I'm trying to set up two Docker images for my PHP web application (php-fcm) reversed proxied by NGINX. Ideally I would like all the files of the web application to be copied into the php-fcm based image and exposed as a volume. This way both containers (web and app) can access the files with NGINX serving the static files and php-fcm interpreting the php files.
docker-compose.yml
version: '2'
services:
web:
image: nginx:latest
depends_on:
- app
volumes:
- ./site.conf:/etc/nginx/conf.d/default.conf
volumes_from:
- app
links:
- app
app:
build: .
volumes:
- /app
Dockerfile:
FROM php:fpm
COPY . /app
WORKDIR /app
The above setup works as expected. However, when I make any change to the files and then do
compose up --build
the new files are not picked up in the resulting images. This is despite the following message indicating that the image is indeed being rebuilt:
Building app
Step 1 : FROM php:fpm
---> cb4faea80358
Step 2 : COPY . /app
---> Using cache
---> 660ab4731bec
Step 3 : WORKDIR /app
---> Using cache
---> d5b2e4fa97f2
Successfully built d5b2e4fa97f2
Only removing all the old images does the trick.
Any idea what could cause this?
$ docker --version
Docker version 1.11.2, build b9f10c9
$ docker-compose --version
docker-compose version 1.7.1, build 0a9ab35
The 'volumes_from' option mounts volumes from one container to another. The important word there is container, not image. So when you rebuild an image, the previous container is still running. If you stop and restart that container, or even just stop it, the other containers are still using those old mount points. If you stop, remove the old app container, and start a new one, the old volume mounts will still persist to the now deleted container.
The better way to solve this in your situation is to switch to named volumes and setup a utility container to update this volume.
version: '2'
volumes:
app-data:
driver: local
services:
web:
image: nginx:latest
depends_on:
- app
volumes:
- ./site.conf:/etc/nginx/conf.d/default.conf
- app-data:/app
app:
build: .
volumes:
- app-data:/app
A utility container to update your app-data volume could look something like:
docker run --rm -it \
-v `pwd`/new-app:/source -v app-data:/target \
busybox /bin/sh -c "tar -cC /source . | tar -xC /target"
As BMitch points out, image updates don't automatically filter down into containers. your workflow for updates needs to be revisited. I've just gone through the process of building a container which includes NGINX and PHP-FPM. I've found, for me, that the best way was to include nginx and php in a single container, both managed by supervisord.
I then have scripts in the image that allow you to update your code from a git repo. This makes the whole process really easy.
#Create new container from image
docker run -d --name=your_website -p 80:80 -p 443:443 camw/centos-nginx-php
#git clone to get website code from git
docker exec -ti your_website get https://www.github.com/user/your_repo.git
#restart container so that nginx config changes take effect
docker restart your_website
#Then to update, after committing changes to git, you'll call
docker exec -ti your_website update
#restart container if there are nginx config changes
docker restart your_website
My container can be found at https://hub.docker.com/r/camw/centos-nginx-php/
The dockerfile and associated build files are available at https://github.com/CamW/centos-nginx-php
If you want to give it a try, just fork https://github.com/CamW/centos-nginx-php-demo, change the conf/nginx.conf file as indicated in the readme and include your code.
Doing it this way, you don't need to deal with volumes at all, everything is in your container which I like.
Related
I made the following script in docker-compose.yml, which tries to run a official PHP + Apache image from Docker Hub:
services:
apache:
image: 'php:5.6-apache'
container_name: apache
restart: always
ports:
- '80:80'
- '443:443'
volumes:
- /mnt/data/apps/html:/var/www/html
- /mnt/data/apps/ssl:/etc/ssl
- /mnt/data/apps/apache:/etc/apache2
But when i run it with docker compose up the container does go up, but the files that were supposed to be created on container launch are not being created it... (Also happens when using docker run script)
If i remove the volumes, run it again and access the container with "docker exec -it apache bash" i see that the files are generated accordingly... Just happens when binding volumes. Wasnt the files suposed to be created automatically to the local volumes?
Please, what am i doing wrong? Is there something missing on the script? Am i being dumb?
Sorry if this is a really obvious question, i have nowere to go and are starting now on docker.
Thank you
Solution was to run container without any volumes and use docker cp to copy the config files to my machine, then run it again but with volume poiting to the copied config files...
Nginx Example
docker pull nginx:1.23.1-alpine
docker run --name tmp-nginx-container -d nginx:1.23.1-alpine
docker cp tmp-nginx-container:/etc/nginx/ D:\Docker\Config
docker rm -f tmp-nginx-container
Context
I set up a PHP application recently to work in a docker container connected to a database in a different container.
In production, we're using a single container environment since it just connects to the database which is hosted somewhere else. Nonetheless, we decided to use two containers and docker-compose locally for the sake of easing the development workflow.
Problem
The issue we've encountered is that the first time we build and run the application via docker-compose up --build Composer's vendor directory isn't available in the container, even though we had a specific RUN composer install line in the Dockerfile. We would have to execute the composer install from within the container once it was running.
Solution found
After a lot of googling around, we figured that we had two possible solutions:
change the default command of our Docker image to the following:
bash -c "composer install && /usr/sbin/apache2ctl -D FOREGROUND"
Or simply override the container's default command to the above via docker-compose's command.
The difference is that if we overrid the command via docker-compose, when deploying the application to our server, it would run seamlessly, as it should, but when changing the default command in the Dockerfile it would suffer a 1 minute-ish downtime everytime we deployed.
This helped during this process:
Running composer install within a Dockerfile
Some (maybe wrong) conclusions
My conclusion was that that minute of downtime was due to the container having to install all the dependencies via composer before running the Apache server, vs simply running the server.
Furthermore, another conclusion I drew from all the poking around was that the reason why the docker-compose up --build wouldn't install the composer dependencies was because we had a volume specified in the docker-compose.yml which overrid the directories in the container.
These helped:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/38817651/4700998
https://stackoverflow.com/a/48589910/4700998
Actual question
I was hoping for somebody to shed some light into all this since I don't really understand what's going on fully – why running docker-compose would not install the PHP dependencies, but including the composer install in the default command would and why adding the composer install to the docker-compose.yml is better. Furthermore, how do volumes come into all this, and is it the real reason for all the hassle.
Our current docker file looks like this:
FROM php:7.1.27-apache-stretch
ENV DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive
# install some stuff, PHP, Apache, etc.
WORKDIR /srv/app
COPY . .
RUN composer install
RUN service apache2 restart
EXPOSE 80
CMD ["/usr/sbin/apache2ctl", "-D", "FOREGROUND"]
And our current docker-compose.yml like this:
version: '3'
services:
database:
image: mysql:5.7
container_name: container-cool-name
command: mysqld --user=root --sql_mode=""
ports:
- "3306:3306"
volumes:
- ./db_backup.sql:/tmp/db_backup.sql
- ./.docker/import.sh:/tmp/import.sh
environment:
MYSQL_DATABASE: my_db
MYSQL_USER: my_user
MYSQL_PASSWORD: password
MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD: test
app:
build:
context: .
dockerfile: Dockerfile
image: image-name
command: bash -c "composer install && /usr/sbin/apache2ctl -D FOREGROUND"
ports:
- 8080:80
volumes:
- .:/srv/app
links:
- database:db
depends_on:
- database
environment:
DB_HOST: db
DB_PORT: 3306
DB_DATABASE: my_db
DB_USER: my_user
DB_PASSWORD: password
Your first composer install within Dockerfile works fine, and your resulting image has vendor/ etc.
But later you create a container from that image, and that container is executed with whole directory being replaced by a host dir mount:
volumes:
- .:/srv/app
So, your docker image has both your files and installed vendor files, but then you replace project directory with one on your host which does not have vendor files, and final result looks like the building was never done.
My advice would be:
don't add second command build to the Dockerfile
mount individual folders in your container, i.e. not .:/srv/app, but ./src:/srv/app/src, etc.
or, map whole folder, but copy vendor files from image/container to your host
or use some 3rd party utility to solve exactly this problem, e.g. http://docker-sync.io or many others
I am trying to set up a CI pipeline with docker-compose and am struggling to understand how named volumes work...
As part of my Dockerfile, I copy in the application files and then run composer install to install the application dependencies. There are some elements of the applicaton files and the dependencies that I want to share with the other containers that are running / are set up to be run to perform utility processes (such as running database migrations). See the example below:
Dockerfile:
FROM php:5.6-apache
# Install dependencies
COPY composer.* /app/
RUN composer install --no-dev
# Copy application files
COPY bin bin
COPY environment.json environment.json
VOLUME /app
docker-compose.yml
web:
build:
context: .
dockerfile: docker/web/Dockerfile
volumes:
- app:/app
- ~/.cache/composer:/composer/cache
migrations:
image: my-image
depends_on:
- web
environment:
- DB_DRIVER=pdo_mysql
- AUTOLOADER=../../../vendor/autoload.php
volumes:
- app:/app
working_dir: /app/vendor/me/my-lib
volumes:
app:
In the example above (irrelevant information omitted), I have a "migrations" service that pulls the migrations from the application dependencies installed with composer. My idea is that when I perform docker-compose build followed by docker-compose up, it will bring up the latest version of software with the latest dependencies and run the latest migrations at the same time.
This works fine the first time. Unfortunately on subsequent runs I cannot get docker-compose to use the new versions. If I run docker-compose build, I can see the composer install run and install all the latest libraries, but then when I go into the container with docker-compose run web /bin/bash, the old dependencies are in there! If I run the image directly with docker run web_1, I can see all the latest files no problem. So it's definitely a compose-specific problem.
I assume I need to do something like clear out the volume cache, but whatever I have tried doesn't seem to work. I can only assume I am misunderstanding the idea of volumes.
Any help would be hugely appreciated. Thanks!
What I understand from your question is you want to run composer install every time you run your container. In that case you have to use CMD instruction to execute that command.
CMD composer install --no-dev
RUN and CMD are both Dockerfile instructions.
RUN lets you execute commands inside of your Docker image. These commands get executed once at build time and get written into your Docker image as a new layer.
For example if you wanted to install a package or create a directory inside of your Docker image then RUN will be what you’ll want to use. For example, RUN mkdir -p /path/to/folder.
CMD lets you define a default command to run when your container starts.
You could say that CMD is a Docker run-time operation, meaning it’s not something that gets executed at build time. It happens when you run an image. A running image is called a container.
The problem here has to do with mounting a volume over a location defined in the build. The first build of the image has composer put its output into /app, and the first run of the first build mounts the app named volume to /app. This clobbers the image version of /app with a new write-layer on top. Mounting this named volume on the second build of the image will keep the original contents of /app.
Instead of using a named volume, use volumes-from to load the exported /app volume from web into the migration container.
version: '2'
services:
web:
build:
context: .
dockerfile: docker/web/Dockerfile
volumes:
- ~/.cache/composer:/composer/cache
migrations:
image: docker-registry.efficio.digital:5043/doctrine-migrator:1.1
depends_on:
- web
environment:
- DB_DRIVER=pdo_mysql
- AUTOLOADER=../../../vendor/autoload.php
volumes_from:
- web:ro
I'm trying to run a container using docker compose. I already did it using normal docker commands and it works, but when I do the same using docker compose it did not work as expected.
I compile the image using docker compose build command:
docker-compose build php
and use that image for both docker and docker-compose commands.
docker run -p 80:80 -v /navicu docker_php
docker-compose up php
I allays change the port of one of the container so they never collapse. For example: port 80 on docker and 800 on docker-compose.
The problem is that no matter what I do, the docker-compose container is not working as expected. It doesn't let connections on the localhost (it shows a 500 error). On the other hand the docker container allows the connection and show the page as expected.
Here is the docker-compose.yml:
php:
build: .
ports:
- "80:80"
volumes:
- ./navicu:/navicu
PD: the Dockerfile use a php-apache official image and add a vhost.conf file.
The docker run is not equivalent to the compose file. If you try
docker run -p 80:80 -v $PWD/navicu:/navicu docker_php
it would be the same, and I expect you'll see the same 500 error.
The equivalent compose volumes would be
volumes:
- /navicu
I believe the reason you're getting a 500 error is because you're replacing the container contents at /navicu with the files in the host directory, which are probably not correct, or are missing things.
I'm developing a PHP application which I want to have running using docker containers. I'm using the composer package manager which pulls in all the dependencies. All code is kept in a git repository except the dependencies.
To get everything running on my local machine I'm using docker-compose (fig). I mount my application code (include vendor folder) to volume on my containers. Here is my docker-compose.yml file.
nginx:
image: nginx:1.9
links:
- php
volumes:
- conf/nginx/default.conf:/etc/nginx/conf.d/default.conf
- src:/var/www/html
ports:
- "80:80"
php:
image: php:5.6.9-fpm
links:
- memcached
volumes:
- conf/php/php.ini /usr/local/etc/php/php.ini
- src:/var/www/html
volumes_from:
- nginx
What I don't really understand is how I would push this into production or staging environment. From what I understand it's best to ship everything in a container without having to run a package manager, because this might fail or the packages might not be identical as the packages on my local machine. So I Came up with the following docker-compose.yml file:
webapp:
image : quay.io/myusername/myrepo
php:
image: php:5.6.9-fpm
volumes:
- config/php/php.ini /usr/local/etc/php/php.ini
volumes_from:
- webapp
nginx:
image: nginx:1.9
links:
- php
volumes:
- config/nginx/default.conf:/etc/nginx/conf.d/default.conf
volumes_from:
- webapp
ports:
- "80:80"
The webapp container is build from the following dockerfile and is hosted on some repository.
FROM busybox
VOLUME /var/www/html
ADD src /var/www/html
I have a git hook that will trigger a build of this dockerfile on quay.io and adds my source code to the image.
Here's the problem: The vendor files / dependencies are not in version control so they won't be added.
I see two solutions which I both don't find ideal.
Add the dependencies to version control.
Run command composer install to pull in all files. Not preferable as mentioned above.
I'm still very new to docker, so it could be I got things all wrong. Would love to get an answer how to do this properly.
Your Dockerfile should build the container image as if there would be no volumes mounted. Clone or copy your code in the container, run composer to install dependencies. Running the container without any volumes should work.
Volumes in production environments are for persisting data and logs primarily. Your code should not be in a mounted volume.
For development purposes, you can mount a volume to the code location and your container will still work.
To speed up the build process, copy your composer.json and composer.lock files first and install dependencies to a location outside your source tree. It will ensure the dependencies only get updated when your json file changes, not on every code change, speeding up the process immensely.