Get x highest values from an array including identical values - php

I'm using the following code to retrieve the highest 3 numbers from an array.
$a = array(1,2,5,10,15,20,10,15);
arsort($a, SORT_NUMERIC);
$highest = array_slice($a, 0, 3);
This code correctly gives me the highest three numbers array(20,15,10); however, I'm interested in getting the highest 3 numbers including the ones that are identical. In this example, I'm expecting to get an array like array(10, 10, 15, 15, 20)

Might be simpler but my brain is tired. Use arsort() to get the highest first, count the values to get unique keys with their count and slice the first 3 (make sure to pass true to preserve keys):
arsort($a, SORT_NUMERIC);
$counts = array_slice(array_count_values($a), 0, 3, true);
Then loop those 3 and fill an array with the number value the number of times it was counted and merge with the previous result:
$highest = array();
foreach($counts as $value => $count) {
$highest = array_merge($highest, array_fill(0, $count, $value));
}

You can use a function like this:
$a = array(1,2,5,10,15,20,10,15); //-- Original Array
function get3highest($a){
$h = array(); //-- highest
if(count($a) >= 3){ //-- Checking length
$c = 0; //-- Counter
while ($c < 3 || in_array($a[count($a)-1],$h) ){ //-- 3 elements or repeated value
$max = array_pop($a);
if(!in_array($max,$h)){
++$c;
}
$h[] = $max;
}
sort($h); //-- sorting
}
return $h; //-- values
}
print_r(get3Highest($a));
Of course you can improve this function to accept a dinamic value of "highest" values.

The below function may be usefull
$a = array(1,2,5,10,15,20,10,15);
function getMaxValue($array,$n){
$max_array = array(); // array to store all the max values
for($i=0;$i<$n;$i++){ // loop to get number of highest values
$keys = array_keys($array,max($array)); // get keys
if(is_array($keys)){ // if keys is array
foreach($keys as $v){ // loop array
$max_array[]=$array[$v]; // set values to max_array
unset($array[$v]); // unset the keys to get next max value
}
}else{ // if not array
$max_array[]=$array[$keys]; // set values to max_array
unset($array[$keys]); // unset the keys to get next max value
}
}
return $max_array;
}
$g = getMaxValue($a,3);
Out Put:
Array
(
[0] => 20
[1] => 15
[2] => 15
[3] => 10
[4] => 10
)
You can modify it to add conditions.

I thought of a couple of other possibilities.
First one:
Find the lowest of the top three values
$min = array_slice(array_unique($a, SORT_NUMERIC), -3)[0];
Filter out any lower values
$top3 = array_filter($a, function($x) use ($min) { return $x >= $min; });
Sort the result
sort($top3);
Advantages: less code
Disadvantages: less inefficient (sorts, iterates the entire array, sorts the result)
Second one:
Sort the array in reverse order
rsort($a);
Iterate the array, appending items to your result array until you've appended three distinct items.
$n = 0;
$prev = null;
$top = [];
foreach ($a as $x) {
if ($x != $prev) $n++;
if ($n > 3) break;
$top[] = $x;
$prev = $x;
}
Advantages: more efficient (sorts only once, iterates only as much as necessary)
Disadvantages: more code
This gives the results in descending order. You can optionally use array_unshift($top, $x) instead of $top[] = $x; to get it in ascending order, but I think I've read that array_unshift is less efficient because it reindexes the array after each addition, so if optimization is important it would probably be better to just use $top[] = $x; and then iterate the result in reverse order.

Related

Consolidate array of numbers without exceeding a predefined maximum value per element

I'm trying to combine numbers in an array by adding them so that the max value can only by 30.
For example, this is my array:
array(10,30,10,10,15);
After combining the numbers in the array to items with a max value 30, the result should be:
array(30,30,15);
How to achieve this?
I'm trying to combine numbers in an array by adding them so that the
max value can only by 30
So, when you combine numbers, you can achieve the lowest possible set of values in your array and also make sure that max value remains 30 by:
First, sort them.
Second, keeping adding elements to sum till you are about to get a sum > 30.
Third, once an element can no longer be added to a sum, add the current sum in your array and make the current element as the new sum.
Code:
<?php
$arr = array(10,30,10,10,15);
sort($arr);
$res = [];
$curr_sum = 0;
foreach($arr as $each_value){
if($curr_sum + $each_value <= 30) $curr_sum += $each_value;
else{
$res[] = $curr_sum;
$curr_sum = $each_value;
}
}
$res[] = $curr_sum;
print_r($res);
Demo: https://3v4l.org/BYhuE
Update: If order of the numbers matters, seeing your current output, you could just use rsort() to show them in descending order.
rsort($res);
$total = array_sum(array(10,30,10,10,15)); //assign sum totals from orignal array
$maxValue = 30; //assign max value allowed in array
$numberOfWholeOccurancesOfMaxValue = floor($total/$maxValue);
$remainder = $total%$maxValue;
//build array
$i=0;
while ( $i < $numberOfWholeOccurancesOfMaxValue ){
$array[] = $maxValue;
$i++;
}
$array[] = $remainder;
print_r($array);
You can loop only once to get this,
$temp = array(10,30,10,10,15);
natsort($temp); // sorting to reduce hustle and complication
$result = [];
$i = 0;
$maxValue = 30;
foreach($temp as $v){
// checking sum is greater or value is greater or $v is greater than equal to
if(!empty($result[$i]) && (($result[$i]+$v) > $maxValue)){
$i++;
}
$result[$i] = (!empty($result[$i]) ? ($result[$i]+$v) : $v);
}
print_r($result);
Working demo.
I believe finding most space-optimized/compact result requires a nested loop. My advice resembles the firstFitDecreasing() function in this answer of mine except in this case the nested loops are accessing the same array. I've added a couple of simple conditions to prevent needless iterations.
rsort($array);
foreach ($array as $k1 => &$v1) {
if ($v1 >= $limit) {
continue;
}
foreach ($array as $k2 => $v2) {
if ($k1 !== $k2 && $v1 + $v2 <= $limit) {
$v1 += $v2;
unset($array[$k2]);
if ($v1 === $limit) {
continue 2;
}
}
}
}
rsort($array);
var_export($array);
By putting larger numbers before smaller numbers before processing AND by attempting to add multiple subsequent values to earlier values, having fewer total elements in the result is possible.
See my comparative demonstration.
I believe #Clint's answer is misinterpreting the task and is damaging the data by summing all values then distributing the max amounts in the result array.
With more challenging input data like $array = [10,30,5,10,5,13,14,15,10,5]; and $limit = 30;, my solution provides a more dense result versus #nice_dev's and #rahul's answers.

Sort a flat array in recurring ascending sequences

I am trying to sort it in a repeating, sequential pattern of numerical order with the largest sets first.
Sample array:
$array = [1,1,1,2,3,2,3,4,5,4,4,4,5,1,2,2,3];
In the above array, I have the highest value of 5 which appears twice so the first two sets would 1,2,3,4,5 then it would revert to the second, highest value set etc.
Desired result:
[1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,4]
I am pretty sure I can split the array into chunks of the integer values then cherrypick an item from each subarray sequentially until there are no remaining items, but I just feel that this is going to be poor for performance and I don't want to miss a simple trick that PHP can already handle.
Here's my attempt at a very manual loop using process, the idea is to simply sort the numbers into containers for array_unshifting. I'm sure this is terrible and I'd love someone to do this in five lines or less :)
$array = array(1,1,1,2,3,2,3,4,5,4,4,4,5,1,2,2,3);
sort($array);
// Build the container array
$numbers = array_fill_keys(array_unique($array),array());
// Assignment
foreach( $array as $number )
{
$numbers[ $number ][] = $number;
}
// Worker Loop
$output = array();
while( empty( $numbers ) === false )
{
foreach( $numbers as $outer => $inner )
{
$output[] = array_shift( $numbers[ $outer ] );
if( empty( $numbers[ $outer ] ) )
{
unset( $numbers[ $outer ] );
}
}
}
var_dump( $output );
I think I'd look at this not as a sorting problem, but alternating values from multiple lists, so rather than coming up with sets of distinct numbers I'd make sets of the same number.
Since there's no difference between one 1 and another, all you actually need is to count the number of times each appears. It turns out PHP can do this for you with aaray_count_values.
$sets = array_count_values ($input);
Then we can make sure the sets are in order by sorting by key:
ksort($sets);
Now, we iterate round our sets, counting down how many times we've output each number. Once we've "drained" a set, we remove it from the list, and once we have no sets left, we're all done:
$output = [];
while ( count($sets) > 0 ) {
foreach ( $sets as $number => $count ) {
$output[] = $number;
if ( --$sets[$number] == 0 ) {
unset($sets[$number]);
}
}
}
This algorithm could be adapted for cases where the values are actually distinct but can be put into sets, by having the value of each set be a list rather than a count. Instead of -- you'd use array_shift, and then check if the length of the set was zero.
You can use only linear logic to sort using php functions. Here is optimized way to fill data structures. It can be used for streams, generators or anything else you can iterate and compare.
$array = array(1,1,1,2,3,2,3,4,5,4,4,4,5,1,2,2,3);
sort($array);
$chunks = [];
$index = [];
foreach($array as $i){
if(!isset($index[$i])){
$index[$i]=0;
}
if(!isset($chunks[$index[$i]])){
$chunks[$index[$i]]=[$i];
} else {
$chunks[$index[$i]][] = $i;
}
$index[$i]++;
}
$result = call_user_func_array('array_merge', $chunks);
print_r($result);
<?php
$array = array(1,1,1,2,3,2,3,4,5,4,4,4,5,1,2,2,3);
sort($array);
while($array) {
$n = 0;
foreach($array as $k => $v) {
if($v>$n) {
$result[] = $n = $v;
unset($array[$k]);
}
}
}
echo implode(',', $result);
Output:
1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,4
New, more elegant, more performant, more concise answer:
Create a sorting array where each number gets its own independent counter to increment. Then use array_multisort() to sort by this grouping array, then sort by values ascending.
Code: (Demo)
$encounters = [];
foreach ($array as $v) {
$encounters[] = $e[$v] = ($e[$v] ?? 0) + 1;
}
array_multisort($encounters, $array);
var_export($array);
Or with a functional style with no global variable declarations: (Demo)
array_multisort(
array_map(
function($v) {
static $e;
return $e[$v] = ($e[$v] ?? 0) + 1;
},
$array
),
$array
);
var_export($array);
Old answer:
My advice is functionally identical to #El''s snippet, but is implemented in a more concise/modern/attractive fashion.
After ensuring that the input array is sorted, make only one pass over the array and push each re-encountered value into its next row of values. The $counter variable indicates which row (in $grouped) the current value should be pushed into. When finished looping and grouping, $grouped will have unique values in each row. The final step is to merge/flatten the rows (preserving their order).
Code: (Demo)
$grouped = [];
$counter = [];
sort($array);
foreach ($array as $v) {
$counter[$v] = ($counter[$v] ?? -1) + 1;
$grouped[$counter[$v]][] = $v;
}
var_export(array_merge(...$grouped));

Efficiently pick n random elements from PHP array (without shuffle)

I have the following code to pick $n elements from an array $array in PHP:
shuffle($array);
$result = array_splice($array, 0, $n);
Given a large array but only a few elements (for example 5 out of 10000), this is relatively slow, so I would like to optimize it such that not all elements have to be shuffled. The values must be unique.
I'm looking fo the most performant alternative. We can assume that $array has no duplicates and is 0-indexed.
$randomArray = [];
while (count($randomArray) < 5) {
$randomKey = mt_rand(0, count($array)-1);
$randomArray[$randomKey] = $array[$randomKey];
}
This will provide exactly 5 elements with no duplicates and very quickly. The keys will be preserved.
Note: You'd have to make sure $array had 5 or more elements or add some sort of check to prevent an endless loop.
This function performs a shuffle on only $n elements where $n is the number of random elements you want to pick. It will also work on associative arrays and sparse arrays. $array is the array to work on and $n is the number of random elements to retrieve.
If we define the $max_index as count($array) - 1 - $iteration.
It works by generating a random number between 0 and $max_index. Picking the key at that index, and replacing its index with the value at $max_index so that it can never be picked again, as $max_index will be one less at the next iteration and unreachable.
In summary this is the Richard Durstenfeld's Fisher-Yates shuffle but operating only on $n elements instead of the entire array.
function rand_pluck($array, $n) {
$array_keys = array_keys($array);
$array_length = count($array_keys);
$max_index = $array_length -1;
$iterations = min($n, $array_length);
$random_array = array();
while($iterations--) {
$index = mt_rand(0, $max_index);
$value = $array_keys[$index];
$array_keys[$index] = $array_keys[$max_index];
array_push($random_array, $array[$value]);
$max_index--;
}
return $random_array;
}
The trick is to use a variation of shuffle or in other words a partial shuffle.
performance is not the only criterion, statistical efficiency, i.e unbiased sampling is as important (as the original shuffle solution is)
function random_pick( $a, $n )
{
$N = count($a);
$n = min($n, $N);
$picked = array_fill(0, $n, 0); $backup = array_fill(0, $n, 0);
// partially shuffle the array, and generate unbiased selection simultaneously
// this is a variation on fisher-yates-knuth shuffle
for ($i=0; $i<$n; $i++) // O(n) times
{
$selected = mt_rand( 0, --$N ); // unbiased sampling N * N-1 * N-2 * .. * N-n+1
$value = $a[ $selected ];
$a[ $selected ] = $a[ $N ];
$a[ $N ] = $value;
$backup[ $i ] = $selected;
$picked[ $i ] = $value;
}
// restore partially shuffled input array from backup
// optional step, if needed it can be ignored, e.g $a is passed by value, hence copied
for ($i=$n-1; $i>=0; $i--) // O(n) times
{
$selected = $backup[ $i ];
$value = $a[ $N ];
$a[ $N ] = $a[ $selected ];
$a[ $selected ] = $value;
$N++;
}
return $picked;
}
NOTE the algorithm is strictly O(n) in both time and space, produces unbiased selections (it is a partial unbiased shuffling) and produces output which is proper array with consecutive keys (not needing extra array_values etc..)
Use example:
$randomly_picked = random_pick($my_array, 5);
// or if an associative array is used
$randomly_picked_keys = random_pick(array_keys($my_array), 5);
$randomly_picked = array_intersect_key($my_array, array_flip($randomly_picked_keys));
For further variations and extensions of shuffling for PHP:
PHP - shuffle only part of an array
PHP shuffle with seed
How can I take n elements at random from a Perl array?
This will only show benifits for small n compared to an array shuffle, but you could
Choose a random index r n times, each time decreasing the limit by 1
Adjust for previously used indices
Take value
Store used index
Pseudocode
arr = []
used = []
for i = 0..n-1:
r = rand 0..len-i
d = 0
for j = 0..used.length-1:
if r >= used[j]:
d += 1
arr.append($array[r + d])
used.append(r)
return arr
You could generate n-times a random number with mt_rand() and then fill these values in a new array. To go against the case where the same index gets returned twice we use the actual returned index to fill the new array and check always if the index exists in the new array, if so we use while to loop through it as long as we get a duplicate index. At the end we use array_values() to get a 0-indexed array.
$count = count($array) - 1;
$new_array = array();
for($i = 0; $i < $n; $i++) {
$index = mt_rand(0, $count);
while(isset($new_array[$index])) {
$index = mt_rand(0, $count);
}
$new_array[$index] = $array[$index];
}
$new_array = array_values($new_array);
I wonder why everyone here make it so complicated?
Here's the fastest and simplest way:
$randomArray = array_rand(array_flip($array), $n);

Slice an array into 4 other arrays

I have an array which I want to slice in 4 other arrays because I want to display the content of the first array on four columns.
I have tried the code above, but what I get is N columns with 4 items.
$groups = array();
for ($i = 0; $i < count($menu); $i += 4) $groups[] = array_slice($menu, $i, 4);
Can this be modified in order to get exactly 4 columns and distribute the values so they fit?
Like Michael Berkowski suggested:
$groups = array_chunk($menu,4);
Should give you what you need. If you're more into "manual labour":
$groups = array();
while($groups[] = array_splice($menu,0,4))
{//no need for any code here ^^ chunks the array just fine
printf('This loop will run another %d times<br/>',(int)ceil(count($menu)/4));
}
Update:
I see I got this a bit wrong... want to chunk into 4 arrays, not into arrays of four:
$groups = array_chunk($menu,(int)ceil(count($menu)/4));
You can try
// Some Random array
$array = range(1, 20);
// Split it 4 Chuncks
$array = array_chunk($array, 4);
// Slice The first 4 Chunks
$array = array_slice($array, 0, 4);
// Output Result
foreach ( $array as $set ) {
printf("<li>%s</li>", implode(",", $set));
}

How to do PHP matrix operation easily and gracefully?

I've a $max which is essentially a two dimensional array.
Each element in $max is eithor 1 or 0,
can be denoted by $max[$x][$y], where $x is an integer within 0~WIDTH,similar for $y
My purpose is to find rows and columns in the $maxthat sums up greater than a CONSTANT, and get the average distance between rows/columns that qualify.
Anyone has a good solution ?
I have not tested this, but it should work for summing up the columns and rows:
//Map columns and rows into their respective values
//Note that we preserve the col/row indexes
$rowval = array();
$colval = array();
foreach($max as $k1 => $row) {
$rowval[$k1] = array_sum($row);
foreach($row as $k2 => $col) {
if(!isset($colval[$k2])) {
$colval[$k2] = 0;
}
$colval[$k2] += $col;
}
}
//Define filter function
function is_over($val) {
return $val > CONSTANT;
}
//Filter out the cols/rows from their respective arrays
//Keys will be preserved by array_filter
$foundcols = array_filter($colval, 'is_over');
$foundrows = array_filter($rowval, 'is_over');
You still have to calculate the average distance though.

Categories