I have three old applications (running on Symfony 2) where each one has been developed in separated git repositories and configured in their respective vhosts:
company.com Company website.
admin.company.com Website administration.
api.company.com API company service.
Even though, they share the same database. So we're decided (the Company) unify all of them in one application with Symfony 4 structure & approach, mainly to remove a big quantity of duplicated data and to improve its maintenance.
Right now, I'm integrating all in one application/repository as was planned, but I'm starting to deal with some performance & structure issues:
As I've just one entry point index.php I did two routes prefixes to be able to access for company.com/admin/ and company.com/api/ sub app, so all routes are loaded each time :(
All bundles and configuration is loaded and processed needlessly for each request. For example: when I access the API path the SonataAdminBundle is loaded too :(
The cache clear command takes a long time to complete.
The tests are breaking down and now takes a long time to complete too.
I'd like to keep the early vhost and load just the needed bundles and configuration per domains:
company.com Loads bundles, routes and configuration for a company website only (SwiftmailerBundle, ...)
admin.company.com Loads bundles, routes and configuration only for website administration (SecurityBundle, SonataAdminBundle, ...)
api.company.com Loads just the bundles, routes and configuration to provide a fast API company service (SecurityBundle, FOSRestBundle, NelmioApiDocBundle, ...)
This is what I'm doing so far:
// public/index.php
// ...
$request = Request::createFromGlobals();
$kernel = new Kernel(getenv('APP_ENV'), getenv('APP_DEBUG'));
// new method implemented in my src/kernel.php
$kernel->setHost($request->server->get('HTTP_HOST'));
$response = $kernel->handle($request);
$response->send();
$kernel->terminate($request, $response);
I've check the current host prefix in Kernel::registerBundles() method and I loaded the needed bundles only, but still I've problems with bin/console file (it doesn't work as HTTP_HOST variable is not defined for CLI) I'd like to clear the cache for each "sub-app" and so on.
I have been doing some research on this topic but so far I couldn't find anything helpful for my scenario (Symfony 4).
Is possible to have many applications under one project repository running independently (like individual apps) but sharing some configuration? What is the best approach to achieve it?
Thanks in advance.
Likely the multiple kernels approach could be a good option to solve this kind of project, but thinking now in Symfony 4 approach with environment variables, structure and kernel implementation, it could be improved.
Name-based Virtual Kernel
The term "Virtual Kernel" refers to the practice of running more than one application (such as api.example.com and admin.example.com) on a single project repository. Virtual kernels are "name-based", meaning that you have multiple kernel names running on each application. The fact that they are running on the same physical project repository is not apparent to the end user.
In short, each kernel name corresponds to one application.
Application-based Configuration
First, you'll need replicate the structure of one application for config, src, var directories and leave the root structure for shared bundles and configuration. It should look like this:
├── config/
│ ├── admin/
│ │ ├── packages/
│ │ ├── bundles.php
│ │ ├── routes.yaml
│ │ ├── security.yaml
│ │ └── services.yaml
│ ├── api/
│ ├── site/
│ ├── packages/
│ ├── bundles.php
├── src/
│ ├── Admin/
│ ├── Api/
│ ├── Site/
│ └── VirtualKernel.php
├── var/
│ ├── cache/
│ │ ├── admin/
│ │ │ └── dev/
│ │ │ └── prod/
│ │ ├── api/
│ │ └── site/
│ └── log/
Next, making use of the Kernel::$name property you can stand out the application to run with dedicated project files (var/cache/<name>/<env>/*):
<name><Env>DebugProjectContainer*
<name><Env>DebugProjectContainerUrlGenerator*
<name><Env>DebugProjectContainerUrlMatcher*
This will be the key of the performance as each application has by definition its own DI container, routes and configuration files. Here is a complete sample of the VirtualKernel class that supports the previous structure:
src/VirtualKernel.php
// WITHOUT NAMESPACE!
use Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\Kernel;
class VirtualKernel extends Kernel
{
use MicroKernelTrait;
private const CONFIG_EXTS = '.{php,xml,yaml,yml}';
public function __construct($environment, $debug, $name)
{
$this->name = $name;
parent::__construct($environment, $debug);
}
public function getCacheDir(): string
{
return $this->getProjectDir().'/var/cache/'.$this->name.'/'.$this->environment;
}
public function getLogDir(): string
{
return $this->getProjectDir().'/var/log/'.$this->name;
}
public function serialize()
{
return serialize(array($this->environment, $this->debug, $this->name));
}
public function unserialize($data)
{
[$environment, $debug, $name] = unserialize($data, array('allowed_classes' => false));
$this->__construct($environment, $debug, $name);
}
public function registerBundles(): iterable
{
$commonBundles = require $this->getProjectDir().'/config/bundles.php';
$kernelBundles = require $this->getProjectDir().'/config/'.$this->name.'/bundles.php';
foreach (array_merge($commonBundles, $kernelBundles) as $class => $envs) {
if (isset($envs['all']) || isset($envs[$this->environment])) {
yield new $class();
}
}
}
protected function configureContainer(ContainerBuilder $container, LoaderInterface $loader): void
{
$container->setParameter('container.dumper.inline_class_loader', true);
$this->doConfigureContainer($container, $loader);
$this->doConfigureContainer($container, $loader, $this->name);
}
protected function configureRoutes(RouteCollectionBuilder $routes): void
{
$this->doConfigureRoutes($routes);
$this->doConfigureRoutes($routes, $this->name);
}
private function doConfigureContainer(ContainerBuilder $container, LoaderInterface $loader, string $name = null): void
{
$confDir = $this->getProjectDir().'/config/'.$name;
if (is_dir($confDir.'/packages/')) {
$loader->load($confDir.'/packages/*'.self::CONFIG_EXTS, 'glob');
}
if (is_dir($confDir.'/packages/'.$this->environment)) {
$loader->load($confDir.'/packages/'.$this->environment.'/**/*'.self::CONFIG_EXTS, 'glob');
}
$loader->load($confDir.'/services'.self::CONFIG_EXTS, 'glob');
if (is_dir($confDir.'/'.$this->environment)) {
$loader->load($confDir.'/'.$this->environment.'/**/*'.self::CONFIG_EXTS, 'glob');
}
}
private function doConfigureRoutes(RouteCollectionBuilder $routes, string $name = null): void
{
$confDir = $this->getProjectDir().'/config/'.$name;
if (is_dir($confDir.'/routes/')) {
$routes->import($confDir.'/routes/*'.self::CONFIG_EXTS, '/', 'glob');
}
if (is_dir($confDir.'/routes/'.$this->environment)) {
$routes->import($confDir.'/routes/'.$this->environment.'/**/*'.self::CONFIG_EXTS, '/', 'glob');
}
$routes->import($confDir.'/routes'.self::CONFIG_EXTS, '/', 'glob');
}
}
Now your \VirtualKernel class requires an extra argument (name) that defines the application to load. In order for the autoloader to find your new \VirtualKernel class, make sure add it to composer.json autoload section:
"autoload": {
"classmap": [
"src/VirtualKernel.php"
],
"psr-4": {
"Admin\\": "src/Admin/",
"Api\\": "src/Api/",
"Site\\": "src/Site/"
}
},
Then, run composer dump-autoload to dump the new autoload config.
Keeping one entry point for all applications
├── public/
│ └── index.php
Following the same filosofy of Symfony 4, whereas environment variables decides which development environment and debug mode should be used to run your application, you could add a new APP_NAME environment variable to set the application to execute:
public/index.php
// ...
$kernel = new \VirtualKernel(getenv('APP_ENV'), getenv('APP_DEBUG'), getenv('APP_NAME'));
// ...
For now, you can play with it by using PHP's built-in Web server, prefixing the new application environment variable:
$ APP_NAME=site php -S 127.0.0.1:8000 -t public
$ APP_NAME=admin php -S 127.0.0.1:8001 -t public
$ APP_NAME=api php -S 127.0.0.1:8002 -t public
Executing commands per application
├── bin/
│ └── console.php
Add a new console option --kernel to be able to run commands from different applications:
bin/console
// ...
$name = $input->getParameterOption(['--kernel', '-k'], getenv('APP_NAME') ?: 'site');
//...
$kernel = new \VirtualKernel($env, $debug, $name);
$application = new Application($kernel);
$application
->getDefinition()
->addOption(new InputOption('--kernel', '-k', InputOption::VALUE_REQUIRED, 'The kernel name', $kernel->getName()))
;
$application->run($input);
Later, use this option to run any command different to default one (site).
$ bin/console about -k=api
Or if you prefer, use environment variables:
$ export APP_NAME=api
$ bin/console about # api application
$ bin/console debug:router # api application
$
$ APP_NAME=admin bin/console debug:router # admin application
Also you can configure the default APP_NAME environment variable in the .env file.
Running tests per application
├── tests/
│ ├── Admin/
│ │ └── AdminWebTestCase.php
│ ├── Api/
│ ├── Site/
The tests directory is pretty similar to the src directory, just update the composer.json to map each directory tests/<Name>/ with its PSR-4 namespace:
"autoload-dev": {
"psr-4": {
"Admin\\Tests\\": "tests/Admin/",
"Api\\Tests\\": "tests/Api/",
"Site\\Tests\\": "tests/Site/"
}
},
Again, run composer dump-autoload to re-generate the autoload config.
Here, you might need create a <Name>WebTestCase class per application in order to execute all tests together:
test/Admin/AdminWebTestCase
namespace Admin\Tests;
use Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\Test\WebTestCase;
abstract class AdminWebTestCase extends WebTestCase
{
protected static function createKernel(array $options = array())
{
return new \VirtualKernel(
isset($options['environment']) ? $options['environment'] : 'test',
isset($options['debug']) ? $options['debug'] : true,
'admin'
);
}
}
Later, extends from AdminWebTestCase to test admin.company.com application (Do the same for another ones).
Production and vhosts
Set the environment variable APP_NAME for each vhost config in your production server and development machine:
<VirtualHost company.com:80>
SetEnv APP_NAME site
# ...
</VirtualHost>
<VirtualHost admin.company.com:80>
SetEnv APP_NAME admin
# ...
</VirtualHost>
<VirtualHost api.company.com:80>
SetEnv APP_NAME api
# ...
</VirtualHost>
Adding more applications to the project
With three simple steps you should be able to add new vKernel/applications to the current project:
Add to config, src and tests directories a new folder with the <name> of the application and its content.
Add to config/<name>/ dir at least the bundles.php file.
Add to composer.json autoload/autoload-dev sections the new PSR-4 namespaces for src/<Name>/ and tests/<Name> directories and update the autoload config file.
Check the new application running bin/console about -k=<name>.
Final directory structure:
├── bin/
│ └── console.php
├── config/
│ ├── admin/
│ │ ├── packages/
│ │ ├── bundles.php
│ │ ├── routes.yaml
│ │ ├── security.yaml
│ │ └── services.yaml
│ ├── api/
│ ├── site/
│ ├── packages/
│ ├── bundles.php
├── public/
│ └── index.php
├── src/
│ ├── Admin/
│ ├── Api/
│ ├── Site/
│ └── VirtualKernel.php
├── tests/
│ ├── Admin/
│ │ └── AdminWebTestCase.php
│ ├── Api/
│ ├── Site/
├── var/
│ ├── cache/
│ │ ├── admin/
│ │ │ └── dev/
│ │ │ └── prod/
│ │ ├── api/
│ │ └── site/
│ └── log/
├── .env
├── composer.json
Unlike multiple kernel files approach, this version reduces a lot of code duplication and files; just one kernel, index.php and console for all applications, thanks to environment variables and virtual kernel class.
Example based-on Symfony 4 skeleton: https://github.com/yceruto/symfony-skeleton-vkernel
Inspired in https://symfony.com/doc/current/configuration/multiple_kernels.html
You can create new environments like: admin, website, api. Then by provide environment variable SYMFONY_ENV by apache/nginx you will be able to run dedicated application and still use sub domains company.com, admin.company.com, api.company.com. Also you will be able to easily load only required routing.
Depends from how many application you want to create based on this approach you can add conditions to load specified bundles by project in AppKernel class or create separate classes for each project.
You should also read this article https://jolicode.com/blog/multiple-applications-with-symfony2
Also when you want to run Behat testing, you should run it with this command:
for windows:
set APP_NAME=web&& vendor\bin\behat
for linux:
export APP_NAME='web' && vendor\bin\behat
where "web" is your kernel name you want to run.
The KernelInterface::getName() method and the kernel.name parameter have been deprecated. There's no alternative to them because this is a concept that no longer makes sense in Symfony applications.
If you need a distinctive ID for the kernel of the application, you can use the KernelInterface::getContainerClass() method and the kernel.container_class parameter.
Similarly, the getRootDir() method and the kernel.root_dir parameter have been deprecated too. The alternative is to use the getProjectdir() and kernel.project_dir method introduced in Symfony 3.3
See https://symfony.com/blog/new-in-symfony-4-2-important-deprecations#deprecated-the-kernel-name-and-the-root-dir
Related
I am trying to move few of my Symfony projects into one monorepo. This is my structure.
packages/
├─ symfony-project-1/
│ ├─ public/
│ │ ├─ index.php
│ ├─ composer.json
├─ symfony-project-2/
│ ├─ public/
│ │ ├─ index.php
│ ├─ composer.json
vendor/
composer.json
I use package symplify/monorepo-builder to merge all of my project's composer.json file into the root one. Then I split my packages to READ-ONLY repositories.
To production, I would like to deploy the READ-ONLY repository. So for example, only the content of the directory symfony-project-1 would be transferred to the production server and the vendor folder would be installed directly to the same directory. Here comes the problem.
How can I make the front-controller index.php load ./../../../vendor in development and ./../vendor in production?
The index.php looks normally like this:
<?php
// public/index.php
use App\Kernel;
require_once dirname(__DIR__).'/vendor/autoload_runtime.php';
return function (array $context) {
return new Kernel($context['APP_ENV'], (bool) $context['APP_DEBUG']);
};
I tried this:
...
if (is_file(dirname(__DIR__).'/vendor/autoload_runtime.php')) {
$autoloadPath = dirname(__DIR__).'/vendor/autoload_runtime.php';
} else {
$autoloadPath = dirname(__DIR__).'/../../vendor/autoload_runtime.php';
}
require_once $autoloadPath;
...
But then Symfony tries to read .env file from the root of the monorepo not the project root (I get this: Fatal error: Uncaught Symfony\Component\Dotenv\Exception\PathException: Unable to read the "/Users/xxx/work/monorepo/.env" environment file.).
How to solve this in monorepo?
I am creating a PHP project and want to implement PSR-4 autoloading.
I don't know which files I need to create in the vendor directory to implement autoloading for class files.
If you are using composer, you do not create the autoloader but let composer do its job and create it for you.
The only thing you need to do is create the appropriate configuration on composer.json and execute composer dump-autoload.
E.g.:
{
"autoload": {
"psr-4": {"App\\": "src/"}
}
}
By doing the above, if you have a file structure like this
├── src/
│ ├── Controller/
│ ├── Model/
│ ├── View/
│ └── Kernel.php
├── public/
│ └── index.php
└── vendor/
After executing composer dump-autoload the autoloader will be generated on vendor/autoload.php.
All your classes should be nested inside the App namespace, and you should put only one class per file.
E.g.:
<?php /* src/Controller/Home.php */
namespace App\Controller;
class Home { /* implementation */ }
And you need only to include the autoloader in your entry-point script (e.g. index.php).
<?php
require '../vendor/autoload.php';
Which will allow you to simply load your classes directly from anywhere after this point, like this:
use App\Controller\Home;
$homeController = new Home();
This is explained at the docs, here.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
I struggle on how to use localizations correctly with custom packages for laravel?
$this->loadTranslationsFrom(__DIR__ . '/../../resources/lang', 'package_lang'); does not provide me access to my nested translation-files in my views (Blade Templating).
My Folder-Structure
foo-package/
├── resources/
│ ├── lang/
│ │ ├── de/
│ │ │ └── subs/
│ │ │ ├── fields.php
│ │ │ └── general.php
│ │ └── en/
│ │ └── subs/
│ │ ├── fields.php
│ │ └── general.php
│ └── views/
│ └── subs/
│ ├── create.php
│ └── edit.php
└── src/
└── Providers/
└── PackageProvider.php
In my views I try to access it like this:
<label>{{ __('package_lang::subs/fields.name_of_subs') }}</label>
or
<button type="submit">{{ __('package_lang::subs/fields.create_sub') }}</button>
Resulting in returning the translation string key.
The ServiceProvider is loaded in my app.phpconfig, in which I have set the correct locale as well (Debug-Bar proves that). Tried composer dump-autoload, but no success.
I'm only getting this to work if I use the standard project folders of laravel project/resources/lang, which prevents me from using my prefered namespace package_lang:: and making my package ready for localization.
My Service Provider
namespace FooPackage\Providers;
use Illuminate\Routing\Router;
use Illuminate\Support\ServiceProvider;
class PackageServiceProvider extends ServiceProvider
{
/**
* Bootstrap the application services.
*
* #return void
*/
public function boot()
{
$this->loadMigrationsFrom(__DIR__ . '/../../database/migrations');
$this->loadViewsFrom(__DIR__.'/../../resources/views', 'package_views');
$this->loadTranslationsFrom(__DIR__.'/../../resources/lang', 'package_lang');
}
}
Any idea how to solve it?
EDIT:
I have multiple packages following this folder structure.
Okay nevermind, the Post was missing out one major point.
Multiple custom packages are involved, which uses the same namespace package_lang, which causes the problem.
For whatever reason, the second namespace-parameter of $this->loadTranslationsFrom(__DIR__ . '/../../resources/lang', 'package_lang'); has to be uniquely defined!
Changing this solves the problem.
Just a side note:
The above rule does however not apply to $this->loadViewsFrom(__DIR__.'/../../resources/views', 'package_views'); where multiple packages can have the same namespace.
The PHPUnit manual highlights some conventions:
The tests for a class MyClass go into a class MyClassTest
The class MyClassTest live in file MyClassTest.php
MyClassTest inherits from PHPUnit_Framework_TestCase
Tests are public methods that are named test*
This will result in something like this folder structure:
├── src/
│ ├── classes/
│ │ ├── MyClass.php # Different
│ └── ...
├── tests/
│ ├── testcases/
│ │ ├── MyClassTest.php # Different
│ ├── bootstrap.php
│ └── ...
└── ...
... and this test case:
MyClassTest extends PHPUnit_Framework_TestCase {
testMyMethod() {
// Code here.
}
}
My question
I'm wondering if there is any reason why the naming used inside the test suite can't mirror the project's source code? For example, I'm thinking file names could match:
├── src/
│ ├── classes/
│ │ ├── MyClass.php # Same
│ └── ...
├── tests/
│ ├── testcases/
│ │ ├── MyClass.php # Same
│ ├── bootstrap.php
│ └── ...
└── ...
And if using PHP > 5.3, namespaces can be used to allow class names to match:
namespace MyProject\MyTests;
MyClass extends PHPUnit_Framework_TestCase { # The class name MyClass matches the class name used in my project's source.
/**
* #test
*/
MyMethod() { # The method name MyMethod matches the method name used in my project's source.
// Code here.
}
}
Note the #tests annotation is used so method names can match.
And if using PHP > 5.3, namespaces can be used to allow class names to match:
There are reasons not to do this:
It makes sense to have test and class under test in the same namespace
Otherwise you need to import the class under test with a class alias to distinguish it from the test case:
use MyProject\MyClass as MyActualClass;
The method name MyMethod matches the method name used in my project's source.
This might sound appealing if you think of testMyMethod as the alternative, but this is not the convention. Instead you should use more descriptive test method names like testThatMyMethodReturnsTrueIfFooIsBar.
I am trying to implement PSR-4 autoloading in my project. It is an existing application I have inherited that doesn't currently use OOP (it's all scripted), but I am hoping to refactor over time to use OOP, and PSR-4 is crucial for me as it will end up being a large project.
At this present time we do not rely on any external libraries (old application entirely written in-house), so composer is ONLY being used for autoloading at this moment in time, but will use third-party packages eventually such as phpunit.
My app structure on my server looks like this:
/var/www/appurl/
│ composer.json
│
├───htdocs
│ ├───AppName
│ │ ├───admin
│ │ │ authenticated.php
│ │ │ init.php
│ │ │ login.php
│ │ │
│ │ └───php
│ │ └───search.php
│ └───Framework
│ ├───Helpers
│ │ └───OSHelpers.php
└───vendor
│ autoload.php
│
└───composer
autoload_classmap.php
autoload_namespaces.php
autoload_psr4.php
autoload_real.php
ClassLoader.php
composer.json:
{
"autoload": {
"psr-4": {
"Framework\\": "htdocs/Framework"
}
}
}
login.php calls authenticated.php when a user successfully logs in, and authenticated calls my init.php script which contains:
<?php
require_once('../../../vendor/autoload.php');
?>
it is search.php that has the error. The user is redirected to search.php when they are authenticated.
search.php has the lines:
use Framework\Helpers\OSHelpers;
$current_os = OSHelpers::GetConciseOSFromUserAgent($user_agent);
OSHelpers.php is namedspaced as: namespace Framework\Helpers;
the static call to OSHelpers works fine if require_once is used, but the 2nd line where I define $current_os is where it appears to be failing.
The error I receive is:
Fatal error: Class 'Framework\Helpers\OSHelpers' not found in /var/www/appurl/htdocs/AppName/php/search.php on line 829
I'm at a bit of a loss about why it does this? When I follow the example in this video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGSerlMoIrY) my example app works fine, but trying to replicate this in a slightly more complicated structure is giving me problems.
I have done composer dump-autoload -o, and looking within the vendor directory shows that my classes are defined correctly. From vendor/composer/autoload_classmap.php:
'Framework\\Helpers\\OSHelpers' => $baseDir . '/htdocs/Framework/Helpers/OSHelpers.php',