So, basically I'm trying to count the number of landline phone numbers in a list of both landlines and mobile phone numbers $mobile_list (071234567890,02039989435,0781...)
$mobile_array = explode(",",$mobile_list); // turn into an array
$landlines = array_count_values($mobile_array); // create count variable
echo $landlines["020..."]; // print the number of numbers
So, I get the basic count specific elements function, but I don't see where I can specify if an element 'starts with' or 'contains' a sequence. With the above you can only specify an exact phone number (obviously not useful).
Any help would be great!
I don't see any reason to first explode the string to an array, and then check each array item.
That is a complete waste of performance!
I suggest using preg_match_all and match with word boundary "020".
That means the "word" has to start with 020.
$mobile_list = "071234567890,02039989435,0781,020122,123020";
preg_match_all("/\b020\d+\b/", $mobile_list, $m);
var_dump($m);
echo count($m[0]); // 2
https://3v4l.org/ucSDm
The lightest and fastest method I have found is to explode on ",020".
The array that is returned has item 0 as undefined, meaning we don't know if it's a 020 number so I have to look at that manually.
$temp = explode(",020", $mobile_list);
$cnt = count($temp);
if(substr($temp[0],0,3) != "020") $cnt--;
echo $cnt;
A small scale test shows this as the fastest method.
https://3v4l.org/rD54d
You can use array_reduce() to count the occurrences of strings beginning with '020'
$mobile_list = "02039619491,07143502893,02088024526,07351261813,02095694897";
$mobile_array = explode(',', $mobile_list);
function landlineCount($carry, $item)
{
if (substr($item, 0, 3) === '020') {
return $carry += 1;
}
return $carry;
}
$count = array_reduce($mobile_array, 'landlineCount');
echo $count;
prints 3
I'm sure the OP has finished what they needed to do hours ago but for fun here is a faster way to count the landlines.
I hadn't spotted that the question original code was exploding the string.
That isn't necessary, you can just count the sub strings with substr_count() this could miss the first which wouldn't have a comma before it so I check for that too with substr().
If you need the total count of all numbers you can just count the commas with substr_count() again and add one.
$count = substr($mobile_list, 0, 3) === '020' ? 1 : 0;
$count += substr_count($mobile_list, ",020");
$totalCount = substr_count($mobile_list, ",") + 1;
echo $count;
echo $totalCount;
Here is the bench run a 1000 times to get an average.
https://3v4l.org/Sma66
Use array_filter() or preg_grep() functions to find all numbers that contain or starts with given number sequence.
Note: There is easier and better solution in other answers that cover request to find values that start with given number sequence.
Because you have mentioned - "but I don't see where I can specify if an element 'starts with' or 'contains' a sequence." - My code assumes that you wan't to find any occurrence of sequence, not only in start of string of each item.
$mobile_list = '02000, 02032435, 039002300, 00305600';
$mobile_array = explode(",",$mobile_list); // turn into an array
$landlines = array_count_values($mobile_array); // create count variable
$sequence = '020'; // print the number of numbers
function filter_phone_numbers($mobile_array, $sequence){
return array_filter($mobile_array, function ($item) use ($sequence) {
if (stripos($item, $sequence) !== false) {
return true;
}
return false;
});
}
$filtered_items = array_unique (filter_phone_numbers($mobile_array, $sequence)); //use array_unique in case we find same number that both contains or starts with sequence
echo count($filtered_items);
Or with preg_grep():
$mobile_list = '02000, 02032435, 039002300, 00305600';
$mobile_array = explode(",",$mobile_list); // turn into an array
$landlines = array_count_values($mobile_array); // create count variable
$sequence = preg_quote('020', '~'); ; // print the number of numbers
function grep_phone_numbers($mobile_array, $sequence){
return preg_grep('~' . $sequence . '~', $mobile_array);
}
//use array_unique in case we find same number that both contains or starts with sequence
$filtered_items = array_unique(grep_phone_numbers($mobile_array, $sequence));
echo count($filtered_items);
I recommend doing this with the database. The database is design to manage data and can do it a lot more efficient than PHP can. You can simply put it into a query and just get the result you want in 1 go:
SELECT * FROM phone_numbers WHERE number LIKE '020%'
If you get the data from the database anyways, that LIKE adds a little time to the query, but less that it takes PHP to loop, strpos and store the results. Also, as you return a smaller dataset, less resources are being used.
I have scraped 5000 files, stored them in individual files (0-4999.txt), now i need to find duplicate content in them. so i am comparing each file with one another in nested loop (ETA 82 hours). This approach will definitely take hours to complete. My main concern here is the no. of iterations. Can anyone suggest a better approach to cut down iterations and reduce time taken?
current code: NCD algorithm
function ncd_new($sx, $sy, $prec=0, $MAXLEN=9000) {
# NCD with gzip artifact correctoin and percentual return.
# sx,sy = strings to compare.
# Use $prec=-1 for result range [0-1], $pres=0 for percentual,
# For NCD definition see http://arxiv.org/abs/0809.2553
$x = $min = strlen(gzcompress($sx));
$y = $max = strlen(gzcompress($sy));
$xy= strlen(gzcompress($sx.$sy));
$a = $sx;
if ($x>$y) { # swap min/max
$min = $y;
$max = $x;
$a = $sy;
}
$res = ($xy-$min)/$max; # NCD definition.
if ($MAXLEN<0 || $xy<$MAXLEN) {
$aa= strlen(gzcompress($a.$a));
$ref = ($aa-$min)/$min;
$res = $res - $ref; # correction
}
return ($prec<0)? $res: 100*round($res,2+$prec);
}
looping over each file:
$totalScraped = 5000;
for($fileC=0;$fileC<$totalScraped;$fileC++)
{
$f1 = file_get_contents($fileC.".txt");
$stripstr = array('/\bis\b/i', '/\bwas\b/i', '/\bthe\b/i', '/\ba\b/i');
$file1 = preg_replace($stripstr, '', $f1);
// 0+fileC => exclude already compared files
// eg. if fileC=10 , start loop 11 to 4999
for($fileD=(0+$fileC);$fileD<$totalScraped;$fileD++)
{
$f2 = file_get_contents($fileD.".txt", FILE_USE_INCLUDE_PATH);
$stripstr = array('/\bis\b/i', '/\bwas\b/i', '/\bthe\b/i', '/\ba\b/i');
$file2 = preg_replace($stripstr, '', $f2);
$total=ncd_new($file1,$file2);
echo "$fileName1 vs $fileName2 is: $total%\n";
}
}
You may want to find a way to distinguish likely candidates from unlikely ones.
So, maybe there is a way that you can compute a value for each file (say: a word count, a count of sentences / paragraphs... maybe even a count of individual letters), to identify the unlikely candidates beforehand.
If you could achieve this, you could reduce the amount of comparisons by ordering your arrays by this computed number.
another process that i tried was:
strip html tags from page
replace \s{2,} with \s, \n{2,} with \n, so that text b/w each tag is presented in a single line(almost)
compare two such generated files by taking a line, preg_matching, if found -> duplicate, else break line into array of words, calculate array_intersect, if count is 70% or more of line length -> duplicate.
which was very efficient and i could compare 5000 files in ~10 minutes
but still slow for my requirements.
So i implemented the first logic "ncd algo" method in C language, and it completes the task with 5-10 seconds (depending on the average page size)
I have a range of whole numbers that might or might not have some numbers missing. Is it possible to find the smallest missing number without using a loop structure? If there are no missing numbers, the function should return the maximum value of the range plus one.
This is how I solved it using a for loop:
$range = [0,1,2,3,4,6,7];
// sort just in case the range is not in order
asort($range);
$range = array_values($range);
$first = true;
for ($x = 0; $x < count($range); $x++)
{
// don't check the first element
if ( ! $first )
{
if ( $range[$x - 1] + 1 !== $range[$x])
{
echo $range[$x - 1] + 1;
break;
}
}
// if we're on the last element, there are no missing numbers
if ($x + 1 === count($range))
{
echo $range[$x] + 1;
}
$first = false;
}
Ideally, I'd like to avoid looping completely, as the range can be massive. Any suggestions?
Algo solution
There is a way to check if there is a missing number using an algorithm. It's explained here. Basically if we need to add numbers from 1 to 100. We don't need to calculate by summing them we just need to do the following: (100 * (100 + 1)) / 2. So how is this going to solve our issue ?
We're going to get the first element of the array and the last one. We calculate the sum with this algo. We then use array_sum() to calculate the actual sum. If the results are the same, then there is no missing number. We could then "backtrack" the missing number by substracting the actual sum from the calculated one. This of course only works if there is only one number missing and will fail if there are several missing. So let's put this in code:
$range = range(0,7); // Creating an array
echo check($range) . "\r\n"; // check
unset($range[3]); // unset offset 3
echo check($range); // check
function check($array){
if($array[0] == 0){
unset($array[0]); // get ride of the zero
}
sort($array); // sorting
$first = reset($array); // get the first value
$last = end($array); // get the last value
$sum = ($last * ($first + $last)) / 2; // the algo
$actual_sum = array_sum($array); // the actual sum
if($sum == $actual_sum){
return $last + 1; // no missing number
}else{
return $sum - $actual_sum; // missing number
}
}
Output
8
3
Online demo
If there are several numbers missing, then just use array_map() or something similar to do an internal loop.
Regex solution
Let's take this to a new level and use regex ! I know it's nonsense, and it shouldn't be used in real world application. The goal is to show the true power of regex :)
So first let's make a string out of our range in the following format: I,II,III,IIII for range 1,3.
$range = range(0,7);
if($range[0] === 0){ // get ride of 0
unset($range[0]);
}
$str = implode(',', array_map(function($val){return str_repeat('I', $val);}, $range));
echo $str;
The output should be something like: I,II,III,IIII,IIIII,IIIIII,IIIIIII.
I've come up with the following regex: ^(?=(I+))(^\1|,\2I|\2I)+$. So what does this mean ?
^ # match begin of string
(?= # positive lookahead, we use this to not "eat" the match
(I+) # match I one or more times and put it in group 1
) # end of lookahead
( # start matching group 2
^\1 # match begin of string followed by what's matched in group 1
| # or
,\2I # match a comma, with what's matched in group 2 (recursive !) and an I
| # or
\2I # match what's matched in group 2 and an I
)+ # repeat one or more times
$ # match end of line
Let's see what's actually happening ....
I,II,III,IIII,IIIII,IIIIII,IIIIIII
^
(I+) do not eat but match I and put it in group 1
I,II,III,IIII,IIIII,IIIIII,IIIIIII
^
^\1 match what was matched in group 1, which means I gets matched
I,II,III,IIII,IIIII,IIIIII,IIIIIII
^^^ ,\2I match what was matched in group 1 (one I in thise case) and add an I to it
I,II,III,IIII,IIIII,IIIIII,IIIIIII
^^^^ \2I match what was matched previously in group 2 (,II in this case) and add an I to it
I,II,III,IIII,IIIII,IIIIII,IIIIIII
^^^^^ \2I match what was matched previously in group 2 (,III in this case) and add an I to it
We're moving forward since there is a + sign which means match one or more times,
this is actually a recursive regex.
We put the $ to make sure it's the end of string
If the number of I's don't correspond, then the regex will fail.
See it working and failing. And Let's put it in PHP code:
$range = range(0,7);
if($range[0] === 0){
unset($range[0]);
}
$str = implode(',', array_map(function($val){return str_repeat('I', $val);}, $range));
if(preg_match('#^(?=(I*))(^\1|,\2I|\2I)+$#', $str)){
echo 'works !';
}else{
echo 'fails !';
}
Now let's take in account to return the number that's missing, we will remove the $ end character to make our regex not fail, and we use group 2 to return the missed number:
$range = range(0,7);
if($range[0] === 0){
unset($range[0]);
}
unset($range[2]); // remove 2
$str = implode(',', array_map(function($val){return str_repeat('I', $val);}, $range));
preg_match('#^(?=(I*))(^\1|,\2I|\2I)+#', $str, $m); // REGEEEEEX !!!
$n = strlen($m[2]); //get the length ie the number
$sum = array_sum($range); // array sum
if($n == $sum){
echo $n + 1; // no missing number
}else{
echo $n - 1; // missing number
}
Online demo
EDIT: NOTE
This question is about performance. Functions like array_diff and array_filter are not magically fast. They can add a huge time penalty. Replacing a loop in your code with a call to array_diff will not magically make things fast, and will probably make things slower. You need to understand how these functions work if you intend to use them to speed up your code.
This answer uses the assumption that no items are duplicated and no invalid elements exist to allow us to use the position of the element to infer its expected value.
This answer is theoretically the fastest possible solution if you start with a sorted list. The solution posted by Jack is theoretically the fastest if sorting is required.
In the series [0,1,2,3,4,...], the n'th element has the value n if no elements before it are missing. So we can spot-check at any point to see if our missing element is before or after the element in question.
So you start by cutting the list in half and checking to see if the item at position x = x
[ 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 9 ]
^
Yup, list[4] == 4. So move halfway from your current point the end of the list.
[ 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 9 ]
^
Uh-oh, list[6] == 7. So somewhere between our last checkpoint and the current one, one element was missing. Divide the difference in half and check that element:
[ 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 9 ]
^
In this case, list[5] == 5
So we're good there. So we take half the distance between our current check and the last one that was abnormal. And oh.. it looks like cell n+1 is one we already checked. We know that list[6]==7 and list[5]==5, so the element number 6 is the one that's missing.
Since each step divides the number of elements to consider in half, you know that your worst-case performance is going to check no more than log2 of the total list size. That is, this is an O(log(n)) solution.
If this whole arrangement looks familiar, It's because you learned it back in your second year of college in a Computer Science class. It's a minor variation on the binary search algorithm--one of the most widely used index schemes in the industry. Indeed this question appears to be a perfectly-contrived application for this searching technique.
You can of course repeat the operation to find additional missing elements, but since you've already tested the values at key elements in the list, you can avoid re-checking most of the list and go straight to the interesting ones left to test.
Also note that this solution assumes a sorted list. If the list isn't sorted then obviously you sort it first. Except, binary searching has some notable properties in common with quicksort. It's quite possible that you can combine the process of sorting with the process of finding the missing element and do both in a single operation, saving yourself some time.
Finally, to sum up the list, that's just a stupid math trick thrown in for good measure. The sum of a list of numbers from 1 to N is just N*(N+1)/2. And if you've already determined that any elements are missing, then obvously just subtract the missing ones.
Technically, you can't really do without the loop (unless you only want to know if there's a missing number). However, you can accomplish this without first sorting the array.
The following algorithm uses O(n) time with O(n) space:
$range = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7];
$N = count($range);
$temp = str_repeat('0', $N); // assume all values are out of place
foreach ($range as $value) {
if ($value < $N) {
$temp[$value] = 1; // value is in the right place
}
}
// count number of leading ones
echo strspn($temp, '1'), PHP_EOL;
It builds an ordered identity map of N entries, marking each value against its position as "1"; in the end all entries must be "1", and the first "0" entry is the smallest value that's missing.
Btw, I'm using a temporary string instead of an array to reduce physical memory requirements.
I honestly don't get why you wouldn't want to use a loop. There's nothing wrong with loops. They're fast, and you simply can't do without them. However, in your case, there is a way to avoid having to write your own loops, using PHP core functions. They do loop over the array, though, but you simply can't avoid that.
Anyway, I gather what you're after, can easily be written in 3 lines:
function highestPlus(array $in)
{
$compare = range(min($in), max($in));
$diff = array_diff($compare, $in);
return empty($diff) ? max($in) +1 : $diff[0];
}
Tested with:
echo highestPlus(range(0,11));//echoes 12
$arr = array(9,3,4,1,2,5);
echo highestPlus($arr);//echoes 6
And now, to shamelessly steal Pé de Leão's answer (but "augment" it to do exactly what you want):
function highestPlus(array $range)
{//an unreadable one-liner... horrid, so don't, but know that you can...
return min(array_diff(range(0, max($range)+1), $range)) ?: max($range) +1;
}
How it works:
$compare = range(min($in), max($in));//range(lowest value in array, highest value in array)
$diff = array_diff($compare, $in);//get all values present in $compare, that aren't in $in
return empty($diff) ? max($in) +1 : $diff[0];
//-------------------------------------------------
// read as:
if (empty($diff))
{//every number in min-max range was found in $in, return highest value +1
return max($in) + 1;
}
//there were numbers in min-max range, not present in $in, return first missing number:
return $diff[0];
That's it, really.
Of course, if the supplied array might contain null or falsy values, or even strings, and duplicate values, it might be useful to "clean" the input a bit:
function highestPlus(array $in)
{
$clean = array_filter(
$in,
'is_numeric'//or even is_int
);
$compare = range(min($clean), max($clean));
$diff = array_diff($compare, $clean);//duplicates aren't an issue here
return empty($diff) ? max($clean) + 1; $diff[0];
}
Useful links:
The array_diff man page
The max and min functions
Good Ol' range, of course...
The array_filter function
The array_map function might be worth a look
Just as array_sum might be
$range = array(0,1,2,3,4,6,7);
// sort just in case the range is not in order
asort($range);
$range = array_values($range);
$indexes = array_keys($range);
$diff = array_diff($indexes,$range);
echo $diff[0]; // >> will print: 5
// if $diff is an empty array - you can print
// the "maximum value of the range plus one": $range[count($range)-1]+1
echo min(array_diff(range(0, max($range)+1), $range));
Simple
$array1 = array(0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7);// array with actual number series
$array2 = array(0,1,2,4,6,7); // array with your custom number series
$missing = array_diff($array1,$array2);
sort($missing);
echo $missing[0];
$range = array(0,1,2,3,4,6,7);
$max=max($range);
$expected_total=($max*($max+1))/2; // sum if no number was missing.
$actual_total=array_sum($range); // sum of the input array.
if($expected_total==$actual_total){
echo $max+1; // no difference so no missing number, then echo 1+ missing number.
}else{
echo $expected_total-$actual_total; // the difference will be the missing number.
}
you can use array_diff() like this
<?php
$range = array("0","1","2","3","4","6","7","9");
asort($range);
$len=count($range);
if($range[$len-1]==$len-1){
$r=$range[$len-1];
}
else{
$ref= range(0,$len-1);
$result = array_diff($ref,$range);
$r=implode($result);
}
echo $r;
?>
function missing( $v ) {
static $p = -1;
$d = $v - $p - 1;
$p = $v;
return $d?1:0;
}
$result = array_search( 1, array_map( "missing", $ARRAY_TO_TEST ) );
When a user signs up for an account on my website their own page is created called USERNAME.php. Whenever the username "bob" gets signed in then a new line is added to bob.php which contains the time, date and ip address of that login. What I want to do is have a maximum of 20 lines in that file, so that the file doesn't get too big over time. I have the first line as "Login Retrieval for bob" and then the most recent login result at the bottom. So the first line should not be deleted, but the second line should be deleted with every login (only if the amount of lines is > 20). What would be the best way to go about doing this? Thanks!
I assume that the .php extension is not used and that the file has up to twenty lines.
You could explode the file in lines using the file() function, shift out the first line to save it, then use array_splice() to extract the last 19, unshift the first line back into the new array to get up to 20 entries. join them and rewrite them back to the original file.
Better yet, write them onto a new file, then if everything went well, rename the new file onto the new.
/**
* #param $file the input file
* #param $n total number of meaningful lines to keep (default 20)
* #param $m prefix lines to keep (default 1)
*
* #return number of lines in case something was done
* 0 nothing to do
* -1 file not found
* -2 file not readable
* -3 file not writeable
* -4 write error
* -8 bad parameter
*/
function trim_file($file, $n = 20, $m = 1)
{
if (!file_exists($file))
return -1;
if (!is_readable($file))
return -2;
if (!is_writeable($file))
return -3;
if ($m > $n)
return -8;
$lines = file($file);
$num = count($lines);
// If file is short, no need to do anything
if ($num <= $n)
return 0;
$header = array_slice($lines, 0, $m);
// Remove lines from 0 to ($num-($n-$m))
// and replace them with the first $m lines
array_splice($lines, 0, $num-($n-$m), $header);
// Write file with new contents
$fp = fopen($file . '.tmp', 'w');
if (!$fp)
return -4;
fwrite($fp, join('', $lines));
fclose($fp);
// Replace the file in one fell swoop.
rename($file . '.tmp', $file);
return count($lines);
}
If there only 20 lines. Would be easy to read the file to an array and manipulate it that way. Could easily unset array elements and keep the total count to 20. Then write new info back to the file
I have a list of phrases and I want to know which two words occurred the most often in all of my phrases.
I tried playing with regex and other codes and I just cannot find the right way to do this.
Can anyone help?
eg:
I am purchasing a wallet
a wallet for 20$
purchasing a bag
I'd know that
a wallet occurred 2 times
purchasing a occurred 2 times
<?
$string = "I am purchasing a wallet a wallet for 20$ purchasing a bag";
//split string into words
$words = explode(' ', $string);
//make chunks block ie [0,1][2,3]...
$chunks = array_chunk($words, 2);
//remove first array element
unset($words[0]);
//make chunks block ie [0,1][2,3]...
//but since first element is removed , the real block will be [1,2][3,4]...
$alternateChunks = array_chunk($words, 2);
//merge both chunks
$totalChunks = array_merge($chunks,$alternateChunks);
$finalChunks = array();
foreach($totalChunks as $t)
{
//change the inside chunk to pharse using +
//+ can be replaced to space, if neeced
//to keep associative working + is used instead of white space
$finalChunks[] = implode('+', $t);
}
//count the words inside array
$result = array_count_values($finalChunks);
echo "<pre>";
print_r($result);
I hesitate to suggest this, as it's an extremely brute force way to go about it:
Take your string of words, explode it using the explode(" ", $string); command, then run it through a for loop checking every two word combination against every two words in the string.
$string = "I am purchasing a wallet a wallet for 20$ purchasing a bag";
$words = explode(" ", $string);
for ($t=0; $t<count($string); $t++)
{
for ($i=0; $i<count($string); $i++)
{
if (($words[$t] . words[$t+1]) == ($words[$i] . $word[$i+1])) {$count[$words[$i].$words[$i+1]]++}
}
}
So the nested for loop steps in, grabs the first two words, compares them to each other set of two consecutive words, then grabs the next two words and does it again. Every answer will have an answer of at least 1 (it will always match itself) but sorting the resulting array by size will give you the most repeated values.
Note that this will run (n-1)*(n-1) iterations, which could get unwieldy FAST.
Place them all into an array, and access them by the current word index and next word index.
I think this should do the trick. It will grab pairs of words, unless you are at the end of the string, where you'll get only one word.
$str = "I purchased a wallet because I wanted a wallet a wallet a wallet";
$words = explode(" ", $str);
$array_results = array();
for ($i = 0; $i<count($words); $i++) {
if ($i < count($words)-1) {
$pair = $words[$i] . " " . $words[$i+1]; echo $pair . "\n";
// Have to check if the key is in use yet to avoid a notice
$array_results[$pair] = isset($array_results[$pair]) ? $array_results[$pair] + 1 : 1;
}
// At the end of the array, just use a single word
else $array_results[$words[$i]] = isset($array_results[$words[$i]]) ? $array_results[$words[$i]] + 1 : 1;
}
// Sort the results
// use arsort() instead to get the highest first
asort($array_results);
// Prints:
Array
(
[I wanted] => 1
[wanted a] => 1
[wallet] => 1
[because I] => 1
[wallet because] => 1
[I purchased] => 1
[purchased a] => 1
[wallet a] => 2
[a wallet] => 4
)
Update changed ++ to +1 above since it wasn't working when tested...
Try to put it with explode into an array and count the values with array_count_values.
<?php
$text = "whatever";
$text_array = explode( ' ', $text);
$double_words = array();
for($c = 1; $c < count($text_array); $c++)
{
$double_words[] = $text_array[$c -1] . ' ' . $text_array[$c];
}
$result = array_count_values($double_words);
?>
I updated it now to two word version. Does this work for you?
array(9) {
["I am"]=> int(1)
["am purchasing"]=> int(1)
["purchasing a"]=> int(2)
["a wallet"]=> int(2)
["wallet a"]=> int(1)
["wallet for"]=> int(1)
["for 20$"]=> int(1)
["20$ purchasing"]=> int(1)
["a bag"]=> int(1)
}
Since you used the excel tag, I thought I'd give it a shot, and it's actually really easy.
Split string using space as delimiter. Data > Text to Columns... > Delimited > Delimiter: Space. Each word is now in its own cell.
Transpose the result (not strictly required but much easier to visualize). Copy, Edit > Paste Special... > Transpose.
Make cells containing consecutive word pairs. So if your words are in cells B5:B15, cell C5 should be =B5&" "&B6 (and drag down).
Count occurence of each word pair: In cell D5, =COUNTIF($C$5:$C$15,"="&C5), drag down.
Highlight the winner(s). Select C5:D15, Format > Conditional Formatting... > Formula Is =$D5=MAX($D$5:$D$15) and choose e.g. a yellow background.
Note that there is some inefficiency in step 4 because the count of each word pair will be calculated multiple times if that word pair occurs multiple times. If this is a concern, then you can first make a list of unique word pairs using Data > Filter > Advanced Filter... > Unique records only.
An automated VBA solution could easily be crafted by recording a macro of the above followed by some minor editing.
One way to go about it is to use SPLIT or a regex to split the sentences into words and store each into an array. Then take the array and create a dictionary object. When you add a term to the dictionary, if it's already there, add 1 to the .value to tally the count.
Here is some example code (far from perfect as it's just to show the overlying concept) that will take all the string in column A and generate a word frequency list in columns B and C. It's not exactly what you want, but should give you some ideas on how you can go about doing it I hope:
Sub FrequencyList()
Dim vArray As Variant
Dim myDict As Variant
Set myDict = CreateObject("Scripting.Dictionary")
Dim i As Long
Dim cell As range
With myDict
For Each cell In range("A1", cells(Rows.count, "A").End(xlUp))
vArray = Split(cell.Value, " ")
For i = LBound(vArray) To UBound(vArray)
If Not .exists(vArray(i)) Then
.Add vArray(i), 1
Else
.Item(vArray(i)) = .Item(vArray(i)) + 1
End If
Next
Next
range("B1").Resize(.count).Value = Application.Transpose(.keys)
range("C1").Resize(.count).Value = Application.Transpose(.items)
End With
End Sub