I have two arrays, for example $session and $post with 100+ values. I will compare the $post array values with $session array. If post is different then it will be taken to result array else not.
We can try this using array_diff_assoc($post, $session) and foreach(). Which one is faster?
For profiling, Phil has suggested a great way in his reply, but I will link it here too, just in case:
Simplest way to profile a PHP script
Practically, you need to know what each approach does. in array_diff_assoc, you are returning the difference between 2 collections, after comparing the key/value couples for each element. It will then return an array that contains the entries from array1 that are not present in array2 or array3, etc.
In a for each loop, you will need to hard code the same function (assuming that's what you need). You will need to take the first element, then look for the combination in your other arrays. If it matches your requirements, you will save it into your output array, or even print it directly.
Same principles apply, but then again, it will be up to profiling to determine the faster approach. Try doing so on a large number of big arrays, as the difference isn't noticeable at smaller scales.
I'll leave this as a stub/example, please edit, or use for profiling.
<?php
$before = [
'name' => 'Bertie',
'age' => '23'
];
$after = [
'name' => 'Harold',
'age' => '23',
'occupation' => 'Bus driver'
];
function changed_1($after, $before) {
return array_diff_assoc($after, $before);
}
function changed_2($after, $before) {
$changed = [];
foreach($after as $k => $v) {
if(isset($before[$k]) && $before[$k] !== $v)
$changed[$k] = $v;
if(!isset($before[$k]))
$changed[$k] = $v;
}
return $changed;
}
var_export(changed_1($after, $before));
var_export(changed_2($after, $before));
Output:
array (
'name' => 'Harold',
'occupation' => 'Bus driver',
)array (
'name' => 'Harold',
'occupation' => 'Bus driver',
)
Related
Both of my arrays have over 500 000 elements.
I would like to return only those elements from multidimensional array that ARE NOT PRESENT in indexed array.
Here is what my multidimensional array looks like:
$new_codes = [
0 => [
'id' => 1,
'code' => 'code1',
... another values
],
1 => [
'id' => 2,
'code' => 'code2',
... another values
],
2 => [
'id' => 3,
'code' => 'code3',
... another values
]
];
Another array is just plain indexed array with code values:
$old_codes = [
'code1',
'code2',
];
For this limited example, after filtering, $new_codes should only have index 2 because that value doesn't exist in $old_codes array.
I've tried using the code bellow, but because the arrays are so huge, the operation takes so long that I thought that I somehow created infinite loop, but it seems that checking if the values for over 500000 elements exist in another array that also has over half a million elements takes very long time.
// option 1
$new = array_filter($new_codes, function ($var) use ($old_codes) {
return !in_array($var['code'], $old_codes);
});
// option 2
$filtered = [];
foreach($new_codes as $code) {
if(in_array($code['code']){
continue;
}
$filtered[] = $code;
}
Any suggestions for more optimized solutions are welcome.
Thanks in advance.
Reading this question I realized that using isset() is much better option for handling such a large amount of elements so I did this:
// switch array keys and values
$old_array = array_flip($old_array);
foreach($new_codes as $code) {
if(isset($old_array[$code['code']])){
continue;
}
$filtered[] = $code;
}
Doing this reduced the time to just few seconds.
I wrote this function to get a subset of an array. Does php have a built in function for this. I can't find one in the docs. Seems like a waste if I'm reinventing the wheel.
function array_subset($array, $keys) {
$result = array();
foreach($keys as $key){
$result[$key] = $array[$key];
}
return $result;
}
I always want this too. Like a PHP version of Underscore's pick.
It's ugly and counter-intuitive, but what I sometimes do is this (I think this may be what prodigitalson was getting at):
$a = ['foo'=>'bar', 'zam'=>'baz', 'zoo'=>'doo'];
// Extract foo and zoo but not zam
print_r(array_intersect_key($a, array_flip(['foo', 'zoo'])));
/*
Array
(
[foo] => bar
[zoo] => doo
)
*/
array_intersect_key returns all the elements of the first argument whose keys are present in the 2nd argument (and all subsequent arguments, if any). But, since it compares keys to keys, I use array_flip for convenience. I could also have just used ['foo' => null, 'zoo' => null] but that's even uglier.
array_diff_key and array_intersect_key are probably what you want.
There is no direct function I think in PHP to get a subset from an array1 with compare to another array2 where the values are the list of key name which we fetch.
Like: array_only($array1, 'field1','field2');
But this way can be achieved the same.
<?php
$associative_array = ['firstname' => 'John', 'lastname' => 'Smith', 'DOB' => '2000-10-10', 'country' => 'Ireland' ];
$subset = array_intersect_key( $associative_array, array_flip( [ 'lastname', 'country' ] ) );
print_r( $subset );
// Outputs...
// Array ( [lastname] => Smith [country] => Ireland );
Using the numbers from $ids, I want to pull the data from $nuts.
So for example:
$ids = [0,3,5]; // 0 calories, 3 sugar, 5 fat
$nuts = [
'calories' => 'cal',
'protein' => 'pro',
'carbohydrate' => 'car',
'sugar' => 'sug',
'fiber' => 'fib',
'fat' => 'fat',
];
$returnData = [
'calories' => 'cal',
'sugar' => 'sug',
'fat' => 'fat',
];
I could loop through each $ids number with a foreach(); but I'm curious to see if there is a better method than this?
$newNuts = array_values(array_flip($nuts));
foreach($ids as $i)
$returnData[$newNuts[$i]] = $nuts[$newNuts[$i]];
I did some work and realized, you don't need array_flip, array_values is fine.
$num_nuts = array_values ($nuts);
for ($z=0; $z<sizeof($ids); $z++) {
echo $num_nuts[$ids[$z]];
}
Just 1 more line of code, but I think it does the job. I think mine is going to be faster because the array_flip basically exchanges all keys with their associated values in an array, which is not what I am doing. It's actually one less pain.
I am simply converting the original array to a new one by index and simply looping upon it. Also, not the elegant way to use the power of PHP available to us, but works just fine. array_flip is O(n), but I think better not use it for larger data-sets.
How about a simple array_slice?
$result = array();
foreach ($ids as $i) {
$result += array_slice($nuts, $i, 1, true);
}
No need to create a copy of the array.
I have two arrays as shown below. I need to merge the content of the arrays so that I can get the structure as shown in the third array at last. I have checked array_merge but can't figure out the way this is possible. Any help appreciated. Thanks.
[
['gross_value' => '100', 'quantity' => '1'],
['gross_value' => '200', 'quantity' => '1']
]
and
[
['item_title_id' => '1', 'order_id' => '4'],
['item_title_id' => '2', 'order_id' => '4']
];
I should get a merged array like this:
[
[
'gross_value' => '100',
'quantity' => '1',
'item_title_id' => '1',
'order_id' => 4
],
[
'gross_value' => '200',
'quantity' => '1',
'item_title_id' => '2',
'order_id' => 4
]
]
Use array_merge_recursive :
Convert all numeric key to strings, (make is associative array)
$result = array_merge_recursive($ar1, $ar2);
print_r($result);
See live demo here
how about:
$arr1 = array(
0 => array(
'gross_value' => '100',
'quantity' => '1'
),
1 => array(
'gross_value' => '200',
'quantity' => '1'
)
);
$arr2 = array(
0 => array(
'item_title_id' => '1',
'order_id' => '4'
),
1 => array(
'item_title_id' => '2',
'order_id' => '4'
)
);
$arr = array();
foreach($arr1 as $k => $v) {
array_push($arr, array_merge($v, $arr2[$k]));
}
print_r($arr);
output:
Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[gross_value] => 100
[quantity] => 1
[item_title_id] => 1
[order_id] => 4
)
[1] => Array
(
[gross_value] => 200
[quantity] => 1
[item_title_id] => 2
[order_id] => 4
)
)
Have a look at array_merge
I would probably iterate over the arrays and merge them manually.
$result = array();
foreach ( $array1 as $key => $item )
{
$result[$key] = array_merge($array1[$key], $array2[$key]);
}
You will have an issue if the top-level arrays don't have strictly matching keys though.
If you have $array1 and $array2, try this:
foreach($array1 as $key1=>$innerArray){
$array1[$key1]['item_title_id'] = $array2[$key1]['item_title_id'];
$array1[$key1]['order_id'] = $array2[$key1]['order_id'];
}
The problem with things like merge recursive is that they don't know when to stop.
In some scenarios you want to stop traversing down an array and simply take a given value if it exists.
For instance if you have to override a nested config array you might not want the default keys to stick around at a a specific level.
here is my solution:
public static function merge_lvl2(){
$args = func_get_args();
return static::merge($args, 2);
}
public static function merge($args, $maxDepth = null, $depth = 1)
{
$merge = [];
foreach($args as $arg) {
if (is_array($arg)) {
if (is_array($merge)) {
if ($maxDepth == $depth) {
$arg += $merge;
$merge = $arg;
} else {
$merge = array_merge($merge, $arg);
}
} else {
$merge = $arg;
}
}
}
if ($maxDepth !== $depth) {
foreach($args as $a) {
if (is_array($a)) {
foreach($a as $k => $v) {
if (isset($merge[$k]) && is_array($merge[$k])) {
$merge[$k] = static::merge([$merge[$k], $v], $maxDepth, $depth + 1);
}
}
}
}
}
return $merge;
}
You can pass as many arrays to merge as you want to.
$merged = ClassName::merge_lvl2([..array1..], [..array2..], [..array3..], etc...);
It will stop merging at level 2 and accept the last instance of the key as an override instead of a merge.
You can also call merge directly with an array of args and setting the max depth.
If no max depth is set it will traverse the entire array.
The most modern, elegant, concise way to merge rows from two or more arrays (or the rows from a multidimensional array with 3 or more levels of depth) is to call array_merge() on each row (array_replace() can also be used). array_map() can call array_merge by its string name and the input data can be split into individual arguments with the "spread operator" (...) when needed.
Code for the OP's arrays: (Demo)
var_export(
array_map('array_merge', $arr1, $arr2)
);
The above technique will return a newly indexed array (though you might not notice because the sample input arrays were indexed to begin with). If your input data has associative first-level keys, they will be ignored and destroyed by this technique. If you have non-numeric first-level keys and want to merge on those, then array_merge_recursive() is likely to be the ideal native function - Demo.
However, it must be said, that for the OP's sample data array_merge_recursive() IS NOT a correct technique.
My first snippet is conveniently extended if you have more than two arrays which need their rows to be merge based on their positions. (Demo)
var_export(
array_map('array_merge', $arr1, $arr2, $arr3)
);
And as mentioned earlier, the spread operator can be used to unpack deeper arrays with the same result. Again, the number of subarrays containing rows can be dynamic. If your deep array only has one subarray containing rows, then the result will be a "flattening" effect where the top level is removed.
Code with new data structure: (Demo)
$masterArray = [
[
['gross_value' => '100', 'quantity' => '5'],
['gross_value' => '200', 'quantity' => '6']
],
[
['item_title_id' => '1', 'order_id' => '3'],
['item_title_id' => '2', 'order_id' => '4']
],
[
['foo' => 'bar1'],
['foo' => 'bar2']
]
];
var_export(
array_map('array_merge', ...$masterArray)
);
To be fair, array_replace_recursive() does provide the desired result using the OP's sample data, but I find the technique to be semantically misleading. (Demo)
All that said, you are not forced to use PHP's native array functions; you can use classic loops as well -- you will have several ways to "unite" the rows inside the loop. This approach is a little less D.R.Y. because you need to explicitly specific the separate arrays that you wish to synchronously iterate. Just make sure that you understand the nuanced differences in using array_merge(), array_replace(), and the union operator (+) with different qualities of data. Hint: associative, non-numeric keyed data in the respective rows will be affected when key collisions occur. Be careful to use a merging technique that will not overwrite the wrong data when rows share associative keys.
array_merge() to build a new array: (array_merge() Demo) (array_replace() Demo) (array union operator + Demo)
$result = [];
foreach ($arr1 as $i => $row) {
$result[] = array_merge($row, $arr2[$i]);
}
var_export($result);
Alternative, you can use the same general approach, but instead of populating a new $result array, you can merge data into the first array.
(array_merge() Demo) (array_replace() Demo) (array union assignment operator += Demo)
foreach ($arr1 as $i => &$row) {
$row = array_merge($row, $arr2[$i]);
}
var_export($arr1);
For the sake of completeness, if you have an indexed array of indexed arrays, then you might even use iterated calls of array_push() with the spread operator to achieve a similar functionality. This quite literally, indicatively appends the row data from subsequent arrays to the first array's rows.
Code: (Demo)
$arr1 = [
['A', 'B', 'C'],
['F', 'G']
];
$arr2 = [
['D', 'E'],
['H', 'I', 'J', 'L']
];
foreach ($arr1 as $i => &$row) {
array_push($row, ...$arr2[$i]);
}
var_export($arr1);
Related non-duplicate content on Stack Overflow:
Partially merge one array's row data with another another array:Add column of values from one array to another
Merge two flat arrays to create an array of merged rows:Transforming array values in elements of a subarray using PHP
Merge rows with indexed elements, remove duplicates and reindex:Merge two multidimensional arrays, preserve numeric keys, and combine values inside array
Merge arrays containing objects:Merge rows of two arrays containing objects by first level index
Push single elements from one array to rows in another array:Push elements from one array into rows of another array (one element per row)
On the above pages, the rabbit hole goes further because I've linked other related pages to them. Keep researching until you find what you need.
If you are using Laravel, you might be interested in its combine() and collect() methods.
I wrote this function to get a subset of an array. Does php have a built in function for this. I can't find one in the docs. Seems like a waste if I'm reinventing the wheel.
function array_subset($array, $keys) {
$result = array();
foreach($keys as $key){
$result[$key] = $array[$key];
}
return $result;
}
I always want this too. Like a PHP version of Underscore's pick.
It's ugly and counter-intuitive, but what I sometimes do is this (I think this may be what prodigitalson was getting at):
$a = ['foo'=>'bar', 'zam'=>'baz', 'zoo'=>'doo'];
// Extract foo and zoo but not zam
print_r(array_intersect_key($a, array_flip(['foo', 'zoo'])));
/*
Array
(
[foo] => bar
[zoo] => doo
)
*/
array_intersect_key returns all the elements of the first argument whose keys are present in the 2nd argument (and all subsequent arguments, if any). But, since it compares keys to keys, I use array_flip for convenience. I could also have just used ['foo' => null, 'zoo' => null] but that's even uglier.
array_diff_key and array_intersect_key are probably what you want.
There is no direct function I think in PHP to get a subset from an array1 with compare to another array2 where the values are the list of key name which we fetch.
Like: array_only($array1, 'field1','field2');
But this way can be achieved the same.
<?php
$associative_array = ['firstname' => 'John', 'lastname' => 'Smith', 'DOB' => '2000-10-10', 'country' => 'Ireland' ];
$subset = array_intersect_key( $associative_array, array_flip( [ 'lastname', 'country' ] ) );
print_r( $subset );
// Outputs...
// Array ( [lastname] => Smith [country] => Ireland );