I know this is probably a newbie question, but is it possible to do this?
unserialize(LOG_ACTIONS_.''.strtoupper($language));
I have list of constants with _LANGUAGE which I want to use the variable $language with.
Example:
unserialize(LOG_ACTIONS_ENGLISH);
Here's the error I get:
Fatal error: Call to undefined function LOG_ACTIONS_strtoupper()
Use constant() to get the constant's actual value.
unserialize(constant(LOG_ACTIONS_.''.strtoupper($language)));
I'm not sure whether having serialized data in a constant is really wise, though - it can be expensive if there's a lot of data in them.
I assume it's to circumvent the restriction that constants can't contain array values. This SO question shows some better ways to work around that:
What is the most "elegant" way to define a global constant array in PHP
You could probably just use the constant() function:
unserialize(constant('LOG_ACTIONS_'.strtoupper($language)));
Related
I was wondering if we could check for all undefined and null variables in JSP using its built-in functions?
I know I can build a function to do that, but I need a lazy solution.
<c:if test="${name == null}">variable name is undefined</c:if>
For testing you can define and undefine a variable using:
<c:set var="name" value="Petra"/>
<c:set var="name" value="${null}"/>
To state you are using the core JSTL tags add this to the top of the page:
<%# taglib prefix="c" uri="http://java.sun.com/jstl/core" %>
There are No built-in functions to check this in a JSP, so I guess you would have to make one, which I think should be a fairly simple task if you take the bookish meaning of null.
If not bookish then null is sort of an overloaded term, it could mean any of the following in general usage:
actually null String, which could throw NullPointerException.
"", empty string which might be called null.
"null"
An acutally null array. :-)
An empty array.
An array with just null objects ...
So you can build a method to include these or other cases you can think of for null-check or just the basic-primitive-unembellished null-check.
In Java I suppose there is no such thing as an undefined variables, since it is a statically typed language and compiler would catch any of these so called undefined errors :-)
In PHP (since I think you took this function from there) you have these things because it is a scripting language and is not a statically typed language like Java.
Hope this helps.
Instead of checking against null, you can use this snippet:
<c:if test="${not name}">variable name is undefined</c:if>
for checking variable is sent or not use following function
request.getParameterMap().containsKey("variable")
if(request.getParameterMap().containsKey("name"))
{
out.print(request.getParameter("name"));
}
I've been searching for quite a while and cannot find what this method is actually called.
In PHP example:
$var->{'property_name'}
Depending on what you are accessing it will be called...
A variable variable
A variable property
A variable function
It is worth noting that the curly-braces are only needed when you need to disambiguate an expression (bear in mind the string you use may itself be stored in a variable!)
And so on. This is documented in the PHP manual for variable variables.
I want to use a global variable setup where they are all declared, initialized and use friendly syntax in PHP so I came up with this idea:
<?
error_reporting(E_ERROR | E_WARNING | E_PARSE | E_NOTICE);
$GLOBALS['debugger'] = 1; // set $GLOBALS['debugger'] to 1
DEFINE('DEBUGGER','$GLOBALS["debugger"]'); // friendly access to it globally
echo "1:" . DEBUGGER . ":<br>";
echo "2:" . ${DEBUGGER}. ":<br>";
echo "3:" . $GLOBALS['debugger'] . ":<br>";
if (DEBUGGER==1) {echo "DEBUG SET";}
?>
generates the following:
1:$GLOBALS["debugger"]:
Notice: Undefined variable: $GLOBALS["debugger"] in /home/tra50118/public_html/php/test.php on line 8
2::
3:1:
How can there be an error with 2: when clearly $GLOBALS["debugger"] IS defined? And then not generate a similar notice with the test at line 10?
I think what I am trying to do is to force PHP to interpret a string ($GLOBALS["debugger"]) as a variable at run time i.e. a constant variable variable
Disclaimer: I agree with the comments, globals are generally a bad idea.
That said, there's a few questions here that are worth answering, and the concept of indirection is useful, so here goes.
${'$GLOBALS["debugger"]'} is undefined. You don't include the leading '$' when using indirection. So, the correct version would be define('DEBUGGER', 'GLOBALS["debugger"]').
But, this doesn't work either. You can only access one level down via indirection. So you can access the array $GLOBALS, but you can't access keys in that array. Hence, you might use :
define('DEBUGGER', 'debugger');
${DEBUGGER};
This isn't useful, practically. You may as well just use $debugger directly, as it's been defined as a global and will be available everywhere. You may need to define global $debugger; at the start of functions however.
The reason your if statement is not causing notices is because you defined DEBUGGER to be a string. Since you aren't trying to use indirection in that line at all, it ends up reading as:
if ("$GLOBALS['debugger']"==1) {echo "DEBUG SET";}
This is clearly never true, though it is entirely valid PHP code.
I think you may have your constants crossed a bit.
DEFINE('DEBUGGER','$GLOBALS["debugger"]'); sets the constant DEBUGGER to the string $GLOBALS["debugger"].
Note that this is neither the value nor the reference, just a string.
Which causes these results:
1: Output the string $GLOBALS["debugger"]
2: Output the value of the variable named $GLOBALS["debugger"]. Note that this is the variable named "$GLOBALS["debugger"]", not the value of the key "debugger" in the array $GLOBALS. Thus a warning occurs, since that variable is undefined.
3: Output the actual value of $GLOBALS["debugger"]
Hopefully that all makes sense.
OK, thanks to all who answered. I think I get it now, I am new to PHP having come form a C++ background and was treating the define like the C++ #define and assuming it just did a string replace in the precompile/run phase.
In precis, I just wanted to use something like
DEBUGGER = 1;
instead of
$GLOBALS['debugger'] = 1;
for a whole lot of legitimate reasons; not the least of which is preventing simple typos stuffing you up. Alas, it appears this is not doable in PHP.
Thanks for the help, appreciated.
You can not use "variable variables" with any of the superglobal arrays, of which $GLOBALS is one, if you intend to do so inside an array or method. To get the behavior you would have to use $$, but this will not work as I mentioned.
Constants in php are already global, so I don't know what this would buy you from your example, or what you are going for.
Your last comparison "works" because you are setting the constant to a string, and it is possible with PHP's typecasting to compare a string to an integer. Of course it evaluates to false, which might be surprising to you, since you expected it to actually work.
Why don't the function handling functions like call_user_func() support passing parameters by reference?
The docs say terse things like "Note that the parameters for call_user_func() are not passed by reference." I assume the PHP devs had some kind of reason for disabling that capability in this case.
Were they facing a technical limitation? Was it a language design choice? How did this come about?
EDIT:
In order to clarify this, here is an example.
<?php
function more(&$var){ $var++; }
$count = 0;
print "The count is $count.\n";
more($count);
print "The count is $count.\n";
call_user_func('more', $count);
print "The count is $count.\n";
// Output:
// The count is 0.
// The count is 1.
// The count is 1.
This is functioning normally; call_user_func does not pass $count by reference, even though more() declared it as a referenced variable. The call_user_func documentation clearly says that this is the way it's supposed to work.
I am well aware that I can get the effect I need by using call_user_func_array('more', array(&$count)).
The question is: why was call_user_func designed to work this way? The passing by reference documentation says that "Function definitions alone are enough to correctly pass the argument by reference." The behavior of call_user_func is an exception to that. Why?
The answer is embedded deep down in the way references work in PHP's model - not necessarily the implementation, because that can vary a lot, particularly in the 5.x versions. I'm sure you've heard the lines, they're not like C pointers, or C++ references, etc etc... Basically when a variable is assigned or bound, it can happen in two ways - either by value (in which case the new variable is bound to a new 'box' containing a copy of the old value), or by reference (in which case the new variable is bound to the same value box as the old value). This is true whether we're talking about variables, or function arguments, or cells in arrays.
Things start to get a bit hairy when you start passing references into functions - obviously the intent is to be able to modify the original variables. Quite some time ago, call-time pass-by-reference (the ability to pass a reference into a function that wasn't expecting one) got deprecated, because a function that wasn't aware it was dealing with a reference might 'accidentally' modify the input. Taking it to another level, if that function calls a second function, that itself wasn't expecting a reference... then everything ends up getting disconnected. It might work, but it's not guaranteed, and may break in some PHP version.
This is where call_user_func() comes in. Suppose you pass a reference into it (and get the associated the call-time pass-by-reference warning). Then your reference gets bound to a new variable - the parameters of call_user_func() itself. Then when your target function is called, its parameters are not bound where you expect. They're not bound to the original parameters at all. They're bound to the local variables that are in the call_user_func() declaration. call_user_func_array() requires caution too. Putting a reference in an array cell could be trouble - since PHP passes that array with "copy-on-write" semantics, you can't be sure if the array won't get modified underneath you, and the copy won't get detached from the original reference.
The most insightful explanation I've seen (which helped me get my head around references) was in a comment on the PHP 'passing by reference' manual:
http://ca.php.net/manual/en/language.references.pass.php#99549
Basically the logic goes like this. How would you write your own version of call_user_func() ? - and then explain how that breaks with references, and how it fails when you avoid call-time pass-by-reference. In other words, the right way to call functions (specify the value, and let PHP decide from the function declaration whether to pass value or reference) isn't going to work when you use call_user_func() - you're calling two functions deep, the first by value, and the second by reference to the values in the first.
Get your head around this, and you'll have a much deeper understanding of PHP references (and a much greater motivation to steer clear if you can).
See this:
http://hakre.wordpress.com/2011/03/09/call_user_func_array-php-5-3-and-passing-by-reference/
Is it possible to pass parameters by reference using call_user_func_array()?
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=17309&edit=1
Passing references in an array works correctly.
Updated Answer:
You can use:
call_user_func('more', &$count)
to achieve the same effect as:
call_user_func_array('more', array(&$count))
For this reason I believe (unfoundedly) that call_user_func is just a compiler time short cut. (i.e. it gets replaced with the later at compile time)
To give my view on you actual question "Why was call_user_func designed to work this way?":
It probably falls under the same lines as "Why is some methods strstr and other str_replace?, why is array functions haystack, needle and string functions needle, haystack?
Its because PHP was designed, by many different people, over a long period of time, and with no strict standards in place at the time.
Original Answer:
You must make sure you set the variable inside the array to a reference as well.
Try this and take note of the array(&$t) part:
function test(&$t) {
$t++;
echo '$t is '.$t.' inside function'.PHP_EOL;
}
$t = 0;
echo '$t is '.$t.' in global scope'.PHP_EOL;
test($t);
$t++;
echo '$t is '.$t.' in global scope'.PHP_EOL;
call_user_func_array('test', array(&$t));
$t++;
echo '$t is '.$t.' in global scope'.PHP_EOL;
Should output:
$t is 0 in global scope
$t is 1 inside function
$t is 2 in global scope
$t is 3 inside function
$t is 4 in global scope
Another possible way - the by-reference syntax stays the 'right' way:
$data = 'some data';
$func = 'more';
$func($more);
function more(&$data) {
// Do something with $data here...
}
This is stumping me.. I am writing components / library functions where it would be used for calling a lot of different functions, so I want it to make an array print out each variable to be passed into the function as an argument, like below but I am pretty sure that this isn't proper syntax.. thanks for any advice
$myfunction = function_name;
$myfunction (print_r($my_array));
You can use a built-in php function, reference from call-user-func-array
In addition to Bang Dao's answer:
If you need to get all function arguments as array, use func_get_args().