Firebase PHP: Updating also deletes the other children - php

I am using the Firebase PHP Admin SDK: https://firebase-php.readthedocs.io/en/stable/realtime-database.html#update-specific-fields
Here is the example it gives to update specific fields:
$uid = 'some-user-id';
$postData = [
'title' => 'My awesome post title',
'body' => 'This text should be longer',
];
// Create a key for a new post
$newPostKey = $db->getReference('posts')->push()->getKey();
$updates = [
'posts/'.$newPostKey => $postData,
'user-posts/'.$uid.'/'.$newPostKey => $postData,
];
$db->getReference() // this is the root reference
->update($updates);
From that, I created a users class and in that I have an update function. Like so:
public function update() {
$data = array('users' => array('1' => 'David'));
$this->database->getReference()->update($data);
return true;
}
In my database I have this structure:
Now if I run that function $users->update();
It removes the other child and only leaves David. Like so:
How can I update only a specific value of a specified key without it overriding the other data?

There's nothing specific to PHP here. That's the way Realtime Database update operations work. If you want a minimal update, you have to target the deepest key that you want to update. In your case, since you're storing an array type object, the keys are the number indexes of the array items you've written. If you want to modify one of them, you need to build a reference that includes the child number you want update. In that case, none of the sibling values will be touched.
Try this instead:
$this->database->getReference('users')->update(array('1' => 'David'));
Notice here that the update is rooted at "users", and you're updating just the immediate child "1" of that.

The example on docs is a little bit hard to grasp as a beginner. I have made it simpler for you to understand.
Once you get the newPostKey, prepare the url for child and run the code. It will only change the specific fields.
$ref = 'users/' . $newPostKey;
$updates = [
'title' => 'Updated title',
'body' => 'Updated body text',
];
$set = $db->getReference($ref)->update($updates);

Related

How to return a variable operator like $option[];

Obviously, I can't do this, but is there some way to achieve what I am trying to? I only found can not do's online, but no potential workarounds.
Here is what I am trying to do.
Currently I get the following error... "Cannot use [] for reading"
For my theme, I have a framework and the fields from that framework are built using an array that I create.
It looks something like this (minus the 300+ lines of code that I actually use)...
$options[] =
array(
'title' => 'This Field Tab Title',
'name' => 'this-field-tab-slug',
'fields' =>
array(
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------
// This Field Option Name
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------
array(
'type' => 'this_field_type',
'id' => 'this_field_types_id',
),
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------
// This Field Option Name
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------
array(
'type' => 'this_field_type',
'id' => 'this_field_types_id',
),
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------
// This Field Option Name
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------
array(
'type' => 'this_field_type',
'id' => 'this_field_types_id',
),
),
);
I am running a grouped field type, so my output has many options/fields within this grouped field/area which can then be added again and again as many times as the user needs. Then I am repeating that whole process/code again but for other taxonomies of the user's site.
So for example, the whole process above applies to post types, categories, tags, archived, etc. etc. So instead of having thousands of lines of repetitive codes, I'm trying to create my own function and pass the variables to that function.
But for the function, I find I can't return $options[];
Here is a screenshot of what I mean by the grouped field that can be added as many times as the user needs.
And here's an example of the function I am trying to create!
public static function layout_settings_config($title_name = '', $title_slug = '', $title_id = '', $query = '') {
$title_name = 'Post Type';
$title_slug = 'post-type';
$title_id = 'post_type';
$query = 'post_types';
$options[] =
array(
// all the config array codes in here...
);
return $options ??? $options[]; doesn't work.
}
Is this possible to achieve what I am trying to a different way? I'm still a little new to creating my own functions and OOP, but nothing I find online for this specific issue with a workaround.
Thanks!
$options[] is not object but it is an operation like function.
You should return $options instead.
and, by the way, when you say $options[] = something. it actually insert something inside an array called $option. so effectively you have to access your options like this.
$option[0]->title.
So I suggest Instead of making it complex like this. simply say
$option = something.

Facebook Marketing API ProductAudience doesn't save some values

I'm facing the following:
I create a pixel (use it in project: ViewProduct, AddToBasket & Purchase)
Create a Catalog + create products feed + create product sets
Implement ProductAudience to create Audience on Facebook.
Everything until then works just great, but when I go to Facebook, and navigate to the product audience, It doesn't have any data that I've set while creating the Audience. (eg. PIXEL_ID, PRODUCT_SET_ID, INCLUSIONS & EXCLUSIONS are not set)
That's how my code look like:
use FacebookAds\Object\ProductAudience;
use FacebookAds\Object\Fields\ProductAudienceFields;
$productAudience = new ProductAudience($this->id, <myFacebookAdAccountId>);
$audienceData = [
ProductAudienceFields::PIXEL_ID => <myPixelId>,
ProductAudienceFields::PRODUCT_SET_ID => <myProductSetId>,
ProductAudienceFields::NAME => 'Name for the audience',
];
if (count($this->inclusions)) $audienceData[ProductAudienceFields::INCLUSIONS] = $this->inclusions;
if (count($this->exclusions)) $audienceData[ProductAudienceFields::EXCLUSIONS] = $this->exclusions;
$productAudience->setData($audienceData);
return $productAudience->create();
So I'm wondering, what am I doing wrong? Hope to get some guidelines... Have lost already one working day on trying to fix it without any result.
I also tried to retrieve the data trough API:
$productAudience = new ProductAudience($this->id);
return $productAudience->read([
ProductAudienceFields::PIXEL_ID,
ProductAudienceFields::NAME,
ProductAudienceFields::DESCRIPTION,
]);
The following object is been returned:
#data: array:7 [
"id" => "6047126484024"
"name" => "Name for the audience"
"description" => null
"product_set_id" => null
"pixel_id" => null
"inclusions" => null
"exclusions" => null
]
The values are set to null as well... Version of API I'm using is 2.5.0
found the solution for my problem
$productAudience = new ProductAudience($this->id);
$productAudience->read([
ProductAudienceFields::PIXEL_ID,
ProductAudienceFields::NAME,
ProductAudienceFields::DESCRIPTION,
'data_source',
]);
It doesn't set the values, so the product_set_id and few other fields ares still set to null, but we get all the fields in 'creation_params' object.
I also created a helper function that sets the needed values:
private function fieldsFromDataSourceToObject(ProductAudience &$productAudience)
{
$creationParams = json_decode($productAudience->data_source['creation_params']);
$productAudience->setData([
ProductAudienceFields::PRODUCT_SET_ID => $creationParams->product_set_id,
ProductAudienceFields::INCLUSIONS => json_decode($creationParams->inclusions, true),
ProductAudienceFields::EXCLUSIONS => json_decode($creationParams->exclusions, true),
]);
}
So after reading existing product audience, I just call the helper function with response as param
$this->fieldsFromDataSourceToObject($productAudience);
Hope this solution saves someones time.

How to merge data in elasticsearch

i want to merge some data in Elasticsearch, but every time it is replacing my previous data and not merging it.
Suppose when i new is created it should add with the previous data, not replacing previous data. So Suppose there is a user exists in the "update_field" named "Christofer" so when i array_merge($usernames) where $usernames contains one or couple of usernames it is always replacing previous data.
I am working on PHP.
$usernames= array ("Johanna", "Maria");
$doc = array();
$doc['update_field'] = array_merge($usernames);
$u_params = array();
$u_params['id'] = 'my_id';
$u_params['index'] = 'my_index';
$u_params['type'] = 'my_type';
$u_params['body'] = array('doc' => $doc);
$client->update($u_params);
For being more clear, as a example let's say in the usernames field there are couple of username exists- like - "Christofer", "Henrik", "Eric".
So now i want to add more user like - "Johanna", "Maria", ...
Now every time i merge and update documents it is replacing the data, like ("Christofer", "Henrik", "Eric") is getting replace by ("Johanna", "Maria").
I want them to be added not replaced.
Do any body knows how can i merge the new data, or just the new data in other process. Thanks in advanced.
You need to use partial update. Try this instead, i.e. you need to send a doc hash in the body with the fields to marge (i.e. update_fields):
$params = [
'index' => 'my_index',
'type' => 'my_type',
'id' => 'my_id',
'body' => [
'doc' => [
'update_field' => array_merge($usernames)
]
]
];
$client->update($params);
UPDATE
That's right, core values and arrays are getting replaced.
You may want to try scripted partial update then
$usernames= array ("Johanna", "Maria");
$script = array();
$script['script'] = 'ctx._source.update_field += new_value';
$script['params'] = array('new_value' => array_merge($usernames));
$u_params = array();
$u_params['id'] = 'my_id';
$u_params['index'] = 'my_index';
$u_params['type'] = 'my_type';
$u_params['body'] = $script;
$client->update($u_params);
And make sure that scripting is enabled in your elasticsearch.yml config file:
script.disable_dynamic: false

$this->Model->id not working before saveAll in CakePHP

I have the following code in CakePHP 2:
$this->Order->id = 5;
$this->Order->saveAll(array(
'Order' => array(
'person_id' => $this->Session->read('Person.id'),
'amount' => $total,
'currency_id' => $code
),
'Lineitem' => $lineitems /* a correctly-formatted array */
));
I would expect this to update the row with the Primary Key of 5 in the Order table and then insert the Lineitem rows with an order_id of 5.
However, all it does is create a new row in Order and then use the new id from the new Order record to create the Listitem rows.
Note: I'm only setting the ID as above for debugging purposes and to easily demonstrate this question. In my final code, I'll be checking to see if there's already a pending order with the current person_id and doing $this->Order->id = $var; if there is and $this->Order->create(); if there isn't.
In other words, sometimes I will want it to INSERT (in which case I will issue $this->Order->create(); ) and sometimes I will want it to UPDATE (in which case I will issue $this->Order->id = $var; ). The test case above should produce an UPDATE but it's producing an INSERT instead.
Any idea what I am doing wrong here?
The array you pass to Model->saveAll() doesnt't contain the order's id, so Cake creates a new one. If you wanto to update an existing record, either you set the order id in the passed array, or you retrieve it with a find. The documentation explicitly remarks
If you want to update a value, rather than create a new one, make sure
your are passing the primary key field into the data array
$order = $this->Order->findById(5);
// ... modify $order if needed
$this->Order->saveAll(array('Order' => $order, 'LineItem' => $items));
In your case, you may want to use something like the following to be as concise as possible. Model::saveAssociated() is smart enough to create or update depending on the id, but you must provide suitable input. Model::read($fields, $id) initializes the internal $data: for an existing record all fields will be read from the database, but for a nonexistent id, you'll need to supply the correct data for it to succeed. Assuming an order belongsTo a customer, I supply the customer id if the order doesn't exist
// set the internal Model::$data['Order']
$this->Order->read(null, 5);
// You may want to supply needed information to create
// a new order if it doesn't exist, like the customer
if (! $this->Order->exists()) {
$this->Order->set(array("Customer" => array("id" => $customer_id)));
}
$this->Order->set(array('LineItem' => $items));
$this->Order->saveAssociated();
As a final note, it seems you are implementing a shopping cart. If that's the case, maybe it'd be clearer to use a separate ShoppingCart instead of an Order with a finalized flag.
Have you tried following:
$this->Order->saveAll(array(
'Order' => array(
'id' => 5,
'person_id' => $this->Session->read('Person.id'),
'amount' => $total,
'currency_id' => $code
),
'Lineitem' => $lineitems /* a correctly-formatted array */
));
Its pretty much the same what you did with :
$this->Order->id = 5;
Maybe that would fix your problem.
Cake is checking if you set id field and if its there it updates record, if not found it creates new record instead.
update:
Then maybe check before you saveAll if there is id field, then save result of check to some boolean and create array to save determined by this boolean for example:
if($id_exist) $order['Order']['id'] = 5;
$order['Order']['id'] = 5;
$order['Order']['person_id'] = $this->Session->read('Person.id'),
$order['Order']['amount'] = $total;
$order['Order']['currency_id'] = $code;
$this->Order->saveAll(array(
'Order' => $order,
'Lineitem' => $lineitems /* a correctly-formatted array */
));

Using the CakeDC search plugin with associated models

I'm using CakePHP 1.3.8, and I've installed the CakeDC Search plugin. I have a Tutorial model, which is in a HABTM relationship with a LearningGoal model.
I have a search action & view in the Tutorials controller with which I can successfully search fields in the Tutorial model. I'd also like to filter my tutorial search results using LearningGoal checkboxes on the same form. I've tried adding various parameters to Tutorial's $filterArgs and TutorialsController's $presetVars. I've also tried moving the relevant $filterArgs to the LearningGoal model. I have not yet been able to successfully trigger the entry for learning goals in $filterArgs.
I think I must be missing something obvious. Or maybe the Search plugin doesn't support what I'm trying to do. Does anyone know how to use this plugin to search on associated models?
So here's what I've figured out. You can combine what's below with the Search plugin directions to search on related models.
The $filterArgs piece in the Tutorial model must look like this:
var $filterArgs = array(
array('name' => 'LearningGoal', 'type' => 'subquery', 'method' => 'findByLearningGoals', 'field' => 'Tutorial.id'),
);
Here's the supporting function in the Tutorial model:
function findByLearningGoals($data = array()) {
$ids = explode('|', $data['LearningGoal']);
$ids = join(',', $ids);
$this->LearningGoalsTutorial->Behaviors->attach('Containable', array('autoFields' => false));
$this->LearningGoalsTutorial->Behaviors->attach('Search.Searchable');
$query = $this->LearningGoalsTutorial->getQuery('all',
array(
'conditions' => array('LearningGoalsTutorial.learning_goal_id IN (' . $ids . ')'),
'fields' => array('tutorial_id'),
)
);
return $query;
}
In TutorialsController, $presetVars should look like this:
public $presetVars = array(
array('field' => 'LearningGoal', 'type' => 'checkbox', 'model' => 'Tutorial'),
);
And in my search action in TutorialsController, I did this:
$this->LearningGoal = $this->Tutorial->LearningGoal;
The Prg component seems to need that.
I am using CakePHP version 2.X
Every time I come to do this in a project I always spend hours figuring out how to do it using CakeDC search behavior so I wrote this to try and remind myself with simple language what I need to do. I've also noticed that although Michael is generally correct there is no explanation which makes it more difficult to modify it to one's own project.
When you have a "has and belongs to many" relationship and you are wanting to search the joining table i.e. the table that has the two fields in it that joins the tables on either side of it together in a many-to-many relationship you want to create a subquery with a list of IDs from one of the tables in the relationship. The IDs from the table on the other side of the relationship are going to be checked to see if they are in that record and if they are then the record in the main table is going to be selected.
In this following example
SELECT Handover.id, Handover.title, Handover.description
FROM handovers AS Handover
WHERE Handover.id in
(SELECT ArosHandover.handover_id
FROM aros_handovers AS ArosHandover
WHERE ArosHandover.aro_id IN (3) AND ArosHandover.deleted != '1')
LIMIT 20
all the records from ArosHandover will be selected if they have an aro_id of 3 then the Handover.id is used to decide which Handover records to select.
On to how to do this with the CakeDC search behaviour.
Firstly, place the field into the search form:
echo $this->Form->create('Handover', array('class' => 'form-horizontal'));?>
echo $this->Form->input('aro_id', array('options' => $roles, 'multiple' => true, 'label' => __('For', true), 'div' => false, true));
etc...
notice that I have not placed the form element in the ArosHandover data space; another way of saying this is that when the form request is sent the field aro_id will be placed under the array called Handover.
In the model under the variable $filterArgs:
'aro_id' => array('name' => 'aro_id', 'type' => 'subquery', 'method' => 'findByAros', 'field' => 'Handover.id')
notice that the type is 'subquery' as I mentioned above you need to create a subquery in order to be able to find the appropriate records and by setting the type to subquery you are telling CakeDC to create a subquery snippet of SQL. The method is the function name that are going to write the code under. The field element is the name of the field which is going to appear in this part of the example query above
WHERE Handover.id in
Then you write the function that will return the subquery:
function findByAros($data = array())
{
$ids = ''; //you need to make a comma separated list of the aro_ids that are going to be checked
foreach($data['aro_id'] as $k => $v)
{
$ids .= $v . ', ';
}
if($ids != '')
{
$ids = rtrim($ids, ', ');
}
//you only need to have these two lines in if you have not already attached the behaviours in the ArosHandover model file
$this->ArosHandover->Behaviors->attach('Containable', array('autoFields' => false));
$this->ArosHandover->Behaviors->attach('Search.Searchable');
$query = $this->ArosHandover->getQuery('all',
array(
'conditions' => array('ArosHandover.aro_id IN (' . $ids . ')'),
'fields' => array('handover_id'), //the other field that you need to check against, it's the other side of the many-to-many relationship
'contain' => false //place this in if you just want to have the ArosHandover table data included
)
);
return $query;
}
In the Handovers controller:
public $components = array('Search.Prg', 'Paginator'); //you can also place this into AppController
public $presetVars = true; //using $filterArgs in the model configuration
public $paginate = array(); //declare this so that you can change it
// this is the snippet of the search form processing
public function admin_find()
{
$this->set('title_for_layout','Find handovers');
$this->Prg->commonProcess();
if(isset($this->passedArgs) && !empty($this->passedArgs))
{//the following line passes the conditions into the Paginator component
$this->Paginator->settings = array('conditions' => $this->Handover->parseCriteria($this->passedArgs));
$handovers = $this->Paginator->paginate(); // this gets the data
$this->set('handovers', $handovers); // this passes it to the template
If you want any further explanation as to why I have done something, ask and if I get an email to tell me that you have asked I will give an answer if I am able to.

Categories