I created an Artisan command which worked and where I injected a Kafka client service as the first parameter and a concrete class BudgetsTransformer, as the second parameter.
class ConsumeBudgetsCommand extends Command {
public function __construct(FKafka $kafkaClient, BudgetsTransformer $transformer)
{
$this->kafkaClient = $kafkaClient;
$this->transformer = $transformer;
parent::__construct();
}
}
AppServiceProvider class looked like:
class AppServiceProvider extends ServiceProvider
{
public function register()
{
$this->app->bind('kafka.client', function ($app) {
return new \Weq\FKafka\FKafka();
});
$this->app->bind('budget.transformer', function ($app) {
return new BudgetsTransformer();
});
}
public function boot()
{
$this->app->bind('consume:budgets', function ($app) {
return new ConsumeBudgetsCommand($app['kafka.client'], $app['budget.transformer']);
});
$this->commands('consume:budgets');
}
}
So far all is working properly. Then I decided to create a TransformerInterface which BudgedTransformer implements (and other future Transformers will implement it):
class BudgetsTransformer implements TransformerInterface
{
// ...
}
and I changed the signature in the command to inject the interface instead of the concrete class:
class ConsumeBudgetsCommand extends Command {
public function __construct(FKafka $kafkaClient, TransformerInterface $transformer)
{
$this->kafkaClient = $kafkaClient;
$this->transformer = $transformer;
parent::__construct();
}
}
But I get the following issue when I try to run some artisan command
In Container.php line 933:
Target [App\Transformers\TransformerInterface] is not instantiable while building [App\Console\Commands\ConsumeBudgetsCommand].
I run previously the issue the following artisan command just in case. cache:clear, clear-compiled, optimize and so on but no luck.
What I'm doing wrong? Should I bind the BudgetTransformer in a different way I'm doing now for passing and Interface instead of a concrete class?
I added:
$this->app->bind(TransformerInterface::class, BudgetsTransformer::class);
in AppServiceProvider::register() and I removed
$this->app->bind('budget.transformer', function ($app) {
return new BudgetsTransformer();
});
there, then I update in AppServiceProvider::boot() the command binding:
$this->app->bind('consume:budgets', function ($app) {
return new ConsumeBudgetsCommand($app['kafka.client'], $app[TransformerInterface::class]);
});
But still not working, anyway this approach (even working) will not resolve the issue since when I want to add another different transformer implementation, let's say CostTransformer which implements TransformerInterface is gonna always inject BudgetTransformer. So reading the documentation in the link, I found that Contextual Binding could be the solution, so I substituted by:
$this->app
->when(ConsumeBudgetsCommand::class)
->needs(TransformerInterface::class)
->give(function ($app) {
return new BudgetsTransformer();
});
So in that way, I will be able to inject different implementations of transformers to different commands by injecting the interface. But still not working.
Can someone tell me how exactly declare the command binding
$this->app->bind('consume:budgets', function ($app) {
return new ConsumeBudgetsCommand($app['kafka.client'], ???);
});
to use that Contextual binding?
For binding interfaces must be use this structure https://laravel.com/docs/5.5/container#binding-interfaces-to-implementations
$this->app->bind(TransformerInterface::class, BudgetsTransformer::class);
And
$this->app->bind('consume:budgets', function ($app) {
return new ConsumeBudgetsCommand($app['kafka.client'], $app->make(TransformerInterface::class));
});
Related
I am currently implementing repository pattern and dependency injection on my laravel project. But when I inject two or more class, I got this error
Too few arguments to function App\Repositories\UserRepository::__construct(), 0 passed
I don't know what's wrong but I think I did it correctly. Here's my code:
My service provider:
public function register()
{
$this->app->bind(LoanRepository::class, function() {
return new LoanRepository(new Loan, new UserRepository);
});
}
and here's my Repository
public function __construct($loan, $userRepository)
{
$this->loan = $loan;
$this->userRepository = $userRepository;
}
does anyone experience this?
The error is telling you that the UserRepository class is expecting some arguments that you are not passing it. Below would be an example of how you would pass a constructor argument to your new UserRepositiry call.
public function register()
{
$this->app->bind(LoanRepository::class, function() {
return new LoanRepository(new Loan, new UserRepository($constructorArgsHere);
});
}
I haven't worked with Laravel so I don't know what the UserRepository class constructor is looking for as arguments, but that should be an easy thing to find out just looking at the file where that class is defined or a quick google search.
I would like to make a package which uses a custom stub for creating migrations needed for my package. More precisely, running the command should make pivot tables for models which have a specific trait present.
If I make a "normal" command, I can register it within my service provider:
public function boot()
{
if ($this->app->runningInConsole()) {
$this->commands([
MakeContainerMigration::class,
]);
}
}
However in this case I wanted to reuse Laravel's coding and save myself the trouble to reinvent the wheel. So my command looks like this:
class MakeContainerMigration extends MigrateMakeCommand
{
protected $name = 'custom:make-container';
protected $description = '...';
}
Since MigrateMakeCommand doesn't have stubs defined, but rather it's dependency MigrationCreator, I needed to find a way to provide custom stub path to it without disrupting "regular" migration stubs.
I tried doing something like this but failed:
public function register()
{
$this->registerCreator();
$this->registerMigrateMakeCommand();
if ($this->app->runningInConsole()) {
$this->commands([
//MakeContainerMigration::class,
'custom.command.migrate.make'
]);
}
}
protected function registerCreator()
{
$this->app->singleton('custom.migration.creator', function ($app) {
return new MigrationCreator($app['files'], __DIR__ . '/stubs');
});
}
protected function registerMigrateMakeCommand()
{
$this->app->singleton('custom.command.migrate.make', function ($app) {
$creator = $app['custom.migration.creator'];
$composer = $app['composer'];
return new MakeContainerMigration($creator, $composer);
});
}
I'm aware that registering the command shouldn't function like this as I am simply registering singletons to Laravel app instance, but I have no idea how to register it through the class while ensuring that the right version of MigrationCreator will be injected. I'm kinda stuck here, is there a way to do it?
Turns out everything is working, I just needed to replace
protected $name = 'custom:make-container';
with
protected $signature = 'custom:make-container';
I have tried to register to the container an Uuid and i have tried to retrive it from a route controller more than once, but the uuid value is not the first registered.
Can anyone help me to understand?
class AppServiceProvider extends ServiceProvider
{
public function boot()
{
if(App::bound('conf')==NULL)
App::instance('conf', Uuid::generate()->string);
}
}
class InstanceController extends Controller
{
public function getUuid()
{
return App::make('conf');
}
}
I need to register an unique value or object that will be accessible to all.
I have also tried to put this code:
config(['uuid' => Uuid::generate()->string]);
in Laravel command handle method:
class RegisteredInstances extends Command
{
public function handle()
{
config(['uuid' => Uuid::generate()->string]);
}
}
and execute it, but when i try to retrive the uuid from a service, the response is null.
Now i have registered a laravel command that do this:
class RegisteredInstances extends Command
{
.
.
.
public function handle()
{
if(App::bound('conf')==NULL)
App::instance('conf', Uuid::generate()->string);
if(config('uuid2')==NULL)
config(['uuid2' => Uuid::generate()->string]);
}
}
A task every minute execute this command and i try to retrive the uuid from a service controller like this:
class InstanceController extends Controller
{
public function getUuid()
{
return App::make('conf');
}
public function getUuid()
{
return config('uuid2');
}
}
The problem, in this case, is that the controller return NULL:
You need to use laravel Configuration (accessing-configuration-values) with AppServiceProvider
Example:
class AppServiceProvider extends ServiceProvider
{
public function boot()
{
config([ 'theconfig.uuid' => $class_here->UUID ]);
}
}
Then to use it, call
config('theconfig.uuid');
anywhere in the program
Is this in Laravel 4? I haven't seen the App::instance markup before, but I found it in Laravel 4.2 docs for the IoC Container.
This looks like a case for using a singleton. You can use this to ensure that conf is only resolved once. Looking at 4.2 docs, you could define your singleton as follows.
App::singleton('conf', function()
{
return Uuid::generate()->string;
});
I have a selection control on a blade form that is to be refreshed via ajax through this function:
function getOpciones(tbName) {
$.get('/ajax/read-data/' + tbName, function(data){
return (data);
});
}
The function takes a string variable 'tbName' whith the name of the table the control is related to, and passes it on as a parameter to the route:
Route::get('/ajax/read-data/{modelo}', 'AjaxController#readData');
Then the controller should get the parameter {modelo}, and retrieve the records in that table:
use App\RegFiscal;
public function readData($modelo) {
$arreglo = $modelo::all();
return response($arreglo);
}
But even though I am referencing the model with 'use App\RegFiscal', all I get is this error in laravel log:
2018-03-23 18:52:08] local.ERROR: exception
'Symfony\Component\Debug\Exception\FatalErrorException' with message
'Class 'RegFiscal' not found' in
C:\wamp64\www\laravel\cte\app\Http\Controllers\AjaxController.php:32
I´m new to Laravel, so needless to say I am lost and any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Just because you use App\RegFiscal doesn't mean $modelo is associated with it.
What you can do, though, is use app("App\\$modelo") to load in your model based on the parameter you get from the router. You would no longer need to use App\RegFiscal either.
$arreglo = app("App\\$modelo");
return response($arreglo::all());
This is assuming your model is stored in the default app directory within your Laravel project. If not you can change "App\" to where ever it is stored. If for example your model is in app\models\modelname.php it would be "App\Models\\$modelo".
You can do this as the following:
public function readData($modelo) {
$modelName = '\App' . '\\' . $modelo;
$class = new $modelName();
arreglo = $class::all();
return response($arreglo);
}
To those like me who wanted to inject it on a constructor, here's how to do it:
~$ php artisan make:provider MyProvider
Then override the register function like so:
class MyProvider implements ServiceProvider {
/** #override */
public function register() {
$this->app->bind(ShapeInterface::class, function ($app) {
return new Square($app->make(MyModel::class));
});
}
}
The ShapeInterface is a simple interface and Square is a simple class that implements the shape interface with a constructor parameter of the eloquent model.
class Square implements ShapeInterface {
private MyModel $model;
function __construct(MyModel $model) {
$this->model = $model;
}
...
}
I'm trying to add a custom assertion to the TestReponse class so I can make something like this:
$response = $this->json('POST', '/foo/bar');
$response->myCustomAssertion();
I tried creating an App\TestResponse class that extends the original one and then binding it in the App\Provider\AppServiceProvider class.
public function register()
{
$this->app->bind('Illuminate\Foundation\Testing\TestResponse', function ($app) {
return new App\TestResponse();
});
}
But $response->json() is still returning the original one and not my own implementation.
How can I extend the TestResponse class?
If you want a little more fine-grained control, you can also extend the Illuminate\Foundation\Testing\TestResponse, as you have done, and then override the createTestResponse method in your TestCase class to return an instance of your custom response class:
// Laravel 8 and above
protected function createTestResponse($response)
{
return tap(App\TestResponse::fromBaseResponse($response), function ($response) {
$response->withExceptions(
$this->app->bound(LoggedExceptionCollection::class)
? $this->app->make(LoggedExceptionCollection::class)
: new LoggedExceptionCollection
);
});
}
// Before Laravel 8
protected function createTestResponse($response)
{
return App\TestResponse::fromBaseResponse($response);
}
From Illuminate\Foundation\Testing\Concerns\MakesHttpRequests.
The TestResponse class uses the Macroable trait so you can add macro functions at runtime.
TestResponse::macro('nameOfFunction', function (...) {
...
});
You can add this to a Service Provider's boot method or somewhere before you need to make the call to that macro'ed method.