What is the differece between private and protected in OOP? - php

I don't understand what is the different between private method and protected method in Object Oriented PHP. After make a method private , I'm able to access it from extends class. Please check the code below -
<?php
class person{
private function namedilam(){
return "likhlam";
}
public function kicu(){
return $this->namedilam();
}
}
class second extends person{
}
$info = new second;
echo $info->kicu();

The difference will become clear when you do it like this:
class Liam {
private getFirstName() {
return "Liam";
}
public function getName() {
return $this->getFirstName();
}
}
class Max extends Liam {
private function getFirstName() {
return "Max";
}
}
class Peter extends Liam {
public function getLiamsName() {
return $this->getFirstName();
}
}
$max = new Max();
echo $max->getName();
// returns "Liam", not "Max" as you might expect
$peter = new Peter();
echo $peter->getLiamsName();
// PHP Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to private method Liam::getFirstName() [...]
Max will return "Liam" because the getName() calls getFirstName() in the Liam class, not the one from the class extending it. This means with private methods you can make sure that whenever in your class you call this method exactly this one is used and it will never be overwritten.
To explain it in general terms:
private methods are only accessible inside the class. They can not be overwritten or accessed from outside or even classes extending it.
protected methods are accessible inside the class and in extending classes, but you can't call them from outside like:
$max = new Max();
$max->iAmProtected();
This will neither work with private or protected methods.

Related

How to implement abstract properties in PHP? [duplicate]

Is there any way to define abstract class properties in PHP?
abstract class Foo_Abstract {
abstract public $tablename;
}
class Foo extends Foo_Abstract {
//Foo must 'implement' $property
public $tablename = 'users';
}
There is no such thing as defining a property.
You can only declare properties because they are containers of data reserved in memory on initialization.
A function on the other hand can be declared (types, name, parameters) without being defined (function body missing) and thus, can be made abstract.
"Abstract" only indicates that something was declared but not defined and therefore before using it, you need to define it or it becomes useless.
No, there is no way to enforce that with the compiler, you'd have to use run-time checks (say, in the constructor) for the $tablename variable, e.g.:
class Foo_Abstract {
public final function __construct(/*whatever*/) {
if(!isset($this->tablename))
throw new LogicException(get_class($this) . ' must have a $tablename');
}
}
To enforce this for all derived classes of Foo_Abstract you would have to make Foo_Abstract's constructor final, preventing overriding.
You could declare an abstract getter instead:
abstract class Foo_Abstract {
abstract public function get_tablename();
}
class Foo extends Foo_Abstract {
protected $tablename = 'tablename';
public function get_tablename() {
return $this->tablename;
}
}
Depending on the context of the property, if I want to force declaration of an abstract class property in an extended class, I like to use a constant with the static keyword for the property in the abstract object constructor or setter/getter methods. You can optionally use final to prevent the method from being overridden in extended classes.
Example: https://3v4l.org/WH5Xl
abstract class AbstractFoo
{
public $bar;
final public function __construct()
{
$this->bar = static::BAR;
}
}
class Foo extends AbstractFoo
{
//const BAR = 'foobar'; //uncomment to prevent exception
}
$foo = new Foo();
//Fatal Error: Undefined class constant 'BAR'
However, the extended class overrides the parent class properties and methods if redefined.
For example; if a property is declared as protected in the parent and redefined as public in the extended class, the resulting property is public. Otherwise, if the property is declared private in the parent it will remain private and not available to the extended class.
http://www.php.net//manual/en/language.oop5.static.php
As stated above, there is no such exact definition.
I, however, use this simple workaround to force the child class to define the "abstract" property:
abstract class Father
{
public $name;
abstract protected function setName(); // now every child class must declare this
// function and thus declare the property
public function __construct()
{
$this->setName();
}
}
class Son extends Father
{
protected function setName()
{
$this->name = "son";
}
function __construct(){
parent::__construct();
}
}
The need for abstract properties can indicate design problems. While many of answers implement kind of Template method pattern and it works, it always looks kind of strange.
Let's take a look at the original example:
abstract class Foo_Abstract {
abstract public $tablename;
}
class Foo extends Foo_Abstract {
//Foo must 'implement' $property
public $tablename = 'users';
}
To mark something abstract is to indicate it a must-have thing. Well, a must-have value (in this case) is a required dependency, so it should be passed to the constructor during instantiation:
class Table
{
private $name;
public function __construct(string $name)
{
$this->name = $name;
}
public function name(): string
{
return $this->name;
}
}
Then if you actually want a more concrete named class you can inherit like so:
final class UsersTable extends Table
{
public function __construct()
{
parent::__construct('users');
}
}
This can be useful if you use DI container and have to pass different tables for different objects.
I've asked myself the same question today, and I'd like to add my two cents.
The reason we would like abstract properties is to make sure that subclasses define them and throw exceptions when they don't. In my specific case, I needed something that could work with statically.
Ideally I would like something like this:
abstract class A {
abstract protected static $prop;
}
class B extends A {
protected static $prop = 'B prop'; // $prop defined, B loads successfully
}
class C extends A {
// throws an exception when loading C for the first time because $prop
// is not defined.
}
I ended up with this implementation
abstract class A
{
// no $prop definition in A!
public static final function getProp()
{
return static::$prop;
}
}
class B extends A
{
protected static $prop = 'B prop';
}
class C extends A
{
}
As you can see, in A I don't define $prop, but I use it in a static getter. Therefore, the following code works
B::getProp();
// => 'B prop'
$b = new B();
$b->getProp();
// => 'B prop'
In C, on the other hand, I don't define $prop, so I get exceptions:
C::getProp();
// => Exception!
$c = new C();
$c->getProp();
// => Exception!
I must call the getProp() method to get the exception and I can't get it on class loading, but it is quite close to the desired behavior, at least in my case.
I define getProp() as final to avoid that some smart guy (aka myself in 6 months) is tempted to do
class D extends A {
public static function getProp() {
// really smart
}
}
D::getProp();
// => no exception...
As you could have found out by just testing your code:
Fatal error: Properties cannot be declared abstract in ... on line 3
No, there is not. Properties cannot be declared abstract in PHP.
However you can implement a getter/setter function abstract, this might be what you're looking for.
Properties aren't implemented (especially public properties), they just exist (or not):
$foo = new Foo;
$foo->publicProperty = 'Bar';
PHP 7 makes it quite a bit easier for making abstract "properties". Just as above, you will make them by creating abstract functions, but with PHP 7 you can define the return type for that function, which makes things a lot easier when you're building a base class that anyone can extend.
<?php
abstract class FooBase {
abstract public function FooProp(): string;
abstract public function BarProp(): BarClass;
public function foo() {
return $this->FooProp();
}
public function bar() {
return $this->BarProp()->name();
}
}
class BarClass {
public function name() {
return 'Bar!';
}
}
class FooClass extends FooBase {
public function FooProp(): string {
return 'Foo!';
}
public function BarProp(): BarClass {
// This would not work:
// return 'not working';
// But this will!
return new BarClass();
}
}
$test = new FooClass();
echo $test->foo() . PHP_EOL;
echo $test->bar() . PHP_EOL;
if tablename value will never change during the object's lifetime, following will be a simple yet safe implementation.
abstract class Foo_Abstract {
abstract protected function getTablename();
public function showTableName()
{
echo 'my table name is '.$this->getTablename();
}
}
class Foo extends Foo_Abstract {
//Foo must 'implement' getTablename()
protected function getTablename()
{
return 'users';
}
}
the key here is that the string value 'users' is specified and returned directly in getTablename() in child class implementation. The function mimics a "readonly" property.
This is fairly similar to a solution posted earlier on which uses an additional variable. I also like Marco's solution though it can be a bit more complicated.
Just define the property in the base class without assigning it a (default) value.
Getting the property value without redefining it with a default value or assigning it a value will throw an Error.
<?php
class Base {
protected string $name;
public function i_am() : string {
return $this->name;
}
}
class Wrong extends Base {
...
}
class Good extends Base {
protected string $name = 'Somebody';
}
$test = new Good();
echo $test->i_am(), '<br>'; // Will show "Nobody"
$test = new Wrong();
echo $test->i_am(), '<br>'; // Will throw an Error:
// Error: Typed property Base::$name must not be accessed before initialization in ....
?>
You can define a static property in an abstract class.
<?php
abstract class Foo {
private static $bar = "1234";
public static function func() {
echo self::$bar;
}
}
Foo::func(); // It will be printed 1234
Too late to answer the question, but you may use the difference between self and static as follows
<?php
class A { // Base Class
protected static $name = 'ClassA';
public static function getSelfName() {
return self::$name;
}
public static function getStaticName() {
return static::$name;
}
}
class B extends A {
protected static $name = 'ClassB';
}
echo A::getSelfName(); // ClassA
echo A::getStaticName(); // ClassA
echo B::getSelfName(); // ClassA
echo B::getStaticName(); // ClassB

Can I/How to... call a protected function outside of a class in PHP

I have a protected function that is defined within a certain class. I want to be able to call this protected function outside of the class within another function. Is this possible and if so how may I achieve it
class cExample{
protected function funExample(){
//functional code goes here
return $someVar
}//end of function
}//end of class
function outsideFunction(){
//Calls funExample();
}
Technically, it is possible to invoke private and protected methods using the reflection API. However, 99% of the time doing so is a really bad idea. If you can modify the class, then the correct solution is probably to just make the method public. After all, if you need to access it outside the class, that defeats the point of marking it protected.
Here's a quick reflection example, in case this is one of the very few situations where it's really necessary:
<?php
class foo {
protected function bar($param){
echo $param;
}
}
$r = new ReflectionMethod('foo', 'bar');
$r->setAccessible(true);
$r->invoke(new foo(), "Hello World");
That's the point of OOP - encapsulation:
Private
Only can be used inside the class. Not inherited by child classes.
Protected
Only can be used inside the class and child classes. Inherited by child classes.
Public
Can be used anywhere. Inherited by child classes.
If you still want to trigger that function outside, you can declare a public method that triggers your protected method:
protected function b(){
}
public function a(){
$this->b() ;
//etc
}
If the parent's method is protected, you can use an anonymous class:
class Foo {
protected function do_foo() {
return 'Foo!';
}
}
$bar = new class extends Foo {
public function do_foo() {
return parent::do_foo();
}
}
$bar->do_foo(); // "Foo!"
https://www.php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.anonymous.php
You can override this class with another where you make this public.
class cExample2 extends cExample {
public function funExample(){
return parent::funExample()
}
}
(note this won't work with private members)
But the idea of private and protected members is to NOT BE called from outside.
Another option (PHP 7.4)
<?php
class cExample {
protected function funExample(){
return 'it works!';
}
}
$example = new cExample();
$result = Closure::bind(
fn ($class) => $class->funExample(), null, get_class($example)
)($example);
echo $result; // it works!
If you want to share code between your classes you can use traits, but it depends how you want use your function/method.
Anyway
trait cTrait{
public function myFunction() {
$this->funExample();
}
}
class cExample{
use cTrait;
protected function funExample() {
//functional code goes here
return $someVar
}//end of function
}//end of class
$object = new cExample();
$object->myFunction();
This will work, but keep in mind that you don't know what your class is made of this way. If you change the trait then all of your classes which use it will be altered as well. It's also good practice to write an interface for every trait you use.
here i can give you one example like below
<?php
class dog {
public $Name;
private function getName() {
return $this->Name;
}
}
class poodle extends dog {
public function bark() {
print "'Woof', says " . $this->getName();
}
}
$poppy = new poodle;
$poppy->Name = "Poppy";
$poppy->bark();
?>
or one another way to use with latest php
In PHP you can do this using Reflections. To invoke protected or private methods use the setAccessible() method http://php.net/reflectionmethod.setaccessible (just set it to TRUE)
I am using Laravel. i was facing issue while access protected method outside of class.
$bookingPriceDetails = new class extends BookingController {
public function quotesPrice( $req , $selectedFranchise) {
return parent::quotesPrice($req , $selectedFranchise);
}
};
return $bookingPriceDetails->quotesPrice($request , selectedFranchisees());
here BookingController is Class name from which i want to get protected method. quotesPrice( $req , $selectedFranchise) is method that i want to access in different Class.

PHP access private methods from one child to another

class Master{
protected static $DB;
function __construct(){
static::$DB = new DB();
$view = new View();
}
}
class DB extends Master{
private function ReturnSomeData(){
return $data;
}
}
class View extends Master{
public function ViewData(){
$DBdata = static::$DB->ReturnSomeData();
}
}
Fatal error: Call to private method DB::ReturnSomeData() from context 'View'
How can I access the ReturnSomeData() method from the View class? Is there something like a 'gateway'?
class Master {
... }
class DB extends Master{
...
public function PassItToMe(){
return $this;
}
}
class View extends Master{
public function ViewData(){
$DBdata = static::$DB->PassItToMe()->ReturnSomeData();
}
}
This is my picture right now, but I'm really lost.
The idea is that I want to access private methods from one child class to another.
You have to choose:
you want to keep ReturnSomeData() private? Fine, you won't be able to access it from outside class [not even subclasses];
you want to access ReturnSomeData()? Make it public.
The idea is to make private [or protected] fields, and public accessors in case, that is one of the main points of encapsulation.

PHP abstract properties

Is there any way to define abstract class properties in PHP?
abstract class Foo_Abstract {
abstract public $tablename;
}
class Foo extends Foo_Abstract {
//Foo must 'implement' $property
public $tablename = 'users';
}
There is no such thing as defining a property.
You can only declare properties because they are containers of data reserved in memory on initialization.
A function on the other hand can be declared (types, name, parameters) without being defined (function body missing) and thus, can be made abstract.
"Abstract" only indicates that something was declared but not defined and therefore before using it, you need to define it or it becomes useless.
No, there is no way to enforce that with the compiler, you'd have to use run-time checks (say, in the constructor) for the $tablename variable, e.g.:
class Foo_Abstract {
public final function __construct(/*whatever*/) {
if(!isset($this->tablename))
throw new LogicException(get_class($this) . ' must have a $tablename');
}
}
To enforce this for all derived classes of Foo_Abstract you would have to make Foo_Abstract's constructor final, preventing overriding.
You could declare an abstract getter instead:
abstract class Foo_Abstract {
abstract public function get_tablename();
}
class Foo extends Foo_Abstract {
protected $tablename = 'tablename';
public function get_tablename() {
return $this->tablename;
}
}
Depending on the context of the property, if I want to force declaration of an abstract class property in an extended class, I like to use a constant with the static keyword for the property in the abstract object constructor or setter/getter methods. You can optionally use final to prevent the method from being overridden in extended classes.
Example: https://3v4l.org/WH5Xl
abstract class AbstractFoo
{
public $bar;
final public function __construct()
{
$this->bar = static::BAR;
}
}
class Foo extends AbstractFoo
{
//const BAR = 'foobar'; //uncomment to prevent exception
}
$foo = new Foo();
//Fatal Error: Undefined class constant 'BAR'
However, the extended class overrides the parent class properties and methods if redefined.
For example; if a property is declared as protected in the parent and redefined as public in the extended class, the resulting property is public. Otherwise, if the property is declared private in the parent it will remain private and not available to the extended class.
http://www.php.net//manual/en/language.oop5.static.php
As stated above, there is no such exact definition.
I, however, use this simple workaround to force the child class to define the "abstract" property:
abstract class Father
{
public $name;
abstract protected function setName(); // now every child class must declare this
// function and thus declare the property
public function __construct()
{
$this->setName();
}
}
class Son extends Father
{
protected function setName()
{
$this->name = "son";
}
function __construct(){
parent::__construct();
}
}
The need for abstract properties can indicate design problems. While many of answers implement kind of Template method pattern and it works, it always looks kind of strange.
Let's take a look at the original example:
abstract class Foo_Abstract {
abstract public $tablename;
}
class Foo extends Foo_Abstract {
//Foo must 'implement' $property
public $tablename = 'users';
}
To mark something abstract is to indicate it a must-have thing. Well, a must-have value (in this case) is a required dependency, so it should be passed to the constructor during instantiation:
class Table
{
private $name;
public function __construct(string $name)
{
$this->name = $name;
}
public function name(): string
{
return $this->name;
}
}
Then if you actually want a more concrete named class you can inherit like so:
final class UsersTable extends Table
{
public function __construct()
{
parent::__construct('users');
}
}
This can be useful if you use DI container and have to pass different tables for different objects.
I've asked myself the same question today, and I'd like to add my two cents.
The reason we would like abstract properties is to make sure that subclasses define them and throw exceptions when they don't. In my specific case, I needed something that could work with statically.
Ideally I would like something like this:
abstract class A {
abstract protected static $prop;
}
class B extends A {
protected static $prop = 'B prop'; // $prop defined, B loads successfully
}
class C extends A {
// throws an exception when loading C for the first time because $prop
// is not defined.
}
I ended up with this implementation
abstract class A
{
// no $prop definition in A!
public static final function getProp()
{
return static::$prop;
}
}
class B extends A
{
protected static $prop = 'B prop';
}
class C extends A
{
}
As you can see, in A I don't define $prop, but I use it in a static getter. Therefore, the following code works
B::getProp();
// => 'B prop'
$b = new B();
$b->getProp();
// => 'B prop'
In C, on the other hand, I don't define $prop, so I get exceptions:
C::getProp();
// => Exception!
$c = new C();
$c->getProp();
// => Exception!
I must call the getProp() method to get the exception and I can't get it on class loading, but it is quite close to the desired behavior, at least in my case.
I define getProp() as final to avoid that some smart guy (aka myself in 6 months) is tempted to do
class D extends A {
public static function getProp() {
// really smart
}
}
D::getProp();
// => no exception...
As you could have found out by just testing your code:
Fatal error: Properties cannot be declared abstract in ... on line 3
No, there is not. Properties cannot be declared abstract in PHP.
However you can implement a getter/setter function abstract, this might be what you're looking for.
Properties aren't implemented (especially public properties), they just exist (or not):
$foo = new Foo;
$foo->publicProperty = 'Bar';
PHP 7 makes it quite a bit easier for making abstract "properties". Just as above, you will make them by creating abstract functions, but with PHP 7 you can define the return type for that function, which makes things a lot easier when you're building a base class that anyone can extend.
<?php
abstract class FooBase {
abstract public function FooProp(): string;
abstract public function BarProp(): BarClass;
public function foo() {
return $this->FooProp();
}
public function bar() {
return $this->BarProp()->name();
}
}
class BarClass {
public function name() {
return 'Bar!';
}
}
class FooClass extends FooBase {
public function FooProp(): string {
return 'Foo!';
}
public function BarProp(): BarClass {
// This would not work:
// return 'not working';
// But this will!
return new BarClass();
}
}
$test = new FooClass();
echo $test->foo() . PHP_EOL;
echo $test->bar() . PHP_EOL;
if tablename value will never change during the object's lifetime, following will be a simple yet safe implementation.
abstract class Foo_Abstract {
abstract protected function getTablename();
public function showTableName()
{
echo 'my table name is '.$this->getTablename();
}
}
class Foo extends Foo_Abstract {
//Foo must 'implement' getTablename()
protected function getTablename()
{
return 'users';
}
}
the key here is that the string value 'users' is specified and returned directly in getTablename() in child class implementation. The function mimics a "readonly" property.
This is fairly similar to a solution posted earlier on which uses an additional variable. I also like Marco's solution though it can be a bit more complicated.
Just define the property in the base class without assigning it a (default) value.
Getting the property value without redefining it with a default value or assigning it a value will throw an Error.
<?php
class Base {
protected string $name;
public function i_am() : string {
return $this->name;
}
}
class Wrong extends Base {
...
}
class Good extends Base {
protected string $name = 'Somebody';
}
$test = new Good();
echo $test->i_am(), '<br>'; // Will show "Nobody"
$test = new Wrong();
echo $test->i_am(), '<br>'; // Will throw an Error:
// Error: Typed property Base::$name must not be accessed before initialization in ....
?>
You can define a static property in an abstract class.
<?php
abstract class Foo {
private static $bar = "1234";
public static function func() {
echo self::$bar;
}
}
Foo::func(); // It will be printed 1234
Too late to answer the question, but you may use the difference between self and static as follows
<?php
class A { // Base Class
protected static $name = 'ClassA';
public static function getSelfName() {
return self::$name;
}
public static function getStaticName() {
return static::$name;
}
}
class B extends A {
protected static $name = 'ClassB';
}
echo A::getSelfName(); // ClassA
echo A::getStaticName(); // ClassA
echo B::getSelfName(); // ClassA
echo B::getStaticName(); // ClassB

PHP make class propery inheritable

i have 2 classes A and B that extends A. A has a public property and i want that on the instances of B that property can't be accessible. I try to explain better:
class A
{
public $prop;
}
class B extends A
{
...
}
$instance=new B;
$instance->prop; //This must throw an error like "Undefined property prop"
I tried with the final keyword but it's only available for methods not for properties. I tried also by setting the same property as private on B but PHP does not allow to change the access level from public to private or protected.
Maybe there's a simple solution to this problem but i can't find it so do you know a way to do this?
Simply change public $prop; to private $prop; by making $prop public you are making it accessible by every possible way, but making it private will make it accessible within a class only
Use magic methods
class A {
protected $_prop;
public function __get($key) {
if ($key=='prop') {
return $this->_prop;
}
}
public function __set($key, $value) {
if ($key=='prop') {
return $this->_prop = $value;
}
}
}
class B extends A {
public function __get($key) {
}
public function __set($key, $value) {
}
// how you can use it
public function foo() {
echo $this->_prop;
}
}
Hmm. Tricky!
The only idea that comes to mind is making $prop private from the start, and using magic getter and setter functions to control access. You'd have to store the access information in a separate array and then either return the correct value, or throw a fatal error in the getter function.

Categories