Call method of another controller in laravel - php

I have to call the method of another controller.
I use following code to make a call.
app('App\Http\Controllers\ApiUserController')->getList();
This is working fine.
But I want to try using use function so that I dont have to repeat all line
use App\Http\Controllers\ApiUserController;
class MyMethods
{
public function index()
{
app('ApiUserController')->getList()
Did I made some mistake here?

Instead of using app function, you will need to go through OOP way like so:
use App\Http\Controllers\ApiUserController;
class MyMethods
{
public function index()
{
$apiUserController = new ApiUserController();
$apiUserController->getList();
However, as many people have mentioned here, it is not really the best practice to call a method of one controller from the another.
So if I were at your place, I would create a helper, register its alias in config and use that helper to get the list in both places.
I hope it helps

Calling controller from other controller or other objects is not a good practice. Here is a good article explaining why. Also "fat" controllers is less preferable than "thin" controllers.
You should define a service layer object with common logic and use it. Create a service object and register it with one of service providers.
namespace App\Providers;
use Illuminate\Support\ServiceProvider;
use App\Services\YourUserService;
class AppServiceProvider extends ServiceProvider
{
public function register()
{
$this->app->singleton(YourUserService::class);
}
}
After that you can use your service in DI style.
use App\Services\YourUserService;
class MyMethods
{
protected $userService;
public function __construct(YourUserService $userService)
{
$this->userService = $userService;
}
public function index()
{
$this->userService->foo();
}
}
Why should I use dependency injection?

I agree with the answer Learner has given above, however, I wouldn't recommend it in terms of code organisation and testability.
Looking at the code, I can see that you need to get list of users and thats why you have to call the api user controller from another controller. However, you can easily extract the logic out to a service or even a trait.
if you were to use a trait then you could do some thing like following,
trait ApiUser {
public function getList()
{
// get the list for users from api
}
}
//Then you can simply use this trait any where you want,
class SomeController
{
// correct namespace for ApiUser trait
use ApiUser;
}
Another way of doing it, which i love to use again and again depending on the scenario; is to stick with the principle of coding to interface not to implementation. That would be some thing like follow.
interface ApiUserInterface
{
public function getList();
}
class ApiUser implements ApiUserInterface
{
public function getList()
{
// logic to get users from api
}
}
Make sure that when application requires the interface, it knows where to find its implementation. If you using Laravel, then you could register your interface to class in AppServiceProvider
Once that's done, you can use this service any where you want as a contract.
class OneController
{
protected $apiUserContract;
public function __construct(ApiUserInterface $apiUserContract)
{
$this->apiUserContract = $apiUserContract;
}
public function index()
{
// You can retrieve the list of the contract
$this->apiUserContract->getList();
}
}
// you could also just typehint the contact in method without requiring
// it in constructor and it will get resolved out of IOC i.e. container
class AnotherController
{
public function index(ApiUserInterface $apiUserContract)
{
// You can retrieve the list of the contract
$apiUserContract->getList();
}
}
Let me know if you need further explanation and hope it helps

Related

How to call a method service injected in another constructor service PHP Symfony

So I'm really trying to figure it out how can I do that in Symfony 5.
I have an services named PaymentRequestService which have the entire logic for requests to another application (based on microservices).
I injected PaymentRequestService in PaymentService as constructor, an service which processes data, make validation, etc.
And right now I'm trying to call from my controller an method from PaymentRequestService by using PaymentService. Something like that: $paymentService->$paymentRequestService->method.
Can someone tell me how can I do that?
Right now it looks something like that $payment = $paymentRequestService->getPaymentRequest((string)$id)
But I want to eliminate PaymentRequestService.
I dont argue the architecture you want to use... but you would do it this way:
(PHP 8 syntax)
class PaymentService
public function __construct(private PaymentRequestService $requestService)
{}
public function getRequest(): PaymentRequestService
{
return $this->requestService;
}
}
class MyController extends AbstractController
{
public function myAction(PaymentService $paymentService, Request $request): Response
{
$id = $request->get('id');
$payment = $paymentService->getRequest()->getPaymentRequest((string)$id);
return new Response('done');
}
}
you also could map specific methods to dont need the cascading - but then why you dont use the RequestService directly in the first place.
That should be doable over a getter like you have implemented currently, but why not just pass the PaymentRequestService to the controller where it is used?
e.g. $paymentRequestService->method()
Services are injectable in every class inside your application and since there is (by default) only one instance of that service running, you could just autowire it to your controller.
You have to inject service directly in controller and do data validation in PaymentService. For example:
class MyController extends AbstractController
{
private PaymentRequestService $paymentRequestService;
public function __construct(PaymentRequestService $paymentRequestService)
{
$this->paymentRequestService = $paymentRequestService;
}
public function index()
{
$this->paymentRequestService->method();
}
}

Avoid Laravel facade on controller

I'm using Laravel 5.5 and trying to get used to code by psr-2 standard (just started learning). I analyze all my code with Quafoo QA and go step by step fixing the errors and record them.
By using facades i get this error "Avoid using static access to class". Because of it i'm trying to avoid using them.
On my controller i have this code:
<?php
namespace App\Http\Controllers;
use Illuminate\Http\Request;
use App\Events\FileLoaded;
use Illuminate\Support\Facades\Input;
use Illuminate\Auth\Middleware\Authenticate;
use PhpOffice\PhpSpreadsheet\Shared\StringHelper;
use \Illuminate\Contracts\View\Factory as ViewFactory;
class LoadDataController extends Controller
{
public function index()
{
$viewfactory = app(ViewFactory::class);
return $viewfactory->make('LoadData/index');
}
//more code
}
Besides the View Facade i also use DB, Input, Validator and Storage
Is this the correct way, are there others?
You don't need to avoid Facades - they are a key part of the framework. But if you want to, you can use dependency injection to include the classes you need as arguments in the controller methods:
class LoadDataController extends Controller
{
public function index(ViewFactory $viewFactory)
{
return $viewfactory->make('LoadData/index');
}
//more code
}
Or if you need that in all the controller methods:
class LoadDataController extends Controller
{
private $viewFactory;
public function __construct(ViewFactory $viewFactory)
{
$this->viewFactory = $viewFactory;
}
public function index()
{
return $this->viewFactory->make('LoadData/index');
}
//more code
}
Of course, this doesn't actually change the functionality of the code you've written, it just rearranges it. I wouldn't take the word of the code analyzer you mentioned as something you are doing wrong. These are standard patterns to use in Laravel.

(Laravel) Dynamic dependency injection for interface, based on user input

I am currently facing a very interesting dilemma with my architecture and implementation.
I have an interface called ServiceInterface which have a method called execute()
Then I have two different implementations for this interface: Service1 and Service2, which implements the execute method properly.
I have a controller called MainController and this controller has a "type-hint" for the ServiceInterface (dependency injection), it means that both, Service1 and Service2, can be called as resolution for that dependency injection.
Now the fun part:
I do not know which of those implementations to use (Service1 or Service2) because I just know if I can use one or other based on a user input from a previous step.
It means the user choose a service and based on that value I know if a can use Service1 or Service2.
I am currently solving the dependency injection using a session value, so depending of the value I return an instance or other, BUT I really think that it is not a good way to do it.
Please, let me know if you faced something similar and, how do you solve it, or what can I do to achieve this in the right way.
Thanks in advance. Please let me know if further information is required.
Finally, after some days of researching and thinking a lot about the best approach for this, using Laravel, I finally solved it.
I have to say that this was especially difficult in Laravel 5.2 because, in this version, the Session middleware only is executed in the controllers used in a route, it means that if for some reason I used a controller (not linked for a rote) and try to get access to the session it is not going to be possible.
So, because I cannot use the session, I decided to use URL parameters. Here you have the solution approach; I hope some of you found it useful.
so, you have an interface:
interface Service
{
public function execute();
}
Then a couple of implementations for the interface:
Service one:
class ServiceOne implements Service
{
public function execute()
{
.......
}
}
Service two.
class ServiceTwo implements Service
{
public function execute()
{
.......
}
}
The interesting part is that I have a controller with a function with a dependency with the Service interface. Still, I need to resolve it dynamically to ServiceOne or ServiceTwo based on user input. So:
The controller
class MyController extends Controller
{
public function index(Service $service, ServiceRequest $request)
{
$service->execute();
.......
}
}
Please note that ServiceRequest, validated that the request already have the parameter that we need to resolve the dependency (call it 'service_name')
Now, in the AppServiceProvider we can resolve the dependency in this way:
class AppServiceProvider extends ServiceProvider
{
public function boot()
{
}
public function register()
{
//This specific dependency is going to be resolved only if
//the request has the service_name field stablished
if(Request::has('service_name'))
{
//Obtaining the name of the service to be used (class name)
$className = $this->resolveClassName(Request::get('service_name')));
$this->app->bind('Including\The\Namespace\For\Service', $className);
}
}
protected function resolveClassName($className)
{
$resolver = new Resolver($className);
$className = $resolver->resolveDependencyName();
return $className;
}
}
So now all the responsibility is for the Resolver class. This class basically use the parameter passed to the constructor to return the full name (with namespace) of the class that is going to be used as an implementation of the Service interface:
class Resolver
{
protected $name;
public function __construct($className)
{
$this->name = $className;
}
public function resolveDependencyName()
{
//This is just an example, you can use whatever as 'service_one'
if($this->name === 'service_one')
{
return Full\Namespace\For\Class\Implementation\ServiceOne::class;
}
if($this->name === 'service_two')
{
return Full\Namespace\For\Class\Implementation\ServiceTwo::class;
}
//If none, so throw an exception because the dependency can not be resolved
throw new ResolverException;
}
}
Well, I really hope it helps some of you.
Best wishes!
---------- EDIT -----------
I just realize that it is not a good idea to use the request data directly inside the container of Laravel. It really is going to cause some trouble in the long term.
The best way is to directly register all the possible instances supported (serviceone and servicetwo) and then resolve one of them directly from a controller or a middleware, so then is the controller "who decides" what service to use (from all the available) based on the input from the request.
In the end, it works at the same, but it is going to allow you to work more naturally.
I have to say thanks to rizqi, a user from the questions channel of the slack chat of Laravel.
He personally created a golden article about this. Please read it because it solves this issue completely and in a very right way.
laravel registry pattern
The fact that you define that your controller works with ServiceInterface is ok
If you have to choose the concrete implementation of the service basing on a previous step (that, as i've understood, happens in a previous request) storing the value in session or in database is right too, as you have no alternative: to choose the implementation you have to know the value of the input
The important point is to 'isolate' the resolution of the concrete implementation from the input value in one place: for example create a method that takes this value as a parameter and returns the concrete implementation of the service from the value:
public function getServiceImplementation($input_val)
{
switch($input_val)
{
case 1 : return new Service1();
case 2 : return new Service2();
}
}
and in your controller:
public function controllerMethod()
{
//create and assign the service implementation
$this->service = ( new ServiceChooser() )->getServiceImplementation( Session::get('input_val') );
}
In this example i've used a different class to store the method, but you can place the method in the controller or use a Simple Factory pattern, depending on where the service should be resolved in your application
It's an interesting problem. I'm currently using Laravel 5.5 and have been mulling it over. I also want my service provider to return a specific class (implementing an interface) based upon user input. I think it's better to manually pass the input from the controller so it's easier to see what's going on. I would also store the possible values of the class names in the config.
So based upon the Service classes and interface you've defined above i came up with this:
/config/services.php
return [
'classes': [
'service1' => 'Service1',
'service2' => 'Service2',
]
]
/app/Http/Controllers/MainController.php
public function index(ServiceRequest $request)
{
$service = app()->makeWith(ServiceInterface::class, ['service'=>$request->get('service)]);
// ... do something with your service
}
/app/Http/Requests/ServiceRequest.php
public function rules(): array
$availableServices = array_keys(config('services.classes'));
return [
'service' => [
'required',
Rule::in($availableServices)
]
];
}
/app/Providers/CustomServiceProvider.php
class CustomServiceProvider extends ServiceProvider
{
public function boot() {}
public function register()
{
// Parameters are passed from the controller action
$this->app->bind(
ServiceInterface::class,
function($app, $parameters) {
$serviceConfigKey = $parameters['service'];
$className = '\\App\\Services\\' . config('services.classes.' . $serviceConfigKey);
return new $className;
}
);
}
}
This way we can validate the input to ensure we are passing a valid service, then the controller handles passing the input from the Request object into the ServiceProvider. I just think when it comes to maintaining this code it will be clear what is going on as opposed to using the request object directly in the ServiceProvider.
PS Remember to register the CustomServiceProvider!
I find the best way to deal with this is using a factory pattern. You can create a class say ServiceFactory and it has a single method create() it can accept an argument which is used to dynamically choose which concrete class to instantiate.
It has a case statement based on the argument.
It will use App::make(ServiceOne::class) or App::make(ServiceTwo::class).depending on which one is required.
You are then able to inject this into your controller (or service which depends on the factory).
You can then mock it in a service unit test.
Recently, I had to implement a similar logic where I was to implement a method to perform mobile top-ups for multiple networks in our application. So, I decided to implement the logic using Factory and Bridge pattern. Factory to create an instance of the concrete Service class based on the user input, and then, the Bridge pattern to set closely related classes into separate hierarchies and route the request to the respective class.
In the controller's method, both Factory and Service classes are injected. The TopUpServiceFactory's create method creates an object of the concrete class. The TopUpService class then routes the request to that concrete class method.
class TopUpController extends Controller
{
public function topUp(Request $request, TopUpServiceFactoryInterface $serviceFactory, TopUpServiceInterface $topUpService)
{
$serviceFactory->create($request->networkCode);
$topUpService->TopUp($request->all());
}
}
The TopUpServiceFactoryInterface and TopUpServiceInterface are bound to TopUpServiceFactory and TopUpService concrete Classes respectively in Service Container.
class AppServiceProvider extends ServiceProvider
{
public function register()
{
$this->app->bind(TopUpServiceFactoryInterface::class, TopUpServiceFactory::class);
$this->app->bind(TopUpServiceInterface::class, TopUpService::class);
}
}
The create method accepts user input and creates an object of the respective class based on the user input.
class TopUpServiceFactory implements TopUpServiceFactoryInterface
{
public function create(string $networkCode)
{
switch ($networkCode) {
case 'network1':
app()->bind(NetworkServiceInterface::class, Network1Service::class);
break;
case 'network2':
app()->bind(NetworkServiceInterface::class, Network2Service::class);
break;
default:
app()->bind(NetworkServiceInterface::class, DefaultNetworkService::class);
break;
}
}
}
The Service Class then picks the object of NetworkService Class and forwards the request.
class TopUpService implements TopUpServiceInterface
{
public function topUp(array $requestParams)
{
$networkService = app()->get(NetworkServiceInterface::class);
$networkService->topUp($requestParams);
}
}
All network's concrete classes implement a common interface NetworkServiceInterface, which is used to inject dependency dynamically, implementing Liskov Substitution Principle
class Network1Service implements NetworkServiceInterface
{
public function topUp(array $requestParam)
{
Process Topup ......
}
}
class Network2Service implements NetworkServiceInterface
{
public function topUp(array $requestParam)
{
Process Topup ......
}
}
...

Gateway and repository pattern PHP Laravel

I wanna ask about design pattern.
Why should I use dependency injection in constructor, not import it ('use statement')?
For example:
in my controller:
class AuthController extends Controller {
public function __construct(UserGateway $userGateway)
{
$this->userGateway = $userGateway;
}
public function doSomething()
{
$this->userGateway->foo();
}
}
Why don't use just like this instead?
use Acme\UserGateway;
class AuthController extends Controller {
public function doSomething()
{
UserGateway::foo();
}
}
Many thanks.
Assuming UserGateway is not laravel facade: here's the biggest advantage of injecting stuff this way: in the future, you might redefine what UserGateway actually is, and supply some other class (most often, it's subclass) instead of it like this:
$this->app->bind(UserGateway::class, function ($app) {
return new NewUserGateway();
});
This is extremely useful for overriding some parts of your code, especially if you're using same packages across multiple projects. And it does not require you to change the AuthController's code.
If UserGateway is a Facade, the only benefit you'll get is a better code navigation with you IDE, since it will know what class exactly are you referencing (assuming that you didn't re-bound it).

Implementing ServiceLocatorAwareInterface dependency for forward() class in a ZF2 service

EDITED (Code is updated and working for others)
For the overall idea of what's happening.
I'm trying to access post data from the view in the controller, without refreshing the page.
To do this I am executing the page controller by using a ViewHelper to call the Service below which then forwards back to the controller; afterwards I can manage the posted data in the page controller.
Everything works except the last step which is the forward(), I receive the error Call to undefined method AlbumModule\Service\postAlbumService::forward()
I understand I must implement the ServiceLocatorAwareInterface in order to use the forward() class, but what I've written doesn't seem to work.
<?php
namespace AlbumModule\Service;
use Zend\ServiceManager\ServiceLocatorAwareInterface;
use Zend\ServiceManager\ServiceLocatorInterface;
class postAlbumService implements
ServiceLocatorAwareInterface
{
protected $services;
public function __construct() {
echo '<script>console.log("postAlbumService is Started")</script>';
}
public function setServiceLocator(ServiceLocatorInterface $serviceLocator)
{
$this->services = $serviceLocator;
}
public function getServiceLocator()
{
return $this->services;
}
public function test(){
$cpm = $this->getServiceLocator()->get('controllerpluginmanager');
$fwd = $cpm->get('forward');
echo '<script>console.log("postAlbumService TEST() is Started")</script>';
return $fwd->dispatch('newAlbum', array('action' => 'submitAlbum'));
}
}
It seems as though I'm just having a dependency issue with the forward() class, but I'm not sure what the issue is.
EDIT-
Here is how I am calling the postAlbumService from the viewHelper
<?php
namespace AlbumModule\View\Helper;
use Zend\View\Helper\AbstractHelper;
class invokeIndexAction extends AbstractHelper
{
protected $sm;
public function test()
{
$this->sm->getServiceLocator()->get('AlbumModule\Service\postAlbumService')->test();
}
public function __construct($sm) {
$this->sm = $sm;
}
}
Is there any way to call a specific class in the service being requested, after the dependencies are injected into the service?
You're doing a couple of things wrong and you're misunderstanding some things...
First of all, forward() is a ControllerPlugin. You'll gain access to this method by accessing said manager via the ServiceLocator. An example could be this:
$cpm = $serviceLocator->get('controllerpluginmanager');
$fwd = $cpm->get('forward');
return $fwd->dispatch('foo/bar');
Now, to get the ServiceLocator into any of your Service-Classes you need Dependency Injection. One of the ways is to implement the ServiceLocatorAwareInterface. The ServiceManager of ZF2 has so called Listeners. These Listeners check for implemented interfaces and stuff like this. Whenever it finds a match, it injects the required dependencies via the interfaces given functions. The workflow looks like this:
ServiceManager get('FooBar');
$ret = new FooBar();
foreach (Listener)
if $ret instanceof Listener
doInjectDependenciesInto($ret)
end
end
return $ret
Now what does this tell you. This tells you, that within the __construct() of any of your classes NONE of your required dependencies are actually there. They only get injected AFTER the class/service has been instantiated.
On a last side-note, the given code example doesn't really make much sense ;) No matter what ServiceAction i'd like to access, you'd always return me to the "newAlbum" action...

Categories