I have an array of subarrays in the following format:
[
'a' => ['id' => 20, 'name' => 'chimpanzee'],
'b' => ['id' => 40, 'name' => 'meeting'],
'c' => ['id' => 20, 'name' => 'dynasty'],
'd' => ['id' => 50, 'name' => 'chocolate'],
'e' => ['id' => 10, 'name' => 'bananas'],
'f' => ['id' => 50, 'name' => 'fantasy'],
'g' => ['id' => 50, 'name' => 'football']
]
And I would like to group it into a new array based on the id field in each subarray.
array
(
10 => array
(
e => array ( id = 10, name = bananas )
)
20 => array
(
a => array ( id = 20, name = chimpanzee )
c => array ( id = 20, name = dynasty )
)
40 => array
(
b => array ( id = 40, name = meeting )
)
50 => array
(
d => array ( id = 50, name = chocolate )
f => array ( id = 50, name = fantasy )
g => array ( id = 50, name = football )
)
)
$arr = array();
foreach ($old_arr as $key => $item) {
$arr[$item['id']][$key] = $item;
}
ksort($arr, SORT_NUMERIC);
foreach($array as $key => $value){
$newarray[$value['id']][$key] = $value;
}
var_dump($newarray);
piece of cake ;)
The following code adapts #Tim Cooper’s code to mitigate Undefined index: id errors in the event that one of the inner arrays doesn’t contain an id:
$arr = array();
foreach($old_arr as $key => $item)
{
if(array_key_exists('id', $item))
$arr[$item['id']][$key] = $item;
}
ksort($arr, SORT_NUMERIC);
However, it will drop inner arrays without an id.
E.g.
$old_arr = array(
'a' => array ( 'id' => 20, 'name' => 'chimpanzee' ),
'b' => array ( 'id' => 40, 'name' => 'meeting' ),
'c' => array ( 'id' => 20, 'name' => 'dynasty' ),
'd' => array ( 'id' => 50, 'name' => 'chocolate' ),
'e' => array ( 'id' => 10, 'name' => 'bananas' ),
'f' => array ( 'id' => 50, 'name' => 'fantasy' ),
'g' => array ( 'id' => 50, 'name' => 'football' ),
'h' => array ( 'name' => 'bob' )
);
will drop the 'h' array completely.
You can also use Arrays::groupBy() from ouzo-goodies:
$groupBy = Arrays::groupBy($array, Functions::extract()->id);
print_r($groupBy);
And result:
Array
(
[20] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[id] => 20
[name] => chimpanzee
)
[1] => Array
(
[id] => 20
[name] => dynasty
)
)
[40] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[id] => 40
[name] => meeting
)
)
[50] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[id] => 50
[name] => chocolate
)
[1] => Array
(
[id] => 50
[name] => fantasy
)
[2] => Array
(
[id] => 50
[name] => football
)
)
[10] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[id] => 10
[name] => bananas
)
)
)
And here are the docs for Arrays and Functions.
Here is a function that will take an array as the first argument and a criteria (a string or callback function) as the second argument. The function returns a new array that groups the array as asked for.
/**
* Group items from an array together by some criteria or value.
*
* #param $arr array The array to group items from
* #param $criteria string|callable The key to group by or a function the returns a key to group by.
* #return array
*
*/
function groupBy($arr, $criteria): array
{
return array_reduce($arr, function($accumulator, $item) use ($criteria) {
$key = (is_callable($criteria)) ? $criteria($item) : $item[$criteria];
if (!array_key_exists($key, $accumulator)) {
$accumulator[$key] = [];
}
array_push($accumulator[$key], $item);
return $accumulator;
}, []);
}
Here is the given array:
$arr = array(
'a' => array ( 'id' => 20, 'name' => 'chimpanzee' ),
'b' => array ( 'id' => 40, 'name' => 'meeting' ),
'c' => array ( 'id' => 20, 'name' => 'dynasty' ),
'd' => array ( 'id' => 50, 'name' => 'chocolate' ),
'e' => array ( 'id' => 10, 'name' => 'bananas' ),
'f' => array ( 'id' => 50, 'name' => 'fantasy' ),
'g' => array ( 'id' => 50, 'name' => 'football' )
);
And examples using the function with a string and a callback function:
$q = groupBy($arr, 'id');
print_r($q);
$r = groupBy($arr, function($item) {
return $item['id'];
});
print_r($r);
The results are the same in both examples:
Array
(
[20] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[id] => 20
[name] => chimpanzee
)
[1] => Array
(
[id] => 20
[name] => dynasty
)
)
[40] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[id] => 40
[name] => meeting
)
)
[50] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[id] => 50
[name] => chocolate
)
[1] => Array
(
[id] => 50
[name] => fantasy
)
[2] => Array
(
[id] => 50
[name] => football
)
)
[10] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[id] => 10
[name] => bananas
)
)
)
Passing the callback is overkill in the example above, but using the callback finds its use when you pass in an array of objects, a multidimensional array, or have some arbitrary thing you want to group by.
Maybe it's worth to mention that you can also use php array_reduce function
$items = [
['id' => 20, 'name' => 'chimpanzee'],
['id' => 40, 'name' => 'meeting'],
['id' => 20, 'name' => 'dynasty'],
['id' => 50, 'name' => 'chocolate'],
['id' => 10, 'name' => 'bananas'],
['id' => 50, 'name' => 'fantasy'],
['id' => 50, 'name' => 'football'],
];
// Grouping
$groupedItems = array_reduce($items, function ($carry, $item) {
$carry[$item['id']][] = $item;
return $carry;
}, []);
// Sorting
ksort($groupedItems, SORT_NUMERIC);
print_r($groupedItems);
https://www.php.net/manual/en/function.array-reduce.php
Because of how PHP's sorting algorithm treats multidimensional arrays -- it sorts by size, then compares elements one at a time, you can actually use a key-preserving sort on the input BEFORE restructuring. In functional style programming, this means that you don't need to declare the result array as a variable.
Code: (Demo)
asort($array);
var_export(
array_reduce(
array_keys($array),
function($result, $k) use ($array) {
$result[$array[$k]['id']][$k] = $array[$k];
return $result;
}
)
);
I must say that functional programming is not very attractive for this task because the first level keys must be preserved.
Although array_walk() is more succinct, it still requires the result array to be passed into the closure as a reference variable. (Demo)
asort($array);
$result = [];
array_walk(
$array,
function($row, $k) use (&$result) {
$result[$row['id']][$k] = $row;
}
);
var_export($result);
I'd probably recommend a classic loop for this task. The only thing the loop needs to do is rearrange the first and second level keys. (Demo)
asort($array);
$result = [];
foreach ($array as $k => $row) {
$result[$row['id']][$k] = $row;
}
var_export($result);
To be completely honest, I expect that ksort() will be more efficient than pre-loop sorting, but I wanted to a viable alternative.
Related
I need to convert the below 2d array in to specified 2d array format. Array contains multiple parent and multiple child array. Also, have tried to convert the code, but am not getting the expected output.
This is the code what i have tried,
$a1 = array(
'0' =>
array(
'banner_details' =>
array(
'id' => 2,
'section_id' => 24
),
'slide_details' =>
array(
0 => array(
'id' => 74,
'name' => 'Ads1'
),
1 => array(
'id' => 2,
'name' => 'Ads2'
)
)
),
'1' =>
array(
'banner_details' =>
array(
'id' => 106,
'section_id' => 92
),
'slide_details' =>
array(
0 => array(
'id' => 2001,
'name' => 'Adv1'
),
1 => array(
'id' => 2002,
'name' => 'Adv2'
)
)
)
);
$s = [];
for($i = 0; $i<2; $i++) {
foreach($a1[$i]['slide_details'] as $vs){
$s[] = $vs;
}
}
My output:
Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[id] => 74
[name] => Ads1
)
[1] => Array
(
[id] => 2
[name] => Ads2
)
[2] => Array
(
[id] => 2001
[name] => Adv1
)
[3] => Array
(
[id] => 2002
[name] => Adv2
)
)
Expected output:
Array
(
[24] => Array
(
[0] => 74
[1] => 2
)
[92] => Array
(
[0] => 2001
[1] => 2002
)
)
please check the above code and let me know.
Thanks,
You can apply next simple foreach loop with help of isset() function:
foreach($a1 as $data){
if (isset($data['banner_details']['section_id'])){
$s[$data['banner_details']['section_id']] = [];
if (isset($data['slide_details'])){
foreach($data['slide_details'] as $row){
$s[$data['banner_details']['section_id']][] = $row['id'];
}
}
}
}
Demo
If you know that indexes like banner_details or slide_details or section_id will be there always then you can skip isset() in if statements.
You can use array_column function for simple solution:
$result = [];
foreach ($a1 as $item)
{
$result[$item['banner_details']['section_id']] = array_column($item['slide_details'], 'id');
}
var_dump($result);
I have below array $billitems_taxes
[0] => Array
(
[id] => 1
[tax_name] => A
[tax_value] => 12
)
[1] => Array
(
[id] => 2
[tax_name] => A
[tax_value] => 8
)
[2] => Array
(
[id] => 3
[tax_name] => B
[tax_value] => 12
)
and I want output as below, find two common tax_name and do some of same and then create a new array.
[0] => Array
(
[id] => 1
[tax_name] => A
[tax_value] => 20
)
[1] => Array
(
[id] => 3
[tax_name] => B
[tax_value] => 12
)
I tried with below code, but it did not return a correct array.
$return_array = [];
foreach($billitems_taxes as $b)
{
$return_array['tax_name'] = $b->tax_name;
$return_array['tax_value'] += $b->tax_value;
}
First off, you have an array of arrays, not objects.
Then your loop needs to know if it has already seen a this tax name which will already be in the new array to check that I used array_key_exists()
$return_array = [];
foreach($billitems_taxes as $b)
{
if ( array_key_exists($b['tax_name'], $return_array) ) {
$return_array[$b['tax_name']]['tax_value'] += $b['tax_value'];
} else {
$return_array[$b['tax_name']] = $b;
}
}
RESULT
Array(
[A] => Array
([id] => 1
[tax_name] => A
[tax_value] => 20
)
[B] => Array
([id] => 3
[tax_name] => B
[tax_value] => 12
)
)
And if its important for the array to be numerically indexed just add
$return_array = array_values($return_array);
after the end of the loop
You must group by 'tax_name' and must sum 'tax_value'.
$billitems_taxes = [
['id' => 1, 'tax_name' => 'A', 'tax_value' => 12],
['id' => 2, 'tax_name' => 'A', 'tax_value' => 8],
['id' => 3, 'tax_name' => 'B', 'tax_value' => 12]
];
$result = [];
foreach($billitems_taxes as $row){
$groupKey = $row['tax_name'];
if(array_key_exists($groupKey,$result)){
$result[$groupKey]['tax_value'] += $row['tax_value'];
} else {
$result[$groupKey] = $row;
}
}
$result = array_values($result);
echo '<pre>';
var_export($result);
/*
array (
0 =>
array (
'id' => 1,
'tax_name' => 'A',
'tax_value' => 20,
),
1 =>
array (
'id' => 3,
'tax_name' => 'B',
'tax_value' => 12,
),
)
*/
The solution with the external class tableArray is very simple. The result is the same.
$result = tableArray::create($billitems_taxes)
->filterGroupAggregate(['tax_value' => 'SUM'],['tax_name'])
->fetchAll()
;
I try to use array_column and array_multisort to sort Array B by Key (ID).
However, I have a scenario whereby I need to have some ID to be sticky on the top .
For example, by comparing Array A and Array B, move ID 3 and ID 1 to the top of the Array B. The final result will be Array C .
Is there a PHP array function to achieve this? Please advice...
Array A
Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ID] => 3
)
[1] => Array
(
[ID] => 1
)
)
1
Array B
Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ID] => 1
[product] => A
)
[1] => Array
(
[ID] => 2
[product] => B
)
[2] => Array
(
[ID] => 3
[product] => C
)
[3] => Array
(
[ID] => 4
[product] => D
)
)
1
Array C (Result)
Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ID] => 3
[product] => C
)
[1] => Array
(
[ID] => 1
[product] => A
)
[2] => Array
(
[ID] => 2
[product] => B
)
[3] => Array
(
[ID] => 4
[product] => D
)
)
1
The preparatory steps involved in generating the lookup and outlier values may be avoidable with more intimate knowledge of your project scope, but I'll only use the values that you have provided. (I mean, you could hardcode outlier as 9999999 and wrap array_flip around array_column for brevity.)
The max value simply needs to be a value higher than the highest ID in the priority array.
The lookup needs to have ID values as keys and their original indexes as the new values (hence the flip).
usort() is precisely the php function to use when performing a custom sorting process.
use is necessary to pass the required additional values into the custom function's scope.
The spaceship operator (<=>) is a fantastic way to package your two-condition sort logic. Each side will be compared using the values "left to right".
Code: (Demo)
$priority = [['ID' => 3], ['ID' => 1]];
$input = [['ID' => 1, 'product' => 'A'], ['ID' => 2, 'product' => 'B'], ['ID' => 3, 'product' => 'C'], ['ID' => 4, 'product' => 'D']];
$lookup = array_column($priority, 'ID');
$outlier = max($lookup) + 1;
$lookup = array_flip($lookup);
usort($input, function($a, $b) use ($lookup, $outlier) {
return [$lookup[$a['ID']] ?? $outlier, $a['ID']] <=> [$lookup[$b['ID']] ?? $outlier, $b['ID']];
});
var_export($input);
Output:
array (
0 =>
array (
'ID' => 3,
'product' => 'C',
),
1 =>
array (
'ID' => 1,
'product' => 'A',
),
2 =>
array (
'ID' => 2,
'product' => 'B',
),
3 =>
array (
'ID' => 4,
'product' => 'D',
),
)
Without the spaceship operator, the custom function gets noticeably more verbose.
Code: (Demo)
usort($input, function($a, $b) use ($lookup, $outlier) {
$bIsPriority = isset($lookup[$b['ID']]);
if (isset($lookup[$a['ID']])) {
if ($bIsPriority) {
return $lookup[$a['ID']] - $lookup[$b['ID']];
} else {
return -1;
}
} elseif ($bIsPriority) {
return 1;
} else {
return $a['ID'] - $b['ID'];
}
});
Here is one of doing it:
<?php
$a = [['ID' => 5], ['ID' => 1]];
$b = [['ID' => 1, 'product' => 'A'], ['ID' => 2, 'product' => 'B'], ['ID' => 3, 'product' => 'C'], ['ID' => 4, 'product' => 'D'], ['ID' => 5, 'product' => 'E']];
// $keysOnTop = Array([0] => 5, [1] => 1)
$keysOnTop = array_column($a, 'ID');
$temp1 = $temp2 = [];
foreach($b as $value){
if(in_array($value['ID'], $keysOnTop)){
$temp1[] = $value;
} else {
$temp2[] = $value;
}
}
// $temp1 = Array([0] => Array([ID] => 1, [product] => A), [1] => Array([ID] => 5, [product] => E))
// $temp2 = Array([0] => Array([ID] => 2, [product] => B), [1] => Array([ID] => 3, [product] => C), [2] => Array([ID] => 4, [product] => D))
$final_arr = array_merge($temp1, $temp2);
echo '<pre>';
print_r($final_arr);
// Output:
/*
Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ID] => 1
[product] => A
)
[1] => Array
(
[ID] => 5
[product] => E
)
[2] => Array
(
[ID] => 2
[product] => B
)
[3] => Array
(
[ID] => 3
[product] => C
)
[4] => Array
(
[ID] => 4
[product] => D
)
)
*/
?>
I have 2 arrays:
Array ( [0] => Array ( [intTrackId] => 41 [intAverageRating] => 10 [bolNewRelease] => 0 [dtDateAdded] => 2013-03-08 17:32:26 ) [1] => Array ( [intTrackId] => 1 [intAverageRating] => 7 [bolNewRelease] => 0 [dtDateAdded] => 2013-03-08 18:54:35 ))
Array ( [0] => Array ( [intTrackId] => 41 [intAverageRating] => 5.5000 [bolNewRelease] => 1 [dtDateAdded] => 2014-03-25T09:39:28Q ) [1] => Array ( [intTrackId] => 361 [intAverageRating] => 8.0000 [bolNewRelease] => 1 [dtDateAdded] => 2014-03-25T09:39:28Q ))
I want to remove the items in the second which have a matching track ID in the first. So in this example, I would get:
Array ( [0] => Array ( [intTrackId] => 361 [intAverageRating] => 8.0000 [bolNewRelease] => 1 [dtDateAdded] => 2014-03-25T09:39:28Q ))
Is this possible with array_filter or is this a little complex for that?
Just use array_udiff() - it's intended to do this:
$one = Array (
0 => Array ('intTrackId' => 41, 'intAverageRating' => 10, 'bolNewRelease' => 0, 'dtDateAdded' => '2013-03-08 17:32:26' ),
1 => Array ('intTrackId' => 1, 'intAverageRating' => 7, 'bolNewRelease' => 0, 'dtDateAdded' => '2013-03-08 18:54:35' )
);
$two = Array (
0 => Array ('intTrackId' => 41, 'intAverageRating' => 5.5000, 'bolNewRelease' => 1, 'dtDateAdded' => '2014-03-25T09:39:28Q' ),
1 => Array ('intTrackId' => 361, 'intAverageRating' => 8.0000, 'bolNewRelease' => 1, 'dtDateAdded' => '2014-03-25T09:39:28Q' )
);
$result = array_udiff($two, $one, function($x, $y)
{
return $x['intTrackId']-$y['intTrackId'];
});
Yes it can be done with array_filter:
$array1 = array(...);
$array2 = array(...);
$newArray = array_filter($array2, function($item) use ($array1){
foreach($array1 as $elem){
if($item['intTrackId'] == $elem['intTrackId']){
return false;
}
}
return true;
});
I would first create a loop and store all track IDs from the first array in a separate array.
Then I'd loop over the second array and delete those keys that exist in the track ID array.
$track_ids = array();
foreach($array1 as $index => $items) {
$track_ids[$items['intTrackId']] = $index;
}
foreach($array2 as $items) {
if (isset($track_ids[$items['intTrackId']])) {
unset($array2[$track_ids[$items['intTrackId']]]);
}
}
I have an array of subarrays in the following format:
[
'a' => ['id' => 20, 'name' => 'chimpanzee'],
'b' => ['id' => 40, 'name' => 'meeting'],
'c' => ['id' => 20, 'name' => 'dynasty'],
'd' => ['id' => 50, 'name' => 'chocolate'],
'e' => ['id' => 10, 'name' => 'bananas'],
'f' => ['id' => 50, 'name' => 'fantasy'],
'g' => ['id' => 50, 'name' => 'football']
]
And I would like to group it into a new array based on the id field in each subarray.
array
(
10 => array
(
e => array ( id = 10, name = bananas )
)
20 => array
(
a => array ( id = 20, name = chimpanzee )
c => array ( id = 20, name = dynasty )
)
40 => array
(
b => array ( id = 40, name = meeting )
)
50 => array
(
d => array ( id = 50, name = chocolate )
f => array ( id = 50, name = fantasy )
g => array ( id = 50, name = football )
)
)
$arr = array();
foreach ($old_arr as $key => $item) {
$arr[$item['id']][$key] = $item;
}
ksort($arr, SORT_NUMERIC);
foreach($array as $key => $value){
$newarray[$value['id']][$key] = $value;
}
var_dump($newarray);
piece of cake ;)
The following code adapts #Tim Cooper’s code to mitigate Undefined index: id errors in the event that one of the inner arrays doesn’t contain an id:
$arr = array();
foreach($old_arr as $key => $item)
{
if(array_key_exists('id', $item))
$arr[$item['id']][$key] = $item;
}
ksort($arr, SORT_NUMERIC);
However, it will drop inner arrays without an id.
E.g.
$old_arr = array(
'a' => array ( 'id' => 20, 'name' => 'chimpanzee' ),
'b' => array ( 'id' => 40, 'name' => 'meeting' ),
'c' => array ( 'id' => 20, 'name' => 'dynasty' ),
'd' => array ( 'id' => 50, 'name' => 'chocolate' ),
'e' => array ( 'id' => 10, 'name' => 'bananas' ),
'f' => array ( 'id' => 50, 'name' => 'fantasy' ),
'g' => array ( 'id' => 50, 'name' => 'football' ),
'h' => array ( 'name' => 'bob' )
);
will drop the 'h' array completely.
You can also use Arrays::groupBy() from ouzo-goodies:
$groupBy = Arrays::groupBy($array, Functions::extract()->id);
print_r($groupBy);
And result:
Array
(
[20] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[id] => 20
[name] => chimpanzee
)
[1] => Array
(
[id] => 20
[name] => dynasty
)
)
[40] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[id] => 40
[name] => meeting
)
)
[50] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[id] => 50
[name] => chocolate
)
[1] => Array
(
[id] => 50
[name] => fantasy
)
[2] => Array
(
[id] => 50
[name] => football
)
)
[10] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[id] => 10
[name] => bananas
)
)
)
And here are the docs for Arrays and Functions.
Here is a function that will take an array as the first argument and a criteria (a string or callback function) as the second argument. The function returns a new array that groups the array as asked for.
/**
* Group items from an array together by some criteria or value.
*
* #param $arr array The array to group items from
* #param $criteria string|callable The key to group by or a function the returns a key to group by.
* #return array
*
*/
function groupBy($arr, $criteria): array
{
return array_reduce($arr, function($accumulator, $item) use ($criteria) {
$key = (is_callable($criteria)) ? $criteria($item) : $item[$criteria];
if (!array_key_exists($key, $accumulator)) {
$accumulator[$key] = [];
}
array_push($accumulator[$key], $item);
return $accumulator;
}, []);
}
Here is the given array:
$arr = array(
'a' => array ( 'id' => 20, 'name' => 'chimpanzee' ),
'b' => array ( 'id' => 40, 'name' => 'meeting' ),
'c' => array ( 'id' => 20, 'name' => 'dynasty' ),
'd' => array ( 'id' => 50, 'name' => 'chocolate' ),
'e' => array ( 'id' => 10, 'name' => 'bananas' ),
'f' => array ( 'id' => 50, 'name' => 'fantasy' ),
'g' => array ( 'id' => 50, 'name' => 'football' )
);
And examples using the function with a string and a callback function:
$q = groupBy($arr, 'id');
print_r($q);
$r = groupBy($arr, function($item) {
return $item['id'];
});
print_r($r);
The results are the same in both examples:
Array
(
[20] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[id] => 20
[name] => chimpanzee
)
[1] => Array
(
[id] => 20
[name] => dynasty
)
)
[40] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[id] => 40
[name] => meeting
)
)
[50] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[id] => 50
[name] => chocolate
)
[1] => Array
(
[id] => 50
[name] => fantasy
)
[2] => Array
(
[id] => 50
[name] => football
)
)
[10] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[id] => 10
[name] => bananas
)
)
)
Passing the callback is overkill in the example above, but using the callback finds its use when you pass in an array of objects, a multidimensional array, or have some arbitrary thing you want to group by.
Maybe it's worth to mention that you can also use php array_reduce function
$items = [
['id' => 20, 'name' => 'chimpanzee'],
['id' => 40, 'name' => 'meeting'],
['id' => 20, 'name' => 'dynasty'],
['id' => 50, 'name' => 'chocolate'],
['id' => 10, 'name' => 'bananas'],
['id' => 50, 'name' => 'fantasy'],
['id' => 50, 'name' => 'football'],
];
// Grouping
$groupedItems = array_reduce($items, function ($carry, $item) {
$carry[$item['id']][] = $item;
return $carry;
}, []);
// Sorting
ksort($groupedItems, SORT_NUMERIC);
print_r($groupedItems);
https://www.php.net/manual/en/function.array-reduce.php
Because of how PHP's sorting algorithm treats multidimensional arrays -- it sorts by size, then compares elements one at a time, you can actually use a key-preserving sort on the input BEFORE restructuring. In functional style programming, this means that you don't need to declare the result array as a variable.
Code: (Demo)
asort($array);
var_export(
array_reduce(
array_keys($array),
function($result, $k) use ($array) {
$result[$array[$k]['id']][$k] = $array[$k];
return $result;
}
)
);
I must say that functional programming is not very attractive for this task because the first level keys must be preserved.
Although array_walk() is more succinct, it still requires the result array to be passed into the closure as a reference variable. (Demo)
asort($array);
$result = [];
array_walk(
$array,
function($row, $k) use (&$result) {
$result[$row['id']][$k] = $row;
}
);
var_export($result);
I'd probably recommend a classic loop for this task. The only thing the loop needs to do is rearrange the first and second level keys. (Demo)
asort($array);
$result = [];
foreach ($array as $k => $row) {
$result[$row['id']][$k] = $row;
}
var_export($result);
To be completely honest, I expect that ksort() will be more efficient than pre-loop sorting, but I wanted to a viable alternative.