Laravel Validation Rules If Value Exists in Another Field Array - php

I am working in Laravel 5.4 and I have a slightly specific validation rules need but I think this should be easily doable without having to extend the class. Just not sure how to make this work..
What I would like to do is to make the 'music_instrument' form field mandatory if program array contains 'Music'.
I found this thread How to set require if value is chosen in another multiple choice field in validation of laravel? but it is not a solution (because it never got resolved in the first place) and the reason it doesn't work is because the submitted array indexes aren't constant (not selected check boxes aren't considered in indexing the submission result...)
My case looks like this:
<form action="" method="post">
<fieldset>
<input name="program[]" value="Anthropology" type="checkbox">Anthropology
<input name="program[]" value="Biology" type="checkbox">Biology
<input name="program[]" value="Chemistry" type="checkbox">Chemistry
<input name="program[]" value="Music" type="checkbox">Music
<input name="program[]" value="Philosophy" type="checkbox">Philosophy
<input name="program[]" value="Zombies" type="checkbox">Zombies
<input name="music_instrument" type="text" value"">
<button type="submit">Submit</button>
</fieldset>
</form>
If I select some of the options from the list of check boxes I can potentially have this result in my $request values
[program] => Array
(
[0] => Anthropology
[1] => Biology
[2] => Music
[3] => Philosophy
)
[music_instrument] => 'Guitar'
Looking at validation rules here: https://laravel.com/docs/5.4/validation#available-validation-rules I think something like his should work but i am literally getting nothing:
$validator = Validator::make($request->all(),[
'program' => 'required',
'music_instrument' => 'required_if:program,in:Music'
]);
I was hoping this would work too but no luck:
'music_instrument' => 'required_if:program,in_array:Music',
Thoughts? Suggestions?
Thank you!

Haven't tried that, but in general array fields you usually write like this: program.*, so maybe something like this will work:
$validator = Validator::make($request->all(),[
'program' => 'required',
'music_instrument' => 'required_if:program.*,in:Music'
]);
If it won't work, obviously you can do it also in the other way for example like this:
$rules = ['program' => 'required'];
if (in_array('Music', $request->input('program', []))) {
$rules['music_instrument'] = 'required';
}
$validator = Validator::make($request->all(), $rules);

I know this post is older but if someone came across this issue again.
$validator = Validator::make($request->all(),[
'program' => 'required',
'music_instrument' => 'required_if:program,Music,other values'
]);

You could create a new custom rule called required_if_array_contains like this...
In app/Providers/CustomValidatorProvider.php add a new private function:
/**
* A version of required_if that works for groups of checkboxes and multi-selects
*/
private function required_if_array_contains(): void
{
$this->app['validator']->extend('required_if_array_contains',
function ($attribute, $value, $parameters, Validator $validator){
// The first item in the array of parameters is the field that we take the value from
$valueField = array_shift($parameters);
$valueFieldValues = Input::get($valueField);
if (is_null($valueFieldValues)) {
return true;
}
foreach ($parameters as $parameter) {
if (in_array($parameter, $valueFieldValues) && strlen(trim($value)) == 0) {
// As soon as we find one of the parameters has been selected, we reject if field is empty
$validator->addReplacer('required_if_array_contains', function($message) use ($parameter) {
return str_replace(':value', $parameter, $message);
});
return false;
}
}
// If we've managed to get this far, none of the parameters were selected so it must be valid
return true;
});
}
And don't forget to check there is a use statement at the top of CustomValidatorProvider.php for our use of Validator as an argument in our new method:
...
use Illuminate\Validation\Validator;
Then in the boot() method of CustomValidatorProvider.php call your new private method:
public function boot()
{
...
$this->required_if_array_contains();
}
Then teach Laravel to write the validation message in a human-friendly way by adding a new item to the array in resources/lang/en/validation.php:
return [
...
'required_if_array_contains' => ':attribute must be provided when ":value" is selected.',
]
Now you can write validation rules like this:
public function rules()
{
return [
"animals": "required",
"animals-other": "required_if_array_contains:animals,other-mamal,other-reptile",
];
}
In the above example, animals is a group of checkboxes and animals-other is a text input that is only required if the other-mamal or other-reptile value has been checked.
This would also work for a select input with multiple selection enabled or any input that results in an array of values in one of the inputs in the request.

The approach I took for a similar problem was to make a private function inside my Controller class and use a ternary expression to add the required field if it came back true.
I have roughly 20 fields that have a checkbox to enable the input fields in this case, so it may be overkill in comparison, but as your needs grow, it could prove helpful.
/**
* Check if the parameterized value is in the submitted list of programs
*
* #param Request $request
* #param string $value
*/
private function _checkProgram(Request $request, string $value)
{
if ($request->has('program')) {
return in_array($value, $request->input('program'));
}
return false;
}
Using this function, you can apply the same logic if you have other fields for your other programs as well.
Then in the store function:
public function store(Request $request)
{
$this->validate(request(), [
// ... your other validation here
'music_instrument' => ''.($this->_checkProgram($request, 'music') ? 'required' : '').'',
// or if you have some other validation like max value, just remember to add the |-delimiter:
'music_instrument' => 'max:64'.($this->_checkProgram($request, 'music') ? '|required' : '').'',
]);
// rest of your store function
}

Here my piece of code to solve that kind of trouble usind Laravel 6 Validation Rules
I tried to use the code above
public function rules()
{
return [
"some_array_field.*" => ["required", "integer", "in:1,2,4,5"],
"another_field" => ["nullable", "required_if:operacao.*,in:1"],
];
}
I need that when some_array_field has 1 in your value, another_field must be validated, otherwhise, can be null.
With the code above, doesn't work, even with required_if:operacao.*,1
If I change the rule for another_field to required_if:operacao.0,1 WORKS but only if the value to find is in index 0, when the order changes, validation fails.
So, I decided to use a custom closure function
Here's the final code for the example that works fine form me.
public function rules()
{
return [
"some_array_field.*" => ["required", "integer", "in:1,2,4,5"],
"another_field" => [
"nullable",
Rule::requiredIf (
function () {
return in_array(1, (array)$this->request->get("some_array_field"));
}
),
]
];
}
I hope that solve your trouble too!

Related

Laravel Validation: only allow known properties/attributes, otherwise fail validation

We are building an api endpoint where precision is required. We want to enforce strict validation on the parameters that are POST/PUT to the server.
If the api user sends a key=value pair that is not supported (eg. we allow the parameters [first_name, last_name] and the user includes an unsupported parameter [country]), we want the validation to fail.
Have tried building a custom validator called allowed_attributes (used as allowed_attributes:attr1,attr2,...), but for it to be usable in a $validationRules array, it has to be applied to the parent of a list of nested/child attributes (...because otherwise our custom validator did not have access to the attributes being validated).
Validator::extend('allowed_attributes', 'App\Validators\AllowedAttributesValidator#validate');
This created issues with other validators, where we then had to anticipate this parent/child structure and code around it, including additional post-validation clean-up of error keys and error message strings.
tl;dr: very dirty, not a clean implementation.
$validationRules = [
'parent' => 'allowed_attributes:first_name,last_name',
'parent.first_name' => 'required|string|max:40',
'parent.last_name' => 'required|string|max:40'
];
$isValid = Validator::make(['parent' => $request], $validationRules);
var_dump("Validation results: " . ($isValid ? "passed" : "failed"));
Any ideas/suggestions on how this can be accomplished more cleanly in laravel, without requiring the use of parent/child relationship to get access to the list of all $request attributes (within the custom validator)?
I preferred to post a new answer as the approach is different from the previous one and a bit more cleaner. So I would rather keep the two approaches separated and not mixed together in the same answer.
Better problem handling
After digging deeper into the Validation's namespace's source code since my last answer I figured out that the easiest way would have been to extend the Validator class to remplement the passes() function to also check what you needed.
This implementation has the benefit to also correcly handle specific error messages for single array/object fields without any effor and should be fully compatible with the usual error messages translations.
Create a custom validator class
You should first create a Validator class within your app folder (I placed it under app/Validation/Validator.php) and implement the passes method like this:
<?php
namespace App\Validation;
use Illuminate\Support\Arr;
use Illuminate\Validation\Validator as BaseValidator;
class Validator extends BaseValidator
{
/**
* Determine if the data passes the validation rules.
*
* #return bool
*/
public function passes()
{
// Perform the usual rules validation, but at this step ignore the
// return value as we still have to validate the allowance of the fields
// The error messages count will be recalculated later and returned.
parent::passes();
// Compute the difference between the request data as a dot notation
// array and the attributes which have a rule in the current validator instance
$extraAttributes = array_diff_key(
Arr::dot($this->data),
$this->rules
);
// We'll spin through each key that hasn't been stripped in the
// previous filtering. Most likely the fields will be top level
// forbidden values or array/object values, as they get mapped with
// indexes other than asterisks (the key will differ from the rule
// and won't match at earlier stage).
// We have to do a deeper check if a rule with that array/object
// structure has been specified.
foreach ($extraAttributes as $attribute => $value) {
if (empty($this->getExplicitKeys($attribute))) {
$this->addFailure($attribute, 'forbidden_attribute', ['value' => $value]);
}
}
return $this->messages->isEmpty();
}
}
This would essentially extend the default Validator class to add additional checks on the passes method. The check compute the array difference by keys between the input attributes converted to dot notation (to support array/object validation) and the attributes which have at least one rule assigned.
Replace the default Validator in the container
Then the last step you miss is to bind the new Validator class in the boot method of a service provider. To do so you can just override the resolver of the Illuminate\Validation\Factory class binded into the IoC container as 'validator':
// Do not forget the class import at the top of the file!
use App\Validation\Validator;
// ...
/**
* Bootstrap any application services.
*
* #return void
*/
public function boot()
{
$this->app->make('validator')
->resolver(function ($translator, $data, $rules, $messages, $attributes) {
return new Validator($translator, $data, $rules, $messages, $attributes);
});
}
// ...
Pratical use in a controller
You don't have to do anything specific to use this feature. Just call the validate method as usual:
$this->validate(request(), [
'first_name' => 'required|string|max:40',
'last_name' => 'required|string|max:40'
]);
Customize Error messages
To customize the error message you just have to add a translation key in your lang file with a key equal to forbidden_attribute (you can customize the error key name in the custom Validator class on the addFailure method call).
Example: resources/lang/en/validation.php
<?php
return [
// ...
'forbidden_attribute' => 'The :attribute key is not allowed in the request body.',
// ...
];
Note: this implementation has been tested in Laravel 5.3 only.
It should work for simple key/value pairs with this custom validator:
Validator::extendImplicit('allowed_attributes', function ($attribute, $value, $parameters, $validator) {
// If the attribute to validate request top level
if (strpos($attribute, '.') === false) {
return in_array($attribute, $parameters);
}
// If the attribute under validation is an array
if (is_array($value)) {
return empty(array_diff_key($value, array_flip($parameters)));
}
// If the attribute under validation is an object
foreach ($parameters as $parameter) {
if (substr_compare($attribute, $parameter, -strlen($parameter)) === 0) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
});
The validator logic is pretty simple:
If $attribute doesn't contains a ., we're dealing with a top level parameter, and we just have to check if it is present in the allowed_attributes list that we pass to the rule.
If $attribute's value is an array, we diff the input keys with the allowed_attributes list, and check if any attribute key has left. If so, our request had an extra key we didn't expect, so we return false.
Otherwise $attribute's value is an object we have to check if each parameter we're expecting (again, the allowed_attributes list) is the last segment of the current attribute (as laravel gives us the full dot notated attribute in $attribute).
The key here is to apply it to validation rules should like this (note the first validation rule):
$validationRules = [
'parent.*' => 'allowed_attributes:first_name,last_name',
'parent.first_name' => 'required|string|max:40',
'parent.last_name' => 'required|string|max:40'
];
The parent.* rule will apply the custom validator to each key of the 'parent' object.
To answer your question
Just don't wrap your request in an object, but use the same concept as above and apply the allowed_attributes rule with a *:
$validationRules = [
'*' => 'allowed_attributes:first_name,last_name',
'first_name' => 'required|string|max:40',
'last_name' => 'required|string|max:40'
];
This will apply the rule to all the present top level input request fields.
NOTE: Keep in mind that laravel validation is influenced by order of the rules as they are putted in rules array.
For example, moving the parent.* rule on bottom will trigger that rule on parent.first_name and parent.last_name; as opposed, keeping it as the first rule will not trigger the validation for the first_name and last_name.
This means that you could eventually remove the attributes that has further validation logic from the allowed_attributes rule's parameter list.
For example, if you would like to require only the first_name and last_name and prohibit any other field in the parent object, you might use these rules:
$validationRules = [
// This will be triggered for all the request fields except first_name and last_name
'parent.*' => 'allowed_attributes',
'parent.first_name' => 'required|string|max:40',
'parent.last_name' => 'required|string|max:40'
];
But, the following WON'T work as expected:
$validationRules = [
'parent.first_name' => 'required|string|max:40',
'parent.last_name' => 'required|string|max:40',
// This, instead would be triggered on all fields, also on first_name and last_name
// If you put this rule as last, you MUST specify the allowed fields.
'parent.*' => 'allowed_attributes',
];
Array Minor Issues
As far as I know, per Laravel's validation logic, if you were up to validate an array of objects, this custom validator would work, but the error message you would get would be generic on the array item, not on the key of that array item that wasn't allowed.
For example, you allow a products field in your request, each with an id:
$validationRules = [
'products.*' => 'allowed_attributes:id',
];
If you validate a request like this:
{
"products": [{
"id": 3
}, {
"id": 17,
"price": 3.49
}]
}
You will get an error on product 2, but you won't be able to tell which field is causing the problem!

Override single message for required_without_all laravel

I have been using required_without_all for at least one field required in laravel.
Here is my code for rule
'rental_company_id' => 'required_without_all:camper_id,take_over_station_id,returnable_station_id',
'camper_id' => 'required_without_all:rental_company_id,take_over_station_id,returnable_station_id',
'take_over_station_id' => 'required_without_all:rental_company_id,camper_id,returnable_station_id',
'returnable_station_id' => 'required_without_all:rental_company_id,camper_id,take_over_station_id',
Here are my custom message which will override default message produced by laravel
'rental_company_id.required_without_all' => 'The Rental Companies is required when none of Campers, Takeover stations and Returnable stations are present.',
'camper_id.required_without_all' => 'The Campers is required when none of Rental Companies, Takeover stations and Returnable stations are present.',
'take_over_station_id.required_without_all' => 'The Takeover stations is required when none of Campers, Rental Companies and Returnable stations are present.',
'returnable_station_id.required_without_all' => 'The Returnable stations is required when none of Campers, Rental Companies and Takeover stations are present.',
Instead of showing multiple line of error message to the user. is there any way I can sum up those four messages into single message like
One of the following Season,Rental companies,... must be present.
Thanks in advance.
There is a very simple way you can achieve this. Apply the rule to a made-up ids field and then include all the actual fields for which you want validation applied after required_without_all. And just one corresponding validation message.
$validator = Validator::make($request->all(), [
'ids' => 'required_without_all:rental_company_id,camper_id,take_over_station_id, returnable_station_id'
], [
'required_without_all' => 'One of the following Season,Rental companies,... must be present.'
]);
If you are using a form request, you could do this in your messages() method:
return [
'required_without_all' => 'One of the field must be present.'
];
If you are using a manual validator, you could do this:
$messages = [
'required_without_all' => 'One of the field must be present.',
];
$validator = Validator::make($input, $rules, $messages);
Edit: An alternative would be to check if your MessageBag contains an error for one of those fields, and then display another one accordingly in your view. For example:
#if (
$errors->has('rental_company_id')
|| $errors->has('camper_id')
|| $errors->has('take_over_station_id')
|| $errors->has('returnable_station_id')
) {
// display the error message you need
}
Admittedly, this is not pretty, but I can't seem to find another way of doing it.
So... I wouldn't necessarily recommend this, but here's a quick and dirty way to prevent duplicate error messages when using required_without_all on multiple fields with the aim of an "at least one of these fields is required" type of rule:
In the controller, give your fields custom identical error messages (i.e. don't use :attribute):
public function foo(Request $request)
{
$request->validate(
[
// the "at least one of these" fields must be grouped together here.
'field_1' => 'required_without_all:field_2|nullable|etc',
'field_2' => 'required_without_all:field_1|nullable|etc',
// etc...
],
[
'field_1.required_without_all' => 'At least one is required',
'field_2.required_without_all' => 'At least one is required',
// etc...
// If this list of fields is the only time you're using
// required_without_all, you can just use a single catch-all
// ['required_without_all' => 'message'] instead
]
);
}
Then, in your view check for duplicate error messages as you're looping/writing them:
#if ($errors->any())
<ul>
#foreach ($errors->all() as $error)
#if ($error !== ($prevError ?? ''))
<li>{{ $prevError = $error }}</li>
#endif
#endforeach
</ul>
#endif
One of PHP's quirks(?) is that it returns the assigned value on variable assignment, which is why our <li> items will still contain the "at least one required" error text. The null coalescing ?? is just so that the foreach doesn't break on the first loop, before $prevError has been assigned.
Again... I'm not sure I could properly recommend doing this - there are several reasons why it's suboptimal. But if you need a quick and dirty way of achieving a "at least one of these" type rule you may find it useful.
Solve by adding custom rule php artisan make:rule AssignDataValidation
/**
* Determine if the validation rule passes.
*
* #param string $attribute
* #param mixed $value
* #return bool
*/
public function passes($attribute, $value)
{
$isSet = false;
$input = Input::all();
foreach (Discount::ASSIGNED_DATA_FIELD as $data){
if (isset($input[$data])){
$isSet = true;
break;
}
}
return $isSet;
}
/**
* Get the validation error message.
*
* #return string
*/
public function message()
{
return 'One of the following Season, Rental companies,... must be present.';
}
On Form request I have an override getValidatorInstance() method and invoke after validation to add my rule manually and trigger on error bag with the custom name
protected function getValidatorInstance()
{
$validator = parent::getValidatorInstance();
$validator -> after(function ($validator){
$timeDataValidation = new TimeDataValidation;
$assignDataValidation = new AssignDataValidation;
if (!$timeDataValidation -> passes(TimeDataValidation::FIELD,Discount::TIME_DATA_FIELD)){
$validator -> errors() -> add(TimeDataValidation::FIELD,$timeDataValidation -> message());
}
if (!$assignDataValidation -> passes(AssignDataValidation::FIELD,Discount::ASSIGNED_DATA_FIELD)){
$validator -> errors() -> add(AssignDataValidation::FIELD,$assignDataValidation -> message());
}
});
return $validator;
}

Conditional form validation in CakePHP 3

I want to validate some fields from validationDefault() function not all because of conditions but did not find any solution.
Example:
public function validationDefault(Validator $validator) {
$validator
->requirePresence('title', 'create')
->notEmpty('title');
$validator
->requirePresence('inquiry')
->allowEmpty('inquiry');
$validator
->requirePresence('dosage')
->allowEmpty('dosage');
$validator
->requirePresence('dosage_occurance')
->integer('dosage_occurance')
->allowEmpty('dosage_occurance');
return $validator;
}
Note: Response coming from two diffrent form first contains(title and inquiry) other contains(title, dosage and dosage_occurance).
I want to validate it from validationDefault() but it give me error
"dosage_occurance": {
"_required": "This field is required"
}
when I am not sending dosage_occurance which is correct but according to condition it is wrong.
using fieldList while creating new entity but it is not working.
Thanks
You want conditional validation.
Taken from the documentation:
When defining validation rules, you can use the on key to define when a validation rule should be applied. If left undefined, the rule will always be applied. Other valid values are create and update. Using one of these values will make the rule apply to only create or update operations.
Read the whole documentation page.
Example taken from there, pay attention to the on part.
$validator->add('picture', 'file', [
'rule' => ['mimeType', ['image/jpeg', 'image/png']],
'on' => function ($context) {
return !empty($context['data']['show_profile_picture']);
}
]);

CakePHP 3 - Cake trying to validate notEmpty for some reason

My table is throwing a default "notEmpty" validation error, even though I have not written any validation of the sort.
Basic validation in my Table class:
public function validationDefault(Validator $validator)
{
return $validator->requirePresence('my_field', 'create', 'Custom error message');
}
Data being set:
['my_field' => null]
As far as I can tell from the docs, this should not fail validation.
Key presence is checked by using array_key_exists() so that null values will count as present.
However, what is actually happening is that validation is failing with a message:
'my_field' => 'This field cannot be left empty'
This is Cake's default message for the notEmpty() validation function, so where is it coming from? I want it to allow the null value. My database field also allows NULL.
Edit
I have managed to solve the issue by adding allowEmpty() to the validation for that field. This would, therefore, seem to show that Cake assumes that if your field is required you also want it validate notEmpty() by default, even if you didn't tell it so.
This directly contradicts the documentation line I showed above:
Key presence is checked by using array_key_exists() so that null values will count as present.
So does the documentation need to be updated, or is it a bug?
Although it is not mentioned in the Cake 3 documentation, required fields are not allowed to be empty by default, so you have to explicitly state that the field is required and allowed to be empty.
public function validationDefault(Validator $validator)
{
return $validator
->requirePresence('my_field', 'create', 'Custom error message')
->allowEmpty('my_field', 'create');
}
This had me stumped for a while. The default behaviour is not at all intuitive. Here's some code that applies conditional validation on an array of scenarios coded as [ targetField, whenConditionalField, isConditionalValue ]
public function validationRegister()
{
$validator = new Validator();
$conditionals = [ ['shipAddress1','shipEqualsBill','N'], ['shipTown','shipEqualsBill','N'], ['shipPostcode','shipEqualsBill','N'] ];
foreach($conditionals as $c) {
if (!is_array($c[2])) $c[2] = [$c[2]];
// As #BadHorsie says, this is the crucial line
$validator->allowEmpty($c[0]);
$validator->add($c[0], 'notEmpty', [
'rule' => 'notEmpty',
'on' => function ($context) use ($c) {
return (!empty($context['data'][$c[1]]) && in_array($context['data'][$c[1]], $c[2]));
}
]);
}
return $validator;
}
So, in this case, if the user selects that the Shipping Address is not the same as the Billing Address, various shipping fields must then be notEmpty.

How to apply the "matches" validation rule in Kohana 3.1?

I need to know how to apply the "matches" validation rule in Kohana 3.1. I've tried the following rule in my model with no success:
'password_confirm' => array(
array('matches', array(':validation', ':field', 'password')),
)
But it always fails. I put a var_dump($array) in the first line of the Valid::matches() method. I paste it below:
/**
* Checks if a field matches the value of another field.
*
* #param array array of values
* #param string field name
* #param string field name to match
* #return boolean
*/
public static function matches($array, $field, $match)
{
var_dump($array);exit;
return ($array[$field] === $array[$match]);
}
It prints an object of type Validation and if I do var_dump($array[$field]) it prints null.
Thanks a lot in advance.
UPDATE: Also I figured out by the validation message that the order of the parameters of the rule should be inverted to this:
'password_confirm' => array(
array('matches', array(':validation', 'password', ':field')),
)
Your syntax is correct, but I'm going to guess and say that your DB schema does not have a 'password_confirm' column so you are trying to add a rule to a field that doesn't exist.
Regardless, the right place to perform password confirm matching validation is not in your model but as extra validation that is passed to your model in your controller when you attempt to save.
Put this in your user controller:
$user = ORM::Factory('user');
// Don't forget security, make sure you sanitize the $_POST data as needed
$user->values($_POST);
// Validate any other settings submitted
$extra_validation = Validation::factory(
array('password' => Arr::get($_POST, 'password'),
'password_confirm' => Arr::get($_POST, 'password_confirm'))
);
$extra_validation->rule('password_confirm', 'matches', array(':validation', 'password_confirm', 'password'));
try
{
$user->save($extra_validation);
// success
}
catch (ORM_Validation_Exception $e)
{
$errors = $e->errors('my_error_msgs');
// failure
}
Also, see the Kohana 3.1 ORM Validation documentation for more information

Categories