PHP Classes function inside function? - php

I'm self-studying the PHP language. And I'm focused on the latest PHP OOP language.
I search for some "ready-to-install" PHP software and as I scan for some references to search and know, I saw lines of code with a structure like this (can't remember so I'll create my own):
$myapp->settings->getValue('openforum');
$myapp->settings->setValue('closeformaintenance', '1');
So my question is, how can I reproduce the code above? I don't know what term to use that line of code (objects, I guess?).
Something like this:
$newLogin->search($uid)->setLogin($dateToday);
Like that. I really need to do that way so I can organize my coding structure. Thanks by the way.
And also for the final question, IS THAT POSSIBLE?

Here's a fairly straight forward way of looking at it, using dependency injection.
Try it out: https://3v4l.org/iSJgL
Note, the below requires PHP 7 due to the string type hint. Remove that and I believe it should work in 5.6 just fine.
<?php
$myapp = new MyApp(new SettingsBag([
'works' => false,
'random' => rand(),
]));
var_dump($myapp->settings()->get('random'));
var_dump($myapp->settings()->get('works'));
// Let's change it up...
$myapp->settings()->set('works', true);
// Now it should be true.
var_dump($myapp->settings()->get('works'));
These would normally have namespaces like \App and/or \App\Configuration, but I ignore that here so it's easier to follow:
class MyApp {
private $settings_bag = null;
function __construct(SettingsBag $settings_bag)
{
$this->settings_bag = $settings_bag;
}
public function settings()
{
return $this->settings_bag;
}
}
class SettingsBag {
private $settings = null;
function __construct(array $settings = [])
{
$this->settings = $settings;
}
public function set(string $key, $value)
{
return $this->settings[$key] = $value;
}
public function get(string $key)
{
return $this->settings[$key];
}
}

What you try to achieve is called method chaining. You can get this by the following:
<?php
class TestClass {
private $val = '';
public function test1($val) {
$this->val = $val;
return $this;
}
public function test2() {
echo 'Hello '.$this->val;
}
}
$test->test1('World')->test2(); // Hello World
You have simply to return the instance of the object on the method to allow the method chaining.

You can read more here.
It's method chaining.
See code below:
class T {
public function test() {
// do something
return $this;
}
}
$x = new T;
$x->test()->test();

Related

Assign functions from another file to a Class

I am trying to add functions to class from a separate file, I wonder if this could be possible!
$mClass = new MyClass();
$mClass->new_Functions[0](10); // Is there a way to have it in this form?
class myClass
{
private $Pvar = 5;
$new_Fcuntions;
function __construct()
{
include('additional.functions.php');
$arr = get_defined_functions();
$this->new_Functions = $arr['user'];
// trying to call the function with parameter 10
call_user_func(array($this, $this->new_Functions[0]), 10);
}
}
[additional.functions.php] file
function operate($y)
{
return $this->Pvar * $y;
}
----- Edited ------- as it wasn't clear!
"additional.functions.php" is a module and there will be multiple modules to be added to the application, and every module could have more than single function and modules could call one another!
additional.functions.php [module file]
function operate($y)
{
return $this->Pvar * $y;
}
function do-more($foo)
{
return $this->operate(20) + $foo;
}
another.functions.php [another module]
function do-another($foo)
{
return $this->do-more(30) - $foo;
}
function add($foo, $bar)
{
return $foo + $bar;
}
appreciate every participation, its been a while since I am trying to maneuver around with it!
Is this possible or should I give up!
It looks to me like you are looking for Traits, which are a new feature as of PHP 5.4.0. Using traits, you can have snippets of code "mixed in" to other classes, a concept known as "horizontal reuse".
If you are not looking for traits, it's possible that you could do what you wanted with Runkit, however I would suggest staying as far away from it as possible, if you are not genuinely interested in PHP internals as well.
In any event, whatever you are trying to do is very interesting
I got it to work with dependency injection. The pvar has to be public or create a __get method to return the private variable. I also used the function name because it seems cleaner to me to use it via name rather than it's position in the list but if you want to keep that then just put $key where you see $value from the line: $this->function_list[$value] = ...
function operate($y, $that)
{
return $that->Pvar * $y;
}
class Example {
public $function_list = array();
private $Pvar = 5;
public function __construct()
{
$list = get_defined_functions();
$that = $this;
foreach ($list['user'] as $key => $value) {
$this->function_list[$value] = function() use ($value, $that) {
print call_user_func_array($value, array_merge(func_get_args(), array($that )));
};
}
}
public function __get($key)
{
if (isSet($this->$key)) {
return $this->$key;
} else {
throw new \Exception('Key "'.$key.'" does not exist');
}
}
}
$Ex = new Example();
$Ex->function_list['operate'](10);
If you want to extend MyClass from your modules (and not to initialize it, like in your example code), than you could do it in a way like this:
<?php
namespace modules\MyModuleA;
class MyClassExtension
{
private $MyObject;
public function __construct(\MyClass $MyObject)
{
$this->MyObject = $MyObject;
}
public function doSomething($anyParameter)
{
return $this->MyObject->doSomethingElse($anyParameter * 5, 42, 'foo');
}
}
And MyClass:
<?php
class MyClass extends \Extensible
{
// some code
}
abstract class Extensible
{
private $extensions = [];
public function extend($extension)
{
$this->extensions[] = $extension;
}
public function __call($methodName, $parameters)
{
foreach ($this->extensions as $Extension) {
if (in_array($methodName, get_class_methods($Extension))
return call_user_func_array([$Extension, $methodName], $parameters);
}
throw new \Exception('Call to undefined method ' . $methodName . '...');
}
public function hasExtension($extensionName)
{
return in_array($this->extensions, $extensionName);
}
}
And put it all together:
<?php
$moduleNames = ['MyModuleA', 'MyModuleB'];
$MyObject = new \MyClass;
foreach ($moduleNames as $moduleName) {
$className = '\\modules\\' . $moduleName . '\\MyClassExtension';
$module = new $className($MyObject);
$MyObject->extend($module);
}
// Now you can call a method, that has been added by MyModuleA:
$MyObject->doSomething(10);
You should add an interface for the extension classes of course...
The problem is: What happens if any code in your application calls a method of $MyObject, that is not there, because the module has not been loaded. You would always have to check if ($MyObject->hasExtension('ModuleA')) { ... }, but, of course, the application shouldn't be aware of any module. So I would not design an application in such a way.
I would suggest to use traits (mix-ins). See PHP reference
If you can have another class in that file instead of file with functions
- the best solution will be Traits
http://php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.traits.php
or using inheritance
If you move that code to class you can avoid a lot of unnecessary code. I mean:
include('additional.functions.php');
$arr = get_defined_functions();
$this->new_Functions = $arr['user'];
// trying to call the function with parameter 10
call_user_func(array($this, $this->new_Functions[0]), 10);
It'll be e.g.:
class myClass extends MyBaseClassWithMyAwesomeFunctions
{
private $Pvar = 5;
}
Maybe this approach helps you:
In the files with the additional functions, don't define named functions, but return a closure, that expects (at least) the object (instance of MyClass) as parameter:
<?php
// additional.functions.php
return function ($myObject) {
$Object->multiplyPvar($myObject->getTheNumber());
$Object->doSomethingElse(42, 'foo');
};
The client, that builds MyClass collects those functions from the files into the array:
<?php
$files = [
'/path/to/my/additional.functions1.php',
'/path/to/my/additional.functions2.php'
];
$initFunctions = [];
foreach ($files as $path)
$initFunctions[] = include $path;
$MyObject = new \MyClass($initFunctions);
The constructor then calls those functions:
<?php
class MyClass
{
public function __construct(array $additionalInitFunctions)
{
foreach ($additionalInitFunctions as $additionalInitFunction)
$additionalInitializerFunction($this); // you can also add parameters of course
}
}
This way the class keeps very well testable as well as the function files. Maybe this could help you in any way. You should never ever think about modifying the internal (private) state of an object directly from any code from outside of the class. This is not testable! Think about writing tests before you implement your code (called "test driven development"). You will see, it is not possible to test a class, if you allow any code outside of that class to modify the internal (private) state of the class instance. And you don't want to have this. If you change some internal implementation detail in your class without breaking the unit test of that class, you will anyways probably break some code in any of your additional.functions.php files and no test will tell you: "Hey: you've broken something right now".

Assigning defaults for Smarty using Object Oriented style

I'm just very slowly starting to sink into object-oriented programming, so please be gentle on me.
I have a custom class for Smarty that was partially borrowed. This is how the only example reflects the basic idea of using it across my current project:
class Template {
function Template() {
global $Smarty;
if (!isset($Smarty)) {
$Smarty = new Smarty;
}
}
public static function display($filename) {
global $Smarty;
if (!isset($Smarty)) {
Template::create();
}
$Smarty->display($filename);
}
Then in the PHP, I use the following to display templates based on the above example:
Template::display('head.tpl');
Template::display('category.tpl');
Template::display('footer.tpl');
I made the following example of code (see below) work across universally, so I wouldn't repeat the above lines (see 3 previous lines) all the time in each PHP file.
I would just like to set, e.g.:
Template::defauls();
that would load:
Template::display('head.tpl');
Template::display('template_name_that_would_correspond_with_php_file_name.tpl');
Template::display('footer.tpl');
As you can see Template::display('category.tpl'); will always be changing based on the PHP file, which name is corresponded with the template name, meaning, if for example, PHP file is named stackoverflow.php then the template for it would be stackoverflow.tpl.
I've tried my solution that have worked fine but I don't like it the way it looks (the way it's structured).
What I did was:
Assigned in config a var and called it $current_page_name (that derives the current PHP page name, like this: basename($_SERVER['PHP_SELF'], ".php"); ), which returned, for e.g.: category.
In PHP file I used Template::defaults($current_page_name);
In my custom Smarty class I added the following:
public static function defaults($template) {
global $Smarty;
global $msg;
global $note;
global $attention;
global $err;
if (!isset($Smarty)) {
Templates::create();
}
Templates::assign('msg', $msg);
Templates::assign('note', $note);
Templates::assign('attention', $attention);
Templates::assign('err', $err);
Templates::display('head.tpl');
Templates::display($template . '.tpl');
Templates::display('footer.tpl');
}
Is there a way to make it more concise and well structured? I know about Code Review but I would like you, guys, to take a good look at it.
This looks like you haven't loaded Smarty, that's why the error happens. You need to start by including Smarty before the class starts. If you follow my other config suggestion you should start by including that one as well.
In you Template class, just add the following function:
function defaults() {
// Don't know if you need the assignes, havn't used Smarty, but if so, insert them here...
Template::display( Config::get('header_template') ); //header_template set in the Config file
Template::display( basename($_SERVER['PHP_SELF'], ".php") . '.tpl' );
Template::display( Config::get('footer_template') ); //footer_template set in the Config file
}
Now you should be able to use it in any file:
$template = new Template();
$template->defaults();
EDIT:
A singleton is in every sense the same as a global, that will keep your same problem.
But your problem is that if you try to use one of the Template's static functions you are in the "static" mode, which means the constructor have not been run. And Smarty has not been assigned. If you want to go this road, you can do one of two thinks:
Make the Template a real singleton, meaning set the constructor to private add a function getInstance, that returns a instance of the class, and then use that object to call the functions in it (which should not be static), or
Make all those static functions check if smarty is set, and if it's not, create a new instance of smarty, otherwise use the one that already is instantiated to run its function.
EDIT 2:
Here's the proper way to make a singleton:
class Singleton {
private static $instance = null;
// private static $smarty = null;
private function __construct() {
//self::$smarty = new Smarty();
}
public static function getInstance() {
if( self::$instance === null ) {
self::$instance = self();
}
return self::$instance;
}
public function doSomething() {
//self::$smarty->doSomething();
}
}
It's used like this:
$singleton = Singletong::getInstance();
$singleton->doSomething();
I commented out the things you probably want do to to make this a singleton wrapper around a singleton Smarty object. Hope this helps.
EDIT 3:
Here's a working copy of your code:
class Template {
private static $smarty_instance;
private static $template_instance;
private function Template() {
self::$smarty_instance = new Smarty();
$this->create();
}
public static function getInstance() {
if( ! isset( self::$template_instance ) ) {
self::$template_instance = new self();
}
return self::$template_instance;
}
private function create() {
self::$smarty_instance->compile_check = true;
self::$smarty_instance->debugging = false;
self::$smarty_instance->compile_dir = "/home/docs/public_html/domain.org/tmp/tpls";
self::$smarty_instance->template_dir = "/home/docs/public_html/domain.org";
return true;
}
public function setType($type) {
self::$smarty_instance->type = $type;
}
public function assign($var, $value) {
self::$smarty_instance->assign($var, $value);
}
public function display($filename) {
self::$smarty_instance->display($filename);
}
public function fetch($filename) {
return self::$smarty_instance->fetch($filename);
}
public function defaults($filename) {
global $user_message;
global $user_notification;
global $user_attention;
global $user_error;
self::$smarty_instance->assign('user_message', $user_message);
self::$smarty_instance->assign('user_notification', $user_notification);
self::$smarty_instance->assign('user_attention', $user_attention);
self::$smarty_instance->assign('user_error', $user_error);
self::$smarty_instance->assign('current_page', $filename);
self::$smarty_instance->display('head.tpl');
self::$smarty_instance->display($filename . '.tpl');
self::$smarty_instance->display('footer.tpl');
}
}
When using this function, you should use it like this:
$template = Template::getInstance();
$template->defaults($filename);
Try it now.
You can get current file name in your defaults() function. Use this piece of code:
$currentFile = $_SERVER['REQUEST_URI'];
$parts = explode('/', $currentFile);
$fileName = array_pop($parts);
$viewName = str_replace('.php', '.tpl', $fileName);
$viewName is the name that you need.
This is a quick wrapper I made for Smarty, hope it gives you some ideas
class Template extends Smarty
{
public $template = null;
public $cache = null;
public $compile = null;
public function var($name, $value, $cache)
{
$this->assign($name, $value, $cache);
}
public function render($file, $extends = false)
{
$this->prep();
$pre = null;
$post = null;
if ($extends)
{
$pre = 'extends:';
$post = '|header.tpl|footer.tpl';
}
if ($this->prep())
{
return $this->display($pre . $file . $post);
}
}
public function prep()
{
if (!is_null($this->template))
{
$this->setTemplateDir($this->template);
return true;
}
if (!is_null($this->cache))
{
$this->setCacheDir($this->cache);
}
if (!is_null($this->compile))
{
$this->setCompileDir($this->compile);
return true;
}
return false;
}
}
Then you can use it like this
$view = new Template();
$view->template = 'path/to/template/';
$view->compile = 'path/to/compile/'
$view->cache = 'path/to/cache';
$view->assign('hello', 'world');
// or
$view->var('hello', 'world');
$view->render('index.tpl');
//or
$view->render('index.tpl', true); // for extends functionality
I did this kinda fast, but just to show you the basic ways you can use smarty. In a more complete version you could probably want to check to see if compile dir is writable, or if file templates exist etc.
After trying for few days to solve this simple problem, I have finally came up with working and fully satisfying solution. Remember, I'm just a newby in object-oriented programming and that's the main reason why it took so long.
My main idea was not to use global $Smarty in my initial code that worked already fine. I like to use my Smarty as just simple as entering, e.g.: Template::assign('array', $array). To display defaults, I came up with the trivial solution (read my initial post), where now it can be just used Template::defaults(p()); to display or assign anything that is repeated on each page of your project.
For doing that, I personally stopped on the following fully working solution:
function p() {
return basename($_SERVER['PHP_SELF'], ".php");
}
require('/smarty/Smarty.class.php');
class Template
{
private static $smarty;
static function Smarty()
{
if (!isset(self::$smarty)) {
self::$smarty = new Smarty();
self::Smarty()->compile_check = true;
self::Smarty()->debugging = false;
self::Smarty()->plugins_dir = array(
'/home/docs/public_html/domain.com/smarty/plugins',
'/home/docs/public_html/domain.com/extensions/smarty');
self::Smarty()->compile_dir = "/home/docs/public_html/domain.com/cache";
self::Smarty()->template_dir = "/home/docs/public_html/domain.org";
}
return self::$smarty;
}
public static function setType($type)
{
self::Smarty()->type = $type;
}
public static function assign($var, $value)
{
self::Smarty()->assign($var, $value);
}
public static function display($filename)
{
self::Smarty()->display($filename);
}
public static function fetch($filename)
{
self::Smarty()->fetch($filename);
}
public static function defaults($filename)
{
Template::assign('current_page_name', $filename);
Template::display('head.tpl');
Template::display($filename . '.tpl');
Template::display('footer.tpl');
}
}
Please use it if you like it in your projects but leave comments under this post if you think I could improve it or you have any suggestions.
Initial idea of doing all of that was learning and exercising in writing a PHP code in object-oriented style.

PHP - runkit redefine method

all my websites share a common starter, that deals with urls, file locations, etc.. There are 3 cases that need to be handled - is directory, file exists and file does not exist. Each application has unique code for each case. I decided to tinker with runkit a bit and I am trying to unify the code. Each case will be handled by a function, that could be redefined via runkit.
Consider this code:
class start {
function __construct() {
$this->options = array();
}
public function process() {
// some code here
$this->file_not_exists();
}
public function file_not_exists() {
$this->options['page'] = 222;
}
public function redefine($what, $code) {
runkit_method_redefine(get_class($this), $what, '', $code, RUNKIT_ACC_PUBLIC);
}
}
$start = new start();
$start->redefine('file_not_exists', '$this->options["page"] = 333;')
// page is now 333
This part works as intended. But when I try to change the code so the redefined method calls user function it works. But, for the love of god, I cant figure out how to pass the $this to the function.
Redefine method looks like this:
public function redefine($what, $code) {
runkit_method_redefine(get_class($this), $what, '', 'call_user_func('.$code.'(), '.$this.');', RUNKIT_ACC_PUBLIC)
}
This doesn't work, no matter what I try (call_user_func_array as well). I just cant figure it out. For the record:
public function redefine($what, $code) {
my_user_function($this);
}
Does work.
Any help is appreciated.
Note that this is just an experiment and I would like to know how to do this :)
Edit:
I get:
Catchable fatal error: Object of class starter could not be converted to string in blablallala\rewrite_starter2.php on line 153
{... removed as not necessary ...}
==== EDIT =====
[For the new problem, what you need is this]
<?
class start {
function __construct() {
$this->options = array();
}
public function process() {
// some code here
$this->file_not_exists();
}
public function file_not_exists() {
$this->options['page'] = 222;
}
public function redefine($what, $code) {
runkit_method_redefine(get_class($this),
$what,
'',
'call_user_func(array($this,' .$code. '),$this);',
RUNKIT_ACC_PUBLIC);
}
public function my_func($someobj)
{
print_r($someobj);
}
}
$start = new start();
$start->redefine('file_not_exists', 'my_func');
$start->process();
?>
The documentation on the call_user_func function says that the first argument is 'callable'. So to call the class method dynamically, you should pass the array($obj, 'func_name').

Templating system scoping issue

I'm trying to whip up a skeleton View system in PHP, but I can't figure out how to get embedded views to receive their parent's variables. For example:
View Class
class View
{
private $_vars=array();
private $_file;
public function __construct($file)
{
$this->_file='views/'.$file.'.php';
}
public function set($var, $value=null)
{
if (is_array($var))
{
$this->_vars=array_merge($var, $this->_vars);
}
else
$this->_vars[$var]=$value;
return $this;
}
public function output()
{
if (count($this->_vars))
extract($this->_vars, EXTR_REFS);
require($this->_file);
exit;
}
public static function factory($file)
{
return new self($file);
}
}
test.php (top level view)
<html>
<body>
Hey <?=$name?>! This is <?=$adj?>!
<?=View::factory('embed')->output()?>
</body>
</html>
embed.php (embedded in test.php
<html>
<body>
Hey <?=$name?>! This is an embedded view file!!
</body>
</html>
Code:
$vars=array(
'name' => 'ryan',
'adj' => 'cool'
);
View::factory('test')->set($vars)->output();
Output:
Hey ryan! This is cool! Hey [error for $name not being defined]
this is an embedded view file!!
The problem is the variables I set in the top level view do not get passed to the embedded view. How could I make that happen?
So, I'm not exactly answering your question, but here's my super-simple hand-grown template system. It supports what you're trying to do, although the interface is different.
// Usage
$main = new SimpleTemplate("templating/html.php");
$main->extract($someObject);
$main->extract($someArray);
$main->name = "my name";
$subTemplate = new SimpleTemplate("templating/another.php");
$subTemplate->parent($main);
$main->placeholderForAnotherTemplate = $subTemplate->run();
echo $main; // or $main->run();
// html.php
<html><body><h1>Title <?= $name ?></h1><p><?= $placeHolderForAnotherTemplate ?></p></body></html>
<?php
// SimpleTemplate.php
function object_to_array($object)
{
$array = array();
foreach($object as $property => $value)
{
$array[$property] = $value;
}
return $array;
}
class SimpleTemplate
{
public $source;
public $path;
public $result;
public $parent;
public function SimpleTemplate($path=false, $source=false)
{
$this->source = array();
$this->extract($source);
$this->path($path);
}
public function __toString()
{
return $this->run();
}
public function extract($source)
{
if ($source)
{
foreach ($source as $property => $value)
{
$this->source[$property] = $value;
}
}
}
public function parent($parent)
{
$this->parent = $parent;
}
public function path($path)
{
$this->path = $path;
}
public function __set($name, $value)
{
$this->source[$name] = $value;
}
public function __get($name)
{
return isset($this->source[$name]) ? $this->source[$name] : "";
}
public function mergeSource()
{
if (isset($this->parent))
return array_merge($this->parent->mergeSource(), $this->source);
else
return $this->source;
}
public function run()
{
ob_start();
extract ($this->mergeSource());
include $this->path;
$this->result = ob_get_contents();
ob_end_clean();
return $this->result;
}
}
well, you create a new instance of the class, so there are no variables defined in the embedded template. you should try to copy the object, rather than creating a new one.
edit: I'm talking about the factory method
The main issue is that your views have no direct knowledge of each other. By calling this:
<?=View::factory('embed')->output()?>
in your "parent" view, you create and output a template that has no knowledge of the fact that it is inside another template.
There are two approaches I could recommend here.
#1 - Associate your templates.
By making your embedded templates "children" of a parent template, you could allow them to have access to the parent's variables at output() time. I utilize this approach in a View system I built. It goes something like this:
$pView = new View_Parent_Class();
$cView = new View_Child_Class();
$pView->addView($cView);
At $pview->render() time, the child view is easily given access to the parent's variables.
This method might require a lot of refactoring for you, so I'll leave out the dirty details, and go into the second approach.
#2 - Pass the parent variables
This would probably be the easiest method to implement given the approach you've taken so far. Add an optional parameter to your output method, and rewrite it slightly, like this:
public function output($extra_vars = null)
{
if (count($this->_vars))
extract($this->_vars, EXTR_REFS);
if (is_array($extra_vars)) extract($extra_vars, EXTR_REFS);
require($this->_file);
exit;
}
If you add a simple getter method as well:
public function get_vars()
{
return $this->_vars;
}
Then you can embed your files with what is effectively read-access to the parent's variables:
<?=View::factory('embed')->output($this->get_vars())?>
$this will be a reference to the current template, ie. the parent. Note that you can have variable name collisions via this method because of the two extract calls.
You could make your $_vars property static, not particularly elegant, but would work for what you are trying to achieve.
On a side note... your array_merge() in the set() function is wrong, swap your 2 variables around.

I need to collect an array of classes to call their static variables in php

First thing i want to say that it's not an easy question to explain, so please be patient if it seems confusing.
I have a set of classes like this
class Product {
public static $static_type = 'product';
public static $static_table = 'product_table';
public function __construct($params) { //do some }
}
and then there are the classes News, Events etc
From another class i need to access to those static variables inside these classes in an iterative way. Something like:
//...
if (Product::$static_type) { //do some }
else if (News::$static_type) { //do other }
//...
I want to trasform it in a cycle, like foreach in a way like this (it's not correct but makes sense to my question)
foreach ($classes as $class) {
echo $class::$static_type; //brrrr, just to render the idea :)
}
So i think about a singleton/static class that has a static method returning an array of my classes (not instantiated). Like this:
class Conf {
public function __construct() {
//nothing
}
public static function get_class_array () {
//how to do this???
}
}
and then
foreach (Conf::get_class_array() as $class) {
echo $class::$static_type; //brrrr, just to render the idea :)
}
How i can reach this? I don't want to instantiate Product, News or others in this case.
Edit: eval is evil, i don't want to use it. No tricks with get_declared_class, if there's no way to solve I will use reflection, that i think it's the more elegant way among the mentioned :(.
Edit: in the meantime i'll do the Conf::get_class_array() in this way
public static function get_class_array () {
return array(new ReflectionClass('Prodotto'), new ReflectionClass('News'));
}
and then call it here:
foreach (Conf::get_class_array() as $class) {
echo $class->getStaticPropertyValue('static_type');
}
I don't think you can do this. You could however do one of these:
$properties = get_class_vars('Product');
echo $properties['static_type'];
or
$class = new ReflectionClass('product');
echo $class->getStaticPropertyValue('static_type');
Note that in PHP 5.3 echo $class::$static_type; will work (http://php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.static.php)
Until 5.3.0, you can try this method. Create a container class as you suggested (we'll call it Conf to stick with what you had), and provide two methods for setting and getting applicable classes that you want to iterate over:
<?php
class Conf {
private static $instance;
private $classes = array();
public static function getInstance() {
if ( is_null(self::$instance) ) {
self::$instance = new self();
}
return self::$instance;
}
public function registerClass($className) {
// Use associative index to maintain uniqueness
$this->classes[$className] = $className;
}
public function getRegisteredClasses() {
return $this->classes;
}
}
Some example classes and how to register them:
class X {
public static $a = "catus";
public static $b = "pants";
}
class Y {
public static $a = "apples";
public static $b = "bananers";
}
$conf = Conf::getInstance();
$conf->registerClass("X");
$conf->registerClass("Y");
Now, to access and/or alter the static members, you can do something like the following (using RefelectionClass as tom Haigh pointed out):
$conf = Conf::getInstance();
echo "<pre>";
foreach ( $conf->getRegisteredClasses() as $class ) {
$reflection = new ReflectionClass($class);
echo "<hr/>Class: $class\n";
// Access example
print_r( $reflection->getStaticProperties() );
// Alter example
$reflection->setStaticPropertyValue("a",
$reflection->getStaticPropertyValue("a") . "-modified"
);
print_r( $reflection->getStaticProperties() );
}
If you have a class naming convention like Com_Example_Static_X and Com_Example_Static_Y, you can simplify Conf->getRegisteredClasses() (and even make it a static method if you so desire) by doing as n3rd suggested:
class Conf {
// ....
static public function getMatchingClasses($pattern="/^Com_Example_Static_.+$/") {
$response = array();
foreach ( get_declared_classes() as $className ) {
if ( preg_match($pattern, $className, $m) ) {
$response[] = $className;
}
}
return $response;
}
}
And, of course, update your foreach to:
foreach ( Conf::getMatchingClasses() as $class ) {
// ...
}
Hope that was helpful.
You can use get_declared_classes() to get a list of classes. This will be all class though, not just the ones you've declared.
You should make all your classes inherit from a base class:
class Product extends MyBase {}
Then you can list the classes like this
function get_class_array()
{
$myClasses = array();
foreach (get_declared_classes as $class)
{
if (is_subclass_of($class, 'MyBase'))
$myClasses[] = $class;
}
return $myClasses;
}
Then you can get the data like this:
foreach (get_class_array() as $class)
echo eval("return $class::\$foo;"); // Yes yes, eval is evil, we know...
To get a list of classes, you can use get_declared_classes. Then you'll have to determine which of those classes you want to process.
You could do this by looking for a common base class with is_subclass_of, or using ReflectionClass to see if it has the static member variables you are interested in.
I don't think there's an easy way to do this. Here are a few ideas off the top of my head how you could go about doing this:
Use get_declared_classes() to retrieve a list of all defined classes and check them against your naming scheme (e.g. MyNamespace_*) or whether they implement an interface (e.g. MyStaticEnumerable).
Kinda like the above, but a little more sophisticated: write your on class loader and have it check whether a loaded class is one of ones you want to enumerate. If so, make it known to some manager class.
Check the directory in which the classes are defined to manually enumerate all classes.

Categories