes() adds slashes before both single- and double-quotes within the string.
The code generated for your example would be
$html = "<title>{$tpl[\'title\']}</title>
<meta name=\"description\" content=\"{$tpl[\'description\']}\" />
nav, etc…¦
<div id=\"main-content\"> {$tpl[\'page-content\']} </div>";
And {$tpl[\'title\']} doesn't parse well.
In PHP, the HEREDOC string declarations are really useful for outputting a block of html. You can have it parse in variables just by prefixing them with $, but for more complicated syntax (like $var[2][3]), you have to put your expression inside {} braces.
In PHP 5, it is possible to actually make function calls within {} braces inside a HEREDOC string, but you have to go through a bit of work. The function name itself has to be stored in a variable, and you have to call it like it is a dynamically-named function. For example:
$fn = 'testfunction';
function testfunction() { return 'ok'; }
$string = <<< heredoc
plain text and now a function: {$fn()}
heredoc;
As you can see, this is a bit more messy than just:
$string = <<< heredoc
plain text and now a function: {testfunction()}
heredoc;
There are other ways besides the first code example, such as breaking out of the HEREDOC to call the function, or reversing the issue and doing something like:
?>
<!-- directly output html and only breaking into php for the function -->
plain text and now a function: <?PHP print testfunction(); ?>
The latter has the disadvantage that the output is directly put into the output stream (unless I'm using output buffering), which might not be what I want.
So, the essence of my question is: is there a more elegant way to approach this?
Edit based on responses: It certainly does seem like some kind of template engine would make my life much easier, but it would require me basically invert my usual PHP style. Not that that's a bad thing, but it explains my inertia.. I'm up for figuring out ways to make life easier though, so I'm looking into templates now.
If you really want to do this but a bit simpler than using a class you can use:
function fn($data) {
return $data;
}
$fn = 'fn';
$my_string = <<<EOT
Number of seconds since the Unix Epoch: {$fn(time())}
EOT;
I would not use HEREDOC at all for this, personally. It just doesn't make for a good "template building" system. All your HTML is locked down in a string which has several disadvantages
No option for WYSIWYG
No code completion for HTML from IDEs
Output (HTML) locked to logic files
You end up having to use hacks like what you're trying to do now to achieve more complex templating, such as looping
Get a basic template engine, or just use PHP with includes - it's why the language has the <?php and ?> delimiters.
template_file.php
<html>
<head>
<title><?php echo $page_title; ?></title>
</head>
<body>
<?php echo getPageContent(); ?>
</body>
index.php
<?php
$page_title = "This is a simple demo";
function getPageContent() {
return '<p>Hello World!</p>';
}
include('template_file.php');
I would do the following:
$string = <<< heredoc
plain text and now a function: %s
heredoc;
$string = sprintf($string, testfunction());
Not sure if you'd consider this to be more elegant ...
For completeness, you can also use the !${''} black magic parser hack:
echo <<<EOT
One month ago was { ${!${''} = date('Y-m-d H:i:s', strtotime('-1 month'))} }.
EOT;
See it live on 3v4l.org.
Note: PHP 8.2 deprecated bare ${} variable variables within strings, in preference to the explicit { ${} } syntax. The example above uses this explicit format to remove the deprecation notice, though it makes this method even more noisy!
Try this (either as a global variable, or instantiated when you need it):
<?php
class Fn {
public function __call($name, $args) {
if (function_exists($name)) {
return call_user_func_array($name, $args);
}
}
}
$fn = new Fn();
?>
Now any function call goes through the $fn instance. So the existing function testfunction() can be called in a heredoc with {$fn->testfunction()}
Basically we are wrapping all functions into a class instance, and using PHP's __call magic method to map the class method to the actual function needing to be called.
I'm a bit late, but I randomly came across it. For any future readers, here's what I would probably do:
I would just use an output buffer. So basically, you start the buffering using ob_start(), then include your "template file" with any functions, variables, etc. inside of it, get the contents of the buffer and write them to a string, and then close the buffer. Then you've used any variables you need, you can run any function, and you still have the HTML syntax highlighting available in your IDE.
Here's what I mean:
Template File:
<?php echo "plain text and now a function: " . testfunction(); ?>
Script:
<?php
ob_start();
include "template_file.php";
$output_string = ob_get_contents();
ob_end_clean();
echo $output_string;
?>
So the script includes the template_file.php into its buffer, running any functions/methods and assigning any variables along the way. Then you simply record the buffer's contents into a variable and do what you want with it.
That way if you don't want to echo it onto the page right at that second, you don't have to. You can loop and keep adding to the string before outputting it.
I think that's the best way to go if you don't want to use a templating engine.
found nice solution with wrapping function here: http://blog.nazdrave.net/?p=626
function heredoc($param) {
// just return whatever has been passed to us
return $param;
}
$heredoc = 'heredoc';
$string = <<<HEREDOC
\$heredoc is now a generic function that can be used in all sorts of ways:
Output the result of a function: {$heredoc(date('r'))}
Output the value of a constant: {$heredoc(__FILE__)}
Static methods work just as well: {$heredoc(MyClass::getSomething())}
2 + 2 equals {$heredoc(2+2)}
HEREDOC;
// The same works not only with HEREDOC strings,
// but with double-quoted strings as well:
$string = "{$heredoc(2+2)}";
This snippet will define variables with the name of your defined functions within userscope and bind them to a string which contains the same name. Let me demonstrate.
function add ($int) { return $int + 1; }
$f=get_defined_functions();foreach($f[user]as$v){$$v=$v;}
$string = <<< heredoc
plain text and now a function: {$add(1)}
heredoc;
Will now work.
I think using heredoc is great for generating HTML code. For example, I find the following almost completely unreadable.
<html>
<head>
<title><?php echo $page_title; ?></title>
</head>
<body>
<?php echo getPageContent(); ?>
</body>
However, in order to achieve the simplicity you are forced to evaluate the functions before you start. I don't believe that is such a terrible constraint, since in so doing, you end up separating your computation from display, which is usually a good idea.
I think the following is quite readable:
$page_content = getPageContent();
print <<<END
<html>
<head>
<title>$page_title</title>
</head>
<body>
$page_content
</body>
END;
Unfortunately, even though it was a good suggestion you made in your question to bind the function to a variable, in the end, it adds a level of complexity to the code, which is not worth, and makes the code less readable, which is the major advantage of heredoc.
you are forgetting about lambda function:
$or=function($c,$t,$f){return$c?$t:$f;};
echo <<<TRUEFALSE
The best color ever is {$or(rand(0,1),'green','black')}
TRUEFALSE;
You also could use the function create_function
This is a little more elegant today on php 7.x
<?php
$test = function(){
return 'it works!';
};
echo <<<HEREDOC
this is a test: {$test()}
HEREDOC;
I'd take a look at Smarty as a template engine - I haven't tried any other ones myself, but it has done me well.
If you wanted to stick with your current approach sans templates, what's so bad about output buffering? It'll give you much more flexibility than having to declare variables which are the string names of the functions you want to call.
A bit late but still.
This is possible in heredoc!
Have a look in the php manual, section "Complex (curly) syntax"
Here a nice example using #CJDennis proposal:
function double($i)
{ return $i*2; }
function triple($i)
{ return $i*3;}
$tab = 'double';
echo "{$tab(5)} is $tab 5<br>";
$tab = 'triple';
echo "{$tab(5)} is $tab 5<br>";
For instance, a good use for HEREDOC syntax is generate huge forms with master-detail relationship in a Database. One can use HEREDOC feature inside a FOR control, adding a suffix after each field name. It's a typical server side task.
Guys should note that it also works with double-quoted strings.
http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.types.string.php
Interesting tip anyway.
<div><?=<<<heredoc
Use heredoc and functions in ONE statement.
Show lower case ABC="
heredoc
. strtolower('ABC') . <<<heredoc
". And that is it!
heredoc
?></div>
<?php
echo <<<ETO
<h1>Hellow ETO</h1>
ETO;
you should try it . after end the ETO; command you should give an enter.