Codeception/AspectMock Parent class not found by locator - php

I have a problem with Codeception/AspectMock.
When using custom autoloader and try to create an instance of a class which has parent form the same custom namespace I have this error:
PHP Fatal error: Uncaught InvalidArgumentException: Class [parent
class name] was not found by locator in
vendor/goaop/parser-reflection/src/ReflectionEngine.php:112
I have very simple setup:
<?php
require_once __DIR__ . '/vendor/autoload.php';
$kernel = AspectMock\Kernel::getInstance();
$kernel->init([
'debug' => true,
'includePaths' => [__DIR__. '/lib'],
]);
$kernel->loadFile(__DIR__ . '/autoload.php'); // custom autoloader
$b = new \lib\B();
Class \lib\B:
namespace lib;
class B extends A {}
Class \lib\A:
namespace lib;
class A
{
public function getName()
{
return static::class;
}
}
Class B is loaded via my custom autoloader, but then the locator tries to load parent class A via composer autoloader and returns this error. Is this a bug, or I'm doing something wrong?

The topic starter has already got an answer on GitHub.
In order to use custom autoloader you should re-init ReflectionEngine with composite class locator that will be able to locate your classes or you can use CallableLocator with closure for resolving paths.
Or, even better you could switch your code base to the PSR0/PSR-4
For example:
$kernel->loadFile(__DIR__ . '/autoload.php'); // custom autoloader
\Go\ParserReflection\ReflectionEngine::init(
new class implements \Go\ParserReflection\LocatorInterface {
public function locateClass($className) {
return (new ReflectionClass($className))->getFileName();
}
}
);
$b = new \lib\B(); // here you go

If you can easily do a find and replace on your codebase, maybe you could refactor your code to PSR-4 autoloading standards and do away with the need for a custom autoloader altogether.
This is the spec https://www.php-fig.org/psr/psr-4/. I'll try and explain it as simply as possible.
Imagine changing your lowercase namespace lib to Lib, and setting that namespace to the src/ directory in your composer.json:
"autoload": {
"psr-4": {
"Lib\\": "src/"
}
}
After setting that, run composer dumpautoload. Then all you need to do is search and replace namespace lib;, replacing with namespace Lib;.
An example class located in src/Form.php would have namespace Lib; at the top, followed by class Form.
<?php
namepace Lib;
class Form
{
// code
}
Namespaces use the folder naming convention. All classes directly in src/ have namespace Lib;. If there are subdirectories, the directory name becomes part of the namespace. For example a file in src/Form/Field/Text.php would have namespace Lib\Form\Field; class Text {}.
<?php
namepace Lib\Form\Field;
class Text
{
// code
}
You can see the full convention in the link above, but the general rule is make any folders begin with a capital letter, as with your classname, and the autoloader should be able to find all of your classes.
This is probably the best practice solution for you, and again as I said, only requires a little bit of file renaming and namespace tweaking. Good luck!

Related

Namespaces used for test in official exemple don't work for me [duplicate]

I am new with this namespace thing.
I have 2 classes(separate files) in my base directory, say class1.php and class2.php inside a directory src/.
class1.php
namespace \src\utility\Timer;
class Timer{
public static function somefunction(){
}
}
class2.php
namespace \src\utility\Verification;
use Timer;
class Verification{
Timer::somefunction();
}
When I execute class2.php, i get the Fatal error that
PHP Fatal error: Class 'Timer' not found in path/to/class2.php at
line ***
I read somewhere on SO, that I need to create Autoloaders for this. If so, how do I approach into creating one, and if not, then what else is the issue?
UPDATE
I created an Autoloader which will require all the required files on top of my php script.
So, now the class2.php would end up like this.
namespace \src\utility\Verification;
require '/path/to/class1.php'
use Timer;
//or use src\utility\Timer ... both doesn't work.
class Verification{
Timer::somefunction();
}
This also does not work, and it shows that class not found. But, if I remove all the namespaces, and use's. Everything works fine.
We can solve the namespace problem in two ways
1) We can just use namespace and require
2) We can use Composer and work with the autoloading!
The First Way (Namespace and require) way
Class1.php (Timer Class)
namespace Utility;
class Timer
{
public static function {}
}
Class2.php (Verification Class)
namespace Utility;
require "Class1.php";
//Some interesting points to note down!
//We are not using the keyword "use"
//We need to use the same namespace which is "Utility"
//Therefore, both Class1.php and Class2.php has "namespace Utility"
//Require is usually the file path!
//We do not mention the class name in the require " ";
//What if the Class1.php file is in another folder?
//Ex:"src/utility/Stopwatch/Class1.php"
//Then the require will be "Stopwatch/Class1.php"
//Your namespace would be still "namespace Utility;" for Class1.php
class Verification
{
Timer::somefunction();
}
The Second Way (Using Composer and the autoloading way)
Make composer.json file. According to your example "src/Utility"
We need to create a composer.json file before the src folder. Example: In a folder called myApp you will have composer.json file and a src folder.
{
"autoload": {
"psr-4": {
"Utility\\":"src/utility/"
}
}
}
Now go to that folder open your terminal in the folder location where there is composer.json file. Now type in the terminal!
composer dump-autoload
This will create a vendor folder. Therefore if you have a folder named "MyApp"
you will see vendor folder, src folder and a composer.json file
Timer.php(Timer Class)
namespace Utility;
class Timer
{
public static function somefunction(){}
}
Verification.php (Verification Class)
namespace Utility;
require "../../vendor/autoload.php";
use Utility\Timer;
class Verification
{
Timer::somefunction();
}
This method is more powerful when you have a complex folder structure!!
You are going to need to implement an autoloader, as you have already read about it in SO.
You could check the autoloading standard PSR-4 at http://www.php-fig.org/psr/psr-4/ and you can see a sample implementation of PSR-4 autoloading and an example class implementation to handle multiple namespaces here https://github.com/php-fig/fig-standards/blob/master/accepted/PSR-4-autoloader-examples.md.

php structural design pattern extended class not found

Whenever I try to extend a class I end up with
Fatal error: Class 'home\register\Create' not found in C:\xampp\htdocs\project\home\register\register.php on line 8
I have 2 file classes under the same directory first one an abstract class Create :
<?php
namespace home\register;
use home\libs\Tools\Sanitize\Sanitize as sanitize;
abstract class Create
{
public $sanitize;
function __construct ()
{
$this->sanitize = new sanitize();
if (isset($_POST)){
foreach ($_POST as $key => $value){
if (!empty($_POST["$key"])){
$this->$key = $this->sanitize->clean($value);
}
}
}
}
abstract function db_query($pdo_db_name, $password, $query, $host = 'localhost');
}
And a second class register which extends Create:
<?php
namespace home\register;
use PDO as pdo;
use home\libs\MainLogger\MainLogger as logger;
class register extends Create //Line 8 Error is thrown when extending the class
I can post the whole code but I doubt the problem is there. I've been trying to adapt to the structural design pattern as I see it as the tidiest way of handling a lot of classes
Right now
You'll need to ensure that Create is loaded before you can extend it in register.php. The simplest way to do this is using require_once, by adding something like:
require_once(__DIR__ . '/Create.php');
to the top of register.php. This should be sufficient for now.
Maybe later
Once you start to get into loading many classes, you may want to look at using an autoloader. From my experience the most flexible way to do this is to convert the project to using composer, and then using the autoload configuration item.
The layout of your classes (not including ones not shown in this question) would be something like:
src/register/Create.php
src/register/register.php
and, to match this, your composer.json would look something like:
{
"autoload": {
"psr-4": {"home\\": "src/"}
}
}
You can then generate the autoloader by running:
composer dump-autoload
and use it in the entry point to your project by adding:
require_once('vendor/autoload.php');
From this point on, you would not need to add individual require_once lines for each file, provided you re-ran dump-autoload after adding new classes to your source.

php psr autoload ambiguity

I am working on a php sdk rewrite project and the client wants to get PSR standards done. I am looking at the standards page here
https://github.com/php-fig/fig-standards/blob/master/accepted/PSR-0.md
One thing what i am not able to understand, if i use name spaces in my class do i still need to use include or require or use. I mean the whole reason of autoload beats the purpose right ?
For example, say i have a class this way,
namespace Employee\Department;
Class Department
{
//code
}
and i have another class which uses this class by extending it,
namespace Employee\community;
Class Community extends Department
{
//code
}
so does the above code make it to psr-0 standard considering that i have an autoload function exactly thats on the link above.
The second example is going to assume Department is in the Community namespace so in this case you would need a use statement. Also both of your examples would use the namespace Employee not Employee\Whatever for example lets assume the following layout:
Employee/
Community.php
Community/
Manager.php
Department.php
Department/
Manager.php
Then we would see the class/namespaces like the following
namespace Employee;
class Department {
}
///////////
namespace Employee;
class Community extends Department {
}
/////////////
namespace Employee\Department;
class Manager {
}
/////////////
namespace Employee\Community;
use Employee\Department\Manager as BaseManager;
Class Manager extends BaseManager {
}
For your understanding, autoloading works by registering the autoload function in the autoload stack via spl_autoload_register; this allows the function to be invoked whenever a new Class() statement is executed (more info).
On the other hand, the FIG standard for autoloading, PSR-0, defines how a namespace will be translated into a filename by a PSR-0 autoloader function. For example, given the namespace Vendor\Foo, the autoloader will look for the file Vendor/Foo.php having the following code
namespace Vendor;
class Foo
{
public function do()
{
echo "Foo";
}
}
Therefore, following the mandatory requirements, a PSR-0 compliant namespace resolves to the correct PHP file which could otherwise have been included using a require or include.
If I read your intentions correctly, you just need the following namespace in both code snippets:
namespace Employee;
Of course, this is not a PSR-0 namespace because there is no vendor name (unless your vendor name is 'Employee'). Anyway, using this namespace in your two code snippets will work fine.
However, if you intended to keep them in separate namespaces, then the autoloader won't figure out Department in extends Department in the second snippet. You will have to either import the namespace or explicitly specify it as so:
namespace Employee\community;
class Community extends Employee\Department\Department
{
//code
}
I imagine that you did not expect the full class names from your snippets to be Employee\Department\Department, and that is why I first suggested keeping the same namespace for your purposes.

What happens when a namespace and class share a name in PHP?

When using the pseudo namespacing pattern of PEAR and Zend, it is common to come across class heirarchies that look like this:
Zend/
Db.php
Db/
Expr.php
Where DB.php contains a class named Zend_Db and Expr.php contains a class named Zend_Db_Expr. However, when you try to convert the old 5.2 psuedo namespacing into PHP 5.3 namespacing you are presented with a case where a namespace and a class share a name. Since the use operator can import either a namespace or a classname this leads to ambiguity.
Here's an example of an app I'm working on converting:
App/
Core.php
Core/
Autoloader.php
Here the base directory and namespace are App. In the top level of the name space is a Core class:
namespace App;
class Core { }
In the Core directory are various other core classes, some of which use the main Core. Under the pseudo namespacing pattern, this isn't a problem. But in the real namespacing pattern it creates this situation:
namespace App\Core;
use App\Core as Core; // What is this importing? Namespace or class?
class Autoloader {
public function __construct(Core $core) {}
}
Is this defined? What is actually imported here?
Simply both. It is not real import, just a hint for compiler, that every encounter of this alias in class related operations should be expanded to this declaration. In php namespace is just part of class so just think of it like this
$alias = 'Zend_Db';
$zendDB = new $alias;
$aliasExpr = $alias . '_Expr';
$expr = new $aliasExpr;

How to Trick Zend loader for multiple classes in one file

I'm trying to implement custom exception classes for a zend project.
I use modules and all my classes are under library.
so a filename DuplicateFileException.php which is under
APPLICATION_PATH "/../library/Abra/Exception" contains
class Abra_Exception_FileNotFoundExcpetion extends Exception {}
class Abra_Exception_MissingFileException extends Exception {}
class Abra_Exception_DuplicateFileException extends Exception {}
class Abra_Exception_FileIOException extends Exception {}
so the ErrorController works fine when i only throw Abra_Exception_DuplicateFileException
because there is indeed a file called DuplicateFileException, but the app breaks when i throw any other than that Exception.
I just can't believe that i have to create a file for each of them.
so how to work around it?
thanks for reading.
Proper zend-way would be implementing your own autoloader class. IT will implement autoload method. You can then use Zend_Autoloader autoloader stack to oad your classes. You just need to have some kind of system/logic in your classname->filename mapping.
class Abra_Autoloader
{
public function autoload($className)
{
if (strpos('Abra_Exception', $className) !== false) {
include $someFile; //faster
}
}
}
//anywhere in bootstrap (preferably in some autoloading section of yours)
// autoloader will load only classes starting with "abra"
$autoloader = Zend_Loader_Autoloader::getInstance();
$autoloader->setFallbackAutoloader(true);
$autoloader->pushAutoloader(array('Abra_Autoloader ', 'autoload'), 'Abra');
Please note that at least teh autoloader class should be Zend_Loader-loadable :)
The Zend autoloader works by mapping requested class names to filesystem paths so you can't make it load a file for a class where the filename does not match.
If you really want to persist down this path, I'd just include the file in your Bootstrap class, eg
protected function _initRequires()
{
require_once 'Abra/Exception/DuplicateFileException.php';
// assuming your "library" folder is on the include path
}

Categories