I want to install and run laravel octane roadrunner using docker. Necessary environment that is needed to build docker container is setup like docker desktop, wsl 2 layer, php 8.
This is my Dockerfile:
this is my docker-compose.yml file :
this is my docker desktop log error:
I think you forgot to install and run roadrunner binary file in the docker container.
Add these two lines on top of your file.
FROM ghcr.io/roadrunner-server/roadrunner:latest AS roadrunner
COPY --from=roadrunner /usr/bin/rr /usr/local/bin/rr
Either I miss something, or the whole chain lacks something.
Here's my assumption:
The whole point of containerization in development, is to reduce the cost of environment setup, and create a prepared image with all the required pieces.
So, when I read that Laravel Sail is installing laravel via containerization, I get excited. Thus I install it via their instructions, and everything works.
Then the problem begins. Because:
After a successful installation, I create a git repo, with GitHub's default laravel .gitignore
Then I push the newly installed laravel app into my git repo.
Then I ask a developer to start developing it. Please note that:
He does not have PHP installed
He does not have Composer installed
He clonse the repo, and as per installation guide, runs ./vendor/bin/sail up
But ./vender folder is correctly excluded in .gitignore
Thus his command results in:
bash: ./vendor/bin/sail: No such file or directory
He Googles it of course, and finds out that people suggest to run composer update
He goes to install composer, then before that PHP, then all extensoins of PHP, then ...
Do I miss something here? The whole point of containerization was to not install the required environment locally.
What is the proper way of running a laravel app, that is not installed from https://laravel.build, but is cloned from a git repo, WITHOUT having PHP or Composer installed locally?
Update
I found Bitnami laravel docker and it's exactly what containers should be.
You are right and the other developer doesn't need to have php nor composer installed.
All he/she needs is Docker installed on the local machine.
If you scaffolded the project with what is mentioned in the official Laravel docs under the Getting started section, then you will have a docker-compose.yml file in your project root directory.
For Windows
For Linux
For Mac OS
All the developer has to do after git cloning the repository is to run
docker-compose up --build -d
That's it.
For those struggling with this issue... I've found a command that work perfectly fine.
First of all, you don't need to locally have any PHP or Composer installed, maybe there is a misunderstanding about it, all you need is Docker.
Docker will install everything you need in something I understand is like a sandbox, not locally, for each project.
And for those downloaded projects, from GIT as example, that does not have vendor folder, and obviously cannot execute sail up you can simple execute:
docker run --rm --interactive --tty -v $(pwd):/app composer install
That command will download a composer image for docker, if you do not have one yet. Then, will run a composer install and you are free to execute a ./vendor/bin/sail up if you hadn't configured an alias or just sail up if you already configure an alias.
That's all.
The official documentation lists the following command.
docker run --rm \
-u "$(id -u):$(id -g)" \
-v $(pwd):/var/www/html \
-w /var/www/html \
laravelsail/php81-composer:latest \
composer install --ignore-platform-reqs
If you were to clone a Laravel project and run this command in the project root, it would create a very small container with php and composer installed and run composer in the project root to install all php dependencies. In effect, this installs the Laravel core code into the cloned project. Once the project in set up this way, the user should create a local .env file to match their development evironment.
cp .env.example .env # creates a .env file to be populated for the local environment
With the envronment set up, they can now create the application containers in docker and run the application. Laravel provides the Sail helper for this.
./vendor/bin/sail up -d # runs the docker containers in detached mode
Now it's a matter of setting up the laravel app and running the Laravel app. (I'm assuming the app uses one of the Laravel start kits that rely on Node.js. If you are using a Blade only application, you can skip the "npm" commands.)
sail artisan key:generate # (Best Practice) Generate a new application key on each machine
sail artisan migrate # Scaffold the database structure
sail artisan db:seed # (Optional) Seed the database with data
sail npm install # (Optional) Install front-end dependencies (Inertia, Vue, React, others...)
sail npm run dev # (Optional) Run the front-end framework in development mode
With this, the new developer should be running an exact copy of both the project and the development environment as the original developer.
Your project README may include additional steps to set up some other dependencies, but this is the basic workflow for contributing to a Laravel project.
The only prerequisites for this workflow is to have Docker installed with an Internet connection. This is most easily accomplished on Windows, Mac, and Linux by installing Docker Desktop.
Alternate for Older Projects
If you are working on an older project that doesn't use Laravel Sail, but does have a docker-compose.yml file, you should be able to build and run the necessary containers with the following command.
docker-compose up --build -d
Once you have the containers running, you would need to install the project dependencies directly into the container.
docker ps # find the container ID of your project's container
docker exec -it CONTAINER_ID php artisan key:generate
docker exec -it CONTAINER_ID php artisan migrate
docker exec -it CONTAINER_ID php artisan db:seed
docker exec -it CONTAINER_ID npm install
docker exec -it CONTAINER_ID npm run dev
Of course, Docker Desktop simplifies this process. With a button click you can have a terminal shell open directly in your container eliminating the need for the docker exec command.
I have a new job as a vulnerability and load tester at a company that makes and runs ecommerce sites for apparel companies in Japan. I don't have a degree in computer science (some first and second year credits) so I'm struggling quite a bit.
First, I gitcloned the repo to my local machine.
Next, are the instructions on our company Bitbucket as follows:
install aws-cli
install composer
install npm
log in to ecr:
$(aws ecr get-login --region ap-northeast-1 --no-include-email)
Get the local environment running with this command:
If there is no SDK in the local directory, set it using "how to update SDK to the newest version"
move to php source directory
cd php/ef
edit composer npm
composer install
npm install
(the contents of package.json package.json.lock have been somewhat edited)
npm run dev
cd ../..
# set environment variables
export CUSTOMER_NAME=javag(choose the client)
# docker-compose
docker-compose -f docker-compose.yml -f docker-compose.local.yml up
After a short while, php-fpm starts up. Check http://localhost:8000/
You can show changes to files in php/ds3-base-pre by reloading.
I apologize for the poor translation from Japanese but basically (from my low knowledge level) I think this ecommerce site is being run in a Docker container in an EC2 instance with Nginx (redis server) as the server and PHP7-fpm as the version of PHP that can be used? I'm new to web and the only thing I've done so far is to get simple MVC examples running on a local server.
However, my question is, how can I open Laravel inside this container so that all the folders on the left side of my editor like below:
I want this so writing Laravel tests would be more organized as I am somewhat accustomed to the folder structure of Laravel and also so I can use the php artisan commands to run tests.
I apologize for such a wordy question but I was thrown this task and really I am having to start at Docker for beginner (and beginner level for every technology mentioned above pretty much) so any guidance is welcome.
Edit:
I opened the /php/ef directory locally with subl ef command and sure enough I have it Laravel style (folders on the side bar).
My current setup involve PhpStorm IDE in which I have imported Symfony 3 projects which is basically CLI tool. On the host machine I don't have PHP installed so I'm running the application from Docker container which has PHP and Xdebug installed.
I don't have issues to debug web applications from Docker containers but with Symfony and this CLI tool it seems a little bit more tricky.
My question is how to properly set this up and debug it from PhpStorm? I tried to create a new debug configuration (PHP Remote Debug) but breakpoints are not trigged.
Suppossing you have followed into the instructions mentioned into the following links:
Can't connect PhpStorm with xdebug with Docker
How to setup Docker + PhpStorm + xdebug on Ubuntu 16.04
Or similar questions
Then you need to follow theese steps:
Step1:
Get shell access to your container via running:
docker exec -ti ^container_id^ /bin/sh
Or if running a debian/ubuntu based one (or you installed manually bash):
docker exec -ti ^container_id^ /bin/bash
The ^container_id^ can be found via docker ps command it is the first column of the table. If running on a small window just pipe int into less -S resulting the command:
docker ps | less -S
Then export the following enviromental variables:
export PHP_IDE_CONFIG="serverName=0.0.0.0:5092"
export XDEBUG_CONFIG="idekey=PHPSTORM"
Please keep in mind to setup the correct value specified into Servers section as you see in the image:
It is important in order not to run into the problem specified in this question.
Then just enable debugger listentin into the phpstorm and spawn the cli as you do when you run a symfony application.
So I recently discovered docker and vagrant, and I'm starting a new Php project in which I want to use both:
Vagrant in order to have a interchangeable environment that all the developers can use.
Docker for production, but also inside the vagrant machine so the development environment resembles the production one as closely as possible.
The first approach is to have all the definition files together with the source code in the same repository with this layout:
/docker
/machine1-web_server
/Dockerfile
/machine2-db_server
/Dockerfile
/machineX
/Dockerfile
/src
/app
/public
/vendors
/vagrant
/Vagrantfile
So the vagrant machine, on provision, runs all docker "machines" and sets databases and source code properly.
Is this a good approach? I'm still trying to figure out how this will work in terms of deployment to production.
Is this a good approach?
Yes, at least it works for me since a few months now.
The difference is that I also have a docker-compose.yml file.
In my Vagrantfile there is a 1st provisioning section that installs docker, pip and docker-compose:
config.vm.provision "shell", inline: <<-SCRIPT
if ! type docker >/dev/null; then
echo -e "\n\n========= installing docker..."
curl -sL https://get.docker.io/ | sh
echo -e "\n\n========= installing docker bash completion..."
curl -sL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dotcloud/docker/master/contrib/completion/bash/docker > /etc/bash_completion.d/docker
adduser vagrant docker
fi
if ! type pip >/dev/null; then
echo -e "\n\n========= installing pip..."
curl -sk https://bootstrap.pypa.io/get-pip.py | python
fi
if ! type docker-compose >/dev/null; then
echo -e "\n\n========= installing docker-compose..."
pip install -U docker-compose
echo -e "\n\n========= installing docker-compose command completion..."
curl -sL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/docker/compose/$(docker-compose --version | awk 'NR==1{print $NF}')/contrib/completion/bash/docker-compose > /etc/bash_completion.d/docker-compose
fi
SCRIPT
and finally a provisioning section that fires docker-compose:
config.vm.provision "shell", inline: <<-SCRIPT
cd /vagrant
docker-compose up -d
SCRIPT
There are other ways to build and start docker containers from vagrant, but using docker-compose allows me to externalize any docker specificities out of my Vagrantfile. As a result this Vagrantfile can be reused for other projects without changes ; you would just have to provide a different docker-compose.yml file.
An other thing I do differently is to put the Vagrantfile at the root of your project (and not in a vagrant directory) as it is a place humans and tools (some IDE) expect to find it. PyCharm does, PhpStorm probably does.
I also put my docker-compose.yml file at the root of my projects.
In the end, for developing I just go to my project directory and fire up vagrant which tells docker-compose to (eventually build then) run the docker containers.
I'm still trying to figure out how this will work in terms of deployment to production.
For deploying to production, a common practice is to provide your docker images to the ops team by publishing them on a private docker registry. You can either host such a registry on your own infrastructure or use online services that provides them such as Docker Hub.
Also provide the ops team a docker-compose.yml file that will define how to run the containers and link them. Note that this file should not make use of the build: instruction but rely instead on the image: instruction. Who wants to build/compile stuff while deploying to production?
This Docker blog article can help figuring out how to use docker-compose and docker-swarm to deploy on a cluster.
I recommend to use docker for development too, in order to get full replication of dependencies. Docker Compose is the key tool.
You can use an strategy like this:
docker-compose.yml
db:
image: my_database_image
ports: ...
machinex:
image: my_machine_x_image
web:
build: .
volumes:
- '/path/to/my/php/code:/var/www'
In your Dockerfile you can specify the dependencies to run your PHP code.
Also, i recommend to keep my_database_image and my_machine_x_image projects separated with their Dockerfiles because perfectly can be used with another projects.
If you are using Mac, you are already using a VM called boot2docker
I hope this helps.