Is there any way to bind trait to class dinamically? [duplicate] - php

Simple question, is it possible to dynamically add traits to a php class in runtime without using eval?

As Glavic said, you can't without using eval() or reflection hacks (and I'm not even sure about that).
But it's very unlikely you really need to.
You can achieve a lot with dynamic class composition (composing a class with some functionality you want into another class). That's simply a matter of putting a reference to the class with the desired functionality into a variable in the hosting class.
class SomeClassWithNeededFunctionality {}
class SomeClassThatNeedsTheFunctionalityOfTheOtherClass {
private $serviceClass = NULL;
public function __construct (SomeClassWithNeededFunctionality $serviceClass) {
$this -> serviceClass = $serviceClass;
}
}

No.
p.s. you can have them in standalone files, and use include() ?

Related

Can methods be defined outside of a class?

I'm just getting into using classes in php and am coming from a C++ background. Literally every example I've seen shows methods being defined inside of the class definition, and I'm wondering if I can define my class methods outside of the class definition in order to improve readability?
Sort of. PHP 5.4 itroduced traits which is about as close as you're gonna get.
Yes you can in PHP. The function body for class methods can be put fully into external files:
class foo
{
function bar() {
include('import_method_body.php');
}
}
This works since ages.
In short, NO you can't do that;
In php every mothod should be inside the class. And that is why php isn't considered to be fully OOP language by some developers i have seen.

Change the content of PHP classes and methods at runtime, with Reflection?

This is for fun only, don't scream please.
I would like to rewrite the content of a class's methods at runtime (I mean, without modifying the file, only replacing/editing the code in memory), is that possible?
Using reflection, or anything else?
Don't close this question please, I'm looking for another answer than runkit.
Why not simply create a new class that inherits from the one you want to modify and overwrite it's methods?
<?php
class MySimpleXML extends SimpleXMLElement {
public function themethodiwanttooverwrite() {
//...
}
}
?>
As long as the method isn't marked as final...

How do I Use Inner Classes in PHP?

I'm from a Java background, and I want to use an inner class in php. Every time I put the inner class though, I get a syntax error. Is this possible with PHP? Also, how do I reference the outer class? Do I get access to ALL its data members?
<?php
class OuterClass {
var $x = 15;
function __construct() {
}
class InnerClass { // error when InnerClass is static
function __construct() { // error when InnerClass is static
echo $x;
}
}
}
?>
This is used for a MoveClass (as in make a move) of a specific card game. I think it'd be good design to put these classes together because they don't make sense apart. Also, the MoveClass needs to know about some data members of the Game class. Why not make it a function? It's simply too big.
Edit:
What about nested classes? From what I understand, those have to be static? O_o
PHP does not allow for inner classes. Should you wish to access all of the data members from the parent class, I would suggest you employ Inheritance.
A possible alternative:
class OuterClass {
var $x = 15;
function __construct() {
}
}
class ChildClass extends OuterClass {
function __construct() {
parent::__construct();
}
}
You can envoke a method form the parent class by referring to the class itself; In PHP you can do this with the parent keyword. So, to refer to a method in the context of a class rather than an object we use :: as opposed to ->.
in PHP 5.4 or later, you can use PHP Traits which are designed more for multiple inheritance, but may suit your needs. From the PHP Documentation:
A Trait is similar to a class, but only intended to group
functionality in a fine-grained and consistent way. It is not possible
to instantiate a Trait on its own. It is an addition to traditional
inheritance and enables horizontal composition of behavior; that is,
the application of class members without requiring inheritance.
http://php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.traits.php
As mentioned in comments to this answer from another question, the PHP version of this functionality has been added in PHP 7. It does not seem to provide exactly what you are asking for. However, it should provide you a similar design pattern.
Here's the RFC describing how it works: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/anonymous_classes
As mentioned in the other answer's comments, search the RFC page for "nested" to see an example of nesting inside an outer class.
You might want to use a stdClass instead. Here's an SO question about it: What is stdClass in PHP?
You can't nest classes like that.
Look at the "extends" section of the manual.

Using classes in PHP to store function

I need some advise on my PHP code organisation.
I need classes where I can store different functions, and I need access to those classes in different parts of my project. Making an object of this classes each time is too sadly, so I've found a two ways have to solve it.
First is to use static methods, like
class car {
public static $wheels_count = 4;
public static function change_wheels_count($new_count) {
car::$wheels_count = $new_count;
} }
Second is to use singleton pattern:
class Example {
// Hold an instance of the class
private static $instance;
// The singleton method
public static function singleton()
{
if (!isset(self::$instance)) {
$c = __CLASS__;
self::$instance = new $c;
}
return self::$instance;
} }
But author of the article about singletons said, that if I have too much singletons in my code I should reconstruct it. But I need a lot of such classes.
Can anybody explain pros and cons of each way? Which is mostly used? Are there more beautiful ways?
See this excellent post:
Singleton Pattern vs Static Classes
More Resources:
How Bad Are Singletons?
Static DB class vs DB singleton object
When you say that you need to use a class of some sort to store functions, I am presuming that you'd normally be fine using plain functions but you do not want to pollute the global scope. This problem you will run into all the time in PHP.
If you are lucky to be working with PHP 5.3 you can use namespaces to pull the functions out of the global scope. Effectively, namespaces serve as a convenient way to auto-complete the prefixes you would normally have on functions to try and ensure their uniqueness. Because of this primitive implementation, there is no access control available for namespaces. If you wish to design an interface, you are out of luck, as all functions are globally accessible.
In this case, use a static class. No, it is certainly not the most beautiful solution but it is literally the best PHP can offer. With a static class you can effectively both prefix your functions for uniqueness and use access control.
Singletons are an object-oriented concept that solve a different problem. If your original design involves no objects, don't introduce them now.
That said, you have a function called change_wheels_count(). This function has a notion of state, and whenever you need state you need an object. I do not know if your code was just a quick example or your actual situation. If it was your actual situation, I would say you need neither a static class or a singleton.

Methods defined outside class?

I am wondering if php methods are ever defined outside of the class body as they are often done in C++. I realise this question is the same as Defining class methods in PHP . But I believe his original question had 'declare' instead of 'define' so all the answers seem a bit inappropriate.
Update:
Probably my idea of define and declare were flawed. But by define outside of the class body, i meant something equivalent to the C++
class CRectangle {
int x, y;
public:
void set_values (int,int);
int area () {return (x*y);}
};
void CRectangle::set_values (int a, int b) {
x = a;
y = b;
}
All the examples of php code have the the code inside the class body like a C++ inlined function. Even if there would be no functional difference between the two in PHP, its just a question of style.
Here is a terrible, ugly, hack that should never be used. But, you asked for it!
class Bar {
function __call($name, $args) {
call_user_func_array(sprintf('%s_%s', get_class($this), $name), array_merge(array($this), $args));
}
}
function Bar_foo($this) {
echo sprintf("Simulating %s::foo\n", get_class($this));
}
$bar = new Bar();
$bar->foo();
What have I done? Anyway, to add new methods, just prefix them with the name of the class and an underscore. The first argument to the function is a reference to $this.
I stumbled upon this question while looking for a way to separate declaration and implementation of class methods. Why? For the sake of code readability. When the declarations are in a separate file, or at the top of the class file, someone looking to use the class does not have to wade through the whole implementation to find out which methods are offered.
I did find something useful though: PHP interface classes. I don't think they are designed for it, but they serve the purpose: an interface class defines all the methods, and then the "real" class implements them. Here's an article about it:
http://www.davegardner.me.uk/blog/2010/11/21/why-you-should-always-use-php-interfaces/
Having the declaration of methods in header files separate from their implementation is, to my knowledge, pretty unique to C/C++. All other languages I know don't have it at all, or only in limited form (such as interfaces in Java and C#)
It's possible, but very, very hacky and not recommended. No reason to do it either.
First of all, in PHP, all class methods must be defined and implemented within the class structure (class x { }). It is in no way like C++ where you have the implementations (*.cpp) separate from the definitions (*.h).
Natively PHP doesn't support features like this, but since PHP5.4 you can dynamically add methods to object. As an example, you can look at this: https://github.com/ptrofimov/jslikeobject
No. You can consider 'declare' and 'define' to be interchangeable in that question.

Categories