Related
I was wondering if it's the right thing to include the tags like etc via another page.
What I mean by that is:
<?php include_once("header.php")?>
The content for each individual page
<?php include_once("footer.php")?>
Header.php contains:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<head>
<title>My Website</title>
</head>
<body>
Footer.php contains:
</body>
</html>
I am using it that way because when I have a lot of pages, it's a lot easier to just change one/two page(s). That way I spare time.
But the question is, is it bad to use a "template" style for my website?
( I saw some similair questions like this one but they didn't really answer my question, that's why I started a new topic - Sorry if it's wrong )
No problem with this I think - it's certainly better than duplicating the same content across multiple pages. Don't Repeat Yourself is a core tenant of programming, and this approach helps in that regard. The performance impact of the PHP includes is absolutely minimal and not worth worrying about, compared to advantage of easier maintenance.
You might be able to go further still though. Do you really need to repeat the includes on every page ? If all the pages have identical headers and footers, then you could make just one page that has them, and an area for dynamic content in the middle instead (this is the approach ASP.NET takes).
No, this is great. You will actually find there are more and more things you would like to move into included files, for example the sidebar for your website could be in its own file. This is exactly what PHP what made for, to allow for easier maintenance of your website.
Any PHP will be slower than only HTML. For example people use cacheing plugins for wordpress sites, so just HTML will be requested and the php server wont have to work as hard, and the page will be quicker. But the benefits of using PHP clearly outweigh this with the popularity of wordpress.
All php calls are made once, so multiple calls of php is not like multiple calls for css files or JavaScript.
As the site grows you will be happy to make one change that will affect all pages, rather than have to change each page. A simple example is a seasonal greeting in the header. Simple to ad and take away with your template. not so without. And that is before the more obvious link changes.
This is a good direction, just don't repeat yourself. Anyway, to get some more robustness from this templating idea you can try to take a look on the following libraries:
Twig : http://twig.sensiolabs.org
Smarty: http://www.smarty.net
I am looking at optimization options, and after checking SO questions, I don't quite see an answer for what I am trying to do. Hopefully that doesn't indicate that what I am doing is a bad practice!
I have an intranet application that loads page content via ajax calls to php files. A lot of the php files have a mixture of php, JavaScript, even some HTML, specific to the interface functionality that they load into the main interface. I was wondering about minifying or compressing these files. Is there a way to do it, or am I stuck because I have mixed languages?
Update: Concerning accepted answer:
I have accepted wildpeaks answer because I think it most closely answers my original question. However, this is one of those times when I wish I could accept two answers because I think the answer Igor Zinov'yev provided has given me perhaps a more important design decision to think about. For that reason I have given a +1 to his answer, as I imagine others will too. Hope that makes sense and is within the SO rules.
Your PHP script generates the Javascript code, so it can minify the code before outputting it: generate the code in a variable, then pass that variable to the minifier, and only then output to the browser.
Here's a PHP library for that.
You are starting your optimization off the wrong end. Obviously if you have hard-coded JavaScript, HTML and whatever else inside your PHP files, you seriously need to refactor the code. But even if you don't, you shouldn't minify the code in place because it would be even harder to maintain.
Pull it out of there, start with small steps, and you will get there eventually.
UPDATE: I thought of replying with a comment, but instead decided to elaborate on why I answered your question this way here.
I'm talking here about separation of concerns. Your server-side code files are no place for the client-side code. All solutions that do this that I have seen so far sooner or later turn into an unmaintainable mess.
If you want to return a piece of HTML code, put it into a template and supply the template with variables that are specific for this current situation. You can do that with Smarty. This way you get among others the following benefits:
No repeating pieces of markup over and over - there are template loops for that
A possibility to re-use existing templates in several places
Developers working with templates do not need to get into your server-side code
And your server-side code gets cleaner, smells nice too!
Later on when you separate logic from presentation maybe you will find that you don't need to send JavaScript code with HTML snippets. Maybe you will create a single JS engine (that you will minify on build) and will only have to trigger certain events upon load.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
I just want to build my first dynamic Website. I want to use PHP, MYSQL, AJAX, HTML, CSS
I have some beginner Questions:
Should the Header and Navigation Bar excluded in a header.php and print out with echo?
Should the design tags in the echo in php (like: <a>1 Test test</a>) or only return the the data
Is there a good example for making dynamic websites?
My main problem is that i don't know how to make a clear structure. Where to make the right design (print out in the php ?)
If it is really your first website, I'd actually recommend using nothing in terms of frameworks. This buys you some time to get comfortable with HTML/CSS, SQL and PHP, without overloading you with higher-level principles such as MVC (model/view/controller) and others. I'm mostly concerned that starting with a framework right away makes the learning curve to steep, and skips over things such as getting comfortable with the programming language you'll be using.
You'll eventually make a mess with way, but this will only make you appreciate the frameworks more; you can then make the transition to using a framework such as CodeIgniter, Symfony or CakePHP (or others, because there's a whole bunch more).
Other frameworks that I really like working with are Play! for Java, and Rails for Ruby. Since you stated you're a beginner, you might consider these as well.
Well, to answer all your questions at once.
The only technology you need is template.
Template is a typical PHP script, however, consists mostly of pure HTML, with some PHP code only to display dynamically generated data.
Create a main site template contains both header and navigation bar and footer everything else excluding actual page content.
Then create separate pages ("sections" of your site: news.php, links.php, etc.)
But make every page of 2 parts: getting data part and displaying data part.
While getting data, not a single character should be printed out.
If some errors occurred, display an error page.
Once you get all your data with no errors - it's time to include a main template.
A typical script may look like
<?
//include our settings, connect to database etc.
include dirname($_SERVER['DOCUMENT_ROOT']).'/cfg/settings.php';
//getting required data
$DATA=dbgetarr("SELECT * FROM links");
// setting title for using in the main template
$pagetitle = "Links to friend sites";
//etc
//set page template filename
$tpl = "links.tpl.php";
//and then finally call a template:
include "main.tpl.php";
?>
where main.tpl.php is your main site template, including common parts, like header, footer, menu etc:
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<title>My site. <?=$pagetitle?></title>
</head>
<body>
<div id="page">
<? include $tpl ?>
</div>
</body>
</html>
and links.tpl.php is the actual page template:
<h2><?=$pagetitle?></h2>
<ul>
<? foreach($DATA as $row): ?>
<li><?=$row['name']?></li>
<? endforeach ?>
<ul>
Eventually you may come to more complex designs, like with front controller one, but for the first site this one is both easy and powerful.
Yes, I do recommend you include header and navbar scripts from another file.. where you can maintain them independently. I think that is pretty important.
I recommend you echo/print html from php, rather than insert php into html (easier when doing things like parsing $_GET/$_POST etc)
I recommend that you create a template, and another script which has functions that print (or echo) the html tags, header, footer, title bar, navbar etc. Just include the script with the functions and all your pages can have the following structure:
<?php
include 'html_display_functions.php';
/* put lines here to parse $_GET and $_POST, session_start()/$_SESSION,etc
if needed */
print_html_pre_content();
print '<p>Hello, world! or other content.</p>';
print_html_post_content();
?>
I have found this to be pretty clean, and it is easy to add functionality when you get to messing around with $_GET, $_POST and $_SESSION, etc.
I'd suggest to use some template system (Smarty would be good).
It does not really matter where do you put your header and navigation bar at first glance. When do you need to exclude Navigation bar and store it separately? When you want to have ability to include different nav. bars in different parts of your website.
For example I have a website with several subdomains: about.website.dev, special.website.dev and, let's say, terms.website.dev
At about.website.dev my navigation bar's entries will be: "Who I am", "What do I do", "How cool am I"; at special.website.dev: "Goods", "Solutions", "Tips" , etc.
Your navigation bar's template is the same: just a loop though all entries, but content differs. In this case you separate navigation bar from header. If you don't use templates, you just create three files (in this case): about.nav.php, special.nav.php and terms.nav.php and then you just include appropriate navigation bar.
If your nav. bar is all the same everywhere on your website, you can store it in header.php. Once you need to separate, it will not be difficult, but still I'd suggest to use templates though just to get used to "proper website development".
Take a look at different templating systems like Smarty or Savant. I, personally, like Django's (python) templating system most. And get used to separate your view and business logic.
IMHO, you would be better off having a look at a php-based web application framework. such as the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_application_frameworks#PHP
Even though it may be a little more to learn upfront (the framework as well as php), they all have solid enough structures to develop dynamic websites with. Find one that is light enough and has good tutorials and you'll find yourself learning the php language along the way. I believe this will be easier than just using raw php at the beginning stage.
When you know more you can then make a judgement call on which frameworks you prefer and suit your needs or coding style or even revert back to raw php.
If you want a good book on the subject, try
MySQL/PHP Database Applications by Brad Bulger, Jay Greenspan and David Wall
What you are asking is pretty much a matter of taste. The more complex your application will be, the more work should go into an elaborate and maintainable structure.
My opinion is: Learn the basics first and then look at frameworks. It makes it a lot easier if you understand what happens under the hood.
Try Agile Toolkit, probably the easiest PHP UI framework to get started with designed for web software.
You'll step over many problems. http://agiletoolkit.org
Depending of the choice of framework/plain PHP, you should do it in accordance with their practices. For instance in Agile Toolkit you use templates, so you put your header and footer into templates/jui/shared.html file. It's explained in the first screencast.
If you reinvent the wheel and go ahead with plain PHP, then you should do better do include 'header.php'; . Good framework lets you NOT learn about inner workings of web software. Bad framework needs you to know everything anyway.
There's a lot of good answers here already - but just to add....
Do split functionality into separate include files - and use a consistent way of locating these files.
Do find a good PHP coding style and stick to it. e.g. horde, PEAR
Don't have code or HTML executed inline in include files - it should only do something when you specifically invoke it from your controlling script.
If you are including files which generate HTML, make sure they provide functionality for closing any tags they open. i.e. not just a 'header.php'
Since CSS and Javascript files should not be directly declared outside the HEAD of the HTML document do look at ways by which invoked functionality can add these into an existing HTML document - one obvious solution is to use a templating system combined with output buffering but you can also inject additional JS and CSS files into the HEAD section later in the document by using javascript.
Use MVC - http://www.yiiframework.com/doc/guide/1.1/en/basics.mvc
See Yii-framework http://yiiframework.com, it has all you need :)
So I have seen some comments on various web sites, pages, and questions I have asked about separating php and html.
I assume this means doing this:
<?php
myPhpStuff();
?>
<html>
<?php
morePhpStuff();
?>
Rather than:
<?php
doPhpStuff();
echo '<html>';
?>
But why does this matter? Is it really important to do or is it a preference?
Also it seems like when I started using PHP doing something like breaking out of PHP in a while loop would cause errors. Perhaps this is not true anymore or never was.
I made a small example with this concept but to me it seems so messy:
<?php
$cookies = 100;
while($cookies > 0)
{
$cookies = $cookies -1;
?>
<b>Fatty has </b><?php echo $cookies; ?> <b>cookies left.</b><br>
<?php
}
?>
Are there instances when it is just better to have the HTML inside the PHP?
<?php
$cookies = 100;
while($cookies > 0)
{
$cookies = $cookies -1;
echo'<b>Fatty has </b> '.$cookies.' <b>cookies left.</b><br>';
}
?>
When people talk about separating PHP and HTML they are probably referring to the practice of separating a website's presentation from the code that is used to generate it.
For example, say you had a DVD rental website and on the homepage you showed a list of available DVDs. You need to do several things: get DVD data from a database, extract and/or format that data and maybe mix some data from several tables. format it for output, combine the DVD data with HTML to create the webpage the user is going to see in their browser.
It is good practice to separate the HTML generation from the rest of the code, this means you can easily change your HTML output (presentation) without having to change the business logic (the reading and manipulation of data). And the opposite is true, you can change your logic, or even your database, without having to change your HTML.
A common pattern for this is called MVC (model view controller).
You might also want to look at the Smarty library - it's a widely used PHP library for separating presentation and logic.
Let's make it clear what is not separation
you switch from php mode to html mode
you use print or echo statements to write out html code
you use small php snipplets inside html files
If you do this, there is no separation at all, no matter if you escape from php to html blocks or do it the other way and put php code into html.
Have a look at a good templating engine, there are a plenty of reasons in the "why use ...." parts of the manuals. I'd suggert www.smarty.net especially http://www.smarty.net/whyuse.php
It will answer all your questions now you have.
It is very important to separate application logic from presentation logic in projects. The benefits include:
Readability: Your code will be much easier to read if it does not mix PHP and HTML. Also, HTML can become difficult to read if its stored and escaped in PHP strings.
Reusability: If you hard-code HTML strings within PHP code, the code will be very specifc to your project and it won't be possible to reuse your code in later projects. On the other hand, if you write small functions that do one task at a time, and put HTML into separate template files, reusing your code in future projects will be possible and much easier.
Working in a team: If you are working in a team that contains developers and designers, separation of application logic and presentation templates will be advantageous to both. Developers will be able to work on the application without worrying about the presentation, and designers (who don't necessarily know PHP very will) will be able to create and update templates without messing with PHP code.
for pages that contain a lot of HTML, embedding PHP code into the page could be easier. this is one of the first intentions behind PHP. anyway when you are developing an application with lots and lots of logic, different types of connectivity, data manipulation, ... your PHP code gets too complicated if you want to just embed them in the same pages that are shown to users. and then the story of maintenance begins. how are you going to change something in the code, fix a bug, add a new feature?
the best way is to separate your logic (where most of the code is PHP) in different files (even directories) from your page files (where most of the code is HTML, XML, CSV, ...).
this has been a concern for developers for so many years and there are recommendations to handle these general problems, that are called design patterns.
since not everyone has the experience, and can apply these design patterns into his application, some experienced developers create Frameworks, that will help other developers to use all the knowledge and experience laying in the hear of that framework.
when you look at toady's most used PHP frameworks, you see that all of them put code into PHP Classes in special directories, make configurations, and .... in none of these files you see a line of HTML. but there are special files that are used to show the results to users, and they have a lot of HTML, so you can embed your PHP values inside those HTML pages to show to users. but remember that these values are not calculated on the same page, they are results of a lot of other PHP codes, written in other PHP files that have no HTML in them.
I find it preferable to separate application logic from the view file (done well with CodeIgniter framework with MVC) as it leaves code looking relatively tidy and understandable. I have also found that separating the two leaves less margin for PHP errors, if the HTML elements are separated from the PHP there is a smaller amount of PHP that can go wrong.
Ultimately I believe it is down to preference however I feel that separation has the following pros:
Tidier Code
Less of an Error Margin
Easy to Interpret
Easier to change HTML elements
Easier to changed Application Logic
Faster Loading (HTML is not going from Parser->Browser it goes straight to browser)
However some cons may be:
It only works in PHP5 (I Believe, could be wrong, correct if needed)
It may not be what one is used to
Untidy if done incorrectly (without indentation etc, however this is the same with anything)
But as you can see, the pros outweigh said cons. Try not to mix the two also, some separation and some intergration - this may get confusing for yourself and other developers that work with you.
I hope this helped.
Benefits of the first method (separating PHP and HTML):
You don't need to escape characters
It's also possible for code editors
to highlight/indent the markup.
It's arguably easier to read
There is no downside to this method,
compared to the second method.
Functionally: they both will work, so ultimately it is a preference.
Yet, you might consider that comments are a preference as well, your code would compile and run exactly the same without comments. However most people would agree comments are essential to writing and maintaining good code. I see this as being a similar subject matter. In the long run it will make it easier to read and maintain the code it if the two are separated.
So is it important? I would say Yes.
I kick off with: the first one you can open in a WYSIWYG editor, and still see some markup, which might makes it easier to maintain.
It says that what you put in echo '' it is first processed by the programming language and then sent to the browser, but if you directly put there html code without php, that code will load faster because there is no programming involved.
And the second reason as people above said is that you should have your 'large programming code' stored separately of the html code, and in the html code just put some calls to print results like 'echo $variable'. Or use a template engine like Smarty (like I do).
Best regards,
Alexandru.
Ouch!
All of the examples in your question are perfectly impossible to read. I'd say, you do yourself and those, who might read your code a great favour and use a template engine of sorts, say, Smarty. It is extremely easy to set up and use and it WILL separate your code from presentation. It doesn't require you to put everything in classes, it just makes sure, that your logic is in one file and presentation - in another one.
I don't know how in php but in asp.net separation has the following advantages.
1. separated code is easy to understand and develop
2. designer can work in html in the same time developer can write a code
I have a website which consists of a bunch of static HTML pages. Obviously there's a lot of duplication among these (header, menu, etc). The hosting company I plan to use supports PHP, which I know nothing about. Presumably PHP provides some sort of #include mechanism, but what changes to I need to make to my HTML pages to use it?
For example, suppose I have a page like this
index.html
<html>
<head></head>
<body>
<h1>My Common Header</h1>
</body>
</html>
Obviously I need to move the common part into it's own file:
header.html
<h1>My Common Header</h1>
Given the example above (and assuming all files are in the same directory):
What do I add within the body tag to get header.html included?
Do I need to rename index.html or add some special tags to indicate that it's a .php file?
Do I need to make any changes to header.html?
Update: I want to emphasise that my objective here is simply to find the lowest-friction means of reducing duplication among static HTML files. I'm a bit reluctant to go down the server side includes route because I don't yet know what type of server (IIS/Apache) I'll be hosting the files on, and whether includes will be turned on or off. I was drawn towards PHP only because it is about the only thing I can presume will be available that will be able to do the job. Thanks for the responses.
Thanks,
Donal
You are looking for include (or one of its derivative such as include_once, require, require_once):
header.php
<h1>My Common Header</h1>
index.php
<html>
<head></head>
<body>
<?php include('header.php'); ?>
</body>
</html>
And so on, for your footer for example.
You don't need to use PHP to get this functionality, and it's generally a bad idea to do so due to potential security concerns. Essentially, you're swatting a gnat with a nuclear bomb. If you're not using a dynamic language, then you're looking for server side includes.
In IIS, for instance:
<!--#include virtual="file.inc"-->
Be aware that you often have to configure the server to utilize them, as this feature is often turned off by default. Both IIS and Apache support server side includes, but they use different configurations.
You can find more information here:
Server Side Includes
EDIT: I don't mean that it's a bad idea to use PHP, just using PHP solely for including other files. It creates a larger attack surface by bringing PHP into the mix when it's not needed, thus the potential for security issues when the functionality of PHP is not required.
EDIT2: I think it's a bad idea to assume you won't be a target because of your size, and thus you can ignore security. Most sites are compromised by automated worms and turned into malware hosts, spam zombies, or pirated software/media servers. Apart from the fact that you might end up being involved with infecting others, your site can become blacklisted and it can cost you real money in bandwidth overage charges. We're talking hundreds or thousands of dollars.
Just because you're a small site doesn't make you any less of a target. Just being on the internet makes you a target.
Forget doing it on the server altogether.
If all you really want to do is maintain some static pages -- and don't anticipate ever having to really use PHP -- I'd just do it with Dreamweaver, which will allow you create and manage templates and variable content on your end.
No includes needed. No templating engine needed. (These would be overkill for what you are trying to accomplish.)
You should first change the file extensions of index and header to be .php, then you can do:
<html>
<head></head>
<body>
<? include 'header.php'; ?>
</body>
</html>
And your header.php file just has
<h1>My Common Header</h1>
While you can just use the "include", "require", or "require_once" directives to include things in one page, you might have better luck with a template engine like Smarty
While using an include file for the header is a solution I went a different route when I faced the problem several years back: I wanted all pages to use the same layout (which I assume is rather common ;-). Thus, as I only wanted to change the content of the page I made the page content the file that gets included and have a master template file that includes header and footer. For setting the page to be included I resorted to creating quite small php scripts that only set a variable that holds the page to get included. In some cases the page can also get named by a GET parameter. Of course this requires proper validation of that parameter. In the long run I don't need to worry about the HTML itself anymore -- all I do is write small snippets (which should be complete for themselves of course) that get included.
A possibly even better solution would be to use an existing template framework. Due to the contraints I had back then I wasn't able to do so, but I would do it when facing the same issue again.
Back in the day, I used SSIs (the "<!--#include virtual="file.inc"-->" method described above by Mystere Man) quite a bit for static HTML pages and I would definitely recommend using that.
However if you want to eliminate any uncertainty about whether support for that will be enabled on the server, you could develop your separate files locally and merge them into the resulting files before uploading to your server. Dreamweaver, for example, supports doing this in a seamless fashion.
Or you could do it yourself with a rather simple script in your language of choice by doing simple string replacement on markers in the files, replacing {{{include-header}}} with the contents of a "header.html" file and so on.
Edit
Oops! Somehow I didn't see Clayton's post with the same note about Dreamweaver.
OK this is a semi-programming related question only.
PHP does have include(), which is really easy to use, but it doesn't contribute to future maintainability. I wouldn't recommend it, especially for big sites.
I'm a pro-frameworks. I've used CodeIgniter, CakePHP and even Smarty template engine. If you are serious about PHP, do consider CakePHP. There's this "layouts" concept where you frame your header, footer, css, javascript outside of the main content; e.g. for the "about us" page, your content would be something like:
This is an about us page that tells you a whole bunch of stuff about us...
CakePHP takes this this content, and wraps your layout around it:
header
css
javascript
This is an about us page that tells you a whole bunch of stuff about us...
footer