I have just started playing with Laravel framework and I have seen this :
Route::get('foo', function () {
return 'Hello World';
});
Can some one please explain what is this ? I mean over all I know what is get . but why do we put 'foo' and then the closure we put ?
Also where am I really getting the information from ?
First we declare the Facade of the Route, think like a shortcut to use the Route class.
After that, we choose the method of the route, it could be:
Route::get($uri, $callback); //get
Route::post($uri, $callback); //post
Route::put($uri, $callback); //put
Route::patch($uri, $callback); //patch
Route::delete($uri, $callback); //delete
Now you choose the url of the page, for example:
If you digit in the browser:
www.foobar.com/user/profile
Laravel will search for the route with the user/profile parameter, like that:
Route::get('user/profile', function () {
return 'Hello World';
});
You can pass variables too,
Route::get('user/{id}', function () {
return 'Hello World';
});
After that, you choose the callback method, in other words, what is gonna happen when the laravel enter in the route.
In your example, you have the function example, just returning a simple "hello world".
The best pratice here is to create a controller
php artisan make:controller FoobarController --resource
And referece to any method of your controller
Route::get('user/profile', 'FoobarController#index');
Now, when the laravel find the route, it's going to redirect to the index method of the Foobar controller, and there, you define your logic
public function index() {
return view('welcome');
}
Firsty, read the documentation, it's super easy, even for the begginers.
Step by step:
get is the HTTP method you use on this particular route. The other most often used is POST, but there are more of them.
foo is the route, in that case will be: www.example.com\foo. You can put any name as you want and need.
As a second parameter to a Route facade you put closure/name of the controller/view you want to handle endpoint, e.g.
Route::get('foo', 'SomeController#method');
Route::get('foo', function(){
return view('some.view');
};
There are lot more options in routing and they are not difficult to understand, just have a look on documentation or some video tutorials.
Related
I have a single domain/subdomain project. In order to see the event by slug, I made this route:
Route::prefix('events')->namespace('Content\Controller')->group(function () {
Route::get('/', 'EventController#getIndex')->name('event.index');
Route::get('{slug}', 'EventController#getView')->name('event.show');
Route::get('{slug}/edit', 'EventController#getEdit')->name('event.edit');
Route::post('load-more-ajax/{region?}', 'EventController#postLoadMoreAjax');
Route::any('sorted-ajax/{region?}', 'EventController#anySortedAjax');
Route::get('category/{category_slug}/{subcategory_slug?}', 'EventController#getCategory');
});
After my page didn't load correctly, I did a dump in the controller:
public function getView($slug)
{
return $slug;
}
To get to the route I am using this URL: https://example.com/events/slug-example.
The problem is that the route is being hit as I see the response when I change it, but I am not getting the slug, instead I am getting Region object back.
If I do this:
public function getView($region, $slug)
{
return $slug;
}
Then I get the slug back. But I have no idea how is this possible, and how could I do it (I came as another dev on the existing project).
I tried commenting out all the middleware and it is still the same. How can I even make something fill the method if I didn't explicitly say it?
EDIT
I noticed there is binding going on in routes file:
Route::bind('region', function ($value) {
...
});
Now if I dd($value) I get the variable back. How is this value filled? From where could it be forwarded?
Looking quickly it should work, but maybe you was verifying other url.
Make sure you put:
Route::get('{slug}', 'EventController#getView')->name('event.show');
Route::get('{slug}/edit', 'EventController#getEdit')->name('event.edit');
routes at the end of routes you showed.
EDIT
If you think that's not the case and you don't have your routes cached you should run:
php artisan route:list
to verify your routes.
EDIT2
After explaining by OPs in comment, domain used for accessing site is:
{region}.example.com
So having $region in controller as 1st parameter is correct behaviour because of route model binding and other route parameters will be 2nd, 3rd and so on.
Instead of
Route::prefix('events')->namespace('Content\Controller')->group(function () {
Route::get('/', 'EventController#getIndex')->name('event.index');
Route::get('{slug}', 'EventController#getView')->name('event.show');
Route::get('{slug}/edit', 'EventController#getEdit')->name('event.edit');
Route::post('load-more-ajax/{region?}', 'EventController#postLoadMoreAjax');
Route::any('sorted-ajax/{region?}', 'EventController#anySortedAjax');
Route::get('category/{category_slug}/{subcategory_slug?}', 'EventController#getCategory');
});
try
Route::prefix('events')->namespace('Content\Controller')->group(function () {
Route::get('/', 'EventController#getIndex')->name('event.index');
Route::post('load-more-ajax/{region?}', 'EventController#postLoadMoreAjax');
Route::any('sorted-ajax/{region?}', 'EventController#anySortedAjax');
Route::get('category/{category_slug}/{subcategory_slug?}', 'EventController#getCategory');
Route::get('{slug}', 'EventController#getView')->name('event.show');
Route::get('{slug}/edit', 'EventController#getEdit')->name('event.edit');
});
I have a PagesController with one action: view.
This action accepts a page argument.
What I want to achieve:
Have a routes example.com/about and example.com/foobar.
When one of this routes is triggered, pass a value predefined in routes file to PagesController#view.
In my routes file:
Route::get('about', function () {
return App::make('App\Http\Controllers\PagesController')->view('about');
})->name('aboutPage');
Route::get('foobar', function () {
return App::make('App\Http\Controllers\PagesController')->view('foobar');
})->name('foobarPage');
It works as expected, but I want to know is there a better and more proper way to achieve the same functionality?
Pass your pages as route parameter:
Route::get('{page}', 'PagesController#view');
//controller
public function view($page)
{
//$page is your value passed by route;
return view($page);
}
So you just want an argument to your action. You can use optional parameters if that argument can be empty. You can read more about it here.
Route::get('{argument?}', 'PagesController#view')->name('page');
And in your PagesController:
public function view($argument = 'default') {
// Your logic
}
The accepted answer is what you want based on what you are doing.
If you really wanted a hardcoded value you can use the 'actions' array part of the route if you wanted.
Route::get('something', ['uses' => 'Controller#page', 'page' => 'something']);
public function page(Request $request)
{
$page = $request->route()->getAction()['page'];
...
}
asklagbox - blog - random tips and tricks
If you don't need the names of the routes like in your example
->name('foobarPage');
you can use something like this
Route::get('{page_name}','PagesController#view')->where('page_name', '(about)|(foobar)');
This will accept only the values passed in the regular expression for the page_name parameter. Other routes will throw a 404 error. I should mention that this technique seems to be valid for applications with one level of url nesting only and should NOT be used as a pattern.
From what I can see above if all you are doing is showing the correct view I would go for
Route::get('{page}', function($page)
{
if (view()->exists($page)) {
return view($page);
}
return abort(404);
});
This prevents you even needing a method in your controller.
I am building a RESTful API using Laravel 5.1.
The default route would be api. The user is allowed to create a url service using as many as parameters as she wants let's say .../api/p1/p2/.../pn.
How do I make a single route to point to a single Controller, so the service will be handled in a single controller?
Note : At first the application just needs to know whether the service exists or not by comparing the url with stored service in the database. As for the service itself, it can be queried into the database later.
I read that we can use * in Laravel 4, how about Laravel 5.1 ?
I have tried :
Route::resource('/api/*', 'APIServiceController'); but it does not work for unlimited parameters
or is it possible to do it like this
Route::group(['prefix' => 'api'], function () {
//what should I put in the closure, how can I redirect it to a single controller
});
Write your route as below:-
Route::group(['prefix' => 'api'], function () {
// this route will basically catch everything that starts with api/routeName
Route::get('routeName/{params?}', function($params= null){
return $params;
})->where('params', '(.*)');
});
Redirect to controller,
Route::group(['prefix' => 'api'], function () {
Route::get('routeName/{params?}', 'YourController#action')->where('params', '(.*)');
});
If you want to make routeName dynamic then just write it in curly bracket as below:-
Route::get('{routeName}/{params?}', 'YourController#action')->where('params', '(.*)');
Hope it will help you :-)
You can try this trick
Route::get('{pageLink}/{otherParams?}', 'IndexController#get')->where('otherParams', '(.*)');
You should put it on the end of routes.php file as it is like a 'catch all' route.
class IndexController extends BaseController {
public function get($pageLink, $otherParams = null)
{
if($otherParams)
{
$otherParams = explode('/', $otherParams);
}
}
}
I have a middleware that detects if a user owns a tournament.
So, if user want to edit a tournament he doesn't own, he will get a 403.
Thing is I can't make difference between laravel.dev/tournament/1/edit, and laravel.devl/tournament/1
Off course, I could check the "edit" word in URL, but I would prefer other better param...
I tried method param in Request Object, but it is giving me GET for both, so I can't make difference...
Any Idea???
In your case, you can do like this:
$request->route()->getName();
Now you can do your logic based on this.
What about using a different HTTP method for edit, e.g PATCH or PUT and declaring two different routes, something like:
Route::get('laravel.devl/tournament/1', 'TournamentController#showTournament');
Route::put('laravel.dev/tournament/1/edit', 'TournamentController#editTournament');
Then in the TournamentController you can check if the user has rights to edit.
It sounds like you should just use route specific middleware instead of global middleware. See https://laravel.com/docs/master/middleware#assigning-middleware-to-routes. Then you can just do:
Route::get('/tournament/{id}/edit', ['middleware' => ['tournamentOwner'], function () {
//
}]);
Route::get('/tournament/{id}', ['middleware' => [], function () {
//
}]);
If it's a RESTful route, you can just do:
public function __construct()
{
$this->middleware('tournamentOwner', ['only' => ['edit']]);
}
At first it seems that the same routes. But in first route not working middleware that I ordered in the constructor.
How to fix that?
Route::get('/cars.get', function() {
return App::make('App\Http\Controllers\CarsController')->{'get'}();
});
Route::get('/cars.get', 'CarsController#get');
sorry for my English =)
Edit
I was wrong about callAction() it does nothing else than call the method.
Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be a simple API to call middleware manually. A solution to this would just be to define the middleware on the route:
Route::get('/cars.get', ['middleware' => 'auth', function() {
return App::make('App\Http\Controllers\CarsController')->{'get'}();
}]);
original answer:
By directly calling the get() method you skip middleware defined in the controller. You should use callAction() instead:
return App::make('App\Http\Controllers\CarsController')->callAction('get');
Also note that you can use app() as a shortcut for App::make():
return app('App\Http\Controllers\CarsController')->callAction('get');