Using LIMIT within GROUP BY to get N results per dynamic group
Hello everyone, firstly I read about questions like this problem.
But didn't get the solution. All of this SQL's are designed for static columns.
But I have dynamic columns.
Table:
id Name Group Level
2 Jonathan A 5
5 David A 10
6 Alex C 10
7 Kemal A 71
8 John D 21
9 Celin F 100
12 Alexis G 15
13 Noone A 23
I want to get the first 2 highest Level from each group.
But query must be dynamic because there will be more Groups, which is where I am stuck.
Solutions I tried:
Select the top N rows from each group Not giving true result it's broken.
Only work in static columns.
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS my_table;
CREATE TABLE my_table
(id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY
,name VARCHAR(12) NOT NULL
,group_name CHAR(1) NOT NULL
,level INT NOT NULL
);
INSERT INTO my_table VALUES
( 2,'Jonathan','A',5),
( 5,'David','A',10),
( 6,'Alex','C',10),
( 7,'Kemal','A',71),
( 8,'John','D',21),
( 9,'Celin','F',100),
(12,'Alexis','G',15),
(13,'Noone','A',23);
SELECT id
, name
, group_name
, level
FROM
( SELECT x.*
, CASE WHEN #prev = group_name THEN #i:=#i+1 ELSE #i:=1 END i
, #prev:=group_name
FROM my_table x -- technically, ordering should really happen here, in a separate subquery
, ( SELECT #prev:=null,#i:=0 ) vars
ORDER
BY group_name
, level DESC
, id
) a
WHERE i <=2;
+----+--------+------------+-------+
| id | name | group_name | level |
+----+--------+------------+-------+
| 7 | Kemal | A | 71 |
| 13 | Noone | A | 23 |
| 6 | Alex | C | 10 |
| 8 | John | D | 21 |
| 9 | Celin | F | 100 |
| 12 | Alexis | G | 15 |
+----+--------+------------+-------+
You can also do workaround.
Select colums upto 2 rows
FROM TABLE ORDER BY DESCENDING GROUP LEVEL
regards,
Umar Abdullah
I have a table of player performance:
CREATE TABLE TopTen (
id INT UNSIGNED PRIMARY KEY AUTO_INCREMENT,
home INT UNSIGNED NOT NULL,
`datetime`DATETIME NOT NULL,
player VARCHAR(6) NOT NULL,
resource INT NOT NULL
);
What query will return the rows for each distinct home holding its maximum value of datetime? In other words, how can I filter by the maximum datetime (grouped by home) and still include other non-grouped, non-aggregate columns (such as player) in the result?
For this sample data:
INSERT INTO TopTen
(id, home, `datetime`, player, resource)
VALUES
(1, 10, '04/03/2009', 'john', 399),
(2, 11, '04/03/2009', 'juliet', 244),
(5, 12, '04/03/2009', 'borat', 555),
(3, 10, '03/03/2009', 'john', 300),
(4, 11, '03/03/2009', 'juliet', 200),
(6, 12, '03/03/2009', 'borat', 500),
(7, 13, '24/12/2008', 'borat', 600),
(8, 13, '01/01/2009', 'borat', 700)
;
the result should be:
id
home
datetime
player
resource
1
10
04/03/2009
john
399
2
11
04/03/2009
juliet
244
5
12
04/03/2009
borat
555
8
13
01/01/2009
borat
700
I tried a subquery getting the maximum datetime for each home:
-- 1 ..by the MySQL manual:
SELECT DISTINCT
home,
id,
datetime AS dt,
player,
resource
FROM TopTen t1
WHERE `datetime` = (SELECT
MAX(t2.datetime)
FROM TopTen t2
GROUP BY home)
GROUP BY `datetime`
ORDER BY `datetime` DESC
The result-set has 130 rows although database holds 187, indicating the result includes some duplicates of home.
Then I tried joining to a subquery that gets the maximum datetime for each row id:
-- 2 ..join
SELECT
s1.id,
s1.home,
s1.datetime,
s1.player,
s1.resource
FROM TopTen s1
JOIN (SELECT
id,
MAX(`datetime`) AS dt
FROM TopTen
GROUP BY id) AS s2
ON s1.id = s2.id
ORDER BY `datetime`
Nope. Gives all the records.
I tried various exotic queries, each with various results, but nothing that got me any closer to solving this problem.
You are so close! All you need to do is select BOTH the home and its max date time, then join back to the topten table on BOTH fields:
SELECT tt.*
FROM topten tt
INNER JOIN
(SELECT home, MAX(datetime) AS MaxDateTime
FROM topten
GROUP BY home) groupedtt
ON tt.home = groupedtt.home
AND tt.datetime = groupedtt.MaxDateTime
The fastest MySQL solution, without inner queries and without GROUP BY:
SELECT m.* -- get the row that contains the max value
FROM topten m -- "m" from "max"
LEFT JOIN topten b -- "b" from "bigger"
ON m.home = b.home -- match "max" row with "bigger" row by `home`
AND m.datetime < b.datetime -- want "bigger" than "max"
WHERE b.datetime IS NULL -- keep only if there is no bigger than max
Explanation:
Join the table with itself using the home column. The use of LEFT JOIN ensures all the rows from table m appear in the result set. Those that don't have a match in table b will have NULLs for the columns of b.
The other condition on the JOIN asks to match only the rows from b that have bigger value on the datetime column than the row from m.
Using the data posted in the question, the LEFT JOIN will produce this pairs:
+------------------------------------------+--------------------------------+
| the row from `m` | the matching row from `b` |
|------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|
| id home datetime player resource | id home datetime ... |
|----|-----|------------|--------|---------|------|------|------------|-----|
| 1 | 10 | 04/03/2009 | john | 399 | NULL | NULL | NULL | ... | *
| 2 | 11 | 04/03/2009 | juliet | 244 | NULL | NULL | NULL | ... | *
| 5 | 12 | 04/03/2009 | borat | 555 | NULL | NULL | NULL | ... | *
| 3 | 10 | 03/03/2009 | john | 300 | 1 | 10 | 04/03/2009 | ... |
| 4 | 11 | 03/03/2009 | juliet | 200 | 2 | 11 | 04/03/2009 | ... |
| 6 | 12 | 03/03/2009 | borat | 500 | 5 | 12 | 04/03/2009 | ... |
| 7 | 13 | 24/12/2008 | borat | 600 | 8 | 13 | 01/01/2009 | ... |
| 8 | 13 | 01/01/2009 | borat | 700 | NULL | NULL | NULL | ... | *
+------------------------------------------+--------------------------------+
Finally, the WHERE clause keeps only the pairs that have NULLs in the columns of b (they are marked with * in the table above); this means, due to the second condition from the JOIN clause, the row selected from m has the biggest value in column datetime.
Read the SQL Antipatterns: Avoiding the Pitfalls of Database Programming book for other SQL tips.
Here goes T-SQL version:
-- Test data
DECLARE #TestTable TABLE (id INT, home INT, date DATETIME,
player VARCHAR(20), resource INT)
INSERT INTO #TestTable
SELECT 1, 10, '2009-03-04', 'john', 399 UNION
SELECT 2, 11, '2009-03-04', 'juliet', 244 UNION
SELECT 5, 12, '2009-03-04', 'borat', 555 UNION
SELECT 3, 10, '2009-03-03', 'john', 300 UNION
SELECT 4, 11, '2009-03-03', 'juliet', 200 UNION
SELECT 6, 12, '2009-03-03', 'borat', 500 UNION
SELECT 7, 13, '2008-12-24', 'borat', 600 UNION
SELECT 8, 13, '2009-01-01', 'borat', 700
-- Answer
SELECT id, home, date, player, resource
FROM (SELECT id, home, date, player, resource,
RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY home ORDER BY date DESC) N
FROM #TestTable
)M WHERE N = 1
-- and if you really want only home with max date
SELECT T.id, T.home, T.date, T.player, T.resource
FROM #TestTable T
INNER JOIN
( SELECT TI.id, TI.home, TI.date,
RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY TI.home ORDER BY TI.date) N
FROM #TestTable TI
WHERE TI.date IN (SELECT MAX(TM.date) FROM #TestTable TM)
)TJ ON TJ.N = 1 AND T.id = TJ.id
EDIT
Unfortunately, there are no RANK() OVER function in MySQL.
But it can be emulated, see Emulating Analytic (AKA Ranking) Functions with MySQL.
So this is MySQL version:
SELECT id, home, date, player, resource
FROM TestTable AS t1
WHERE
(SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM TestTable AS t2
WHERE t2.home = t1.home AND t2.date > t1.date
) = 0
This will work even if you have two or more rows for each home with equal DATETIME's:
SELECT id, home, datetime, player, resource
FROM (
SELECT (
SELECT id
FROM topten ti
WHERE ti.home = t1.home
ORDER BY
ti.datetime DESC
LIMIT 1
) lid
FROM (
SELECT DISTINCT home
FROM topten
) t1
) ro, topten t2
WHERE t2.id = ro.lid
I think this will give you the desired result:
SELECT home, MAX(datetime)
FROM my_table
GROUP BY home
BUT if you need other columns as well, just make a join with the original table (check Michael La Voie answer)
Best regards.
Since people seem to keep running into this thread (comment date ranges from 1.5 year) isn't this much simpler:
SELECT * FROM (SELECT * FROM topten ORDER BY datetime DESC) tmp GROUP BY home
No aggregation functions needed...
Cheers.
You can also try this one and for large tables query performance will be better. It works when there no more than two records for each home and their dates are different. Better general MySQL query is one from Michael La Voie above.
SELECT t1.id, t1.home, t1.date, t1.player, t1.resource
FROM t_scores_1 t1
INNER JOIN t_scores_1 t2
ON t1.home = t2.home
WHERE t1.date > t2.date
Or in case of Postgres or those dbs that provide analytic functions try
SELECT t.* FROM
(SELECT t1.id, t1.home, t1.date, t1.player, t1.resource
, row_number() over (partition by t1.home order by t1.date desc) rw
FROM topten t1
INNER JOIN topten t2
ON t1.home = t2.home
WHERE t1.date > t2.date
) t
WHERE t.rw = 1
SELECT tt.*
FROM TestTable tt
INNER JOIN
(
SELECT coord, MAX(datetime) AS MaxDateTime
FROM rapsa
GROUP BY
krd
) groupedtt
ON tt.coord = groupedtt.coord
AND tt.datetime = groupedtt.MaxDateTime
This works on Oracle:
with table_max as(
select id
, home
, datetime
, player
, resource
, max(home) over (partition by home) maxhome
from table
)
select id
, home
, datetime
, player
, resource
from table_max
where home = maxhome
Try this for SQL Server:
WITH cte AS (
SELECT home, MAX(year) AS year FROM Table1 GROUP BY home
)
SELECT * FROM Table1 a INNER JOIN cte ON a.home = cte.home AND a.year = cte.year
Here is MySQL version which prints only one entry where there are duplicates MAX(datetime) in a group.
You could test here http://www.sqlfiddle.com/#!2/0a4ae/1
Sample Data
mysql> SELECT * from topten;
+------+------+---------------------+--------+----------+
| id | home | datetime | player | resource |
+------+------+---------------------+--------+----------+
| 1 | 10 | 2009-04-03 00:00:00 | john | 399 |
| 2 | 11 | 2009-04-03 00:00:00 | juliet | 244 |
| 3 | 10 | 2009-03-03 00:00:00 | john | 300 |
| 4 | 11 | 2009-03-03 00:00:00 | juliet | 200 |
| 5 | 12 | 2009-04-03 00:00:00 | borat | 555 |
| 6 | 12 | 2009-03-03 00:00:00 | borat | 500 |
| 7 | 13 | 2008-12-24 00:00:00 | borat | 600 |
| 8 | 13 | 2009-01-01 00:00:00 | borat | 700 |
| 9 | 10 | 2009-04-03 00:00:00 | borat | 700 |
| 10 | 11 | 2009-04-03 00:00:00 | borat | 700 |
| 12 | 12 | 2009-04-03 00:00:00 | borat | 700 |
+------+------+---------------------+--------+----------+
MySQL Version with User variable
SELECT *
FROM (
SELECT ord.*,
IF (#prev_home = ord.home, 0, 1) AS is_first_appear,
#prev_home := ord.home
FROM (
SELECT t1.id, t1.home, t1.player, t1.resource
FROM topten t1
INNER JOIN (
SELECT home, MAX(datetime) AS mx_dt
FROM topten
GROUP BY home
) x ON t1.home = x.home AND t1.datetime = x.mx_dt
ORDER BY home
) ord, (SELECT #prev_home := 0, #seq := 0) init
) y
WHERE is_first_appear = 1;
+------+------+--------+----------+-----------------+------------------------+
| id | home | player | resource | is_first_appear | #prev_home := ord.home |
+------+------+--------+----------+-----------------+------------------------+
| 9 | 10 | borat | 700 | 1 | 10 |
| 10 | 11 | borat | 700 | 1 | 11 |
| 12 | 12 | borat | 700 | 1 | 12 |
| 8 | 13 | borat | 700 | 1 | 13 |
+------+------+--------+----------+-----------------+------------------------+
4 rows in set (0.00 sec)
Accepted Answers' outout
SELECT tt.*
FROM topten tt
INNER JOIN
(
SELECT home, MAX(datetime) AS MaxDateTime
FROM topten
GROUP BY home
) groupedtt ON tt.home = groupedtt.home AND tt.datetime = groupedtt.MaxDateTime
+------+------+---------------------+--------+----------+
| id | home | datetime | player | resource |
+------+------+---------------------+--------+----------+
| 1 | 10 | 2009-04-03 00:00:00 | john | 399 |
| 2 | 11 | 2009-04-03 00:00:00 | juliet | 244 |
| 5 | 12 | 2009-04-03 00:00:00 | borat | 555 |
| 8 | 13 | 2009-01-01 00:00:00 | borat | 700 |
| 9 | 10 | 2009-04-03 00:00:00 | borat | 700 |
| 10 | 11 | 2009-04-03 00:00:00 | borat | 700 |
| 12 | 12 | 2009-04-03 00:00:00 | borat | 700 |
+------+------+---------------------+--------+----------+
7 rows in set (0.00 sec)
SELECT c1, c2, c3, c4, c5 FROM table1 WHERE c3 = (select max(c3) from table)
SELECT * FROM table1 WHERE c3 = (select max(c3) from table1)
Another way to gt the most recent row per group using a sub query which basically calculates a rank for each row per group and then filter out your most recent rows as with rank = 1
select a.*
from topten a
where (
select count(*)
from topten b
where a.home = b.home
and a.`datetime` < b.`datetime`
) +1 = 1
DEMO
Here is the visual demo for rank no for each row for better understanding
By reading some comments what about if there are two rows which have same 'home' and 'datetime' field values?
Above query will fail and will return more than 1 rows for above situation. To cover up this situation there will be a need of another criteria/parameter/column to decide which row should be taken which falls in above situation. By viewing sample data set i assume there is a primary key column id which should be set to auto increment. So we can use this column to pick the most recent row by tweaking same query with the help of CASE statement like
select a.*
from topten a
where (
select count(*)
from topten b
where a.home = b.home
and case
when a.`datetime` = b.`datetime`
then a.id < b.id
else a.`datetime` < b.`datetime`
end
) + 1 = 1
DEMO
Above query will pick the row with highest id among the same datetime values
visual demo for rank no for each row
Why not using:
SELECT home, MAX(datetime) AS MaxDateTime,player,resource FROM topten GROUP BY home
Did I miss something?
In MySQL 8.0 this can be achieved efficiently by using row_number() window function with common table expression.
(Here row_number() basically generating unique sequence for each row for every player starting with 1 in descending order of resource. So, for every player row with sequence number 1 will be with highest resource value. Now all we need to do is selecting row with sequence number 1 for each player. It can be done by writing an outer query around this query. But we used common table expression instead since it's more readable.)
Schema:
create TABLE TestTable(id INT, home INT, date DATETIME,
player VARCHAR(20), resource INT);
INSERT INTO TestTable
SELECT 1, 10, '2009-03-04', 'john', 399 UNION
SELECT 2, 11, '2009-03-04', 'juliet', 244 UNION
SELECT 5, 12, '2009-03-04', 'borat', 555 UNION
SELECT 3, 10, '2009-03-03', 'john', 300 UNION
SELECT 4, 11, '2009-03-03', 'juliet', 200 UNION
SELECT 6, 12, '2009-03-03', 'borat', 500 UNION
SELECT 7, 13, '2008-12-24', 'borat', 600 UNION
SELECT 8, 13, '2009-01-01', 'borat', 700
Query:
with cte as
(
select id, home, date , player, resource,
Row_Number()Over(Partition by home order by date desc) rownumber from TestTable
)
select id, home, date , player, resource from cte where rownumber=1
Output:
id
home
date
player
resource
1
10
2009-03-04 00:00:00
john
399
2
11
2009-03-04 00:00:00
juliet
244
5
12
2009-03-04 00:00:00
borat
555
8
13
2009-01-01 00:00:00
borat
700
db<>fiddle here
This works in SQLServer, and is the only solution I've seen that doesn't require subqueries or CTEs - I think this is the most elegant way to solve this kind of problem.
SELECT TOP 1 WITH TIES *
FROM TopTen
ORDER BY ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY home
ORDER BY [datetime] DESC)
In the ORDER BY clause, it uses a window function to generate & sort by a ROW_NUMBER - assigning a 1 value to the highest [datetime] for each [home].
SELECT TOP 1 WITH TIES will then select one record with the lowest ROW_NUMBER (which will be 1), as well as all records with a tying ROW_NUMBER (also 1)
As a consequence, you retrieve all data for each of the 1st ranked records - that is, all data for records with the highest [datetime] value with their given [home] value.
Try this
select * from mytable a join
(select home, max(datetime) datetime
from mytable
group by home) b
on a.home = b.home and a.datetime = b.datetime
Regards
K
#Michae The accepted answer will working fine in most of the cases but it fail for one for as below.
In case if there were 2 rows having HomeID and Datetime same the query will return both rows, not distinct HomeID as required, for that add Distinct in query as below.
SELECT DISTINCT tt.home , tt.MaxDateTime
FROM topten tt
INNER JOIN
(SELECT home, MAX(datetime) AS MaxDateTime
FROM topten
GROUP BY home) groupedtt
ON tt.home = groupedtt.home
AND tt.datetime = groupedtt.MaxDateTime
this is the query you need:
SELECT b.id, a.home,b.[datetime],b.player,a.resource FROM
(SELECT home,MAX(resource) AS resource FROM tbl_1 GROUP BY home) AS a
LEFT JOIN
(SELECT id,home,[datetime],player,resource FROM tbl_1) AS b
ON a.resource = b.resource WHERE a.home =b.home;
Hope below query will give the desired output:
Select id, home,datetime,player,resource, row_number() over (Partition by home ORDER by datetime desc) as rownum from tablename where rownum=1
(NOTE: The answer of Michael is perfect for a situation where the target column datetime cannot have duplicate values for each distinct home.)
If your table has duplicate rows for homexdatetime and you need to only select one row for each distinct home column, here is my solution to it:
Your table needs one unique column (like id). If it doesn't, create a view and add a random column to it.
Use this query to select a single row for each unique home value. Selects the lowest id in case of duplicate datetime.
SELECT tt.*
FROM topten tt
INNER JOIN
(
SELECT min(id) as min_id, home from topten tt2
INNER JOIN
(
SELECT home, MAX(datetime) AS MaxDateTime
FROM topten
GROUP BY home) groupedtt2
ON tt2.home = groupedtt2.home
) as groupedtt
ON tt.id = groupedtt.id
Accepted answer doesn't work for me if there are 2 records with same date and home. It will return 2 records after join. While I need to select any (random) of them. This query is used as joined subquery so just limit 1 is not possible there.
Here is how I reached desired result. Don't know about performance however.
select SUBSTRING_INDEX(GROUP_CONCAT(id order by datetime desc separator ','),',',1) as id, home, MAX(datetime) as 'datetime'
from topten
group by (home)
I have two tables like so:
# Match
id, team1_id , team2_id
-----------------------
1, 10, 20
2, 10, 50
# Team
id, team_name, team_country
---------------------------
10, team A , England
20, team B , France
I'm trying to get the list from Match table with both teams info,
I wanna some thing like :
Team A (England) vs Team B (France)
I tried this one, but I got false team info, some thing wrong with my query for sure.
Here's my query :
SELECT `match`.*,
`t1`.`team_country` as team1_country,
`t2`.`team_country` as team2_country
FROM `match`,
`team` t1 , `team` t2
WHERE `match`.`team1_id` = `t1`.`id` and `match`.`team2_id` = `t2`.`id`
Thanks in advance!
I just fiddled it on my testmachine with postgres. The SQL shouldn't be different:
lara=# create table match ( id serial primary key, team1 int, team2 int);
CREATE TABLE
lara=# create table teams ( id serial primary key, name text, country text);
CREATE TABLE
lara=# insert into match(id, team1, team2) values (1,1,2),(2,1,3),(3,2,1);
INSERT 0 3
lara=# select * from match;
id | team1 | team2
----+-------+-------
1 | 1 | 2
2 | 1 | 3
3 | 2 | 1
(3 rows)
lara=# insert into teams values (1, 't1', 'en');
INSERT 0 1
lara=# insert into teams values (2, 't2', 'de');
INSERT 0 1
lara=# insert into teams values (3, 't3', 'fr');
INSERT 0 1
lara=# select * from match m left join teams t1 on t1.id=m.team1 left join teams t2 on t2.id=m.team2;
id | team1 | team2 | id | name | country | id | name | country
----+-------+-------+----+------+---------+----+------+---------
1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | t1 | en | 2 | t2 | de
2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | t1 | en | 3 | t3 | fr
3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | t2 | de | 1 | t1 | en
So your actual query is correct. A cleaner one would be the following:
SELECT * FROM match m
LEFT JOIN teams t1 ON t1.id=m.team1
LEFT JOIN teams t2 ON t2.id=m.team2;
But your problem is obviously not the SQL.
I have two tables with a single common field.
Here is how these two table structures are
Table 1
+--ID--+--Title----+----others---+
| 123 | Title 1 | other values|
| 124 | Title 2 | other values|
| 125 | Title 3 | other values|
| 126 | Title 4 | other values|
+------+-----------+-------------+
Table 2
+--ID--+--Tag ID--+----others---+
| 123 | 11 | other values|
| 123 | 12 | other values|
| 123 | 13 | other values|
| 123 | 14 | other values|
| 124 | 15 | other values|
| 124 | 16 | other values|
| 125 | 17 | other values|
| 126 | 18 | other values|
+------+----------+-------------+
I want to show that Article ID 123 have 4 tags i.e 11,12,13 & 14 like the table below
+--Article ID--+--Article Title--+--Tags--+--Tag IDs------+
| 123 | Title 1 | 4 | 11, 12, 13, 14|
| 124 | Title 2 | 2 | 15, 16 |
| 125 | Title 3 | 1 | 17 |
| 126 | Title 4 | 1 | 18 |
+--------------+-----------------+--------+---------------+
I'm very new to PHP and MySQL and trying to learn it.
Someone please help me to know how I can get the desired result.
This query should work (with some tweaking).
SELECT `ID` AS `t1`.`Article ID`, `t2`.`Title` AS `Article Title`, COUNT(`t2`.`ID`) AS `Tags`,
GROUP_CONCAT(`t2`.`ID`) AS `Tag IDs` FROM `Articles` AS `t1`
LEFT JOIN `Tags` AS `t2` ON `t1`.`ID` = `t2`.`ID`
GROUP BY `t1`.`ID`
There's a couple of other options to the GROUP_CONCAT function, but the defaults should work fine for what you want.
SELECT t1.id AS 'Article ID',
t1.title AS 'Article Title',
count( t2.tag_id ) AS 'Tags',
GROUP_CONCAT( t2.Tag_Id order by t2.Tag_id ASC) AS `Tag IDs`
FROM table1 t1
JOIN table2 t2 ON ( t1.id = t2.id )
GROUP BY t1.id;
Hope this works!
As somebody already mentioned in the comments, you should use GROUP_CONCAT(). Here are some examples and options - http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/group-by-functions.html#function_group-concat
SELECT table1.*,
table2.tagidgroup
FROM table1
INNER JOIN (SELECT id,
Group_concat(tagid SEPARATOR ',' ) AS tagidgroup
FROM table2
GROUP BY id) Table2
ON table1.id = Table2.id
Merging tables is done by using JOIN (LEFT, RIGHT INNER) keyword. For example:
SELECT T1.*, T2.*, COUNT(T2.ID) AS TAG_COUNT, GROUP_CONCAT(T2.ID) AS TAG_IDS
FROM TABLE1 T1
LEFT OUTER JOIN TABLE2 T2
ON T1.TAG_ID = T2.ID
This type of joining structure suggest, that you have a common filed, by which the join itself is made.
In your table structure I assume, that first table T1 is Article's table, second one is Tags table. In this case you need to have a field in your T1 table, which corresponds to the field in T2, this is most probably ID.
Edit: As final step you need to concatenate the results in order to achieve the desired structure, as many of the answers said - use GROUP_CONCAT() function.