Simulate a http request and parse route parameters in Laravel testcase - php

Question

I'm trying to create unit tests to test some specific classes. I use app()->make() to instantiate the classes to test. So actually, no HTTP requests are needed.
However, some of the tested functions need information from the routing parameters so they'll make calls e.g. request()->route()->parameter('info'), and this throws an exception:
Call to a member function parameter() on null.
I've played around a lot and tried something like:
request()->attributes = new \Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\ParameterBag(['info' => 5]);
request()->route(['info' => 5]);
request()->initialize([], [], ['info' => 5], [], [], [], null);
but none of them worked...
How could I manually initialize the router and feed some routing parameters to it? Or simply make request()->route()->parameter() available?
Update
#Loek: You didn't understand me. Basically, I'm doing:
class SomeTest extends TestCase
{
public function test_info()
{
$info = request()->route()->parameter('info');
$this->assertEquals($info, 'hello_world');
}
}
No "requests" involved. The request()->route()->parameter() call is actually located in a service provider in my real code. This test case is specifically used to test that service provider. There isn't a route which will print the returning value from the methods in that provider.

Answer 1

I assume you need to simulate a request without actually dispatching it. With a simulated request in place, you want to probe it for parameter values and develop your testcase.
There's an undocumented way to do this. You'll be surprised!
The problem
As you already know, Laravel's Illuminate\Http\Request class builds upon Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Request. The upstream class does not allow you to setup a request URI manually in a setRequestUri() way. It figures it out based on the actual request headers. No other way around.
OK, enough with the chatter. Let's try to simulate a request:
<?php
use Illuminate\Http\Request;
class ExampleTest extends TestCase
{
public function testBasicExample()
{
$request = new Request([], [], ['info' => 5]);
dd($request->route()->parameter('info'));
}
}
As you mentioned yourself, you'll get a:
Error: Call to a member function parameter() on null
We need a Route
Why is that? Why route() returns null?
Have a look at its implementation as well as the implementation of its companion method; getRouteResolver(). The getRouteResolver() method returns an empty closure, then route() calls it and so the $route variable will be null. Then it gets returned and thus... the error.
In a real HTTP request context, Laravel sets up its route resolver, so you won't get such errors. Now that you're simulating the request, you need to set up that by yourself. Let's see how.
<?php
use Illuminate\Http\Request;
use Illuminate\Routing\Route;
class ExampleTest extends TestCase
{
public function testBasicExample()
{
$request = new Request([], [], ['info' => 5]);
$request->setRouteResolver(function () use ($request) {
return (new Route('GET', 'testing/{info}', []))->bind($request);
});
dd($request->route()->parameter('info'));
}
}
See another example of creating Routes from Laravel's own RouteCollection class.
Empty parameters bag
So, now you won't get that error because you actually have a route with the request object bound to it. But it won't work yet. If we run phpunit at this point, we'll get a null in the face! If you do a dd($request->route()) you'll see that even though it has the info parameter name set up, its parameters array is empty:
Illuminate\Routing\Route {#250
#uri: "testing/{info}"
#methods: array:2 [
0 => "GET"
1 => "HEAD"
]
#action: array:1 [
"uses" => null
]
#controller: null
#defaults: []
#wheres: []
#parameters: [] <===================== HERE
#parameterNames: array:1 [
0 => "info"
]
#compiled: Symfony\Component\Routing\CompiledRoute {#252
-variables: array:1 [
0 => "info"
]
-tokens: array:2 [
0 => array:4 [
0 => "variable"
1 => "/"
2 => "[^/]++"
3 => "info"
]
1 => array:2 [
0 => "text"
1 => "/testing"
]
]
-staticPrefix: "/testing"
-regex: "#^/testing/(?P<info>[^/]++)$#s"
-pathVariables: array:1 [
0 => "info"
]
-hostVariables: []
-hostRegex: null
-hostTokens: []
}
#router: null
#container: null
}
So passing that ['info' => 5] to Request constructor has no effect whatsoever. Let's have a look at the Route class and see how its $parameters property is getting populated.
When we bind the request object to the route, the $parameters property gets populated by a subsequent call to the bindParameters() method which in turn calls bindPathParameters() to figure out path-specific parameters (we don't have a host parameter in this case).
That method matches request's decoded path against a regex of Symfony's Symfony\Component\Routing\CompiledRoute (You can see that regex in the above dump as well) and returns the matches which are path parameters. It will be empty if the path doesn't match the pattern (which is our case).
/**
* Get the parameter matches for the path portion of the URI.
*
* #param \Illuminate\Http\Request $request
* #return array
*/
protected function bindPathParameters(Request $request)
{
preg_match($this->compiled->getRegex(), '/'.$request->decodedPath(), $matches);
return $matches;
}
The problem is that when there's no actual request, that $request->decodedPath() returns / which does not match the pattern. So the parameters bag will be empty, no matter what.
Spoofing the request URI
If you follow that decodedPath() method on the Request class, you'll go deep through a couple of methods which will finally return a value from prepareRequestUri() of Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Request. There, exactly in that method, you'll find the answer to your question.
It's figuring out the request URI by probing a bunch of HTTP headers. It first checks for X_ORIGINAL_URL, then X_REWRITE_URL, then a few others and finally for the REQUEST_URI header. You can set either of these headers to actually spoof the request URI and achieve minimum simulation of a http request. Let's see.
<?php
use Illuminate\Http\Request;
use Illuminate\Routing\Route;
class ExampleTest extends TestCase
{
public function testBasicExample()
{
$request = new Request([], [], [], [], [], ['REQUEST_URI' => 'testing/5']);
$request->setRouteResolver(function () use ($request) {
return (new Route('GET', 'testing/{info}', []))->bind($request);
});
dd($request->route()->parameter('info'));
}
}
To your surprise, it prints out 5; the value of info parameter.
Cleanup
You might want to extract the functionality to a helper simulateRequest() method, or a SimulatesRequests trait which can be used across your test cases.
Mocking
Even if it was absolutely impossible to spoof the request URI like the approach above, you could partially mock the request class and set your expected request URI. Something along the lines of:
<?php
use Illuminate\Http\Request;
use Illuminate\Routing\Route;
class ExampleTest extends TestCase
{
public function testBasicExample()
{
$requestMock = Mockery::mock(Request::class)
->makePartial()
->shouldReceive('path')
->once()
->andReturn('testing/5');
app()->instance('request', $requestMock->getMock());
$request = request();
$request->setRouteResolver(function () use ($request) {
return (new Route('GET', 'testing/{info}', []))->bind($request);
});
dd($request->route()->parameter('info'));
}
}
This prints out 5 as well.

Answer 2

I ran into this problem today using Laravel7 here is how I solved it, hope it helps somebody
I'm writing unit tests for a middleware, it needs to check for some route parameters, so what I'm doing is creating a fixed request to pass it to the middleware
$request = Request::create('/api/company/{company}', 'GET');
$request->setRouteResolver(function() use ($company) {
$stub = $this->createStub(Route::class);
$stub->expects($this->any())->method('hasParameter')->with('company')->willReturn(true);
$stub->expects($this->any())->method('parameter')->with('company')->willReturn($company->id); // not $adminUser's company
return $stub;
});

Answer 3

Since route is implemented as a closure, you can access a route parameter directly in the route, without explicitly calling parameter('info'). These two calls returns the same:
$info = $request->route()->parameter('info');
$info = $request->route('info');
The second way, makes mocking the 'info' parameter very easy:
$request = $this->createMock(Request::class);
$request->expects($this->once())->method('route')->willReturn('HelloWorld');
$info = $request->route('info');
$this->assertEquals($info, 'HelloWorld');
Of course to exploit this method in your tests, you should inject the Request object in your class under test, instead of using the Laravel global request object through the request() method.

Answer 4

Using the Laravel phpunit wrapper, you can let your test class extend TestCase and use the visit() function.
If you want to be stricter (which in unit testing is probably a good thing), this method isn't really recommended.
class UserTest extends TestCase
{
/**
* A basic test example.
*
* #return void
*/
public function testExample()
{
// This is readable but there's a lot of under-the-hood magic
$this->visit('/home')
->see('Welcome')
->seePageIs('/home');
// You can still be explicit and use phpunit functions
$this->assertTrue(true);
}
}