PHP how to split path to object attribute - php

I have source of data and it is like:
$sourceData = json_decode($sourceData);
OR
$sourceData = simplexml_load_string($sourceData);
but possibly it could be another type of source and the result is probably php object with path to attributes like this:
$sourceData->product->time[$x]->location->precipitation['value'];
and I would like to split the path like this:
$rootPath = $sourceData->product->time[$x];
$rest = ?
/* probably something like '{$location}->{$precipitation}['value']
but I want the rest in one variable like
$rest = 'location->precipitation['value'];
*/
so at the end I should load paths like or similar to:
$temperature = 'location->data->something->temperature['value'];'
$precipitation = 'location->xxx->yyy->precip['data'];'
and use like:
for($i)
{
$temp = $root[$i]->temperature;
$precip = $root[$i]->precipitation;
}

This can be done with dynamic paths (like "dot notation"), but I'd hold off with it and make sure I really need that. It might be slow and it's used in more generic situations - unknown variable paths that client will provide.
Cleaner way would be encapsulating each root subtree ($data->product->time) within object with methods that can reach deep inside and return what you want. For example:
class ProductProperties
{
private $data;
public function __construct($data)
{
$this->data = $data;
}
public function temperature()
{
return $this->data->location->something->temperature['value'];
}
//...
}
Then creating instance and calling it within loop (or separate loops):
foreach ($sourceData as $root) {
$properties = new ProductProperties($root);
$temp = $properties->temperature();
}

Related

Php Laravel Pass value of variables to other methods

I'm refactoring all the codes given to me and I saw in the code that the're so many repeated variables that is using with other methods
which is this
$tag_id = json_decode($_POST['tag_id']);
$tag_name = json_decode($_POST['tag_name']);
$pname = json_decode($_POST['pname']);
$icode = json_decode($_POST['icode']);
$bname = json_decode($_POST['bname']);
$client = json_decode($_POST['client']);
$package = json_decode($_POST['package']);
$reference = json_decode($_POST['reference']);
$prodcat = json_decode($_POST['prodcat']);
$physical_array = json_decode($_POST['physical_array']);
$chemical_array = json_decode($_POST['chemical_array']);
$physpec_array = json_decode($_POST['physpec_array']);
$micro_array = json_decode($_POST['micro_array']);
$microspec_array = json_decode($_POST['microspec_array']);
$prod_type = json_decode($_POST['prod_type']);
$create_physical_id_array = json_decode($_POST['create_physical_id_array']);
$create_chemical_id_array = json_decode($_POST['create_chemical_id_array']);
$create_micro_id_array = json_decode($_POST['create_micro_id_array']);
my question is how can i just use put it in one method and i'll just call it to other methods instead of repeating that code.
thank you
You can't call it from other methods. Because the variables defined to that method are local. Instead you can define the variables as member variables of that class and access from any method or even from outside class depending upon the access specifier.
protected $a=2;
public function method1()
{
echo $this->a;
}
public function method2()
{
echo $this->a;
}
Put it in an array
$post_array = [];
foreach($_POST as $key => $value)
{
$post_array[$key] = json_decode($value);
}
return $post_array;
and then call it like this
$post_array['create_micro_id_array'];
Since it appears you are very much aware of the variable names you want to use... I'll suggest PHP Variable variables
To do this, you can loop through your $_POST and process the value while using the key as variable name.
foreach($_POST as $key => $value)
{
$$key = json_decode($value);
}
At the end of the day, these 4 lines would generate all that... However i'm not so sure of how friendly it may appear to someone else looking at the code. Give it a shot.
You may try extract function.
extract($_POST);

How to parse a variable inside a string inside a CodeIgniter view?

I have function called get_variable which grabs the value of a variable from the database.
Let's say the value of my variable (stored in the db) is something like: "I like $fruit"
I would like to pass this string, WITH $fruit translated to the proper value, on to my view.
I have the following set up (pseudo code below):
$details['fruit'] = 'apples';
$details['test'] = get_variable('my_variable_name');
$var = $CI->load->view('viewname',$details,TRUE);
Problem is that what is outputting in my view ($var) is "I like $fruit"
What I want is "I like apples"
I feel like I'm missing a step here, perhaps with variable variables? (http://php.net/manual/en/language.variables.variable.php), but not sure how to get it to behave. Any insight would be appreciated.
If you are sure the variables in the database are safe (Only you can change them), you can eval the code in your get variable function like this:
function get_variable($var, $data = array())
{
// Here the code that gets the variable from the database
$db_var = 'I like $fruit';
extract($data);
$return = '';
eval('$return = "' . $db_var . '"');
return $return;
}
// And then use this in the controller:
$details['test'] = get_variable('my_variable_name', $details);
But when the database variables are accessible by others, you really would not want to use eval (really don't!). Instead use some form of templating like "I like %fruit%" and make get_variable look like this:
function get_variable($var, $data = array())
{
// Here the code that gets the variable from the database
$db_var = 'I like $fruit';
extract($data);
$return = $db_var;
foreach($data as $var => $value) {
$return = str_replace('%'.$var.'%', $value, $return);
}
return $return;
}
// And then use the same method in the controller:
$details['test'] = get_variable('my_variable_name', $details); // This makes all variables in details available in the database variable

I need some help accessing a member function in a protected array in PHP

Right now I'm trying to write a function that would allow me to access member functions. The code in question looks a little like this:
protected $formName;
protected $formClass;
protected $formAction;
protected $formMethod;
protected $formObjArray = array(); //outputs in order. So far it should only take newLine, selectTag, inputTag, textTag.
protected $submitBtnVal;
protected $encType;
function __construct($args) {
$this->formName = $args['formName'];
$this->formAction = $args['formAction'];
if (isset($args['formClass'])) $this->formClass = $args['formClass'];
if (isset($args['encType'])) $this->encType = $args['encType'];
//default should be POST. Hell, you should never really be using GET for this..
//also, the default submit value is Submit
$this->formMethod = isset($args['formMethod']) ? $args['formMethod'] : "POST";
$this->submitBtnVal = isset($args['submitBtnVal']) ? $args['submitBtnVal'] : "Submit";
}
//get functions
function getFormName () { return $this->formName; }
function getFormAction () { return $this->formAction; }
function getFormMethod () { return $this->formMethod; }
function getSubmitBtnVal () { return $this->submitBtnVal; }
function getEncType () { return $this->encType; }
//set functions
function setFormName ($newName) { $this->fromName = $newName; }
function setFormAction ($newAction) { $this->formAction = $newAction; }
function setFormMethod ($newMethod) { $this->formMethod = $newMethod; }
function setEncType ($newEType) { $this->encType = $newEType; }
function addTag($newTag) {
if ($newTag instanceof formTag || $newTag instanceof fieldSetCont || $newTag instanceof newLine
|| $newTag instanceof noteTag)
$this->formObjArray[] = $newTag;
else throw new Exception ("You did not add a compatible tag.");
}
I'd like to be able to call $myForm->getTagByName("nameA")->setRequired(true);
How would I do that? Or would I need to do something more like..
$tagID = $myForm->getTagByName("nameA");
$myForm->tagArray(tagID)->setRequired(true);
Nothing in your code seems to be protected so you should have no trouble accessing any of it.
It looks like all your tags are in $formObjArray so it should be trivial to filter than array and return tags that match the name you've passed in. The trouble you will have is that, getTagByName really should be getTagsByName and should return an array because you can have more than one tag with the same name. Since it will return an array, you can not call setRequired on the return value, arrays don't have such a method. You'll need to do it more like:
$tags = $myForm->getTagsByName("nameA");
foreach ($tags as $tag) {
$tag->setRequired(true);
}
Exactly what are you stuck on? Maybe I don't understand the question very well.
So maybe the filtering has you stuck? Try this (if you you're using at least php 5.3)
function getTagsByName($tagname)
{
return array_filter($this->formObjArray, function($tag) use($tagname) {
return $tag->getName() == $tagname;
});
}
No ifs or switches.
Prior to 5.3, you don't have lambda functions so you need to do it differently. There are several options but this may be the simplest to understand:
function getTagsByName($tagname)
{
$out = array();
foreach ($this->formObjArray as &$tag) {
if ($tag->getName() == $tagname) {
$out[] = $tag;
}
}
return $out;
}
In your addTag method, you are storing new tags in $this->formObjArray using the [] notation, which will just append the new tag to the end of the array. If your tag objects all have a getName() method, then you can do something like this:
$this->formObjArray[$newTag->getName()] = $newTag;
Then, you can easily add a getTagByName() method:
public function getTagByName($name) {
if (array_key_exists($name, $this->formObjArray) {
return $this->formObjArray($name);
}
else {
return null;
}
}
Please beware of the solutions suggesting you to iterate through all the tags in your array! This could become very costly as your form gets larger.
If you need to use the [] construct because the order of the elements added is important, then you can still maintain a separate index by name, $this->tagIndex, that will be an associative array of name => tag. Since you are storing object references, they will not be using much space. Assuming that getTagByName will be used many times, this will save you a lot of resources over iterating the tags array on every call to getTagByName.
In that case, your addTag method would look like this:
$this->formObjArray[] = $newTag;
$this->tagIndex[$newTag->getName()] = $newTag; // it seems that you're doubling the memory needed, but you're only storing object references so this is safe
EDIT : Here is some modified code to account for the fact that multiple tags can have the same name:
In your addTag() method, do:
$this->formObjArray[] = $newTag;
$tag_name = $newTag->getName();
if (!array_key_exists($tag_name, $this->tagIndex)) {
$this->tagIndex[$tag_name] = array();
}
$this->tagIndex[$tag_name][] = $newTag
You can then rename getTagByName to getTagsByName and get the expected result.
As mentioned in the comments, this is only useful if you will call getTagsByName multiple times. You are trading a little additional memory usage in order to get quicker lookups by name.

PHP: Class property chaining in variable variables

So, I have a object with structure similar to below, all of which are returned to me as stdClass objects
$person->contact->phone;
$person->contact->email;
$person->contact->address->line_1;
$person->contact->address->line_2;
$person->dob->day;
$person->dob->month;
$person->dob->year;
$album->name;
$album->image->height;
$album->image->width;
$album->artist->name;
$album->artist->id;
etc... (note these examples are not linked together).
Is it possible to use variable variables to call contact->phone as a direct property of $person?
For example:
$property = 'contact->phone';
echo $person->$property;
This will not work as is and throws a E_NOTICE so I am trying to work out an alternative method to achieve this.
Any ideas?
In response to answers relating to proxy methods:
And I would except this object is from a library and am using it to populate a new object with an array map as follows:
array(
'contactPhone' => 'contact->phone',
'contactEmail' => 'contact->email'
);
and then foreaching through the map to populate the new object. I guess I could envole the mapper instead...
If i was you I would create a simple method ->property(); that returns $this->contact->phone
Is it possible to use variable variables to call contact->phone as a direct property of $person?
It's not possible to use expressions as variable variable names.
But you can always cheat:
class xyz {
function __get($name) {
if (strpos($name, "->")) {
foreach (explode("->", $name) as $name) {
$var = isset($var) ? $var->$name : $this->$name;
}
return $var;
}
else return $this->$name;
}
}
try this code
$property = $contact->phone;
echo $person->$property;
I think this is a bad thing to to as it leads to unreadable code is is plain wrong on other levels too, but in general if you need to include variables in the object syntax you should wrap it in braces so that it gets parsed first.
For example:
$property = 'contact->phone';
echo $person->{$property};
The same applies if you need to access an object that has disalowed characters in the name which can happen with SimpleXML objects regularly.
$xml->{a-disallowed-field}
If it is legal it does not mean it is also moral. And this is the main issue with PHP, yes, you can do almost whatever you can think of, but that does not make it right. Take a look at the law of demeter:
Law of Demeter
try this if you really really want to:
json_decode(json_encode($person),true);
you will be able to parse it as an array not an object but it does your job for the getting not for the setting.
EDIT:
class Adapter {
public static function adapt($data,$type) {
$vars = get_class_vars($type);
if(class_exists($type)) {
$adaptedData = new $type();
} else {
print_R($data);
throw new Exception("Class ".$type." does not exist for data ".$data);
}
$vars = array_keys($vars);
foreach($vars as $v) {
if($v) {
if(is_object($data->$v)) {
// I store the $type inside the object
$adaptedData->$v = Adapter::adapt($data->$v,$data->$v->type);
} else {
$adaptedData->$v = $data->$v;
}
}
}
return $adaptedData;
}
}
OOP is much about shielding the object's internals from the outside world. What you try to do here is provide a way to publicize the innards of the phone through the person interface. That's not nice.
If you want a convenient way to get "all" the properties, you may want to write an explicit set of convenience functions for that, maybe wrapped in another class if you like. That way you can evolve the supported utilities without having to touch (and possibly break) the core data structures:
class conv {
static function phone( $person ) {
return $person->contact->phone;
}
}
// imagine getting a Person from db
$person = getpersonfromDB();
print conv::phone( $p );
If ever you need a more specialized function, you add it to the utilities. This is imho the nices solution: separate the convenience from the core to decrease complexity, and increase maintainability/understandability.
Another way is to 'extend' the Person class with conveniences, built around the core class' innards:
class ConvPerson extends Person {
function __construct( $person ) {
Person::__construct( $person->contact, $person->name, ... );
}
function phone() { return $this->contact->phone; }
}
// imagine getting a Person from db
$person = getpersonfromDB();
$p=new ConvPerson( $person );
print $p->phone();
You could use type casting to change the object to an array.
$person = (array) $person;
echo $person['contact']['phone'];
In most cases where you have nested internal objects, it might be a good time to re-evaluate your data structures.
In the example above, person has contact and dob. The contact also contains address. Trying to access the data from the uppermost level is not uncommon when writing complex database applications. However, you might find your the best solution to this is to consolidate data up into the person class instead of trying to essentially "mine" into the internal objects.
As much as I hate saying it, you could do an eval :
foreach ($properties as $property) {
echo eval("return \$person->$property;");
}
Besides making function getPhone(){return $this->contact->phone;} you could make a magic method that would look through internal objects for requested field. Do remember that magic methods are somewhat slow though.
class Person {
private $fields = array();
//...
public function __get($name) {
if (empty($this->fields)) {
$this->fields = get_class_vars(__CLASS__);
}
//Cycle through properties and see if one of them contains requested field:
foreach ($this->fields as $propName => $default) {
if (is_object($this->$propName) && isset($this->$propName->$name)) {
return $this->$propName->$name;
}
}
return NULL;
//Or any other error handling
}
}
I have decided to scrap this whole approach and go with a more long-winded but cleaner and most probably more efficient. I wasn't too keen on this idea in the first place, and the majority has spoken on here to make my mind up for me. Thank for you for your answers.
Edit:
If you are interested:
public function __construct($data)
{
$this->_raw = $data;
}
public function getContactPhone()
{
return $this->contact->phone;
}
public function __get($name)
{
if (isset($this->$name)) {
return $this->$name;
}
if (isset($this->_raw->$name)) {
return $this->_raw->$name;
}
return null;
}
In case you use your object in a struct-like way, you can model a 'path' to the requested node explicitly. You can then 'decorate' your objects with the same retrieval code.
An example of 'retrieval only' decoration code:
function retrieve( $obj, $path ) {
$element=$obj;
foreach( $path as $step ) {
$element=$element[$step];
}
return $element;
}
function decorate( $decos, &$object ) {
foreach( $decos as $name=>$path ) {
$object[$name]=retrieve($object,$path);
}
}
$o=array(
"id"=>array("name"=>"Ben","surname"=>"Taylor"),
"contact"=>array( "phone"=>"0101010" )
);
$decorations=array(
"phone"=>array("contact","phone"),
"name"=>array("id","name")
);
// this is where the action is
decorate( $decorations, &$o);
print $o->name;
print $o->phone;
(find it on codepad)
If you know the two function's names, could you do this? (not tested)
$a = [
'contactPhone' => 'contact->phone',
'contactEmail' => 'contact->email'
];
foreach ($a as $name => $chain) {
$std = new stdClass();
list($f1, $f2) = explode('->', $chain);
echo $std->{$f1}()->{$f2}(); // This works
}
If it's not always two functions, you could hack it more to make it work. Point is, you can call chained functions using variable variables, as long as you use the bracket format.
Simplest and cleanest way I know of.
function getValueByPath($obj,$path) {
return eval('return $obj->'.$path.';');
}
Usage
echo getValueByPath($person,'contact->email');
// Returns the value of that object path

Accessing object properties of type array dynamically

I am building a Language class for internationalization, and I would like to access the properties dynamically (giving the string name), but I don't know how to do it when dealing with arrays (this is just an example):
class Language {
public static $languages_cache = array();
public $index_header_title;
public $index = array(
"header" => array(
"title" => NULL
)
);
}
Now I add languages like this:
Language::$languages_cache["en"] = new Language();
Language::$languages_cache["en"]->index_header_title = "Welcome!"; //setting variable
Language::$languages_cache["en"]->index["header"]["title"] = "Welcome!"; //setting array
Function for accessing members dynamically:
function _($member, $lang)
{
if (!property_exists('Language', $member))
return "";
return Language::$languages_cache[$lang]->$member;
}
So, outputting members:
echo _('index_header_title', "en"); //works
echo _('index["header"]["title"]', "en"); //does not work
I would need a way for accessing arrays dynamically.. for public and private via __set() function.
Thank you!
You could try using a separator flag so that you can parse the array path. The only problem is you are mixing you properties and arrays so that might complicate things.
You would call your function like this:
echo _('index.header.title', "en");
And your function would parse the path and return the correct value. Take a look at the array helper in Kohana 3.0. It has the exact function that you want. http://kohanaframework.org/guide/api/Arr#path

Categories