I'm trying to find out why a field is not saving. It's submitted fine and the page reloads with the same value, but it's not stored in the database. I have this in my project
$contact = new Contact($_POST);
$contact->Save();
However, the Save() function doesn't exist in the Contact class, and it doesn't extend anything! How is it able to call a function that doesn't exist? I don't believe PHP has monkeypatching. I know the function is called because I added print_r($_POST) right above it.
<?php
namespace ArcaSolutions\CoreBundle\Entity;
use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;
/**
* Contact
*
* #ORM\Table(name="Contact")
* #ORM\Entity(repositoryClass="ArcaSolutions\CoreBundle\Repository\ContactRepository")
* #ORM\HasLifecycleCallbacks
*/
class Contact
{
My new field is defined as
/**
* #var string
*
* #ORM\Column(name="timezone", type="string", length=50, nullable=true)
*/
private $timezone;
/**
* Set timezone
*
* #param string $timezone
* #return Contact
*/
public function setTimezone($timezone)
{
$this->timezone = $timezone;
return $this;
}
/**
* Get timezone
*
* #return string
*/
public function getTimezone()
{
return $this->timezone;
}
It's an eDirectory project based on Symfony 2.8 and PHP 5.6.27.
As Padam87 suggests in the comments, you seem to mix Doctrine 1 with Doctrine 2 syntax. Doctrine 1 uses the Active Record pattern, whereas Doctrine 2 uses the Data Mapper pattern. A nice explaination of the differences can be found here: https://www.culttt.com/2014/06/18/whats-difference-active-record-data-mapper/
A Doctrine 2 entity will never have a save() or similar method. To persist or retrieve entities, you will have to use the entity manager. If you use Symfony, the entity manager can be injected as a service into your controllers or other services.
Read the Doctrine docs on how to work with an entity manager to learn more.
By the way, whatever you’re trying by injecting the $_POST data into your entity – this is a very bad idea. You should first process this data in your controller or some validator and only fill entities with validated content. Also, when using Symfony, you’ll want to get the POST data through the Request object which is passed to your action if you reference it in the signature.
Here’s a stub for a controller which gets the entity manager injected as a dependency (you should also register it the controller as a service in your bundle’s services.yml) and gets the POST data from the Request object:
use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Request;
use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Response;
use Doctrine\ORM\EntityManagerInterface;
private $entityManager;
public function __construct(EntityManagerInterface $entityManager)
{
$this->entityManager = $entityManager;
}
public function someAction(Request $request)
{
$data = $request->request->all();
// validate $data!!!
$contact = new Contact();
$contact->setSomeValue($data["value"]);
$this->entityManager->persist($contact);
$this->entityManager->flush();
return new Response("Ok", 200);
}
In Symfony, again, you could also inject an instance of Symfony\Component\Validator\Validator\ValidatorInterface and use Symfony’s validation component.
I found out why. There were two Contact classes and eDirectory was using the one in edirectory\web\classes\class_Contact.php. The other one I found was in edirectory\src\ArcaSolutions\CoreBundle\Entity\Contact.php. The one it really uses is defined as
class Contact extends Handle {
var $account_id;
...
function Save() {
$this->prepareToSave();
$dbObj = db_getDBObject(DEFAULT_DB,true);;
$sql = "UPDATE Contact SET"
. " updated = NOW(),"
. " first_name = $this->first_name,"
...
So it does have a Save() function.
Related
I'm new to using Doctrine and am struggling to find the best way to handle the following scenario.
I have a table payment_gateways, which stores payment gateway config for users. Most of the data is common between payment gateways but there is also a JSON column config, the purpose of this column is to store configuration which is unique to specific payment gateways since I can't guarantee all payment gateways will share the same configuration fields.
I want to create a Doctrine ORM entity for my payment_gateways table, but I also want the config property to be its own entity where I can use its own getters and setters instead of accessing and setting properties directly from the config array.
Is single table inheritance a good way to approach this? I have tried this by creating a separate entity for each payment gateway I have integrated with and have extended the base entity PaymentGateway. In these entities I define the properties that I expect to be in the config property. Then I get/set the properties like so:
/**
* #ORM\Entity
*/
class PaypalGateway extends PaymentGateway
{
/**
* #return string|null
*/
public function getApiKey(): ?string
{
return $this->getConfig()['apiKey'] ?? null;
}
/**
* #param string $apiKey
*/
public function setApiKey(string $apiKey)
{
$data = $this->getConfig();
$data['apiKey'] = $apiKey;
$this->setConfig($data);
}
The parent PaymentGateway class looks like the following:
/**
* #ORM\Entity
* #ORM\Table(name="payment_gateways")
* #ORM\InheritanceType("SINGLE_TABLE")
* #ORM\DiscriminatorColumn(name="provider_type", type="string")
* #ORM\DiscriminatorMap({
* "paypal" = "PaypalGateway",
* "stripe" = "StripeGateway"
* })
*/
abstract class PaymentGateway
{
**
* #ORM\Column(type="json")
*/
private ?array $config = null;
public function getConfig()
{
return $this->config;
}
public function setConfig($config)
{
$this->config = $config;
}
As far as I can tell, this is working correctly for me but I'm not sure if it's a good way to go about it. I was wondering if this is the correct approach or if there's something I'm missing completely?
Is there a way to extend classes auto-generated from database by Doctrine2 ?
Example: I have this User class generated by Doctrine.
<?php
namespace Entities;
/**
* User
*/
class User
{
/**
* #var integer
*/
private $id;
/**
* #var string
*/
private $firstName;
/**
* #var string
*/
private $lastName;
/**
* Get id
*
* #return integer
*/
public function getId()
{
return $this->id;
}
/**
* Set firstName
*
* #param string $firstName
*
* #return User
*/
public function setFirstName($firstName)
{
$this->firstName = $firstName;
return $this;
}
/**
* Get firstName
*
* #return string
*/
public function getFirstName()
{
return $this->firstName;
}
/**
* Set lastName
*
* #param string $lastName
*
* #return User
*/
public function setLastName($lastName)
{
$this->lastName = $lastName;
return $this;
}
/**
* Get lastName
*
* #return string
*/
public function getLastName()
{
return $this->lastName;
}
I would like to add this function :
public function getFullName()
{
return $this->getFirstName().' '.$this->getLastname();
}
Is there a cleaner way than adding it directly into this class?
I tried to create another class (Test) in libraries and extends it, then add it in autoload (which is working), but i get an error when I try to save object :
class Test extends Entities\User {
public function getFullName() {
return $this->getFirstName().' '.$this->getLastname();
}
}
Message: No mapping file found named 'Test.dcm.yml' for class 'Test'.
I'm using Doctrine2 in CodeIgniter3.
Thanks.
As explained in the Doctrine 2 FAQ:
The EntityGenerator is not a full fledged code-generator that solves all tasks. [...] The EntityGenerator is supposed to kick-start you, but not towards 100%.
In plain English this means you ask Doctrine to generate the Entity files only once. After that, you are on your own and do whatever changes you like (or it needs) to them.
Because an Entity is not just a container for some properties but it's where the entire action happens, this is how the flow should happen, Doctrine cannot write more code for you.
The only way to add functionality to the stub Entities generated by Doctrine is to complete the generated classes by writing the code that implements the functionality of each Entity according to its role in your Domain Model.
Regarding the other issue, on the Test class, the error message is self-explanatory: any class passed to the EntityManager for handling needs to be mapped.
Take a look at the help page about Inheritance Mapping. You can either map class User as a Mapped Superclass (it acts like a template for the derived classes and its instances are not persisted in the database) or you can use Single Table Inheritance to store the instances of all classes derived from User in a single table (useful when they have the same properties but different behaviour).
Or, in case you created class Test just because you were afraid to modify the code generated by Doctrine, put the behaviour you need in class User and drop class Test.
Seems you are having trouble while accessing the user entity class. You mentioned that test is a library class. Why not try to access the User entity class from a controller. If can do this then may be something is wrong with the configuration of test file. Besides, you need to map you doctrine entity class properly. You can have a look here to learn about doctrine mapping using yml: http://doctrine-orm.readthedocs.org/en/latest/reference/yaml-mapping.html
you can do this:
<?php
namespace Entities;
/**
* User
*/
class User extends Test
{
//... and extends Test
}
or
<?php
namespace Entities;
/**
* User
*/
class User
{
//...
public function getFullName() {
return $this->getFirstName().' '.$this->getLastname();
}
}
view more
Symfony 2 - Extending generated Entity class
http://www.theodo.fr/blog/2013/11/dynamic-mapping-in-doctrine-and-symfony-how-to-extend-entities/
http://doctrine-orm.readthedocs.org/en/latest/reference/inheritance-mapping.html
Annotation allows you to specify repository class to add more methods to entity class.
/**
* #ORM\Entity(repositoryClass="App\Entity\UserRepository")
*/
class User
{
}
class UserRepository extends EntityRepository
{
public function getFullName() {
return $this->getFirstName().' '.$this->getLastname();
}
}
// calling repository method
$entityManager->getRepository('User')->getFullName();
Here's a link [http://doctrine-orm.readthedocs.org/en/latest/reference/working-with-objects.html]
7.8.8. Custom Repositories
OK, so now as I eventually decided to use Doctrine2 ORM in my new Zend2 project I have a question about the best design practices to maintain the Model and Entity classes separate. I'm not asking what's the difference between Entity and Model, I understand that. I also have my Service layer connected with Repository classes working just fine. What I'm asking, is a situation when I have a Model class with some business logic, let's say Document class, and then DocumentEntity which represents it's persistence, and just want to keep them separate, so for example, here is my Entity:
use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;
/**
* #ORM\Entity(repositoryClass="DocumentRepo")
* #ORM\Table(name="document")
*/
class DocumentEntity {
/**
* #ORM\Id
* #ORM\GeneratedValue(strategy="UUID")
* #ORM\Column(type="guid")
*/
protected $guid;
/**
* #ORM\Column(length=64)
*/
protected $name;
// more stuff below...
}
Now, there's my Model class with a lot of business logic that I want to keep separate:
class Document implements SomeImportantInterface, AnotherImportantInterface {
public function doSomeImportantStuff() {
}
public function doEvenMoreImportantStuff() {
}
}
And finally, the Service class:
class DocumentService {
const DOCUMENT_ENTITY = 'DocumentEntity';
/**
* #var EntityManager
*/
protected $em;
/**
* #param EntityManager $entityManager
*/
public function __construct(EntityManager $entityManager) {
$this->em = $entityManager;
}
public function getDocument($guid) {
$documentEntity = $this->em->getRepository(self::DOCUMENT_ENTITY)->findByGuid($guid);
return; //what? I want here Document to be returned, not the DocumentEntity..
}
public function createDocument() {
return new Document();
}
public function saveDocument(Document $document) {
// Document -> DocumentEntity
// $documentEntity = ...?
//$this->em->persist($entityDocument);
//$this->em->flush();
}
}
So as you can see, the plan is to have a Document objects that the application only cares about (accessible via Service), not the DocumentEntities. Two possible approaches that came to my mind:
keep the DocumentEntity as a property inside the Document
make Document to extend DocumentEntity
Or, maybe I'm just missing something in here, and just taking the wrong end of the stick? Looking forward to hear your opinions!
Your entity should extend the model class. Your application needs to do all it's model interaction via a repository interface.
DomainModel
DocumentDomainModel
DocumentDomainModelInterface
DocumentDomainModelRepositoryInterface (get/create/save)
DoctrineEntity
DocumentDoctrineEntity extends DocumentDomainModel
DocumentDoctrineRepository implements DocumentDomainModelRepositoryInterface
This also gives you the flexibility to implement other repositories such as in memory one for testing.
im new to Zf2, i recently upgraded from zf1 and need help and advice on this problem.
Here the fact :
I'm working on medical project (which is an upgrade to a zf1 version) in some controller (page) i need to have the patient's info and current visitation in sidebar panel...
I know i'm new to zf2 but i don't want to do redundant things like having in every action the getvisiteService() and patientService() retrieve info and passing these results to view over and over.
I thought about a plugin but again i have to pass from controller to view and supercharge my view with partials and placeholder helper (grr!!!)
Thinkin' about Strategy and eventlistener but i don't know how these work and i need to inject result to a partial.
So there is a simple and/or complicated way to achieve that? Thank you in advance any hint and code will be appreciated and sorry for my poor english i speak french (such a typical excuse :) )
There's a ton of approaches you could use here, but sticking to your original question, it's quite easy to inject things into your layout model, with something like this:
Module.php
/**
* On bootstrap event
*
* #param \Zend\Mvc\MvcEvent $e
*/
public function onBootstrap(MvcEvent $e)
{
// Inject something, like a nav into your Layout view model
$viewModel = $e->getViewModel(); // Layout View Model
$navigation= new ViewModel(array(
'username' => 'Bob' // Dynamically set some variables..
));
$navigation->setTemplate('navigation/mynav');
$viewModel->addChild($navigation, 'navigation');
}
You could also create a custom view Helper to do the work for you if you wanted
<?php
/**
* MyHelper.php
*/
namespace Application\View\Helper;
use Zend\View\Helper\AbstractHelper;
use Zend\ServiceManager\ServiceManagerAwareInterface;
use Zend\ServiceManager\ServiceManager;
class MyHelper extends AbstractHelper implements ServiceManagerAwareInterface
{
/**
* Invoke
*
* #return string
*/
public function __invoke()
{
// Dynamically build your nav or what ever.
$patientService = $this->getServiceManager()->get('PatientService');
return 'soemthing';
}
/**
* #var ServiceManager
*/
protected $serviceManager;
/**
* Retrieve service manager instance
*
* #return ServiceManager
*/
public function getServiceManager()
{
return $this->serviceManager;
}
/**
* Set service manager instance
*
* #param ServiceManager $locator
* #return User
*/
public function setServiceManager(ServiceManager $serviceManager)
{
$this->serviceManager = $serviceManager;
return $this;
}
}
I'm having this behavior with Doctrine 2.1 where I'm looking for a nice 'workaround'. The problem is as follows:
I have a user Entity:
/**
* #Entity(repositoryClass="Application\Entity\Repository\UserRepository")
* #HasLifecycleCallbacks
*/
class User extends AbstractEntity
{
/**
*
* #var integer
*
* #Column(type="integer",nullable=false)
* #Id
* #GeneratedValue(strategy="IDENTITY")
*/
protected $id;
/**
*
* #var \DateTime
* #Column(type="datetime",nullable=false)
*/
protected $insertDate;
/**
*
* #var string
* #Column(type="string", nullable=false)
*/
protected $username;
/**
*
* #ManyToOne(targetEntity="UserGroup", cascade={"merge"})
*/
protected $userGroup;
}
And a usergroup entity:
/**
* #Entity
*/
class UserGroup extends AbstractEntity
{
/**
*
* #var integer
*
* #Column(type="integer",nullable=false)
* #Id
* #GeneratedValue(strategy="IDENTITY")
*/
protected $id;
/**
*
* #var string
* #Column(type="string",nullable=false)
*/
protected $name;
}
If I instantiate a user object (doing this with Zend_Auth) and Zend_Auth puts it automatically the session.
The problem is however, that is I pull it back from the session at a next page then the data in the user class is perfectly loaded but not in the userGroup association. If I add cascade={"merge"} into the annotation in the user object the userGroup object IS loaded but the data is empty. If you dump something like:
$user->userGroup->name
You will get NULL back. The problem is no data of the usergroup entity is accesed before the user object is saved in the session so a empty initialized object will be returned. If I do something like:
echo $user->userGroup->name;
Before I store the user object in the session all data of the assocication userGroup is succesfully saved and won't return NULL on the next page if I try to access the $user->userGroup->name variable.
Is there a simple way to fix this? Can I manually load the userGroup object/association with a lifecycle callback #onLoad in the user class maybe? Any suggestions?
Your problem is a combination of what mjh_ca answered and a problem with your AbstractEntity implementation.
Since you show that you access entity fields in this fashion:
$user->userGroup->name;
I assume your AbstractEntity base class is using __get() and __set() magic methods instead of proper getters and setters:
function getUserGroup()
{
return $this->userGroup;
}
function setUserGroup(UserGroup $userGroup)
{
$this->userGroup = $userGroup;
}
You are essentially breaking lazy loading:
"... whenever you access a public property of a proxy object that hasn’t been initialized yet the return value will be null. Doctrine cannot hook into this process and magically make the entity lazy load."
Source: Doctrine Best Practices: Don't Use Public Properties on Entities
You should instead be accessing fields this way:
$user->getUserGroup()->getName();
The second part of your problem is exactly as mjh_ca wrote - Zend_Auth detaches your entity from the entity manager when it serializes it for storage in the session. Setting cascade={"merge"} on your association will not work because it is the actual entity that is detached. You have to merge the deserialized User entity into the entity manager.
$detachedIdentity = Zend_Auth::getInstance()->getIdentity();
$identity = $em->merge($detachedIdentity);
The question, is how to do this cleanly. You could look into implementing a __wakeup() magic method for your User entity, but that is also against doctrine best practices...
Source: Implementing Wakeup or Clone
Since we are talking about Zend_Auth, you could extend Zend_Auth and override the getIdentity() function so that it is entity aware.
use Doctrine\ORM\EntityManager,
Doctrine\ORM\UnitOfWork;
class My_Auth extends \Zend_Auth
{
protected $_entityManager;
/**
* override otherwise self::$_instance
* will still create an instance of Zend_Auth
*/
public static function getInstance()
{
if (null === self::$_instance) {
self::$_instance = new self();
}
return self::$_instance;
}
public function getEntityManager()
{
return $this->_entityManager;
}
public function setEntityManager(EntityManager $entityManager)
{
$this->_entityManager = $entityManager;
}
public function getIdentity()
{
$storage = $this->getStorage();
if ($storage->isEmpty()) {
return null;
}
$identity = $storage->read();
$em = $this->getEntityManager();
if(UnitOfWork::STATE_DETACHED === $em->getUnitOfWork()->getEntityState($identity))
{
$identity = $em->merge($identity);
}
return $identity;
}
}
And than add an _init function to your Bootstrap:
public function _initAuth()
{
$this->bootstrap('doctrine');
$em = $this->getResource('doctrine')->getEntityManager();
$auth = My_Auth::getInstance();
$auth->setEntityManager($em);
}
At this point calling $user->getUserGroup()->getName(); should work as intended.
When you store the entity to a session (via Zend_Auth or otherwise), the object is serialized and no longer maintained by Doctrine when subsequently retrieved and unserialized. Try merging the entity back into the EntityManager. See http://www.doctrine-project.org/docs/orm/2.1/en/reference/working-with-objects.html