I have two models, Position and User. They have a One to many relation between them.
When I delete a position, I want all the related users to be detached from that position and attached to a different one (found by id).
I'm sure it's simple enough, but I've tried doing it in a foreach loop, without success:
public function postDelete($position)
{
$positionMembers = $position->users()->get();
foreach ($positionMembers as $member) {
$member->position_id = '4';
// fixed copy/paste var name error
$member->save()
}
// Was the position deleted?
if($position->delete()) {
// Redirect to the position management page
return Redirect::to('admin/positions')->with('success', Lang::get('admin/positions/messages.delete.success'));
}
// There was a problem deleting the position
return Redirect::to('admin/positions')->with('error', Lang::get('admin/positions/messages.delete.error'));
}
I've also tried:
$member->position()->associate($this->position->find(4));
but it doesn't work either. The position_id field always remains unchanged. Is there a more recommended way?
First off define without success, because it says nothing, and the code you're showing should work.
Anyway, I would suggest different approach, for using Eloquent save in a loop isn't the best way:
public function postDelete($position)
{
DB::transaction(function () use ($position, &$deleted) {
// run single query for update
$position->users()->update(['position_id' => 4]);
// run another query for delete
$deleted = $position->delete();
});
// Was the position deleted?
if($deleted) {
// Redirect to the position management page
return Redirect::to('admin/positions')->with('success', Lang::get('admin/positions/messages.delete.success'));
}
// There was a problem deleting the position
return Redirect::to('admin/positions')->with('error', Lang::get('admin/positions/messages.delete.error'));
}
With this, you make sure users don't get updated if there's some error(exception thrown) when deleting position and you execute 2 queries, no matter how many users there are to update.
Related
I've got two tables: step and links joined 1:n. I'm aiming to maintain the links through the step objects. I retrieve all steps from the database and populate the relation with the links table. I persist the step object containing a collection of links to JSON and return it to the front end using REST.
That means that if a step is linked or unlinked to another step in the front end I send the entire step back to the backend including a collection of links. In the back end I use the following code:
public function put($processStep) {
if (isset($processStep['Processesid']) && isset($processStep['Coordx']) && isset($processStep['Coordy'])) {
$p = $this->query->findPK($processStep['Id']);
$p->setId($processStep['Id']);
$p->setProcessesid($processStep['Processesid']);
if (isset($processStep['Flowid'])) $p->setFlowid($processStep['Flowid']);
if (isset($processStep['Applicationid'])) $p->setApplicationid($processStep['Applicationid']);
$p->setCoordx($processStep['Coordx']);
$p->setCoordy($processStep['Coordy']);
$links = $p->getLinksRelatedByFromstep();
$links->clear();
foreach ($processStep['Links'] as $link) {
if (!isset($link['Linkid'])) {
$newLink = new \Link();
$newLink->setFromstep($link['Fromstep']);
$newLink->setTostep($link['Tostep']);
$links->prepend($newLink);
}
}
$p->save();
return $p;
} else {
throw new Exceptions\ProcessStepException("Missing mandatory fields.", 1);
}
}
I'm basically deleting every link from a step and based upon the request object I recreate the links. This saves me the effort to compare what links are deleted and added. The insert work like a charm Propel automatically creates the new links. Thing is it doesn't delete like it inserts. I've checked the object that is being persisted ($p) and I see the link being deleted but in the MySQL log there is absolutely no action being performed by Propel. It looks like a missing member from the link collection doesn't trigger a dirty flag or something like that.
Maybe I'm going about this the wrong way, I hope someone can offer some advice.
Thanks
To delete records, you absolutely always have to use delete. The diff method on the collection is extremely helpful when determining which entities need added, updated, and deleted.
Thanks to Ben I got on the right track, an explicit call for a delete is not needed. I came across a function called: setRelatedBy(ObjectCollection o) I use this function to provide a list of related objects, new objects are interpreted as inserts and omissions are interpreted as deletes.
I didn't find any relevant documentation regarding the problem so here's my code:
$p = $this->query->findPK($processStep['Id']);
$p->setId($processStep['Id']);
$p->setProcessesid($processStep['Processesid']);
$p->setCoordx($processStep['Coordx']);
$p->setCoordy($processStep['Coordy']);
if (isset($processStep['Flowid'])) $p->setFlowid($processStep['Flowid']);
if (isset($processStep['Applicationid'])) $p->setApplicationid($processStep['Applicationid']);
//Get related records, same as populaterelation
$currentLinks = $p->getLinksRelatedByFromstep();
$links = new \Propel\Runtime\Collection\ObjectCollection();
//Check for still existing links add to new collection if so.
//This is because creating a new Link instance and setting columns marks the object as dirty creating an exception due to duplicate keys
foreach ($currentLinks as $currentLink) {
foreach ($processStep['Links'] as $link) {
if (isset($link['Linkid']) && $currentLink->getLinkid() == $link['Linkid']) {
$links->prepend($currentLink);
break;
}
}
}
//Add new link objects
foreach ($processStep['Links'] as $link) {
if (!isset($link['Linkid'])) {
$newLink = new \Link();
$newLink->setFromstep($link['Fromstep']);
$newLink->setTostep($link['Tostep']);
$links->prepend($newLink);
}
}
//Replace the collection and save the processstep.
$p->setLinksRelatedByFromstep($links);
$p->save();
I want to delete all record according to id and then insert record in same table,I tried many ways but can't find solution please help me.
Basically as per the document id i want to delete all document but it is not working.
Here is my controller code:
foreach ($receievers as $user) {
$this->shareRepo->deleteSharedDoc($resourceId);
$this->shareRepo->saveshareSharedDoc($resourceId, $user->id,$this->getCurrentUser());
}
The repository code:
function saveSharedDoc($resourceId, $sharedWith, $resourceOwnerId){
$shareDocs = new ShareDocs;
$shareDocs->resource_id = $resourceId;
$shareDocs->shared_with = $sharedWith;
$shareDocs->user_id = $resourceOwnerId;
$shareDocs->shared_on = $this->getCurrentDateTime();
$shareDocs->token = str_random(20);
$shareDocs->save();
return $shareDocs->token;
}
function deleteSharedDoc($resourceId){
$network = ShareDocs::where('resource_id','=',$resourceId);
$result=$network->delete();
return $result;
}
Please help me out
It's seems you're doing it correctly. But there are two things that you have to change.
You are calling to saveshareSharedDoc method within foreach loop to save data. but actual method name on your repo is saveSharedDoc. (there two "share" words on loop)
you can return deleted rows directly return ShareDocs::where('resource_id', $resourceId)->delete();
So, I was trying to implement this answer for my other question on the same subject... and it keeps givin me the exceeded time error. Any clues?
This is on my product model. It inherits from Eloquent.
public function newQuery($excludeDeleted = true)
{
$user_permission = Auth::user()->permissions;
if( $user_permission->master )
return parent::newQuery();
else if( $user_permission->web_service )
{
$allowed_ids = array();
foreach( $user_permission->allowed_products()->get() as $allowed)
$allowed_ids[] = $allowed->id;
return parent::newQuery()->whereIn('id', $allowed_ids);
}
return parent::newQuery();
}
If the user is master there is no need to query scope on the request. But, if it isn't then I need to filter by the logged user's permissions.
UPDATE:
I tried the following code in a controller and it works alright:
$user_permission = Auth::user()->permissions;
echo "<PRE>"; print_r($user_permission->allowed_products()->get()); exit;
UPDATE 2:
Guys, I just found out that the problem was in this peace of code:
$allowed = Auth::user()->permissions()->first()->allowed_products()->get()->list('id');
It somehow give me an Maximum execution time of 30 seconds exceeded. If I put the exact same code in a controller, works like a charm, though! I also tried to put it in a scope, also worked. This it's really grinding my gears!
Elloquent has a function called newQuery. Controller does not. When you implement this function in a Model you are overriding the one in Elloquent. If you then invoke Elloquent methods that need a new query for your model before they can return, like ->allowed_products()->get(). Then you are calling your own newQuery() method recursively. Since the user permissions have not changed, this results in infinite recursion. The only outcome can be a timeout because it will keep on trying to determine a filtered product list which causes your newQuery() method to be called, which tries to determine the filtered product list before returning the query, and so on.
When you put the method into a Controller, it is not overriding the Elloquent newQuery method so there is no infinite recursion when trying to get the allowed_product list.
It would be more efficient to apply the filter to the product query based on whether the id is in the user's allowed_products() list using ->whereExists() and build up the same query as allowed_products() except now add condition that id from the query you are filtering is equal to the product id in the allowed products query. That way the filtering is done in the database instead of PHP and all is done in the same query so there is no recursion.
I don't see how your update code works. Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Collection does not have any magic methods to call the relation functions, you should get an undefined method error trying to do that.
Can you try something like
public function newQuery($excludeDeleted = true)
{
// Returns `Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Collection`
$user_permission = Auth::user()->permissions;
if ($user_permission->master)
{
return parent::newQuery();
}
else if ($user_permission->web_service)
{
// If here you was to call $user_permission->allowed_products()->get() not much is going to happen, besides probably getting an undefined method error.
$allowed_ids = Auth::user()->permissions()->allowed_products()->get()->lists('id');
return parent::newQuery()->whereIn('id', $allowed_ids);
}
return parent::newQuery();
}
Update: as per comments below I believe the problem is due to newQuery() being called multiple times as the code works just fine when called once in a controller. When this is applied to every query there is no need to collect all the IDs over and over again (assuming they're not going to change each time you call for them). Something such as the below will allow you to store these and only process them once per request rather than every time a query is run.
private $allowed_ids_cache = null;
public function newQuery($excludeDeleted = true)
{
$user_permission = Auth::user()->permissions;
if ($user_permission->master)
{
return parent::newQuery();
}
else if ($user_permission->web_service)
{
if ($this->allowed_ids_cache === null)
{
$this->allowed_ids_cache = Auth::user()->permissions()->allowed_products()->get()->lists('id');
}
return parent::newQuery()->whereIn('id', $this->allowed_ids_cache);
}
return parent::newQuery();
}
TL;DR is at the end to cut to the chase.
I have a lot of belongsTo() models that can have any number of records, and I'm trying to bind them to an edit form. I have the following foreach that creates the form elements:
#foreach ($department->department_10 as $key => $value)
{{ Form::select(
'department_10['.(isset($value->pk_department_10)?$value->pk_department_10:0).']',
$department_10_opts,
(isset($value->department_10)?$value->department_10:''),
array('class'=>'form-control input-md department_10', 'placeholder'=>'Other Types of Service')) }}
#endforeach
Since there can be 0 records (rows?) that belong to the model, to simplify my #foreach, I wanted to create a "blank" instance of the model. Additionally, because I'm going to have to deal with about 70 more cases like this, I created a function that would create the new blank model. Here's the function (in my controller for lack of a better place):
function mkBlankModel($parentModel, $newModel){
if(count($parentModel->$newModel) === 0){
$parentModel->$newModel[0] = new $newModel();
$parentModel->$newModel[0]->fk_department = $parentModel->pk_department;
$parentModel->$newModel[0]->$newModel = '';
}
return $parentModel;
}
When I run it, I don't get any errors, but I do get unexpected results and I can't really make sense of them:
Test Step 1) View the edit page while loading a record with 2 department_10's. It works as expected; loads two fields properly.
Test Step 2) View the edit page while loading a record with 0 department_10's. The page loads but without any fields. Because apparently my function didn't work, so I verify by dumping dump($department->$department_10) and it confirms this.
Test Step 3) I replace the $parentModel->$newModel[0] with $parentModel->department_10[0] like so:
function mkBlankModel($parentModel, $newModel){
if(count($parentModel->$newModel) === 0){
$parentModel->department_10[0] = new $newModel();
$parentModel->department_10[0]->fk_department = $parentModel->pk_department;
$parentModel->department_10[0]->$newModel = '';
}
return $parentModel;
}
And both scenarios (with records and without) work just fine. So my problem likely isn't Laravel specific, but I'm just curious how I can accomplish this.
TL;DR:
I'm trying to create a model instance for a parent model, if one doesn't exist, so a blank field will be created by my #foreach loop in my edit.blade.php's form. I can do this just fine if I manually spell out the model's name when creating it, but since I'll be doing this frequently, I'd prefer to define the class, and populate it with a string.
So I figured it out; I needed to wrap the $newModel in curly-brackets:
function mkBlankModel($parentModel, $newModel){
if(count($parentModel->$newModel) === 0){
$parentModel->{$newModel}[0] = new $newModel();
$parentModel->{$newModel}[0]->fk_department = $parentModel->pk_department;
$parentModel->{$newModel}[0]->$newModel = '';
}
return $parentModel;
}
More info here: http://php.net/manual/en/language.types.string.php#language.types.string.parsing.complex
I'm using the catalogsearch module of Magento. I have 2 stores. When searching "test" on the first one, I get 5 results. When searching "test" on the second one, I get 3 results.
I'd like to add the results of the second store (just the number of results) when I search in the first one.
I added a block and a template, all I need is the code to retrieve the number of the results in the second store, and that's where I'm stucked.
I tried to get the controller code, but it always returns me the number of results in the first store :
private function
_getStoreQuery($storeId) {
$query = Mage::helper('catalogSearch')->getQuery();
$query->setStoreId(7);
if ($query->getQueryText()) {
if (Mage::helper('catalogSearch')->isMinQueryLength())
{
$query->setId(0)
->setIsActive(1)
->setIsProcessed(1);
}
else {
if ($query->getId()) {
$query->setPopularity($query->getPopularity()+1);
}
else {
$query->setPopularity(1);
}
$query->prepare();
}
Mage::helper('catalogSearch')->checkNotes();
if (!Mage::helper('catalogSearch')->isMinQueryLength())
{
$query->save();
}
}
var_dump($query);
return $query;
}
I also tried to change the store context before, but no luck:
Mage::app()->setCurrentStore($secondStoreId);
Do you have any idea? Thanks
Probably the reason the first set of results is returned on your second try is because you are reusing the Mage_Catalogsearch_Model_Query object. You need to create a new set of results instead. Here the collection will create those, you just need to iterate through $collection to get them.
$queryText = Mage::helper('catalogSearch')->getQueryText();
$collection = Mage::getResourceModel('catalogsearch/query_collection')
->setStoreId($storeId)
->setQueryFilter($queryText);