I have to arrays, these:
$array1 = [
'red' => 'pencil',
'blue' => 'eraser',
];
$array2 = [
'reding' => '',
'bluing' => '',
];
and i wanna get this output:
$output = [
'reding' => 'pencil',
'bluing' => 'eraser',
];
So, values come from $array1 and keys come from $array2 on the $output.
Note: elements in array count is variable.
How can i do this ? Thanks for your helps.
if arrays are always the same length
array_combine(array_keys($array2), $array1);
array array_combine ( array $keys , array $values )
Creates an array by using the values from the keys array as keys and the values from the values array as the corresponding values.
More Details here
Related
I have an array of associative arrays like this:
$array = [
["foobar" => "asd"],
["foobar" => "abvc"],
["foobar" => "test123"],
];
I would like to have the column values used as keys and values in the end result.
[
'asd' => 'asd',
'abvc' => 'abvc',
'test123' => 'test123',
];
I tried using array_flip() while looping over, but I did not manage to get the desired output.
Use array_column to get all the nested foobar values. Then use array_combine to make an associative array using that as both the keys and values.
$values = array_column($array, 'foobar');
$result = array_combine($values, $values);
There is no need to call array_combine(). Tell array_column() to assign foobar column values as values (2nd param) and keys (3rd param).
Code: (Demo)
var_export(
array_column($array, 'foobar', 'foobar')
);
I have two arrays as shown below. I need to merge the content of the arrays so that I can get the structure as shown in the third array at last. I have checked array_merge but can't figure out the way this is possible. Any help appreciated. Thanks.
[
['gross_value' => '100', 'quantity' => '1'],
['gross_value' => '200', 'quantity' => '1']
]
and
[
['item_title_id' => '1', 'order_id' => '4'],
['item_title_id' => '2', 'order_id' => '4']
];
I should get a merged array like this:
[
[
'gross_value' => '100',
'quantity' => '1',
'item_title_id' => '1',
'order_id' => 4
],
[
'gross_value' => '200',
'quantity' => '1',
'item_title_id' => '2',
'order_id' => 4
]
]
Use array_merge_recursive :
Convert all numeric key to strings, (make is associative array)
$result = array_merge_recursive($ar1, $ar2);
print_r($result);
See live demo here
how about:
$arr1 = array(
0 => array(
'gross_value' => '100',
'quantity' => '1'
),
1 => array(
'gross_value' => '200',
'quantity' => '1'
)
);
$arr2 = array(
0 => array(
'item_title_id' => '1',
'order_id' => '4'
),
1 => array(
'item_title_id' => '2',
'order_id' => '4'
)
);
$arr = array();
foreach($arr1 as $k => $v) {
array_push($arr, array_merge($v, $arr2[$k]));
}
print_r($arr);
output:
Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[gross_value] => 100
[quantity] => 1
[item_title_id] => 1
[order_id] => 4
)
[1] => Array
(
[gross_value] => 200
[quantity] => 1
[item_title_id] => 2
[order_id] => 4
)
)
Have a look at array_merge
I would probably iterate over the arrays and merge them manually.
$result = array();
foreach ( $array1 as $key => $item )
{
$result[$key] = array_merge($array1[$key], $array2[$key]);
}
You will have an issue if the top-level arrays don't have strictly matching keys though.
If you have $array1 and $array2, try this:
foreach($array1 as $key1=>$innerArray){
$array1[$key1]['item_title_id'] = $array2[$key1]['item_title_id'];
$array1[$key1]['order_id'] = $array2[$key1]['order_id'];
}
The problem with things like merge recursive is that they don't know when to stop.
In some scenarios you want to stop traversing down an array and simply take a given value if it exists.
For instance if you have to override a nested config array you might not want the default keys to stick around at a a specific level.
here is my solution:
public static function merge_lvl2(){
$args = func_get_args();
return static::merge($args, 2);
}
public static function merge($args, $maxDepth = null, $depth = 1)
{
$merge = [];
foreach($args as $arg) {
if (is_array($arg)) {
if (is_array($merge)) {
if ($maxDepth == $depth) {
$arg += $merge;
$merge = $arg;
} else {
$merge = array_merge($merge, $arg);
}
} else {
$merge = $arg;
}
}
}
if ($maxDepth !== $depth) {
foreach($args as $a) {
if (is_array($a)) {
foreach($a as $k => $v) {
if (isset($merge[$k]) && is_array($merge[$k])) {
$merge[$k] = static::merge([$merge[$k], $v], $maxDepth, $depth + 1);
}
}
}
}
}
return $merge;
}
You can pass as many arrays to merge as you want to.
$merged = ClassName::merge_lvl2([..array1..], [..array2..], [..array3..], etc...);
It will stop merging at level 2 and accept the last instance of the key as an override instead of a merge.
You can also call merge directly with an array of args and setting the max depth.
If no max depth is set it will traverse the entire array.
The most modern, elegant, concise way to merge rows from two or more arrays (or the rows from a multidimensional array with 3 or more levels of depth) is to call array_merge() on each row (array_replace() can also be used). array_map() can call array_merge by its string name and the input data can be split into individual arguments with the "spread operator" (...) when needed.
Code for the OP's arrays: (Demo)
var_export(
array_map('array_merge', $arr1, $arr2)
);
The above technique will return a newly indexed array (though you might not notice because the sample input arrays were indexed to begin with). If your input data has associative first-level keys, they will be ignored and destroyed by this technique. If you have non-numeric first-level keys and want to merge on those, then array_merge_recursive() is likely to be the ideal native function - Demo.
However, it must be said, that for the OP's sample data array_merge_recursive() IS NOT a correct technique.
My first snippet is conveniently extended if you have more than two arrays which need their rows to be merge based on their positions. (Demo)
var_export(
array_map('array_merge', $arr1, $arr2, $arr3)
);
And as mentioned earlier, the spread operator can be used to unpack deeper arrays with the same result. Again, the number of subarrays containing rows can be dynamic. If your deep array only has one subarray containing rows, then the result will be a "flattening" effect where the top level is removed.
Code with new data structure: (Demo)
$masterArray = [
[
['gross_value' => '100', 'quantity' => '5'],
['gross_value' => '200', 'quantity' => '6']
],
[
['item_title_id' => '1', 'order_id' => '3'],
['item_title_id' => '2', 'order_id' => '4']
],
[
['foo' => 'bar1'],
['foo' => 'bar2']
]
];
var_export(
array_map('array_merge', ...$masterArray)
);
To be fair, array_replace_recursive() does provide the desired result using the OP's sample data, but I find the technique to be semantically misleading. (Demo)
All that said, you are not forced to use PHP's native array functions; you can use classic loops as well -- you will have several ways to "unite" the rows inside the loop. This approach is a little less D.R.Y. because you need to explicitly specific the separate arrays that you wish to synchronously iterate. Just make sure that you understand the nuanced differences in using array_merge(), array_replace(), and the union operator (+) with different qualities of data. Hint: associative, non-numeric keyed data in the respective rows will be affected when key collisions occur. Be careful to use a merging technique that will not overwrite the wrong data when rows share associative keys.
array_merge() to build a new array: (array_merge() Demo) (array_replace() Demo) (array union operator + Demo)
$result = [];
foreach ($arr1 as $i => $row) {
$result[] = array_merge($row, $arr2[$i]);
}
var_export($result);
Alternative, you can use the same general approach, but instead of populating a new $result array, you can merge data into the first array.
(array_merge() Demo) (array_replace() Demo) (array union assignment operator += Demo)
foreach ($arr1 as $i => &$row) {
$row = array_merge($row, $arr2[$i]);
}
var_export($arr1);
For the sake of completeness, if you have an indexed array of indexed arrays, then you might even use iterated calls of array_push() with the spread operator to achieve a similar functionality. This quite literally, indicatively appends the row data from subsequent arrays to the first array's rows.
Code: (Demo)
$arr1 = [
['A', 'B', 'C'],
['F', 'G']
];
$arr2 = [
['D', 'E'],
['H', 'I', 'J', 'L']
];
foreach ($arr1 as $i => &$row) {
array_push($row, ...$arr2[$i]);
}
var_export($arr1);
Related non-duplicate content on Stack Overflow:
Partially merge one array's row data with another another array:Add column of values from one array to another
Merge two flat arrays to create an array of merged rows:Transforming array values in elements of a subarray using PHP
Merge rows with indexed elements, remove duplicates and reindex:Merge two multidimensional arrays, preserve numeric keys, and combine values inside array
Merge arrays containing objects:Merge rows of two arrays containing objects by first level index
Push single elements from one array to rows in another array:Push elements from one array into rows of another array (one element per row)
On the above pages, the rabbit hole goes further because I've linked other related pages to them. Keep researching until you find what you need.
If you are using Laravel, you might be interested in its combine() and collect() methods.
Does it matter in what order the keys in an array array doing an array_merge, i.e. would the keys in the second array below override the keys in the first array:
array1 = array('username' => 'abc', 'level' => 'admin', 'status' => 'active');
array2 = array('level' => 'root', 'status' => 'active', 'username' => 'bcd');
? Or would the order of the keys have to be the same in the two arrays?
The manual states the answer to this question:
Merges the elements of one or more arrays together so that the values of one are appended to the end of the previous one. It returns
the resulting array.
If the input arrays have the same string keys, then the later value
for that key will overwrite the previous one. If, however, the arrays
contain numeric keys, the later value will not overwrite the original
value, but will be appended.
So, yes the keys in the second array will overwrite the keys from the first one if the second array contains some of the same keys.
$array1 = array('username' => 'abc', 'level' => 'admin', 'status' => 'active');
$array2 = array('level' => 'root', 'status' => 'active', 'username' => 'bcd');
$new = array_merge($array1, $array2);
print_r($new);
Output:
Array
(
[username] => bcd
[level] => root
[status] => active
)
So you can see that the keys from the second array overwrote the same keys from first one; the order of the keys in each array does not matter.
Here is an alternative solution that allows the use of a template array to define the output order. Missing fields are filled with null or as specified. In this example the first and last fields are filled with ---.
Please take note of the highlighted text from the previous answer about numeric keys.
function array_merge_template($array1, $array2, $template, $fill=null) {
$_template = array_fill_keys($template, $fill);
return array_intersect_key ( array_replace ( $_template, array_merge($array1, $array2)) , $_template);
}
Input:
$array1 = ['username' =>'abc', 'level' =>'admin', 'status' =>'active', 'foo'=>'x'];
$array2 = ['level' =>'root', 'status' =>'active', 'username' =>'bcd', 'bar'=>'y'];
$template = ['first','level','foo','username','bar','status','last'];
Output:
/* array_merge($array1,$array2) */
[
"username" => "bcd",
"level" => "root",
"status" => "active",
"foo" => "x",
"bar" => "y"
]
/* array_merge_template($array1,$array2,$template,'---') */
[
"first" => "---",
"level" => "root",
"foo" => "x",
"username" => "bcd",
"bar" => "y",
"status" => "active",
"last" => "---"
]
I have an array that looks like this:
Array([0]=>Array([id]=>7 [name]=foo) [1]=>Array([id]=>10 [name]=bar) [2]=>Array([id]=>15 [name]=baz))
Each index contains an another array with various elements including an 'id'. I would like to "go up" a level, such that my top-level array is indexed by the ID element of the corresponding nested arrays, but that index still contains an array with all of the elements that were in the sub arrays?
In other words, how can I use PHP to turn the above array into this:
Array([7]=>Array([id]=>7 [name]=foo) [10]=>Array([id]=>10 [name]=bar) [15]=>Array([id]=>15 [name]=baz))
What you need to do here is extract the ids from each sub-array in your input. If you have these as an array of ids, you are just an array_combine call away from re-indexing your original array to use these ids as the keys.
You can produce such an array of ids using array_map, which leads to:
// input data
$array = array(array('id' => '7', 'name' => 'foo'),array('id' => 10, 'name' => 'bar'));
// extract ids from the input array
$ids = array_map(function($arr) { return $arr['id']; }, $array);
// "reindex" original array using ids as array keys, keep original values
$result = array_combine($ids, $array);
print_r($result);
The syntax I 've used for the anonymous function (first argument to array_map) requires PHP >= 5.3, but you can achieve the same (although a bit less conveniently) with create_function in any PHP version you 'd not be ashamed of using.
See it in action.
In modern, supported versions of PHP, this whole task can be achieved with array_column() alone.
Using null as the second parameter will leave the rows unchanged.
Using id as the 3rd parameter will assign those columnar values as the new first level keys. Be aware that if these columnar values are not unique, subsequently encountered duplicates will overwrite previously encountered rows with the same id value -- this is because keys cannot be duplicates on a given level in an array.
DO NOT bother calling array_combine(), it is simply unnecessary/indirect.
Code: (Demo)
$array = [
['id' => 7, 'name' => 'foo'],
['id' => 10, 'name' => 'bar'],
['id' => 15, 'name' => 'baz'],
];
var_export(
array_column($array, null, 'id')
);
Output:
array (
7 =>
array (
'id' => 7,
'name' => 'foo',
),
10 =>
array (
'id' => 10,
'name' => 'bar',
),
15 =>
array (
'id' => 15,
'name' => 'baz',
),
)
Try this:
$newArray = array();
foreach($oldArray as $key => $value) {
$newArray[$value['id']] = $value;
}
Since PHP 5.5.0, you can shorten the code by using array_column() instead of array_map().
$result = array_combine(array_column($array, 'id'), $array);
In php I'm willing to check the existence of indexes that match with another values in array.
$indexes = array("index", "id", "view");
$fields = array(
"index" => 5,
"id" => 7,
"form" => 10,
"date" => 10,
);
MY ideal result is, in this case, to get "form" and "date". Any idea?
Try
$fields_keys = array_keys($fields);
$fields_unique = array_diff($fields_keys, $indexes);
The result will be an array of all keys in $fields that are not in $indexes.
You can try this.
<?php
$indexes = array("index", "id", "view");
$fields = array(
"index" => 5,
"id" => 7,
"form" => 10,
"date" => 10,
);
$b = array_diff(array_keys($fields), $indexes);
print_r($b);
You can use array_keys function to retrieve keys of a array
Eg:
$array = array(0 => 100, "color" => "red");
print_r(array_keys($array));
Outputs
Array
(
[0] => 0
[1] => color
)
PHP Documentation
Your question is a little unclear but I think this is what you're going for
array_keys(array_diff_key($fields, array_fill_keys($indexes, null)));
#=> Array( 0=>"form", 1=>"date" )
See it work here on tehplayground.com
array_keys(A) returns the keys of array A as a numerically-indexed array.
array_fill_keys(A, value) populates a new array using array A as keys and sets each key to value
array_diff_key(A,B) returns an array of keys from array A that do not exist in array B.
Edit turns on my answer got more complicated as I understood the original question more. There are better answers on this page, but I still think this is an interesting solution.
There is probably a slicker way than this but it will get you started:
foreach(array_keys($fields) as $field) {
if(!in_array($field, $indexes)) {
$missing[] = $field;
}
}
Now you will have an array that holds form and date.