I have a notes model. Which has a polymorphic 'noteable' method that ideally anything can use. Probably up to 5 different models such as Customers, Staff, Users etc can use.
I'm looking for the best possible solution for creating the note against these, as dynamically as possible.
At the moment, i'm adding on a query string in the routes. I.e. when viewing a customer there's an "Add Note" button like so:
route('note.create', ['customer_id' => $customer->id])
In my form then i'm checking for any query string's and adding them to the post request (in VueJS) which works.
Then in my controller i'm checking for each possible query string i.e.:
if($request->has('individual_id'))
{
$individual = Individual::findOrFail($request->individual_id_id);
// store against individual
// return note
}elseif($request->has('customer_id'))
{
$customer = Customer::findOrFail($request->customer_id);
// store against the customer
// return note
}
I'm pretty sure this is not the best way to do this. But, i cannot think of another way at the moment.
I'm sure someone else has come across this in the past too!
Thank you
In order to optimize your code, dont add too many if else in your code, say for example if you have tons of polymorphic relationship then will you add tons of if else ? will you ?,it will rapidly increase your code base.
Try instead the follwing tip.
when making a call to backend do a maping e.g
$identifier_map = [1,2,3,4];
// 1 for Customer
// 2 for Staff
// 3 for Users
// 4 for Individual
and so on
then make call to note controller with noteable_id and noteable_identifier
route('note.create', ['noteable_id' => $id, 'noteable_identifier' => $identifier_map[0]])
then on backend in your controller you can do something like
if($request->has('noteable_id') && $request->has('noteable_identifier'))
{
$noteables = [ 'Customers', 'Staff', 'Users','Individual']; // mapper for models,add more models.
$noteable_model = app('App\\'.$noteables[$request->noteable_identifier]);
$noteable_model::findOrFail($request->noteable_id);
}
so with these lines of code your can handle tons of polymorphic relationship.
Not sure about the best way but I have a similar scenario to yours and this is the code that I use.
my form actions looks like this
action="{{ route('notes.store', ['model' => 'Customer', 'id' => $customer->id]) }}"
action="{{ route('notes.store', ['model' => 'User', 'id' => $user->id]) }}"
etc..
And my controller looks this
public function store(Request $request)
{
// Build up the model string
$model = '\App\Models\\'.$request->model;
// Get the requester id
$id = $request->id;
if ($id) {
// get the parent
$parent = $model::find($id);
// validate the data and create the note
$parent->notes()->create($this->validatedData());
// redirect back to the requester
return Redirect::back()->withErrors(['msg', 'message']);
} else {
// validate the data and create the note without parent association
Note::create($this->validatedData());
// Redirect to index view
return redirect()->route('notes.index');
}
}
protected function validatedData()
{
// validate form fields
return request()->validate([
'name' => 'required|string',
'body' => 'required|min:3',
]);
}
The scenario as I understand is:
-You submit noteable_id from the create-form
-You want to remove if statements on the store function.
You could do that by sending another key in the request FROM the create_form "noteable_type". So, your store route will be
route('note.store',['noteableClass'=>'App\User','id'=>$user->id])
And on the Notes Controller:
public function store(Request $request)
{
return Note::storeData($request->noteable_type,$request->id);
}
Your Note model will look like this:
class Note extends Model
{
public function noteable()
{
return $this->morphTo();
}
public static function storeData($noteableClass,$id){
$noteableObject = $noteableClass::find($id);
$noteableObject->notes()->create([
'note' => 'test note'
]);
return $noteableObject->notes;
}
}
This works for get method on store. For post, form submission will work.
/**
* Store a newly created resource in storage.
*
* #param \Illuminate\Http\Requests\NoteStoreRequest $request
* #return \Illuminate\Http\Response
*/
public function store(NoteStoreRequest $request) {
// REF: NoteStoreRequest does the validation
// TODO: Customize this suffix on your own
$suffix = '_id';
/**
* Resolve model class name.
*
* #param string $name
* #return string
*/
function modelNameResolver(string $name) {
// TODO: Customize this function on your own
return 'App\\Models\\'.Str::ucfirst($name);
}
foreach ($request->all() as $key => $value) {
if (Str::endsWith($key, $suffix)) {
$class = modelNameResolver(Str::beforeLast($key, $suffix));
$noteable = $class::findOrFail($value);
return $noteable->notes()->create($request->validated());
}
}
// TODO: Customize this exception response
throw new InternalServerException;
}
Related
In my CI4 learning, I have started by trying to simulate user sign in functionality. I have a Controller, two Views (not shown here, but really simply pages- one a pretty much just single form, and the other one a “blank” success HTML page), a set of custom rules in the Validation.php file, and a CustomRule.php file with the first of the methods that will implement all my custom rules (which, ultimately, I’d like to have all set in the Validation.php file). For lack of a better idea, I’ve stuck the CustomRules.php file in the app\Config\ folder.
Here is my problem:
For the life of me, I can’t figure out how to get the Validation service to pass additional parameters (from the form) to my custom rules function called ‘user_validated’. The CI4 documentation describes what the custom function needs to cater for when accepting additional parameters, but not how to trigger the Validation service to pass these additional parameters to one’s custom function… so although ‘user_validated’ is called, only ‘user_email_offered’ is ever passed as in as a string- nothing else goes in, from what I can tell. How do I get around this?
I have tried inserting < $validation->setRuleGroup('user_signin'); > before the call to validate, but found that I could move the setting of the rule group into the call to validate, using: $validationResult = $this->validate('user_signin'), which seemed to do the same, and which doesn't seem to work without the rule-group as a parameter (?). This still doesn't seem to be what triggers the additional data to be passed to the custom rule's method.
Extracts from my hack are appended below.
I’d be very grateful one of you knowledgeable folk could please point me in the right direction.
In app\Controllers\SignupTest.php:
<?php
namespace App\Controllers;
use CodeIgniter\Controller;
class SignupTest extends BaseController
{
public function index() { // redirection from the default to signup(), signin(), ...
return $this->signup();
}
public function signup() {
helper(['form']);
$validation = \Config\Services::validation();
if ($this->request->getPost()) { // still TBD: any different to using $this->request->getGetPost() ?
$validationResult = $this->validate('user_signin'); // set the rules to use: 'user_signin', 'user_signup'
if (!$validationResult) {
$validationErrors = $validation->getErrors();
return view('SignupTestView', $validationErrors); // redisplay simple html form view with list of validation errors
} else {
return view('SignupTestViewSuccess'); // display view to show success
}
} else {
return view('SignupTestView'); // initial display, in the event of there being no POST data
}
}
}
In \app\Config\CustomRules.php:
<?php
namespace Config;
use App\Models\UserModel;
//--------------------------------------------------------------------
// Custom Rule Functions
//--------------------------------------------------------------------
class CustomRules
{
public function user_validated(string $str, string $fields = NULL, array $data = NULL, string &$error = NULL) : bool{
$user_email_offered = $str;
$user_password_offered = ''; // to be extracted using $fields = explode(',', $fields), but $fields is never provided in the call to this user_validated method
if (($user_email_offered !== NULL) && ($user_password_offered !== NULL)) {
$usermodel = new UserModel(); // intended to create a UserEntity to permit connectivity to the database
$user_found = $usermodel->find($user_email_offered); // we're going to assume that user_email is unique (which is a rule configured in the database table)
if ($user_found === NULL) { // check if user exists before doing the more involved checks in the else-if section below, which may throw exceptions if there's nothing to compare (?)
...
}
}
In \app\Config\Validation.php:
?php
namespace Config;
class Validation
{
//--------------------------------------------------------------------
// Setup
//--------------------------------------------------------------------
/**
* Stores the classes that contain the
* rules that are available.
*
* #var array
*/
public $ruleSets = [
\CodeIgniter\Validation\Rules::class,
\CodeIgniter\Validation\FormatRules::class,
\CodeIgniter\Validation\FileRules::class,
\CodeIgniter\Validation\CreditCardRules::class,
\Config\CustomRules::class,
];
/**
* Specifies the views that are used to display the
* errors.
*
* #var array
*/
public $templates = [
'list' => 'CodeIgniter\Validation\Views\list',
'single' => 'CodeIgniter\Validation\Views\single',
];
//--------------------------------------------------------------------
// Custom Rules
//--------------------------------------------------------------------
/* configurable limits for validation rules array below*/
const user_email_min_lenth = 9;
const user_email_max_lenth = 50;
const user_password_min_lenth = 6;
const user_password_max_lenth = 25;
public $user_signin = [
'user_email' => [
'label' => 'e-mail address',
'rules' => 'trim|required|valid_email|user_validated', // user_validated is custom rule, that will have a custom error message
'errors' => [
'required' => 'You must provide an {field}',
'valid_email' => 'Please enter a valid {field}',
]
],
'user_password' => [
'label' => 'password',
'rules' => 'trim|required',
'errors' => [
'required' => 'Enter a {field} to sign in',
'user_password_check' => 'No such user/{field} combination found',
]
Calling custom rule with parameters should be exactly the same as calling CI4's regular rules. Let's get for example "required_without". You use it like in this example:
$validation->setRule('username', 'Username', 'required_without[id,email]');
And the function is declared as so:
public function required_without($str = null, string $fields, array $data): bool
{
$fields = explode(',', $fields);
//...
}
where $str - this is your main field, $fields - string, packing a comma-separated array.
As for Grouping rules, you do not need to group rules to be able to use custom rules with parameters.
If you have only 2 fields to test against you can go a bit cheaper, which will not be perfect but still works:
Function:
public function myrule(string $mainfield, string $fieldtotestwith): bool
{
//doing stuff
}
Validating rule:
$validation->setRule('somemainfield', 'Something', 'myrule[somesecondfield]');
I want to pass $params['user_id'] to $fieldValidations and check if the hour is unique for specific user_id not for all hours hour in the database table
I created a model post
class Post extends Model
{
protected $fillable = ['user_id', 'hour'];
public static $fieldValidations = [
'user_id' => 'required',
'hour' => 'required|date_format:Y-m-d H:i:s|unique:post,hour,NULL,user_id,'
];
}
and a controller post
class PostController extends Controller
{
/**
* Display a listing of the resource.
*
* #return \Illuminate\Http\Response
*/
public function index(Request $request)
{
$params = $request->all();
$params['user_id'] = 12;
$validator = Validator::make($params, Post::$fieldValidations);
if ($validator->fails()) {
return Response::json($validator->errors()->all(), 422);
}
}
}
I don't think you can do this using the unique validation rule. From Laravel 5.7 documentation:
The field under validation must be unique in a given database table.
Note it says table and not column.
You may have to just query the database and return a JSON response error if it fails. Also, in your current code inside the validation rules, you are specifying that user_id is the primary id key column in the post table. I think that is likely an error and should be removed, even though it's irrelevant given that you can't accomplish what you want using the unique rule. Also, you ended the rule with a comma.
if (Post::where(['user_id' => $params['user_id'], 'hour' => $params['hour']])->exists()) {
return response()->json(['status' => 'error', 'msg' => 'Error', 'errors' => ['hour_error' => ['That hour already exists on the user!']]], 422);
}
Lastly, instead of using $params = $request->all(), I prefer to use the request() helper function and just inline it into the rest of the code. But, that's up to you.
I am building an application that uses the repository pattern. Now what I have done is reuse functionality but I have hit a bit of a hiccup. I have one view that shows several different models on it. These models are related through a one-to-one relationship (MovieBasic to MovieDetail) and one-to-many relationship (MovieBasic to MoviePersonnel). The issue I am having is that I have two different request to validate my forms. They are MovieBasicRequest, which validates my movie's basic information (Title, synopsis) and MovieDetailRequest, which validates my movie's detail information (price, screen type, runtime, etc). So to distinguish between which request to use I have added a parameter to my url as follows:
movie_basic.blade.php
<?php $params = ['id' => $movie->id, 'type' => 'movie_basic']; ?>
<h4>Movie Baiscs <span class="pull-right">Edit</span></h4>
<hr>
<table class="table table-bordered">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>{{ $movie->movie_title}}</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>{{ $movie->movie_synopsis }}</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
I know that using the <?php ?> tags is not best practice but I will clean that up later. So because of my $params the URL will look like so
www.moviesite.dev/1/edit?movie_basic
Which will call the edit function in the controller like so
MovieController.php
/**
* Show the form for editing the specified resource.
*
* #param int $id
* #return Response
*/
public function edit($id)
{
$movie = $this->movieBasic->find($id);
return view('cms.edit', compact('movie', 'type'));
}
In this case the type does not really play a role because of the relationship between MovieBasic and MovieDetail models. However it does play a role in my update function below:
MovieController.php
/**
* Update the specified resource in storage.
*
* #param int $id, MovieBasicRequest $request
* #return Response
*/
public function update($id)
{
if(strcmp($_GET['type'], 'movie_basic') == 0)
{
$movie = $this->movieBasic->find($id);
$this->request = new MovieBasicRequest;
$this->movieBasic->update($id, $this->request);
}
elseif(strcmp($_GET['type'], 'movie_detail') == 0)
{
$movie = $this->movieBasic->find($id);
$this->request = new MovieDetailRequest;
$this->movieDetail->update($id, $this->request);
}
return redirect()->action('MovieController#show', compact('movie'));
}
Essentially what this function does is determine what is being passed in and from there call the correct request. However the way I have it now it just creates an empty array and thus validates nothing. Is there any way to uses these requests to validate information passed in? Or to validate input before I pass it to the update function of the repository?
PS. I have also tried this:
$this->movieBasic->update($id, MovieBasicRequest $request);
but I get an "Undefined variable $request" error.
You should better combine them. And you can use sometimes on your form validation for handling both where you will only validate present fields. So that your MovieRequest can be like below
class MovieRequest extends Request
{
public function authorize()
{
return true;
}
public function rules()
{
return [
'movie_title' => 'sometimes|required|min:3',
'price' => 'sometimes|required|integer'
// and so on
];
}
}
So you can update your controller as below and use for the both pages. For instance, if the price is not set within the request, then it will skip validating it, but if it's present and empty, then it will throw an error message as it's required.
public function update($id, MovieRequest $request)
{
$movie = $this->Movie->find($id);
$movie->fill($request->all());
$movie->save();
return redirect()->action('MovieController#show', compact('movie'));
}
I just start learning Laravel 5, and I want to know what the proper way to handle submitted forms. I found many tutorials where we create two separate actions, where first render form, and the second actually handle form. I am came from Symfony2, where we create a single action for both, render and handle submitted form, so I want to know I need to create two separate actions because thats Laravel-way, or I can place all logic into single action, I do this like the folowing, but I dont like code what I get:
public function create(Request $request)
{
if (Input::get('title') !== null) {
$v = Validator::make($request->all(), [
'title' => 'required|unique:posts',
'content' => 'required',
]);
if ($v->fails()) {
return redirect()->back()->withErrors($v->errors());
}
$post = new Post(Input::all());
if ($post->save()) {
return redirect('posts');
}
}
return view('add_post');
}
So can somebody give me advice how I need do this properly? Thanks!
One of the most important reason to create two actions is to avoid duplicate form submissions . You can read more about Post/Redirect/Get pattern.
Another important reason is the way you keep the code cleaner. Take a look at this first change:
public function showForm(){
return view('add_post');
}
public function create(Request $request)
{
$v = Validator::make($request->all(), [
'title' => 'required|unique:posts',
'content' => 'required',
]);
if ($v->fails()) {
return redirect()->back()->withErrors($v->errors());
}
$post = new Post(Input::all());
if ($post->save()) {
return redirect('posts');
}
return redirect()->route('show_form')->withMessage();
}
The first thing that you can notice is that create() function is not rendering any view, it is used to manage the creation logic (as the name itself suggests). That is OK if you plan to stay in low-profile, but what happens when you do need to add some others validations or even better, re-utilize the code in other controllers. For example, your form is a help tool to publish a comment and you want to allow only "authors-ranked" users to comment. This consideration can be manage more easily separating the code in specific actions instead making an if-if-if-if spaghetti. Again...
public function showForm(){
return view('add_post');
}
public function create(PublishPostRequest $request)
{
$post = new Post($request->all());
$post->save()
return redirect('posts');
}
Take a look on how PublishPostRequest request takes place in the appropriated function. Finally, in order to get the best of Laravel 5 you could create a request class to keep all the code related with validation and authorization inside it:
class PublishPostRequest extends Request{
public function rules(){
return [
'title' => 'required|unique:posts',
'content' => 'required',
]
}
public function authorize(){
$allowedToPost = \Auth::user()->isAuthor();
// if the user is not an author he can't post
return $allowedToPost;
}
}
One nice thing about custom request class class is that once is injected in the controller via function parameter, it runs automatically, so you do not need to worry about $v->fails()
I have the 2 simple tables below:
CUSTOMERS
id, email
CLAIMS
id, customer_id(fk), description
I created the related models (Customers.php and Claims.php) and set-up relationships: hasOne() and belongsTo().
I also have my related RESTful controllers ready: CustomersController.php and ClaimsController.php.
What would be the best solution if I need to create/update records in both tables by submitting one form? Create one general controller? Mix models?
I have been searching in Laravel docs and on Google and still have no idea how to achieve this.
Customer model
public function claims(){
return $this->hasMany('App\Claims');
}
Claims model
public function customer(){
return $this->belongsTo('App\Customer');
}
Now in controller u need to send request in store action
Something like this
class CreateCustomerClaim extends Request {
/**
* Determine if the user is authorized to make this request.
*
* #return bool
*/
public function authorize()
{
return true;
}
/**
* Get the validation rules that apply to the request.
*
* #return array
*/
public function rules()
{
return [
'email' => 'required',
'description'=> 'required'
];
}
}
Now in store action send your request, grab data from request and insert it in db
public function store(CreateCustomerClainsRextends $request)
{
//example
$customer= new Customer($request->all());
Auth::user()->claims()->save($customer);
}
if u need to update use same request in update function, when u grab data from request just use update. Here is example where i update 3 different tables from one request
public function update($id,ArtikalUpdateRequest $request)
{
$article = Artikal::findOrFail($id);
if($article !== null){
$article->update($request->all());
\DB::table('artikal_podkategorija')
->where('artikal_id', $article->id)
->update(array('podkategorija_id' => $request['podkategorija']));
\DB::table('arikalslike')
->where('artikal_id', $article->id)
->update(array('NazivSlike' => $request['NazivSlike']));
$slika = \DB::table('arikalslike')
->where('artikal_id', $article->id)->first();
$image = Request::file('image');
//dd($image);
if($image != null){
$destinationPath = 'uploads/artiklislike/';
$thumb = $slika->SifraSlike;
$fileName = $thumb;
$nazivthumb = $slika->NazivThumb;
$slika->NazivSlike = $request['NazivSlike'];
$slika->NazivThumb = $nazivthumb;
$slika->SifraSlike = $fileName;
$slika->artikal_id = $article->id;
//Snima sliku
$img = Image::make(Input::file('image'));
$destinationPath = $destinationPath.$fileName;
Image::make($img)->save($destinationPath);
// Snima sliku u manjem formatu thumb
$destinationPath = 'uploads/artiklislike/';
$img = Image::make(Input::file('image'));
$destinationPath = $destinationPath.$nazivthumb;
Image::make($img)->resize(300, 200)->save($destinationPath);
}
}
return redirect('artikli')->with(['flash_message' => 'Uspiješno ste obrisali artikal!']);
}