I've created a ServiceProvider in Laravel5 that registers two singletons to the service container:
ServiceProvider
namespace App\Providers;
use App\Services\Passwords\FileMakerPasswordBroker;
use App\Services\Passwords\FileMakerTokenRepository;
use Illuminate\Support\ServiceProvider;
class FileMakerPasswordResetServiceProvider extends ServiceProvider
{
protected $defer = true;
public function provides(){
return ['fm.password','fm.password.token'];
}
public function register()
{
$this->registerPasswordBroker();
$this->registerTokenRepository();
}
protected function registerPasswordBroker(){
$this->app->singleton('fm.password', function ($app){
return new FileMakerPasswordBroker;
});
}
protected function registerTokenRepository(){
$this->app->singleton('fm.password.token', function ($app){
return new FileMakerTokenRepository;
});
}
}
I've just started so the two concrete classes being created are just empty class declarations:
TokenRepository
namespace App\Services\Passwords;
class FileMakerTokenRepository {
}
PasswordBroker
namespace App\Services\Passwords;
class FileMakerPasswordBroker {
}
And I've registered my service provider in my config/app.php class:
app.php
...
'providers' => [
...
App\Providers\FileMakerPasswordResetServiceProvider::class
...
The problem is, I can't resolve the singletons out of the service container:
A dev controller
...
use Illuminate\Foundation\Application;
class DevController extends Controller
{
protected $app;
public function __construct(Application $app){
$this->app = $app;
}
public function testPasswordReset(){
// This throws an error
return $this->app->make('fm.password.token');
}
...
When I try to make the singleton, I get the error
ReflectionException in Container.php line 736:
Class fm.password.token does not exist
I walked back through the documentation on binding and resolving from the service container and it looks like everything is right, but I'm obviously missing something.
Is there a step I'm missing or something I'm missing re: resolving a singleton from the service container?
Update
Here's a screen shot of the stack if that helps:
Another interesting fact: When I dump the application to the browser from the dev controller:
dd($this->app);
And look at the list of service providers, the FileMakerPasswordResetServiceProvider class is not present:
The provider is eventually going to be deferred, but at the moment I have the deferred property commented out, so (as far as I know) it should be getting loaded. I see other providers that I've registered in the stack. This may be another clue.
Related
I am using Laravel Lumen (v8.2.4) with PHP (v7.4)
I have the following controller class:
<?php
namespace App\Http\Controllers;
use App\Services\MyService;
class MyController extends Controller
{
protected $myService;
public function __construct(MyService $myService)
{
$this->myService = $myService;
}
}
And the following service class:
<?php
namespace App\Services;
class MyService
{
private $credentials;
function __construct($credentials)
{
$this->credentials = $credentials;
}
}
The myService class requires the credentials property to be set in order to function correctly. When myService is being injected into my controller class, I don't have the credentials at that time so therefore cannot initialise the service class to inject it.
How can I handle this? Should I remove the service class constructor and set the credentials property in a public setter method and invoke this when I need to? I am not sure if this is a good approach.
Appreciate any advice.
You need to register your service in service provider. You can do it in AppServiceProvider or in custom provider.
//retrieve credentials from wherever you need to get them, ex: config file
$credentials = config('app.credentialts');
$this->app->bind(MyService::class, function ($app) use ($credentials) {
return new MyService($credentials);
});
Check out Laravel Service Providers and Laravel Service Containers for more detailed information.
I have a service provider that I want to use to bind an instance of a class to the service container:
namespace App\Providers;
use Eluceo\iCal\Component\Calendar;
use Illuminate\Support\ServiceProvider;
class IcalProvider extends ServiceProvider
{
public function register()
{
$this->app->instance('iCal', function () {
return new Calendar(config('calendar.name'));
});
}
}
As I understand the documentation on binding an instance, this allows me to bind the key iCal to the service container so that later in my controller or service class I can type hint iCal and the instance created in the service provider will be used.
So I created a controller and tried to type hint my instance:
namespace App\Http\Controllers;
use App\Http\Controllers\Controller;
class CalendarInviteController extends Controller
{
public function download(iCal $ical, $sessionId)
{
dd($ical);
}
}
But when I do I get the error:
Class App\Http\Controllers\iCal does not exist
Makes sense, as it applies it's looking for a class named iCal in the controller namespace which doesn't exist. There's not a use statement for the instance since iCal is just a text key, so I tried telling it to look at the root namespace thinking that may fix it:
public function download(\iCal $ical, $sessionId)
and I get the error:
Class iCal does not exist
When I read the section of the documentation on resolving from the service container it looks like the only thing I need to do in the controller is type hint to get the instance.
Am I misunderstanding the docs?
Update
I should also mention that I did add my service provider to my config/app.php file.
Also, when I create an interface, bind it to the service container instead, edit the vendor code to implement said interface, and inject that interface instead it works, but that requires that I edit the vendor code which I don't want.
As you see in the docs the method instance takes a key and an object instance to register in the container. So, if you want to register a specific instance in the container, the registration should be:
namespace App\Providers;
use Eluceo\iCal\Component\Calendar;
use Illuminate\Support\ServiceProvider;
class IcalProvider extends ServiceProvider
{
public function register()
{
//register a specific instance of the Calendar class in the container
$this->app->instance('iCal', new Calendar(config('calendar.name') );
}
}
This way you could get back the instance with:
$cal = \App::make('iCal');
If your purpose is to type-hint the class in the controller method, and you want to resolve the previous registered instance from the service container, you could do like this:
namespace App\Providers;
use Eluceo\iCal\Component\Calendar;
use Illuminate\Support\ServiceProvider;
class IcalProvider extends ServiceProvider
{
public function register()
{
//the key will be 'Eluceo\iCal\Component\Calendar'
$this->app->instance( Calendar::class, new Calendar(config('calendar.name') );
}
}
Now, in your controller:
namespace App\Http\Controllers;
//important: specify the Calendar namespace
use Eluceo\iCal\Component\Calendar;
class CalendarInviteController extends Controller
{
public function download(Calendar $ical, $sessionId)
{
dd($ical);
}
}
This way Laravel will see that you want a Calendar object and it will try to get it from the service container looking if exists a binding for this key: (because this is the namespace of the class you have specified in the controller)
Eluceo\iCal\Component\Calendar
and the binding exists! As you have bound this key to your service container in your service provider, so Laravel will return your registered instance.
In the code you provided, you tipe-hinted the class iCal, but the class didn't exist anywhere so Laravel wasn't able to instantiate the class
If you’re wanting to inject dependencies into your controller (which is good, so kudos!) then you need an interface name to type-hint on.
Usually you would have a generic interface, and then bind that interface to a concrete implementation. So you may have a calendar service interface, that’s bound to your iCal implementation. Something like this:
use Eluceo\iCal\Component\Calendar;
class CalendarServiceProvider extends ServiceProvider
{
public function register()
{
$this->app->bind('App\Services\Calendar', function ($app) {
return new Calendar(config('calendar.name'));
});
}
public function provides()
{
return ['App\Services\Calendar'];
}
}
So long as you register your service provider in your config/app.php file, you can now type-hint your calendar dependency in classes:
use App\Services\Calendar;
class InvitationController extends Controller
{
protected $calendar;
public function __construct(Calendar $calendar)
{
$this->calendar = $calendar;
}
}
I know that this question was asked so many times, but none of answers helped me.
I'm getting exception in Laravel 5
BindingResolutionException in Container.php line 785:
Target [App\Contracts\CustomModelInterface] is not instantiable.
What I've done without success:
Register App\Providers\AppRepositoryProvider in app.php providers
php artisan clear-compiled
Everything works if I replace interfaces on repositories in MyService, but I feel that it's wrong (should it be handled by IoC container?).
Structure:
app
- Contracts
- CustomModelInterface.php
- Models
- CustomModel.php
- Repositories
- CustomModelRepository.php
- Providers
- AppRepositoryProvider.php
- Services
- MyService.php
App\Contracts\CustomModelInterface.php
<?php namespace App\Contracts;
interface CustomModelInterface {
public function get();
}
App\Repositories\CustomModelRepository.php
<?php namespace App\Repositories;
use App\Contracts\CustomModelInterface;
use App\Models\CustomModel;
class CustomModelRepository implements CustomModelInterface {
private $Model;
public function __construct(CustomModel $model) {
$this->Model = $model;
}
public function get() {
return 'result';
}
}
App\Services\MyService.php (Keep business logic / layer between controller and repositories)
<?php namespace App\Services;
use App\Contracts\CustomModelInterface;
class MyService {
private $Model;
public function __construct(CustomModelInterface $customModel) {
$this->Model= $customModel;
}
public function getAll() {
return $this->Model->get();
}
}
App\Providers\AppRepositoryProvider.php
<?php namespace App\Providers;
use Illuminate\Support\ServiceProvider;
class AppRepositoryProvider extends ServiceProvider {
public function boot() {}
public function register() {
$models = array(
'CustomModel'
);
foreach ($models as $idx => $model) {
$this->app->bind("App\Contracts\{$model}Interface", "App\Repositories\{$model}Repository");
}
}
}
My controller looks like:
<?php namespace App\Http\Controllers;
use App\Services\MyService;
class SuperController extends Controller {
private $My;
public function __construct(MyService $myService) {
$this->My = $myService;
}
public function getDetails() {
return $this->My->getAll();
}
}
composer.json
"autoload": {
"classmap": [
"database"
],
"psr-4": {
"App\\": "app/",
"App\\Models\\": "app/Models/",
"App\\Contracts\\": "app/Contracts/",
"App\\Repositories\\": "app/Repositories/"
}
},
Thank you everyone, but problem was in my AppRepositoryProvider. As it's binding exception, then obviously the problem was with binding :)
Correct file is:
<?php namespace App\Providers;
use Illuminate\Support\ServiceProvider;
class AppRepositoryProvider extends ServiceProvider {
public function boot() {}
public function register() {
$models = array(
'CustomModel',
'CustomModel2',
'CustomModel3'
);
foreach ($models as $model) {
$this->app->bind("App\Contracts\\{$model}Interface", "App\Repositories\\{$model}Repository");
}
}
}
Note, that I'm using "App\Contracts\\{$model}Interface" (not escaping "{" symbol) and it generate correct string App\Contracts\CustomModelInterface instead of App\Contracts\{$model}Interface (with unexpected escaping).
Every time I create a new repository/contract pair I make sure I do the following:
check the classes used in the service provider (copy/paste the namespaces)
register a new binding in config/app.php
php artisan optimize
Many hours of useless debugging led me to this short checklist.
For me, I forgot to bind in app->providers->RepositoryServiceProvider
the repository like this in the register method
public function register()
{
$this->app->bind(
\App\Play\Contracts\PatientRepository::class,
\App\Play\Modules\PatientModule::class
);
}
Make sure your RepositoryServiceProvider is registered in AppServiceProvider.
public function register()
{
$this->app->register(RepositoryServiceProvider::class);
}
I got past this error running:
php artisan config:clear
php artisan clear-compiled
php artisan optimize
php artisan config:cache
Related to:
Target is not instantiable. Laravel 5 - App binding service provider
The problem is solved by adding your repository in app/providers/AppServiceProvider
like the example below.
public function register()
{
$this->app->singleton(UserRepository::class, EloquentUser::class);
}
Dont forget the name space
use Test\Repositories\EloquentUser;
use Test\Repositories\UserRepository;
It worked for me
On App\Services\MyService.php you are passing that interface with dependency injection which tries to instantiate that -
public function __construct(CustomModelInterface $customModel) {
$this->Model= $customModel;
}
which is wrong.
Try implement that in that class - class MyService implements CustomModelInterface { and use the function of that interface like -
$this->get();
Or you are using it - class CustomModelRepository implements CustomModelInterface {
So if you do -
public function __construct(CustomModelRepository $customModel) {
$this->Model= $customModel;
}
then also you can access the interface methods.
I've just experienced an issue similar to this and the cause of my error was that I had set $defer to true in the service provider class but I had not implemented the required provides() method.
If you have deferred the creation of your class until it is need rather than it being loaded eagerly, then you need to also implement the provides method which should simply return an array of the classes that the provider provides. In the case of an interface, I believe it should be the name of the interface rather than the concrete class.
E.g.
public method provides(): array
{
return [
MyInterface::class,
];
}
Current documentation: https://laravel.com/docs/5.5/providers#deferred-providers
I hope this helps somebody else.
Don't worry guys. I have a solution to your problem.
I have an example for you.
Step1: php artisan make:repository Repository/Post //By adding this command you can create a repository and eloquent files
Step2: After adding that file you have to add/use this repository in the controller in which you want to use.
for eg: use App\Repositories\Contracts\PostRepository;
Step3: After adding that repo in your controller if you will run the app you will get an error like " Interface is not instantiable". It comes because you have created a repo and used in a controller, but laravel don't know where this repository is register and bind with which eloquent. So that it throws an error.
Step4: To solve this error you have to bind your repo with your eloquent in AppServiceProvider.
E.g:
AppServiceProvider.php file
<?php
namespace App\Providers;
// **Make sure that your repo file path and eloquent path must be correct.**
use App\Repositories\Contracts\PostRepository; // **Use your repository here**
use App\Repositories\Eloquent\EloquentPostRepository; **// Use your eloquent here**
use Illuminate\Support\ServiceProvider;
class AppServiceProvider extends ServiceProvider {
/**
* Register any application services.
*
* #return void
*/
public function register() {
**// And bind your repository and eloquent here. **
$this->app->bind(PostRepository::class, EloquentPostRepository::class);
}
}
Step5: After binding repo and eloquent you can use all method of repo in your controller. Enjoy.....
Please let me know if you have any query.
execute this command :
composer dump-autoload
this command will remap your laravel autoload classes together with all other vendor's i had same issue before and this did the trick you can use it together with "-o" param for optimization .
Note that this can also be caused by the _constructor on the class being declared private, or otherwise being blocked...
If it cant call the constructor, the binding will fail
I think the problem here is that you don't bind App\Contracts\CustomModelInterface to anything so Laravel tries to create instance of interface.
In App\Providers\AppRepositoryProvider.php you have only:
$models = array(
'Model'
);
but you should have in this array CustomModel also, so it should look like this:
$models = array(
'Model',
'CustomModel',
);
The last thing you do is to use the interface you bound to the repository.
Set it up and try running your laravel app to make sure you get no errors.
In my case I had a mismatch between my repository and interface.
interface UserRepositoryInterface{
public function get($userId);
}
class UserRepository implements UserRepositoryInterface{
public function get(int $userId);
}
As you can see the interface get method does not include a type hint but the UserRepository class' get method has a type hint.
You won't get this error if you immediately start to use your Interface Binding.
register a new binding in config/app.php
In my case I forgot use App\Repositories\UserRepository in App\Providers\AppRepositoryProvider.php
intelephense wasn't complaining and the error-message did not give me any clue, but somehow I found out that it's missing and adding this line did the trick
I had this error, and found out that I should restart the queue because it runs in the job:
php artisan queue:restart
I'm trying to deepen my knowlade in laravel architecture.
I have a search engine (elastic search for the sake of the example), but this search engine might change in the future. So im trying to write a container for this, so in case i'll change the engine in the future, i will have to change only the container. (I believe the termenology is factory design?)
I have created a provider app/providers/DataFromSearchEngine.php that looks like this:
use Illuminate\Support\ServiceProvider;
class DataFromSearchEngine extends ServiceProvider {
public function boot()
{
//
}
public function register()
{
$this->app->singleton('SearchEngine', function($app) {
return new elasticSearch;
});
}
}
Then i registered it in the providers array in config/app.php .
'providers' => [
// providers...
'App\Providers\DataFromSearchEngine'
],
The next step is to call SearchEngine from my controller:
namespace App\Http\Controllers;
use App\Http\Requests;
use App\Http\Controllers\Controller;
use Illuminate\Http\Request;
class SearchController extends Controller {
protected $searchEngine;
public function __construct() {
$this->searchEngine = $this->app->make('SearchEngine');
}
}
But all these yields: Undefined property: App\Http\Controllers\SearchController::$app
Can someone explain what i'm missing?
Instead of using $this->app try using app().
This is because non of the inherited controller classes, i.e. App\Http\Controllers\Controller or Illuminate\Routing\Controllers\Controller have an app property on them.
As a note you can use app('SearchEngine') which is the equivalent of app()->make('SearchEngine') as a shortcut to making your object.
I had this issue when trying to create a service provider. I registered my service provider in AppServiceProvider.php but was still getting this same error. The issue was that in my ServiceProvider I needed to add extends ServiceProvider to my class. Seems simple but is often forgotten.
I have a custom class App/Http/Responder, which had a few methods to build a specific JSON response back in my application. I want to test my controller in isolation, so I'm trying to inject my dependencies via the constructor.
My plan was to simply create a service provider, attach bind it to the $app and then, as per the docs, let it be automatically resolved:
public function register()
{
$this->app->bind('responder', function()
{
return new App\Http\Responder($this->app['cache'], $this->app['app'], new JsonResponse, $this->app['config']);
});
}
I then add this to my config/app.php.
Okay, so now my Responder and it's dependancies are bound to the app, as responder.
Now I thought I'd be able to inject Responder into my controller constructor, and Laravel would be able to automatically resolve this from the IoC container:
class AreasController extends BaseController {
protected $responder;
public function __construct(Responder $responder)
{
$this->responder = $responder;
}
However I get Class Responser does not exist.
The only way I can get it working, without using the App::make() Facade, is to inject the app into my controller:
use Illuminate\Foundation\Application as App;
class AreasController extends BaseController {
protected $app;
public function __construct(App $app)
{
$this->app = $app;
}
I can then do $this->app['responder']->method().
Obviously I'm missing something, but I want to keep away from using Facades in my app so I can test.
If you want to type hint classes to be resolved in the IOC container, you should bind the actual class name with namespace:
$this->app->bind('App\Http\Responder', function()
{
return new App\Http\Responder($this->app['cache'], $this->app['app'], new JsonResponse, $this->app['config']);
});
Technically the container would still resolve this class, because it's a concrete class that can be found, but the way you're doing allows to inject other IOC-bound resources, which is a good practice.
Then, when you wish to have this class injected for you, type hint the full path to the class as you normally would:
use App\Http\Responder;
class AreasController extends BaseController {
protected $responder;
public function __construct(Responder $responder)
{
$this->responder = $responder;
}
}
Also, for what it's worth, your error indicates that you misspelled "Responder" as "Responser".